Mysterious death of NATO auditor general

Approaching Infinity

Administrator
Administrator
Moderator
FOTCM Member
Initial report on SOTT:

https://www.sott.net/article/337536-NATO-auditor-general-investigating-terror-financing-shot-dead-in-Belgium
NATO Auditor General was found dead in Belgium. The body of Yves Chandelon was found in the city of Andenne, in 140 kilometers from the place of his work and 100 km from Lens where he lived.

According to local mass media, the auditor committed suicide. He was found with shot in the head. However, the family doesn't believe in the suicide version, Life reported.

Three unites of weapon have been registered on the 60-year-old man. However, an unregistered weapon was found next to his body, Belg24 reported.

NATO Auditor General Yves Chandelon, in particular, dealt with counteraction against terrorism financing issues. Shortly before death he reported he was receiving strange calls.

Newsbud analysis with a bunch more details:


This story (http://www.wort.lu/fr/luxembourg/dans-des-circonstances-mysterieuses-un-fonctionnaire-de-l-otan-de-capellen-retrouve-mort-585b979a53590682caf16981), says the gun was found IN the glove box, but I'm pretty sure that's just a careless error. Ali Syed quotes an in-depth investigation by La Muese, who interviewed his family and friends and who say that the gun was found in his right hand (but he was left-handed). Also, that he kept the unregistered gun in the glovebox (that might explain the confusion).

Then there's this one:
https://www.sott.net/article/337931-Media-blackout-on-death-of-NATO-auditor-was-he-assassinated-to-cover-up-NATOs-black-budget

Which suggests that Chandelon was working on an audit of NATO's hidden budget.
 
Approaching Infinity said:
Initial report on SOTT:

https://www.sott.net/article/337536-NATO-auditor-general-investigating-terror-financing-shot-dead-in-Belgium

[...]

Then there's this one:
https://www.sott.net/article/337931-Media-blackout-on-death-of-NATO-auditor-was-he-assassinated-to-cover-up-NATOs-black-budget


Which suggests that Chandelon was working on an audit of NATO's hidden budget.


Quote from article:
The actual total NATO budget is only known by the US government and by no other NATO member state at all - regardless of their "weight". The information is mysteriously but intentionally compartmentalized.

Is it possible, that NATO's budget is intentionally compartmentalized and "mysterious" because it's financing and distribution of funds is handled through the Clinton Foundation? This article below goes into detail on the circumstances and events in Libya and Clinton's and NATO's involvement but the last two paragraphs point to information on how and when the Clinton Foundation was formed and financed. Apparently, NATO is being used - to help set up Merkel's new EU Army?

Hillary Clinton: Libya and the Clinton Foundation
_http://acdemocracy.org/hillary-clinton-libya-and-the-clinton-foundation/

Although it is often reported that the William J. Clinton Foundation was founded in 2001, contributions from foreign governments to the have been given since its inception in 1996. Before the nomination of Hillary Clinton to Secretary of State, the Foundation had raised at least $46 million from Saudi Arabia and other foreign governments. Saudi Arabia gave $10-25 million to finance Clinton’s library in Little Rock, Ark., and charitable efforts to reduce poverty and treat AIDS.

Qatar was included among other major foreign governments that donated to the effort. And as widely reported now, the Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation broke its December 2008 agreement with Obama to stop accepting contributions from foreign countries. It turns out the Foundation continued to receive millions of dollars from several governments, including Qatar. Reportedly, in 2014 a Qatari government committee gave the Foundation between $250,000 and $500,000. Previously, Qatar’s government had donated between $1 million and $5 million to the Foundation.


Wiki-leaks – Merkel, Clinton, ISIS, NATO, and the Creation of New EU Army
_https://lipstick-and-war-crimes.org/wiki-leaks-merkel-clinton-isis-nato-and-the-creation-of-new-eu-army/

The writer of following group of links is seeing a crisis encouraged as excuse for new EU army. Think for yourself and ask what does the New World Order need to destroy all sovereign nations?

“Most damning is the recent death of Yves Chandelon, the Head Auditor of NATO.

Mirror of post from Reddit

Abstract:

Angela Merkel and those within the EU and German government who are aligned with her are knowingly allowing ISIS operatives to infiltrate the EU, set up networks and stage attacks on European citizens. The goal of allowing this to occur is to create a crisis which will artificially deepen the need for greater European integration into the EU, which is of course mostly controlled by Germany and allows them to control Europe without firing a single shot (so far). Once the crisis has been created, Merkel will use it as an excuse to use the newly formed EU Army to occupy European nations. This army seems to currently be supplied by NATO and NATO officials who are in a position to discover this are showing up dead.

I. German Intelligence is knowingly neglecting to deal with ISIS operatives
_https://wikileaks.org/bnd-inquiry/docs/BAMF/MAT%20A%20BAMF-1a.pdf

The significant portions of this document are as follows:

On page 14: We’re looking for accomplices or candidates involved in terrorist activities that have not yet become perpetrators

They are specifically looking for Taliban defectors from Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan as well as civilians born in Afghanistan and Egypt as well as a few other Middle Eastern countries.

On pages 15-16 they list tiers of individuals they are looking to recruit from:

Tier 1: Males with the following personal features: Aged 18-45, single, lower-middle-class to poor background, lived in refugee camps for a while, poor occupational and societal prospects, sketchy CV, Muslim belief, doesn’t support UMMA (collective community of Islamic peoples).
Tier 2: Individuals with knowledge about suspected terrorist organizations
Tier 3: Individuals that resided in or have knowledge about Al-Azher University, Cairo or the El-Haramein Institute of Culture which is founded by Saudi Arabia and used to promote Wahabbism.

This is highly alarming, because it proves that German intelligence is aware of the fact that there are many individuals among the refugee population that have knowledge of terror organizations, are “defectors” from them or have been exposed to radical Islamic ideologies at certain educational institutions. Why are they not simply arresting these people and preventing them from 1) committing attacks and 2) radicalizing even more males from the refugee population? [This could be argued that they are looking for spies to detect terrorist activity.- Ray Songtree]

This discovery was followed today with another, which has not yet been widely discovered by the public: Moroccan government officials have stated that they tipped Germany off to the fact that Berlin truck attacker Anis Amri was planning to execute a terror event on German soil:
_https://www.moroccoworldnews.com/2016/12/204265/moroccan-intelligence-services-informed-germany-about-tunisian-suspect/
_http://archive.is/Vwxkk

The article explains that Spanish and French authorities has successfully dismantled terror cells based on information passed to them by Moroccan intelligence. Why did Germany not act? It is because Angela Merkel has a vested interested in creating a crisis by allowing ISIS attacks to occur in the EU.

This apparent policy of letting a wild dog like ISIS run rampant does come back to bite them occasionally however. An German intelligence official working for ISIS was recently arrested for helping plot an attack the headquarters of Germany’s domestic intelligence agency, the Bundesverfassungsschutz (BfV):
_https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2291462/german-intelligence-officer-arrested-over-islamist-plot-to-bomb-agencys-headquarters/
_http://archive.is/EwwZa

It is very strange that Germany would be allowing this kind of thing to happen. Unless of course, one views it from the perspective that they might want incidents to occur as a result of neglecting to crack down on known and potential extremists.

