Mysterious "ball" hit the towers?
- Thread starter Bernhard
- Start date
This youtube vid explains that there are two versions of that video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3j9jWYd0HdQ&feature=related
The poster of the above vid wrote:
Let's just keep in mind that it could have been edited after the fact to make it look like a missile.
And then there's this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s3DvUrqO4D0&feature=related
Space-based weapons??
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3j9jWYd0HdQ&feature=related
The poster of the above vid wrote:
Let's just keep in mind that it could have been edited after the fact to make it look like a missile.
And then there's this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s3DvUrqO4D0&feature=related
Space-based weapons??
Kniall said:
another video on the UFO . some thing fishy about this video is the video from the helicopter, some object going very fast but with some trail of smoke. If extraterristrial , smoke may not be necessarily be necessary, unless it is deliberately allowed to spew some smoke or remnants of WTC dust itself.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xwgPRnol5yg
Kniall said:
I seem to remember the Cs being asked about this video, but can't find the transcript. Anyone remember where it was?
Insight from Pilots For Truth Forum. Opening dialog from there site. There interpretation of the dynamics of the planes ability's in pull off a maneuver to drop from the sky and the possible repercussions with the g-forces associated, that would make the maneuver vitally impossible without the destruction of the planes befor supposed impact.
http://pilotsfor911truth.org
anart
A Disturbance in the Force
Vulcan59 said:
That's the session that came to mind for me as well, but I don't think they are referring to the same thing we see in this video - since the object the asked about was shooting toward the ground. (added - I think the 'space based weapons' link Kniall pointed out is what was asked about in this session- could be off on that, though...)
seek10 said:
I think this last video was discussed elsewhere in the forum and identified as a sci-fi channel mock video for promotional purposes. To me, it feels too Hollywood-esque (dramatic, with a near-miss) to be genuine. I also think that the movement of the camera catching the UFO as it shoots upwards is way too good to be true. Either the cameraman caught that by accident or he's got supernatural reflexes.
The other videos (the ball and 'missile') have got me intrigued.
The same video slowed down frame by frame:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5DcXJmNysw&feature=related
It's trajectory is entirely separate from whatever hit the tower because it comes in at a steeper angle from above the tower after the impact.
NewOrleans
Jedi Master
This is one of those "events" that seems orchestrated both in our physical reality and also hyperdimensionally. Ever since the Zuppruder film of the Kennedy assasination film footage has accidently opened up more questions than they answer. We see what we think we see. But they provide us with disparities that are not easily explained away. Nagging doubt is the symptom of someone who is skeptical and wide awake. And the 9/11 tragedy is monumental in the American psyche. There have been so many commissions and conspiracy theories that perhaps there will never be an easily explainable answer.
Here's one hypothesis: the planes were holograms. The real impact may have been completely different. It may seem impossible for the ordinary civilian to conceive that such a fraud could work, but American Black Ops has a million things up its sleeve, no doubt. From weather manipulation to manufactured catastrophies. It is possible to project something in broad daylight that has all the optical reality of a real thing. Especially if it's dramatic.
The several days before Hurricane Katrina we had seen what, at first, looked like a gigantic silver UFO in broad daylight - a cloudless clear afternoon- above a busy city intersection. No one else seemed to look up. Something felt physically malevolent about it, and yet at the same time, it didn't seem to "occupy" airspace like a plane or blimp. Then it disappeared. It seemed to be a demonstration of hyperdimensional uncloaking. One has to ask: who benefits by disaster?
I have the nagging feeling that the 9/11 planes, which even experienced pilots say would be impossible for amateur hyjacker/pilots to fly into buildings, actually happened quite differently than it appeared. In the end it's a "rabbit hole" like some, if not most, Conspiracy Theories - not that I think it's a bad thing to question official sources -but when you climb into the "rabbit hole" it just goes deeper and deeper with no conclusive answers, just more questions. Truth and coincidences, though they may even be accurate, appear stranger than fiction.
Just thinking outloud....
Here's one hypothesis: the planes were holograms. The real impact may have been completely different. It may seem impossible for the ordinary civilian to conceive that such a fraud could work, but American Black Ops has a million things up its sleeve, no doubt. From weather manipulation to manufactured catastrophies. It is possible to project something in broad daylight that has all the optical reality of a real thing. Especially if it's dramatic.
The several days before Hurricane Katrina we had seen what, at first, looked like a gigantic silver UFO in broad daylight - a cloudless clear afternoon- above a busy city intersection. No one else seemed to look up. Something felt physically malevolent about it, and yet at the same time, it didn't seem to "occupy" airspace like a plane or blimp. Then it disappeared. It seemed to be a demonstration of hyperdimensional uncloaking. One has to ask: who benefits by disaster?
I have the nagging feeling that the 9/11 planes, which even experienced pilots say would be impossible for amateur hyjacker/pilots to fly into buildings, actually happened quite differently than it appeared. In the end it's a "rabbit hole" like some, if not most, Conspiracy Theories - not that I think it's a bad thing to question official sources -but when you climb into the "rabbit hole" it just goes deeper and deeper with no conclusive answers, just more questions. Truth and coincidences, though they may even be accurate, appear stranger than fiction.
Just thinking outloud....