NeuroFeedback, NeurOptimal and Electroencephalography

I was wondering what do neurotransmitters have to do with alchemy, and perhaps their influence on genes is the answer?

Dopamine Can Directly Alter Gene Expression

For over sixty years, dopamine has been defined by its ability to transmit signals between neurons. But the discovery of a process called “dopaminylation” suggests this neurotransmitter can also directly alter protein function and gene expression.

Through dopaminylation, dopamine can bind to proteins inside cells and modify their activity or function. At Neuroscience 2024, the Society for Neuroscience’s annual meeting in October, researchers shared evidence of impaired dopaminylation in people with Parkinson’s disease as well as aged mice, raising new questions about how dopamine depletion contributes to the disease.

“Traditionally, dopamine is thought to regulate most of [its] functions via its role as a neurotransmitter,” explained Winnie Chen, a neuroscientist at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York. But that has changed with recent discoveries. “Dopamine not only acts as a cell-to-cell communication messenger, but also as a modification on proteins,” Chen said.

Not Just a Neurotransmitter

In a 2020 Science publication, a team led by neuroscientist Ian Maze at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, reported a neurotransmission-independent role for dopamine in both rats and humans. They found dopamine could bind to histone, a protein that regulates gene expression by controlling access to DNA. By binding histone, dopamine could change gene expression — helping turn genes on and off and alter cells’ functions.

The study focused on the role of dopaminylation in addiction, a disorder linked to dysfunction in the dopamine reward system. The researchers found rats experiencing cocaine withdrawal accumulated dopaminylation marks in the ventral tegmental area, a brain region critical to the dopamine reward system. They think dopaminylation in the region made the rats more susceptible to relapse when given access to cocaine again.

The team found if histone dopaminylation was blocked, the rats reduced their drug-seeking behavior upon re-exposure to cocaine, and typical dopamine signaling patterns were restored. Further work is needed to uncover which genes can be regulated by dopaminylation, but it is clear it can impact neuronal function and, ultimately, behavior.

Since the initial discoveries, the team found dopamine regulates more than histone protein. By investigating four areas of the mouse brain known to send or receive dopamine signals with a specially designed probe labeling proteins bound with dopamine, the researchers found over 1,500 unique dopaminylated proteins, many of which are involved in synaptic function, indicating it has widespread effects throughout the brain beyond its role as a neurotransmitter as noted in a preprint study posted September 2024.

Diverse Effects of Dopamine Depletion in Parkinson’s Disease

In Parkinson’s disease, people experience a gradual loss of dopamine-producing neurons. As dopamine cells are lost, dopamine signaling decreases, impairing functions including movement and motivation.

The risk of Parkinson’s increases with age, so the team at Mount Sinai wondered if changes to dopaminylation could be at play. In pre-publication studies presented at Neuroscience 2024, they reported a decrease in dopaminylated proteins in the mouse brain with age, and many of the affected proteins were associated with the risk of neurodegenerative diseases.

They also collected post-mortem brain tissue samples from Parkinson’s patients to look at dopaminylation in the human brain. They were interested in the prefrontal cortex — an area important for complex cognition — because the dementia and cognitive decline commonly seen in people with Parkinson’s are associated with this brain area. Here, they saw fewer dopaminylated proteins compared to those without the disease, showing Parkinson’s hallmark depletion of dopamine may alter protein function within neurons, not just signaling.

Researchers do not know whether the degeneration of dopamine neurons drives the decrease in dopaminylation across the brain, or whether the drop in dopaminylation drives degeneration. “It’s kind of like the chicken and the egg,” Chen said. “If we get the data of which genes [dopamine] is regulating, we might have an insight into what its function is — whether it’s a protective mechanism or a result.”

This protein modification process has been seen in other closely-related neurotransmitters, namely serotonin and histamine. Collectively, the modification processes across these neurotransmitters have been dubbed “monoaminylation.” An enzyme called transglutaminase-2 mediates monoaminylation across all three cases.

The findings prompt speculation about dopaminylation-based therapies, but designing a drug to target only dopaminylation would be difficult. “The enzyme itself, transglutaminase-2, has so many functions in the brain. It doesn't just do that one [task] — monoaminylation — and so I think there's many reasons why we cannot just modulate the enzyme,” explained Chen.