II. Germany allows ISIS events to occur to justify occupying Europe with the EU Army
A. The EU Army

Merkel was already trying to form an EU Army before Brexit occurred and accelerated the need to create some kind of force that would allow them to militarily pressure countries into abandoning plans to leave as well. European Union allies of Merkel were lobbying for this force to exist even before Brexit. What people do not realize is that it has already been partially set up:
_https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/mar/08/jean-claude-juncker-calls-for-eu-army-european-commission-miltary
_http://archive.is/k08N1

Already EU technocrats are letting on to the public that the EU Army will be formed “much faster than people think”:
_https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/8935/european-army
_http://archive.is/gM7JC

B. NATO arms/vehicles are being used to covertly equip the EU Army

There has been quite a bit of media attention given to recent NATO efforts to posture itself militarily to “stand up to Russian aggression.” A lot of weaponry and heavily machinery has been moved into the EU and Eastern Europe/the V4 (Visegrad Group):
_http://www.cbsnews.com/news/ash-carter-heavy-weapons-eastern-nato-russia-nuclear-provocations-ukraine/
_http://archive.is/aYmxr
_https://www.rt.com/news/239021-us-tanks-latvia-arrive/
_http://archive.is/9yPDX

Here is another example of German military assets being moved into Eastern Europe to “counter Russian aggression.” Notice how they mention Trump’s election as an incentive to form an EU Army? Merkel was hoping her friend Hillary Clinton would win power and collaborate to make this project easier:
_https://euobserver.com/foreign/135877
_http://archive.is/qTfi6

The Russia narrative is a cover story for the formation and equipping of the EU Army. NATO’s shipments of weapons and vehicles to Europe are not for the purpose of arming the alliance against Russia, but to give that gear to Merkel for her new EU force. Most of this stuff is surplus American military gear, think for example about how many unused tanks we have sitting around due to supposed Congressional incompetence.

There is ample indication that NATO is indeed engaging in this covert supply operation with the EU. The current Secretary General of NATO is Jens Stoltenberg, who allegedly was bought the position by a $584 million bribe from Norway to the Clinton Foundation. He is also alleged to be connected to the recent corruption scandal uncovered in part by the FBI. Here are some sources on that:
_https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/corruption/the-noway-clinton-foundation-obama-links-corruption-to-create-world-war-iii/
_http://archive.is/YutuK
_http://www.dagbladet.no/nyheter/pengedryss-over-clinton/60264257
_http://archive.is/kOyAS
_http://www.newsinenglish.no/2016/11/21/huge-pedophile-networks-shock-police/
_http://archive.is/KdeXA

Given his ties to corruption and the Clintons, it is plausible that Stoltenberg is willing to collaborate with Angela Merkel, another ally of the Clintons. He is responsible for massively increasing NATO’s budget over the last few years:
_http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/737513/Hillary-Clinton-charity-received-millions-in-German-cash-after-praising-Angela-Merkel
_http://archive.is/LVogg

Most damning is the recent death of Yves Chandelon, the Head Auditor of NATO. He was found dead 140 kilometers from his work and 100 kilometers from his home in the Belgian city of Lens. Despite owning three registered weapons, the gun used to kill him was unregistered:
_http://www.pravdareport.com/news/hotspots/22-12-2016/136486-nato-0/
_http://archive.is/SIZl3

His death was ruled a “suicide” but his family refuses to believe that conclusion. He had told them that he had the feeling that he was being followed and had also received strange phone calls. His further revealed that he was a happy person and had made several plans for the new year. Not the profile of someone who kills themselves:
_http://www.demorgen.be/buitenland/belgische-navo-topper-sterft-verdachte-dood-b8296fbb/
_http://archive.is/PyBeO

Why is his death significant? One of the jobs of an auditor is to make sure goods are actually delivered to their destination. Revenue cannot be recognized until service is performed. What did Chandelon find about weapons and vehicle deliveries that caused him to be murdered? Where would these lost shipments be going, if not to equip and supply another army? The EU Army?

III. How ISIS provides Merkel with an excuse to occupy Europe with her new army

With an EU army formed, Merkel would only need to look for a good excuse to deploy it. The most likely cover story would be to diffuse some kind of “humanitarian crisis.” What exactly might that crisis look like? There could be a number of reasons, such as fighting “far right racism” against minorities for example.

I personally believe that given the evidence I have uncovered about Germany’s complicity in allowing Islamic extremists to enter the EU, the evidence indicates that they are possibly hoping ISIS will stage a major terror incident in one or two locations in the EU, or perhaps across the entire Union. The militaries of multiple countries would inevitably engage in an immediate crackdown following such a severe event and this would most likely focus solely on migrant heavy areas and “no go zones” inhabited by the Muslim minorities in Europe. This would give the EU a perfect humanitarian excuse to justify violating the sovereignty of multiple European nations and centralize power with the EU government, which is mainly German controlled.

A conflict in the EU anywhere would be very bad for the United States. Look at all the locations of our military bases across Europe. We would be sucked into any kind of European conflict:
_https://i.sli.mg/0Yrrin.jpg
 
Some recent headlines:

The US has reopened a Cold War-era military storage facility in the Netherlands aimed at deterring "Russian aggression" in Europe, media reported.
https://sputniknews.com/us/201612161048640624-us-russia-netherlands-tanks/

The United States has reopened a Cold War-era military storage facility in Dutch town of Eygelshoven and begun restocking it with tanks as part of a $3.4-billion spending plan aimed at deterring "Russian aggression" in Europe, media reported.

Under the plan, five more equipment storage sites are planned to be either reopened or built from scratch in the Netherlands, Poland, Belgium and at two locations in Germany with over 1,600 vehicles to be stored there.


Recently, the Swedish Armed Forces stunned experts with its odd decision to revive an outdated coastal missile system, which has been inactive since 2000. Today, Sweden is ready to dust off military trucks that were put on the backburner ten years ago.

Sweden Dusts Off Yet Another Cold War Relic in Self-Defense
https://sputniknews.com/military/201612161048637463-sweden-cold-war-defense/

The US-produced trucks were used by the Swedish Armed forces in the 1980s and are colloquially known as Klargöringsbil 9712. Manufactured by the Jeep company, Klargöringsbil 9712 is a full-size pickup truck based on the Jeep Wagoneer platform that was built and sold under numerous marques from 1962 to 1988. The Jeep is noteworthy for being in production for more than 26 years with only minor mechanical changes.

Today, the well-traveled trucks will be used to load missiles hung under the wings of JAS Gripen jets, according to Swedish Radio.

Additionally, the jeeps will have a role in resumption of the Swedish Air Force exercises based on Cold War-era scenarios. The idea is to drill landing and take-off on runways outside permanent air bases to increase military capabilities and allow full mobilization in case of attack, Swedish daily Svenska Dagbladet reported.


Amid unfounded fears of a Russian sneak attack, kindled by high-ranking politicians and military experts, Sweden has been taking steps to drastically re-activate its defense. In an obvious return to the Cold War mentality, Sweden has restored a Cold War missile system to protect the island of Gotland.

Blast From the Past: Sweden Dusts Off Cold War Missile System
https://sputniknews.com/military/201611211047664752-sweden-missile-system-gotland-cold-war/

During the Cold War, Sweden possessed coastal artillery that protected Swedish islands, ports and waterways. In the modern era, the coastal artillery was gradually dismantled before the 2000 decision to disband coastal artillery for good. Today, a heavy missile system that was defunct for 16 years has been re-activated. The coastal defense is said to be particularly desirable on the island of Gotland, which in Sweden is widely believed to the likely target for Russian "aggression."


As the anti-Russian sentiment is seething in swaths of Europe, Finland is all set to open a center against hybrid threats together with EU and NATO members. Whereas the name itself bears no clear allusions to Russia, it is Moscow that mostly is groundlessly accused of waging "hybrid wars" and "psychological warfare."

Finland Launches Anti-Hybrid Warfare Center to Fight 'Imaginary Russians'
https://sputniknews.com/military/201611231047743911-finland-hybrid-war-russia/

Earlier this year, traditionally non-aligned Sweden voiced its readiness to join Stratcom, the NATO center for strategic communications, as well as the Riga-based Center for Strategic Information. Recently, non-aligned Finland decided to follow in its neighbor Sweden's shoes and intensify its psychological defense against Russia's "crafty designs."


The country’s Defense Minister Raimundas Karoblis said that Lithuania’s aim is to spend more than 2 percent of gross domestic product on defense in accordance with NATO demands.

Lithuania Aims to Spend More on Defense
https://sputniknews.com/europe/201612281049050989-lithuania-spends-defence/

On December 15, Lithuanian Prime Minister Saulius Skvernelis said that Vilnius was set to comply with the decisions taken at the latest NATO summit in Warsaw and spend 1.8 percent of GDP on defense in 2017. By 2018, Lithuania’s defense budget should reach 2 percent of GDP, according to the government.

So far only five NATO member-states are meeting the alliance’s goal of spending 2 percent of their GDP on defense — the United States, Great Britain, Greece, Estonia and Poland.


Lithuania signed an agreement with the Netherlands on acquirement of estimated 1.95 million euros used military equipment to be delivered by 2018.

Lithuania Signs Deal For $2Mln Worth of Used Dutch Military Equipment - MoD
https://sputniknews.com/europe/201612221048874579-lithuania-agreement-netherlands-military/

Under this agreement, the Lithuanian Army will receive more than 200 units of various used military equipment in a few stages by 2018…. The total value of acquired machinery and equipment is 1.95 million euros," the statement read.

Vilnius will receive off-road Mercedes Benz vehicles, DAF trucks, generators and other equipment.


Extremist ideas have spread across Europe and terrorists hit progressive centers of the Western civilization, such as Berlin, Brussels, Nice and many more in 2016.

Extremist Ideas Growing in Europe as Terror Attacks Hit Major Cities
https://sputniknews.com/europe/201612271049040569-europe-terror-attacks-extremism/
 
So NATO countries pay their NATO dues by way of their defense budget, i.e. they allocate tax payer money to the country's "defense". What exactly does this mean? That a country buys more tanks and weapons and engages in other 'defense' spending specific to NATO's agenda? That's likely a part of it, and it's a good way for the big arms manufacturers to get rich at the expense of tax payers in NATO countries.

But it's also likely that a portion of those "NATO defense funds" go towards more obscure funding, like "support to resistance movements" to "support democracy" in other countries.

I'd say that the story behind this event is large amounts of European and US taxpayers' money, under the auspices of 'NATO contributions', going directly to Libyan and Syrian 'jihadis' including ISIS.

Can you imagine the headline?

"French/German/British/American taxpayers effectively paid for ISIS to attack and kill them".
 
Mysterious death of NATO auditor general

Working for a criminal enterprise can get you killed.


[quote author= Joe]Can you imagine the headline?

"French/German/British/American taxpayers effectively paid for ISIS to attack and kill them".[/quote]

Yes, and to add.

Go and kill, that's how the West achieves their political goals by proxies.

When a Jihadist shows up at your door and asks for money so he can murder people. Would you give it to him, nobody would. Yet, that's basically what is happening. Your tax money at work. Beheading children and burning people alive all made possible because you indirectly paid them their salaries to do so.

- Ignorance turns people into monsters.
 
bjorn said:
Mysterious death of NATO auditor general

Working for a criminal enterprise can get you killed.


[quote author= Joe]Can you imagine the headline?

"French/German/British/American taxpayers effectively paid for ISIS to attack and kill them".

Yes, and to add.

Go and kill, that's how the West achieves their political goals by proxies.

When a Jihadist shows up at your door and asks for money so he can murder people. Would you give it to him, nobody would. Yet, that's basically what is happening. Your tax money at work. Beheading children and burning people alive all made possible because you indirectly paid them their salaries to do so.

- Ignorance turns people into monsters.
[/quote]

Yes and on top of that is the trillions that goes 'missing' every once in a while from the Pentagon budgets.
 
Back
Top Bottom