My Aura Photograph

chaps23

chaps23

Jedi Master
I was at the Mind Body Spirit Festival here in Melbourne on sunday and I thought I would have a go at this Aura Photo.

I will attach an image of it as soon as I'm around a scanner with it. Basically the photo shows an almost only green aura with almost no other color in it but a tiny blue smudge to the top left, Does anyone here know how to interperet these? There is just so much info out there that I dont know whats what.

The photo came with a small 5 minute interperatation from a lovely lady who informed me that she had never seen an all green one before and that I should be healing people with my hands ( whether or not she says that to every person she speaks to I dont know)
she then continued to say that one solid color generally means I'm well balanced and no who I am. which is also interesting because I'm not sure I know that at all....

Can anybody direct me to a site containing an assumed acurate depiction of this sort of stuff? or better yet understand it themselfs? I am intrigued greatly into this area and have wanted to get it done since I read about it in the transcripts. Also... Is it true that the photo can change depending on what I'm feeling at the time? like emotionally etc?

Regards,

Brent.
 
Thanks Vulcan,

I believe my photo was taken from one of these non krilian camera's aswell with the hand sensors and such, why do you think the C's commented the way they did with the photo's they took in session 960120?

They seemed to indicate that the camera worked....
 
Hi chaps23.

If you are interested in auras there is a book that you might find interesting. It is called "The Human Atmosphere" by Walter J. Kilner (_http://www.sacred-texts.com/eso/tha/index.htm).

It is a book wrote in the beginning of the 20th century, and the author states that all investigations are strictly physical and repeatable. I believe it is considered the first scientific (as in real science without preconceptions) investigations of auras of our time.

I'll just leave here a few remarks i pointed, when i read the book a few years ago, regarding the colour of auras.

The most usual aura colour is a mix of gray with blue. Gray more close to the body (a zone he called the etheric double) and blue farther away from the body.

He found that green was the colour corresponding to baby girls (yellow being normal to baby boys). In the process of growing up our aura colours modify.

Finally he found that auras that tended more to the blue tended to be associated with healthier, more intelligent people, and grey ones with less intellectual gifted people.

His theory was that auras are light emitted somewhere between the visible colour violet (end of visual spectrum) and ultra-violet light. He explains somewhere in the book that by using different colour screens it was possible to see this radiation.
 
chaps23 said:
Thanks Vulcan,

I believe my photo was taken from one of these non krilian camera's aswell with the hand sensors and such, why do you think the C's commented the way they did with the photo's they took in session 960120?

They seemed to indicate that the camera worked....
Click to expand...

A little further down in the thread (which you could have read through for the info) I explained it:
Laura said:
That particular camera type thing really has nothing to do with Kirlian photography. It's a regular camera but it has some kind of special "attachment" that overlays a "color" on a regular photograph based on either skin temperature or galvanic skin resistance. Not sure which. What we noticed from examining several images of about a dozen people taken with the same camera was that the exact shape and all features of this "aura" were identical, even to little "spots of light." That was how we figured out that it had some kind of "template" that it used to "overlay" the "colored aura" and that it had absolutely nothing at all to do with a real aura.

But, the fact that it was just a regular polaroid camera made it all the more mysterious that I was not even visible on the photograph though a corner of the board was visible.

Then, of course, the geometric figure was still MORE mysterious because it not only did not follow the pattern of the "overlay system" installed in the camera, it most definitely DID follow the configuration of two main objects in the photo - my hand and "Frank's hand." So we can conjecture that it was not just a photo emulsion mess-up. (see the second image on this page: http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/waveindex.htm )

Those two photos still amaze me.
Click to expand...
 
Green_Manalishi,

Thankyou I will have a read!


Thanks for taking the time to respond Loz,

But in reading that I'm not sure maybe I'm missing something here, but your saying its "Horse Jockey" in one part then saying it "sort of works but not" in another... I did read it but have failed to understand please bare with me here (this is a little embarrasing) I will re read the page in an attempt to make more sence out of it. Perhaps I have perfected the art of skimming all too well.