For now, though, the discovery introduces new considerations for researchers studying any of the brain’s dopamine systems — from the olfactory system and vision to movement and motivation — as its production and release may have far more complex effects than imagined.


The Epigenetic Secrets Behind Dopamine, Drug Addiction and Depression

As I opened my copy of Science at home one night, an unfamiliar word in the title of a new study caught my eye: dopaminylation. The term refers to the brain chemical dopamine’s ability, in addition to transmitting signals across synapses, to enter a cell’s nucleus and control specific genes. As I read the paper, I realized that it completely upends our understanding of genetics and drug addiction. The intense craving for addictive drugs like alcohol and cocaine may be caused by dopamine controlling genes that alter the brain circuitry underlying addiction. Intriguingly, the results also suggest an answer to why drugs that treat major depression must typically be taken for weeks before they’re effective. I was shocked by the dramatic discovery, but to really understand it, I first had to unlearn some things.

“Half of what you learned in college is wrong,” my biology professor, David Lange, once said. “Problem is, we don’t know which half.” How right he was. I was taught to scoff at Jean-Baptiste Lamarck and his theory that traits acquired through life experience could be passed on to the next generation. The silly traditional example is the mama giraffe stretching her neck to reach food high in trees, resulting in baby giraffes with extra-long necks. Then biologists discovered we really can inherit traits our parents acquired in life, without any change to the DNA sequence of our genes. It’s all thanks to a process called epigenetics — a form of gene expression that can be inherited but isn’t actually part of the genetic code. This is where it turns out that brain chemicals like dopamine play a role.

All genetic information is encoded in the DNA sequence of our genes, and traits are passed on in the random swapping of genes between egg and sperm that sparks a new life. Genetic information and instructions are coded in a sequence of four different molecules (nucleotides abbreviated A, T, G and C) on the long double-helix strand of DNA. The linear code is quite lengthy (about 6 feet long per human cell), so it’s stored neatly wound around protein bobbins, similar to how magnetic tape is wound around spools in cassette tapes.

Inherited genes are activated or inactivated to build a unique individual from a fertilized egg, but cells also constantly turn specific genes on and off throughout life to make the proteins cells need to function. When a gene is activated, special proteins latch onto DNA, read the sequence of letters there and make a disposable copy of that sequence in the form of messenger RNA. The messenger RNA then shuttles the genetic instructions to the cell’s ribosomes, which decipher the code and make the protein specified by the gene.

But none of that works without access to the DNA. By analogy, if the magnetic tape remains tightly wound, you can’t read the information on the cassette. Epigenetics works by unspooling the tape, or not, to control which genetic instructions are carried out. In epigenetic inheritance, the DNA code is not altered, but access to it is.

This is why cells in our body can be so different even though every cell has identical DNA. If the DNA is not unwound from its various spools — proteins called histones — the cell’s machinery can’t read the hidden code. So the genes that would make red blood corpuscles, for example, are shut off in cells that become neurons.

How do cells know which genes to read? The histone spool that a specific gene’s DNA winds around is marked with a specific chemical tag, like a molecular Post-it note. That marker directs other proteins to “roll the tape” and unwind the relevant DNA from that histone (or not to roll it, depending on the tag).

It’s a fascinating process we’re still learning more about, but we never expected that a seemingly unrelated brain chemical might also play a role. Neurotransmitters are specialized molecules that transmit signals between neurons. This chemical signaling between neurons is what enables us to think, learn, experience different moods and, when neurotransmitter signaling goes awry, suffer cognitive difficulties or mental illness.

Serotonin and dopamine are famous examples. Both are monoamines, a class of neurotransmitters involved in psychological illnesses such as depression, anxiety disorders and addiction. Serotonin helps regulate mood, and drugs known as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are widely prescribed and effective for treating chronic depression. We think they work by increasing the level of serotonin in the brain, which boosts communication between neurons in the neural circuits controlling mood, motivation, anxiety and reward. That makes sense, sure, but it is curious that it usually takes a month or more before the drug relieves depression.

Dopamine, on the other hand, is the neurotransmitter at work in the brain’s reward circuits; it produces that “gimme-a-high-five!” spurt of euphoria that erupts when we hit a bingo. Nearly all addictive drugs, like cocaine and alcohol, increase dopamine levels, and the chemically induced dopamine reward leads to further drug cravings. A weakened reward circuitry could be a cause of depression, which would help explain why people with depression may self-medicate by taking illicit drugs that boost dopamine.

But (as I found out after reading that dopaminylation paper), research last year led by Ian Maze, a neuroscientist at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, showed that serotonin has another function: It can act as one of those molecular Post-it notes. Specifically, it can bind to a type of histone known as H3, which controls the genes responsible for transforming human stem cells (the forerunner of all kinds of cells) into serotonin neurons. When serotonin binds to the histone, the DNA unwinds, turning on the genes that dictate the development of a stem cell into a serotonin neuron, while turning off other genes by keeping their DNA tightly wound. (So stem cells that never see serotonin turn into other types of cells, since the genetic program to transform them into neurons is not activated.)

That finding inspired Maze’s team to wonder if dopamine might act in a similar way, regulating the genes involved in drug addiction and withdrawal. In the April Science paper that so surprised me, they showed that the same enzyme that attaches serotonin to H3 can also catalyze the attachment of dopamine to H3 — a process, I learned, called dopaminylation.

Together, these results represent a huge change in our understanding of these chemicals. By binding to the H3 histone, serotonin and dopamine can regulate transcription of DNA into RNA and, as a consequence, the synthesis of specific proteins from them. That turns these well-known characters in neuroscience into double agents, acting obviously as neurotransmitters, but also as clandestine masters of epigenetics.

Maze’s team naturally began exploring this new relationship. First they examined postmortem brain tissue from cocaine users. They found a decrease in the amount of dopaminylation of H3 in the cluster of dopamine neurons in a brain region known to be important in addiction: the ventral tegmental area, or VTA.

That’s just an intriguing correlation, though, so to find out if cocaine use actually affects dopaminylation of H3 in these neurons, the researchers studied rats before and after they self-administered cocaine for 10 days. Just as in the human cocaine users’ brains, dopaminylation of H3 dropped within the neurons in the rats’ VTA. The researchers also found a rebound effect one month after withdrawing the rats from cocaine, with much higher dopaminylation of H3 found in these neurons than in control animals. That increase might be important in controlling which genes get turned on or off, rewiring the brain’s reward circuitry and causing an intense drug craving during withdrawal.

Ultimately, it looks as though dopaminylation — not just typical dopamine functioning in the brain — may control drug-seeking behavior. Long-term cocaine use modifies neural circuits in the brain’s reward pathway, making a steady intake of the drug necessary for the circuits to operate normally. That requires turning specific genes on and off to make the proteins for those changes, and this is an epigenetic mechanism driven by dopamine acting on H3, not a change in DNA sequence.

To test that hypothesis, the researchers genetically modified H3 histones in rats by replacing the amino acid that dopamine attaches to with a different one it doesn’t react with. This stops dopaminylation from occurring. Withdrawal from cocaine is associated with changes in the readout of hundreds of genes involved in rewiring neural circuits and altering synaptic connections, but in the rats whose dopaminylation was prevented, these changes were suppressed. Moreover, neural impulse firing in VTA neurons was reduced, and they released less dopamine, showing that these genetic changes were indeed affecting the brain’s reward circuit operation. This might account for why people with substance use disorder crave drugs that boost dopamine levels in the brain during withdrawal. Finally, in subsequent tests, the genetically modified rats exhibited much less cocaine-seeking behavior.

To put it plainly, the discovery that monoamine neurotransmitters control epigenetic regulation of genes is transformative for basic science and medicine. These experiments show that the tagging of H3 by dopamine does indeed underlie drug-seeking behavior, by regulating the neural circuits operating in addiction.

And, equally exciting, the implications likely go well beyond addiction, given the crucial role of dopamine and serotonin signaling in other neurological and psychological illnesses. Indeed, Maze told me that his team’s latest research (not yet published) has also found this type of epigenetic marking in the brain tissues of people with major depressive disorder. Perhaps this connection even explains why antidepressant drugs take so long to be effective: If the drugs work by activating this epigenetic process, rather than just supplying the brain’s missing serotonin, it can take days or even weeks before these genetic changes become apparent.

Looking ahead, Maze wonders if such epigenetic changes might also occur in response to other addictive drugs, including heroin, alcohol and nicotine. If so, medicines based on this newly discovered epigenetic process could eventually lead to better treatments for many types of addiction and mental illnesses.

In a commentary accompanying the research, Jean-Antoine Girault of Sorbonne University in Paris made a final, intriguing observation. We know that typical neural impulse firing works by causing a ripple effect of dynamic changes in calcium concentration inside neurons that eventually reach the nucleus. But Girault noted that the enzyme that catalyzes the attachment of dopamine to H3 is also regulated by levels of intracellular calcium. In this way, electrical chatter between neurons is relayed to the nucleus, suggesting that neural activity — driven by a behavior — could attach the dopamine epigenetic marker to genes responsible for drug-seeking behavior. That’s how the experiences one has in life can select which genes get read out, and which do not. Lamarck would be proud.

 
I would like to rent a Neuroptimal device,but in Spain they are charging 1650 euros for 60 sessions(2 months). Does anybody know where I could rent one for less money?(If posible) Thank you
 
Q: (L) Why are the results of sleep deprivation, psychosis, delirium tremens, and psychedelic drugs and some mystical states so similar in their expressions and manifestations? What is being seen?

A: Openings.

Q: (L) Well, if doing without sleep provides an opening, what is it an opening to?

A: Density levels 4 and up.

Q: (L) It would seem to me - well, why is this not good?

A: Who said it wasn't?

Session 9 June 1996

Sleep deprivation increases dopamine. Perhaps dopamine is the key for the connection with 4D?

 
Sleep deprivation increases dopamine. Perhaps dopamine is the key for the connection with 4D?
Interesting and initially I thought it's a matter of soul recharge versus openings to higher densities. But the article says not to pull an all-nighter to force the effect. And of course, we're drained of dopamine through many information overload pathways these days.
 
Interesting and initially I thought it's a matter of soul recharge versus openings to higher densities.

The best soul rechargings that I had were after sleep deprivations.

But the article says not to pull an all-nighter to force the effect.

Yes, doing just that would probably require extreme sleep deprivation, but combining it with other things that increase dopamine might do the trick. In other words, it would probably be easier to increase dopamine during the night than during the day, since it would follow the natural cycle of dopamine.

And of course, we're drained of dopamine through many information overload pathways these days.

Yes, it's possible that many people today have a lack of dopamine without realizing it.
 
Since we still haven't discovered what is the connection between trace minerals and secrets that C's talked about, perhaps we should consider that what they really meant was trace amines?


József Knoll, the developer of the MAEs, was interviewed by David Healy in 2000 about his work and about MAEs. In the interview, Healy asked Knoll the question of why MAEs should be preferred for increasing monoaminergic signaling and enhancing drive over other monoaminergic drugs, including monoamine releasing agents such as amphetamines, monoamine reuptake inhibitors, monoamine metabolism inhibitors, and direct monoamine receptor agonists. Knoll answered that other monoaminergic agents create an artificial, unphysiological, and abnormal situation in the brain that has substantial accompanying side effects and problems, for instance triggering of homeostatic compensation mechanisms. In contrast, Knoll maintained that MAEs simply augment normal and physiological monoaminergic signaling by increasing the amount of monoamine neurotransmitter released per action potential. He described this as very similar to how the brain situation-dependently regulates its own monoaminergic activity and stated that it is simply a matter of shifting the normal physiological range to allow for a higher level of activity and consequent behavioral performance. On the basis of these arguments, Knoll claimed that MAEs are theoretically better-tolerated, safer, and less tolerance-forming than other monoaminergic drugs.


 
There are some studies about natural MAO inhibitors, but unfortunately there are not many apples to apples comparisons between them, and certainly not much in vivo comparisons, so you would have to try some of these things yourself and see how do they make you feel.

I will not name exotic plants that I know nothing about, but sarmentosin from blackcurrants and pterostilbene from blueberries are potentially interesting things.

 
Joseph Knoll claimed that trace amines work as enhancers of neurotransmitter release. He also claimed that their highest values are during puberty, and after reaching full sexual maturity they fall down and lead to slow decline of brain capabilities as people age.

Well, interesting thing is that vitamin D also works as enhancer of neurotransmitter release, and its active form is also highest during the puberty.

I haven't found a possible direct connection between vitamin D and trace amines, but it seems that vitamin D can play the same role in the brain as trace amines.
 
