Medicated stents are bad news

Context is everything. In general, in the case of a heart attack, the procedure is generally life-saving. There are so many factors, since the old articles and discussions, that are now at play. This includes the COVID-19 bioweapon vaccine. In my experience, people who take their full medications to avoid thrombosis of medicated stents, fair well, despite the side effects. They have an extra protection against the pro-thrombotic effect of the spike protein.

Should anyone require a stent as a life-saving procedure within the context of a heart attack and there's only medicated ones, I wouldn't hesitate. Women are generally harder to diagnose and have worse prognosis from ischemic heart attack. Each individual case has to be evaluated to see the factors at play and how realistically they can reverse them. It doesn't serve to be "all alternative" if the person is not willing to forego inflammatory foods in their life. And often, it can be very hard and costly to discern which foods are really inflammatory for each individual.

Take the example of some Western countries like France, Belgium, and Germany where the mortality rates are high, but still holding up so to say, if you compare them to other Western countries. It's thanks to procedures like the above and background of an excellent health care system in the past, deteriorating, but still somehow holding up.

As always, there's good and evil and the situation that determines which is which.
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom