That's just a supposition, based on this article paragraph:The discussion theorizes that memories may be stored within the cell bodies of the neurons themselves instead of the synpases, which is a lot less sensational than what the presenter says about antennas and the like.
That's what theorizing is. The point is that the article cited doesn't actually say what the video says it does.That's just a supposition
Yeah, the study of where memory is stored is still ongoing, which is why scientists write articles such as those linked above and also why they read them: to discuss the state of research to try and hash things out and maybe develop testable hypotheses. Contrast that with how the video claims that this is how it IS, when all they have to show for it doesn't actually say what they claim it does.Which doesn't carry any validity, since nobody has been able to identify a localized memory center or locus in human cell or DNA.
You may have your own understanding based on previous things you've read (by all means share it here if you think it helps to justify the video's points), but I that can lead us to subconsciously fill in the blanks of an essay or video, and prop up positions that aren't tenable when forced to stand on their own two legs.My understanding is that DNA doesn't store any memory either, they're just circuits. Therefore it's more plausible to think about synapses as antennas and conceive memory as non-localized, which is what to the Gaia video segment explains.
You may have your own understanding based on previous things you've read (by all means share it here if you think it helps to justify the video's points), but I that can lead us to subconsciously fill in the blanks of an essay or video, and prop up positions that aren't tenable when forced to stand on their own two legs.
"[In biosystems]... Billions of cells must “know” about each other, if not about everything, then a lot, and moreover, instantly. Without the phenomenon of “wave information instantaneousness,” the giant multicellular continuum of higher biosystems is unable to fully co-ordinate metabolism, its physiological and other functions.
Intercellular diffusion of signaling substances and nerve processes are too inert for this. Even if we assume that sign-oriented electromagnetic fields with light speeds are involved in the intercellular transmission, which is sufficiently justified, even then, this is not enough. The mechanism of quantum non-locality is necessary, and it is applicable to the genetic apparatus, which can act as an instantly distributed quantum (wave) object, isomorphic to material chromosomes. Using non-locality, the genetic apparatus of higher biosystems create an amazing phenomenon: when in the moments of “collapsed” space-time,”here and there”, “first and then”, the biosystem works as a continuity, providing supercoherence, information over-redundancy, overinformation, connectedness and, as a result, integrity (survival). A manifestation of this, for example, is the ability to regenerate organs and tissues in lower organisms (hydra, worms, amphibians, lizards, crustaceans), an ability that has been largely lost by humans."
SCIRP Open Access
Scientific Research Publishing is an academic publisher with more than 200 open access journal in the areas of science, technology and medicine. It also publishes academic books and conference proceedings.m.scirp.org