Are you saying that it did work but you cant explain why?

Regards,

Brent.
 
So am I correct in thinking, after carefully reading the whole page twice. That the Camera is Baloney in the sence of what some say it can do but it still has the ability to pick up some em reading of some sort in some way. But.. it can however be easily influenced by body temperature and is printed on some kind of template therefore the colour could be anything depending on how hot your hands are and that the size/shape of the Aural feild is basically some kind of template and useless?

I know how long winded that is. My apologies for sounding so dence. I too noticed my Girlfriends was on the same template with the edges and specs of light only her aura photo was all sorts of colours as mine was almost solid. I'm still baffeled at what to make of this though.

Just beeing honest.

Regards,

Brent.
 
chaps23 said:
So am I correct in thinking, after carefully reading the whole page twice. That the Camera is Baloney in the sence of what some say it can do
Click to expand...

Pretty much.

chaps23 said:
but it still has the ability to pick up some em reading of some sort in some way.
Click to expand...

Apparently, it only reads skin conductance and that changes the color and brightness of the "aura".

Every single aura photo we took with that camera was exactly identical EXCEPT for gradations in color. Right down to exact shapes and swirls in the shape, dots, darkening, density, lightening, etc. And we compared about a dozen of them minutely.

The ONLY difference in the normal ones was that: color/brightness.

chaps23 said:
But.. it can however be easily influenced by body temperature and is printed on some kind of template therefore the colour could be anything depending on how hot your hands are and that the size/shape of the Aural feild is basically some kind of template and useless?
Click to expand...

You got it!

chaps23 said:
I know how long winded that is. My apologies for sounding so dence. I too noticed my Girlfriends was on the same template with the edges and specs of light only her aura photo was all sorts of colours as mine was almost solid. I'm still baffeled at what to make of this though.
Click to expand...

Differences in skin conductance. It's really pretty simple.
 
Thanks for the Clarification Loz,

I am eager to investigate more, Kirlian Camera's are only $3-$500.00..... seems reasonable. But I suppose what I see during meditation could be just as accurate with a little more fine tuning.

Thanks for your time guys,
 
many years ago I was at a Mind Body Spirit Festival in Sydney...and I was intrigued by the aura photos so I had one taken and payed for a friend to have hers taken too so I could see if there is a difference
well I was a bit sceptical so when it was my turn I made sure to get as much contact as possible on the hand plates...so I got ''good'' results ,lots of colors ,points of light and so on...my friends photo was different less color no points...I figures they overlay a pic of your skin conductivity on the hand plates over the polaroid of you and then have a new-age lady give you a feel good interpretation on what ever comes out
IMO a waste of money
 
chaps23 said:
Thanks for the Clarification Loz,

I am eager to investigate more, Kirlian Camera's are only $3-$500.00..... seems reasonable. But I suppose what I see during meditation could be just as accurate with a little more fine tuning.

Thanks for your time guys,
Click to expand...

See this page: http://www.kirlian.org/kirlian.htm

which says:

Kirlian photography is contact photography. The object to be photographed must touch the film directly. There is a camera on the market that takes pictures of a subjects head and torso and shows colored lights around the person. Sometimes this unit is falsely marketed as a Kirlian camera. That camera inputs information about electrical skin resistance from the hand, and a computer uses those numbers as inputs in a formula that tells the camera what colors to use. Colored lights are then projected onto Polaroid film. The "aura" would show up regardless of anyone posing for the picture. The skin resistance information this unit displays would be more usable as a chart, rather than an "aura". True Kirlian photography displays vastly more useful information, and does not rely on gimmicks or false advertising.
Click to expand...
 
An interesting site about electrographic photography that I am currently looking over is based on Russian study and research of one scientist (among others) Dr Konstantino Korotkov. It has some interesting things on energy fields and quantum energies.For anyone interested in looking into it http://www.kirilian.org/gdvresearch/index.htm
 
Have also found a 7 min. (approx) video on Dr Korotkov's research on http://www.youtube.com/watch?vQ4a_Gu40SA
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom