A
alchemy
Guest
Although not necessarily hard-to-find, you will have to pay a bit if you wish to pick up this volume. Should not be utilized as a sole source for this subject (what the moon is and/or has been used for), but a valuable addition to the topic.
The primary thesis is that the neutral point for the moon is not as stated (and by extension, the gravity of the moon is not 1/6 of the Earth), but is rather closer by approx. 20,000 miles to the Earth. I believe this ties into Jessup's speculations regarding interdimensional doorways/portals and the moon/sun/earth neutral point, so it is not idle speculation.
Here is what NASA itself has to say about the book:
If combined with these 2 books, I think a reader would have a reasonable start on the subject:
The primary thesis is that the neutral point for the moon is not as stated (and by extension, the gravity of the moon is not 1/6 of the Earth), but is rather closer by approx. 20,000 miles to the Earth. I believe this ties into Jessup's speculations regarding interdimensional doorways/portals and the moon/sun/earth neutral point, so it is not idle speculation.
Here is what NASA itself has to say about the book:
Note that they do not come out & say it is wrong or misinformed, simply that chapters ET interference in the Space Program suggest a tenuous tenor.NASA website said:Brian, William L., II. Moongate: Suppressed Findings of the U.S. Space Program, the NASA-Military Cover-up. Portland, OR: Future Science Research Pub. Co., 1982. As the title suggests, this is a sensationalistic expos‚ arguing that "the true circumstances surrounding the Apollo missions and related discoveries were carefully suppressed from the public." The author claims that far from NASA's space program being a civilian effort as advertised, "the military had almost complete control over it and...many NASA findings were withheld from the public." The title of Chapter 10, "Evidence of Extraterrestrial Interference in the Space Program," will suggest the highly speculative and tenuous tenor of the book, much of which is quite technical, to boot. Lightly footnoted with references alike to scholarly sources and The National Enquirer, the work should be consulted with great caution by those without a solid grounding in space history and technology.
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/Apollobib/ch1.html
If combined with these 2 books, I think a reader would have a reasonable start on the subject:
Estimated disinfo rating for Moongate is low.a) "Someone Else is On Our Moon" by George Leonard. Didn't know about this until I started reading the Jim Marrs book (he mentions it in Chapter 1 of "Alien Agenda"), and while it isn't cheap, it is fairly fascinating, and definitely told from a "believers" point of view. Very much reminder me of the C's post where scientists are overlooking the obvious, and that a multigenerational travel across space in an 'ark' can then be located on a plane in our solar system. Addresses Phobos, Deimos, the short-lived 'Vulcan' and others as well. He is quotes a number of scientists asserting that the moon projects (Ranger, Apollo, Mercury, et al) were primarily military engineering expeditions, which I had to admit I had just never considered. Now it seems rather obvious. Estimated disinfo quotient: low
b) "Our Mysterious Spaceship Moon" by Don Wilson, Sphere Paperback. Another one I cribbed from J Marr's bibliography, this one is not nearly as good as "Someone Else..." above. The same basic premise: that the Moon is largely artificial, not natural to the solar system, and inhabited. However, for Don Wilson this was in the DISTANT past and he either ignores the evidence, or accepts the 'logic', for the numerous fog, mist, lights, artificial structures, etc. seen over the past 200 years by extremely competent (professional and amateur) astronomers. Estimated disinfo quotient: medium+