Moon Landings: Did They Happen or Not?

[Beau]

Well well well... this is interesting.

How could he have taken man's first step on the moon if the Atlantians had bases in Mars tens of thousands of years ago...

I think the C's understood the spirit of the question and answered accordingly.

 

[nature]

But how did they come back on Earth, without propulsion system there to re-launch the space shuttle?
Where did they land on Earth when they came back? And why is there no video showing their arrival, their landing on Earth?

 

[axj]

And why is there no video showing their arrival, their landing on Earth?

There are videos of Apollo 12-17 parachute splashdowns and recovery in the Pacific.

 

[Jones]

Didn't the C's indicate that the technology that the govt has is about 150 years ahead of what we have access to or know about? If that's the case then there may have been real moon landings and fake ones. The latter for public viewing and to hide the level of technology that they were actually using.

 

[Brewer]

So you're saying there's a chance...
If what we have here is a 'false positive'... then Schrödinger's Moon Landing lives!

It lives in same realm as climate change, global warming, covid and Erika. Some question suggestions.
Were Grissom and Baron murdered?
Is Baron's damning report on NASA true?
What percentage of space travel has been faked?

 

[Brewer]

I guess you should learn how cameras operate
night sky needs exposure in 20 seconds range, sun lit surface of the moon in fractions of one
either you have stars and overblown moon surface or moon surface and no stars, you cant have both, not even with modern camera

I know something, had my own darkroom as a teen, friends with a pro photographer who shot with Apollo era Hasselblads. My phone can video stars with a lit foreground. Anyway, no problems seeing stars here with a brightly lit earth in frame, earth is far brighter than the moon.


Question: In this image taken from the original scans show duplicated shadow lines.
Which shadow is the real shadow line, the outer or inner and why?

 

[axj]

Question: In this image taken from the original scans show duplicated shadow lines.
Which shadow is the real shadow line, the outer or inner and why?

The lander had many reflective surfaces with odd angles, which could have reflected some sunlight into the lander shadow.

And I don't know if you noticed, but the next few Apollo 12 pictures after that at the link you gave have stars in them:

 

[Cosmos]

I’m still of the opinion that it might be a mix of faking stuff to some extent (pictures/videos etc.) basically for making it a much more appealing show/event with lots of propaganda value for America, but ALSO, that real landings happened including those mentioned astronauts walking on the moon.

That would also explain why both camps keep thinking they must be right and why the “all faked from start to finish“ group will probably never be convinced that there was quite some real stuff going on too which includes the most important parts.

And I should add that in my opinion it is likely that most if not all the things people point out “as proof“ for why “the landings were fake“, such as taking pictures and videos apart or questioning technological capabilities is filled with make believe, selective, and black and white thinking. I also seem to have noticed that some if not many of the proponents of “it is a all fake from start to finish“ seem pretty obsessed with that moon landing topic.