Mysterious Space Force Finally ID'ed

[Ellipse]

http://www.sott.net/articles/show/228202-Mysterious-Space-Force-Finally-ID-ed

I remember myself, there's a session where Ark ask about this but I can't find it. If someone have the opportunities to dig it out, it would be cool.

 

[HiThere]

981003:

Q: (A) Now, the technical question: in the physics news, it is
reported that scientists have discovered long range
acceleration towards the Sun in the observations of the path
of Pioneer 10 which is now 70 AU from Earth, and they
cannot explain this. The problem is that there are
speculations that this may suggest there is something wrong
with the theory of gravity, and that a new theory is
necessary. What is the reason for this unusual behavior of
Pioneer 10?
A: Wave emittance.
Q: (A) From where?
A: Cosmic energy is composed of particles misidentified.
Q: (L) As what?
A: Not "as," but of.
Q: (L) Of what?
A: Particles are...?
Q: (L) Tachyons?
A: Arkadiusz, please!
Q: (L) Alright, I'll shut up.
A: What do your scientists think about the matter-antimatter
matrix?
Q: (A) Well, now you are leading me somewhere else. I
asked about the anomalies in the path of Pioneer 10 and
now you are talking about matter and anti-matter. The issue
is the acceleration of Pioneer 10 TOWARDS the Sun.
A: Towards the Sun... Not from...
Q: (A) Well, I don't see any connection between this
problem and this matrix you keep mentioning...
A: Yes, so now we see why one goes: "What?!?"
Q: (A) Okay, I will think about it and try to figure it out.
A: No, you will not escape that easily! We are trying to get
you to put your "thinking cap" on and you won't even go
near the hatrack!
Q: (A) Okay, as you repeatedly mention this 'matrix,' I want
to know exactly what your definition of 'matrix' is?
A: Picture a perfectly symmetrical three dimensional
parallelogram.
Q: (A) It's a cube.
A: Yes, now convert to 4 dimensions, and you have the
mathematical representation of the matter-antimatter matrix.
Q: (A) In mathematics, by a matrix we understand a cube
with slots to put numbers in. How many slots do we include?
A: Try inserting phi or an infinite number.
Q: (A) The number of slots must be an integer like one, two
or three, not a decimal like phi.
A: Four dimensional, Arkadiusz, 4th Density, see?
Q: (A) Okay, I will think about it.
A: No, you will not. What is the square root of 13?
Q: (A) When you ask about the square root of 13, do you
want me to use a decimal representation?
A: Yes, that would be fun for starters.
Q: (A) Okay, the square root of 13 is 3.6005551275. Do I
see anything particular? No. But, it is a good start. Okay,
what is so particular about the square root of 13 as opposed
to the square root of 17?
A: Compare with the numerical representation of phi.
Q: (A) I believe that is one plus square root of five over two,
which is 1.618033989. Now, compare. I don't see any
particular relation between these numbers.
A: Subtract...
Q: (A) Okay, I subtract and we have 1.982521138 and so
on. It's a number. I still do not see anything particular about
this number, the result.
A: Now, if you can only reconcile your matrix numerically...
Q: (L) Using these numbers?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) What do you mean by the term 'reconcile?'
A: What do you mean when you use it?
Q: (L) These three numbers are the three dimensions?
A: Play with them, see what you get. Will be better than
Rubik's cube.
Q: (A) Okay, I will play with them. It's not clear to me how I
should play with them, but I will... yes...
A: Computer.
Q: (L) Play with them on the computer. (A) I will.

 

[Ellipse]

:D Thx for this utra fast answer Hithere. I should have search on "Pioneer" instead of more generic terms.

So the article do not match the C's answer:

A: Wave emittance.

The article conclude that the effect is due to the onboard heat of Pionner...

The Portuguese physicists used detailed computer modeling to produce the most precise simulation of Pioneer heat flow yet, including both mirror-like and diffuse reflection from spacecraft surfaces. In their paper, they conclude that heat does the trick and "unless new data arises, the puzzle of the anomalous acceleration of the Pioneer probes can finally be put to rest."

 

[HiThere]

You're welcome! :)

 

[combsbt]

:D Thx for this utra fast answer Hithere. I should have search on "Pioneer" instead of more generic terms.

So the article do not match the C's answer:

A: Wave emittance.

The article conclude that the effect is due to the onboard heat of Pionner...

The Portuguese physicists used detailed computer modeling to produce the most precise simulation of Pioneer heat flow yet, including both mirror-like and diffuse reflection from spacecraft surfaces. In their paper, they conclude that heat does the trick and "unless new data arises, the puzzle of the anomalous acceleration of the Pioneer probes can finally be put to rest."

The article states that infrared radiation is to blame. Infrared radiation is a form of "wave emittance." So in that sense the two descriptions could match, however, I do think that the C's were implying there was more to it than onboard heat.

Bertolami's team calculate that infrared radiation from warm parts of each spacecraft, notably the radioactive thermal generators that powered them, and the main equipment compartment, where electrical power from the generators was used to operate electronics, bounces back and forth between exposed surfaces and exerts pressure on the back of each spacecraft's 9 foot wide onboard parabolic radio antenna pointing toward Earth. Seen from a great distance, the Earth is very close to the sun in the sky, and so pressure on the antenna represents a force on the spacecraft in the direction of the sun.