I have been experimenting with blackcurrant juice, and while it's still early to tell, I think that it positively affects my sleep for whatever reason. But what is interesting is that it not only affects my sleep the night after, but also the night after that, even though I only took it the first day. I was wondering about that, and I discovered that the effect of irreversible MAO-B inhibitors is felt for many days after:

L-Deprenyl (Selegeline) is an enzyme-activated irreversible inhibitor of monoamine oxidase B (MAO B; EC 1.4.3.4). It is used to treat Parkinson's disease at a dose of 5 mg twice a day. Since enzyme inhibition is irreversible, the recovery of functional enzyme activity after withdrawal from L-deprenyl requires the synthesis of new enzyme. We have measured a 40 day half-time for brain MAO B synthesis in Parkinson's disease and in normal subjects after withdrawal from L-deprenyl. This is the first measurement of the synthesis rate of a specific protein in the living human brain. L-Deprenyl is currently used by 50,000 patients with Parkinson's disease in the United States and its use is expected to increase with reports that it may be beneficial in Alzheimer's disease. The slow turnover of brain MAO B suggests that the current clinical dose of L-deprenyl may be excessive and that the clinical efficacy of reduced dosing should be evaluated. Such an evaluation may have mechanistic importance as well as an impact on reducing the side effects and the costs arising from excessive drug use.


If that is the case, that would mean that healthy people could get benefits from MAO-B inhibitors even if they would be taking them once per month.

There is no such study for sarmentosin from blackcurrants, but it seems to me that it lasts at least more than a single day.
 
It's hard to decide where to put this, but I think I might put it here since it follows the same current of research. I have been reading that certain beverages should be consumed hot, and I was wondering why. And it seems that it's true that for the best effect, some things should be consumed warm.

One woman noticed this about absorption of ibuprofen:

Q: Years ago, my doctor prescribed 800 milligrams of ibuprofen three times a day. I was waiting for spinal laminectomy surgery due to a herniated disk.

My stomach began to ache, and I was worried about developing an ulcer. This may sound crazy, but I noticed the GI irritation was always less when I took ibuprofen with hot coffee.

Is it possible that taking pills with a hot drink reduces damage to the GI tract and assists with dissolving and absorption? If I think of simple things such as washing dishes, it is harder and takes longer if the water is cold.

A: You raise a fascinating question that has not been well studied. Does beverage temperature impact drug absorption?

A small study of acetaminophen (Tylenol) demonstrated that a hot drink resulted in faster and greater drug absorption (Pharmaceutical Research, August 2014). Lab tests showed tablets disintegrated almost three times faster in warm liquids than in cool ones (European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aug. 1, 2020).


Here is that study:


And here is the experience with alcohol:

Many individuals who consume alcohol tend to attribute increased potency or effects to hot beverages. Although there are theoretical reasons that alcohol absorption rates might vary with the temperature of the drink, little information is available. Blood alcohol levels were measured by breath analysis in six normal healthy volunteers who randomly consumed hot or cold drinks containing approximately 0.4 grams of alcohol per kilogram of body weight. All subjects perceived the hot drink as being more potent, but there was no statistically significant difference in the blood alcohol levels.

 
I was thinking about the need of the presence of psychotherapist during the color therapy. If it is true that during the human communication, some kind of neurotransmitters are being released, and those neurotransmitters are important for the success of the color therapy, then that would potentially open some other options for the release of such neurotransmitters. One of such neurotransmitters, or neuromodulators, is noradrenaline.

Noradrenaline Modulates Visual Perception and Late Visually Evoked Activity

An identical sensory stimulus may or may not be incorporated into perceptual experience, depending on the behavioral and cognitive state of the organism. What determines whether a sensory stimulus will be perceived? While different behavioral and cognitive states may share a similar profile of electrophysiology, metabolism, and early sensory responses, neuromodulation is often different and therefore may constitute a key mechanism enabling perceptual awareness. Specifically, noradrenaline improves sensory responses, correlates with orienting toward behaviorally relevant stimuli, and is markedly reduced during sleep, while experience is largely “disconnected” from external events. Despite correlative evidence hinting at a relationship between noradrenaline and perception, causal evidence remains absent. Here, we pharmacologically down- and upregulated noradrenaline signaling in healthy volunteers using clonidine and reboxetine in double-blind placebo-controlled experiments, testing the effects on perceptual abilities and visually evoked electroencephalography (EEG) and fMRI responses. We found that detection sensitivity, discrimination accuracy, and subjective visibility change in accordance with noradrenaline (NE) levels, whereas decision bias (criterion) is not affected. Similarly, noradrenaline increases the consistency of EEG visually evoked potentials, while lower noradrenaline levels delay response components around 200 ms. Furthermore, blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) fMRI activations in high-order visual cortex selectively vary along with noradrenaline signaling. Taken together, these results point to noradrenaline as a key factor causally linking visual awareness to external world events.

Conclusions

NE signaling has been implicated in arousal, attention, emotion, decision making, and metacognitive function. Here, we provide evidence for a causal role of noradrenergic tone in basic sensory perception by modulating noradrenaline levels in healthy participants and examining the effects on visual perception and visually evoked activities. We find that although early stages of sensory processing remain largely intact with lower NE signaling—as is the case during sleep—NE presence is an essential causal factor that enables full-fledged processing at later stages associated with the emergence of conscious perception. Viewing perception as cortical “ignition”, NE might serve as “fuel” that facilitates the reverberatory “fire” of sensory activity.



The results of this work suggested that elevation of norepinephrine concentration during emotional arousal could lead to phosphorylation of GluR1, lowering the threshold for the experience-driven synaptic modifications and facilitating the formation of memories.

Norepinephrine application induced LTP when paired with a mild electrical stimulation, but not when it was applied alone. This indicates that synapses would undergo potentiation only if they are activated within a limited time window of emotional arousal associated with the surge of norepinephrine in the brain.

The release of NE in the hippocampus during emotionally-charged events could thus modulate the hippocampus-dependent forms of memory by controlling the induction of synaptic plasticity at corresponding synapses in hippocampal neuronal circuits.

It appears that the mechanisms by which the release of norepinephrine during emotional arousal affects memories most likely involve modulation of synaptic plasticity in corresponding neural circuits.

 
Social Drinking Activates Dopamine and Elevates Mood

Summary: New research reveals why alcohol makes people feel happier in social settings but not when drinking alone. Using fruit flies, scientists discovered that dopamine in the brain plays a key role in amplifying the euphoric effects of alcohol during social interactions.

The study highlights the D1 dopamine receptor’s involvement in alcohol’s impact on the brain, offering insights into vulnerability to Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD). This finding could pave the way for better understanding and treatment of AUD.

Key Facts:
  1. Social Drinking and Dopamine: Social settings enhance the euphoric effects of alcohol through increased dopamine activity, while solitary drinking results in a less significant mood boost.
  2. Fruit Fly Model: Fruit flies share 75% of genes with humans, making them an effective model for studying alcohol’s impact on behavior and brain activity.
  3. D1 Dopamine Receptor: The D1 receptor is a crucial component in the brain’s response to alcohol in social settings, potentially linked to Alcohol Use Disorder.
Grab a drink with friends at happy hour and you’re likely to feel chatty, friendly and upbeat. But grab a drink alone and you may experience feelings of depression. Researchers think they now know why this happens.

“Social settings influence how individuals react to alcohol, yet there is no mechanistic study on how and why this occurs,” said Kyung-An Han, Ph.D., a biologist at The University of Texas at El Paso who uses fruit flies to study alcoholism.

Now, Han and a team of UTEP faculty and students have taken a key step in understanding the neurobiological process behind social drinking and how it boosts feelings of euphoria.

Their new study, published in a recent issue of the journal Addiction Biology, pinpoints the region of the brain that is stimulated by social drinking and may lead to a better understanding of how humans become vulnerable to Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD), a disease that affected nearly 29.5 million people just this past year, according to the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.

Turns out that tipsy fruit flies aren’t that different from intoxicated humans. Although they might seem like an unconventional choice from which to derive knowledge about human behavior, these insects share about 75% of the same genes that cause human diseases, Han explained.

Using fruit flies, Han and her team sought to demonstrate that ethanol, the alcohol in drinks, causes different reactions in solitary versus group settings and that dopamine, the brain molecule that plays a role in pleasure, motivation and learning, is a key player for this phenomenon.

The team’s experiments consisted of exposing fruit flies, either alone or in a group setting, to ethanol vapor and measuring their average speed to determine the degree of ethanol-induced response. While flies who “drank alone” displayed a slight increase in movement, flies exposed to ethanol in a group setting displayed significantly increased speed and movement.

The team then proceeded to test whether dopamine plays a role in the flies’ response to ethanol, comparing a control group whose dopamine was naturally regulated by the brain with an experimental group that had increased levels of dopamine.

The team found that the flies, regardless of whether they had normal or increased levels of dopamine, had a similar reaction to ethanol in a solitary setting — a tiny increase in activity. But in social settings, the flies with increased dopamine showed even more heightened hyperactivity than usual.

“We demonstrated that both social settings and dopamine act together for the flies’ heightened response to ethanol,” said Han who currently serves as associate dean in the College of Science.

The team’s final task was to identify which of the five dopamine receptors in the brain is the largest contributor in this process and found that the D1 dopamine receptor was most important to flies’ reaction to ethanol in a social setting.

“The human D1 receptor gene is linked to Alcohol Use Disorder and this study provides experimental validation for it. For the team, the identification of the D1 receptor is crucial as it gives researchers at UTEP and beyond a blueprint for follow up studies,” Han explained.

Our work is providing scientific knowledge to support the idea that the brain interprets and processes a person’s social surrounding and has that signal converge into the dopamine system that is also activated by alcohol consumption,” said Paul Rafael Sabandal, Ph.D., a research assistant professor in biological sciences and one of the study’s corresponding authors.

“It gives us as researchers an idea of which brain area and components may serve as the meeting point for all the signals that contribute to AUD.”

The team’s next step is to explore the intricacies by which the D1 dopamine receptor serves as the nexus point for the signals that contribute to the ethanol, social interaction and AUD.

Han said, “The opportunity to work on projects whose positive impact can be applied at scale is one of the reasons I became a scientist. It’s humbling to know that our work has the potential to help people live better lives and our team is going to continue striving toward achieving that goal.”


This would explain a use of Gurdjieff's self-remembering as a neuromodulator of impressions. And since when we talk with somebody we use both attentions, an external attention towards a person who talks to us, and an internal attention that we use when we work on formulating our responses, perhaps self-remembering represents just a simple human conversation?

So, a social interaction is a neuromodulator, and impressions could be anything that affects our neurotransmitters. It could be some external substance, it could be some audio or visual stimuli... And when those two things converge, you get an increased effect on the brain.

Now, a social interaction could be connected directly to neurotransmitters, or it could be connected to brainwaves. I mentioned in one of my previous posts that in one study, it was discovered that how people react to some substance depends on their baseline brainwaves. And brainwaves are connected to our attention because we can modulate our brainwaves with our attention. This is something that modern scientists don't pay much attention because they just focus on neurotransmitters.
 
We found that the flies deficient in the D1 dopamine receptor dDA1/Dop1R1 are responsive to the ethanol's stimulant effect in both solitary and social settings but insensitive to the effect of social setting, pinpointing D1 receptor as a major receptor mediating the social context-sensitive stimulant effect of ethanol. We further identify that D1 receptor function is required for the synergistic interaction of social context and hyper dopamine on the ethanol's stimulant effect. D1 receptor has been shown important for social interactions in rodents and courtship motivation of male flies. This study underscores the critical role of D1 receptor in convergent processing of multiple salient information such as ethanol and social recognition.


D1 dopamine receptor is also connected to noradrenaline:

Noradrenaline activation of hippocampal dopamine D1 receptors promotes antidepressant effects

Significance

Dopamine receptors in the brain are important targets for the therapeutic treatment of psychiatric disorders. Dopamine receptors are generally thought to be activated by dopamine. In the present study, however, we reveal that noradrenaline can also robustly activate dopamine D1 receptors in the mouse hippocampus. Noradrenaline-activated D1 receptor signaling was highly sensitive to the neuronal activity and experience of mice. Chronic stress and voluntary exercise synergistically augmented noradrenaline–D1 receptor signaling. This augmented noradrenaline–D1 receptor signaling promoted the induction of hippocampal neuronal plasticity by an antidepressant drug acting on the noradrenergic system. Our results suggest that noradrenaline–D1 receptor signaling increases the efficacy of antidepressant treatment and therefore can be a unique therapeutic target for augmenting antidepressant medication.

Abstract

Dopamine D1 receptors (D1Rs) in the hippocampal dentate gyrus (DG) are essential for antidepressant effects. However, the midbrain dopaminergic neurons, the major source of dopamine in the brain, only sparsely project to DG, suggesting possible activation of DG D1Rs by endogenous substances other than dopamine. We have examined this possibility using electrophysiological and biochemical techniques and found robust activation of D1Rs in mouse DG neurons by noradrenaline. Noradrenaline at the micromolar range potentiated synaptic transmission at the DG output and increased the phosphorylation of protein kinase A substrates in DG via activation of D1Rs and β adrenergic receptors. Neuronal excitation preferentially enhanced noradrenaline-induced synaptic potentiation mediated by D1Rs with minor effects on β-receptor–dependent potentiation. Increased voluntary exercise by wheel running also enhanced noradrenaline-induced, D1R-mediated synaptic potentiation, suggesting a distinct functional role of the noradrenaline–D1R signaling. We then examined the role of this signaling in antidepressant effects using mice exposed to chronic restraint stress. In the stressed mice, an antidepressant acting on the noradrenergic system induced a mature-to-immature change in the DG neuron phenotype, a previously proposed cellular substrate for antidepressant action. This effect was evident only in mice subjected to wheel running and blocked by a D1R antagonist. These results suggest a critical role of noradrenaline-induced activation of D1Rs in antidepressant effects in DG. Experience-dependent regulation of noradrenaline–D1R signaling may determine responsiveness to antidepressant drugs in depressive disorders.

(...)

In the presence of intact noradrenaline uptake activity, low micromolar noradrenaline activated D1Rs at the MF synapse in mice subjected to wheel running (SI Appendix, Fig. S6A), but not in naive mice (Fig. 1I), suggesting a critical influence of experience on the sensitivity of D1Rs to noradrenaline.

(...)

Furthermore, chronic restraint stress may boost the activity-dependent up-regulation of the D1R signaling via corticosterone, resulting in the marked enhancement of the noradrenaline–D1R signaling by restraint stress combined with wheel running.

The central noradrenergic system has long been thought to be an important target of antidepressant drugs, although it is not precisely understood how the noradrenergic system is involved in the pathology of depression and antidepressant effects. Antidepressant drugs have been assumed to reverse dysfunction of monoaminergic systems caused by stress and/or other risk factors for depression. However, our finding implies that antidepressant drugs make use of stress-induced adaptive changes in the noradrenaline–D1R signaling to induce dematuration of GCs. Stress and antidepressant treatment can activate shared cellular responses that mediate resilience to stress. The noradrenaline–D1R signaling may play a role as stress resilience that facilitates the antidepressant efficacy in depressive disorders. Activation of D1Rs contributes to the effects of the serotonergic antidepressant fluoxetine in the DG, including GC dematuration and increased adult neurogenesis, another candidate cellular substrate for antidepressant action. Therefore, the noradrenaline–D1R signaling may be commonly involved in the effects of different classes of antidepressant drugs. Chronic corticosterone treatment that mimics chronic stress exposure augments D1R signaling at the MF synapse and concomitantly facilitates the induction of dematuration by fluoxetine.

Chronic corticosterone also facilitates the fluoxetine-induced increase of adult neurogenesis in the DG, and antidepressant drugs more consistently increase adult neurogenesis in stressed animals than in naive animals. These lines of evidence, including the present study, suggest that antidepressant drugs activate the process of adaptive neuronal plasticity that is initiated by chronic stress rather than simply reversing stress-induced alterations in the brain. Our present finding suggests that the enhancement of the noradrenaline–D1R signaling plays a pivotal role in linking stress with antidepressant-induced plasticity. The enhancement of the noradrenaline–D1R signaling by stress was conditional, requiring increased voluntary activity. This synergistic experience-dependent regulation of the noradrenaline–D1R signaling, possibly influenced by other unknown factors, may determine the antidepressant responsiveness, which suggests a unique target for therapeutic treatments of depressive disorders refractory to antidepressant medication.

 
I think I figured out the mystery of the romance novel reading that I talked about before. I think I know why my new position had such a strong effect on me. I think it's related to immersion in reading. With that new position, with the table lamp beside me, the light in the room is very low, while the light that reflects from the book is high, because I am close to the light source. And I think that this contrast helps my brain to better immerse into the book. Just like in the movie theater, where the screen is bright and the surrounding is darkened. Also, reading late at night helps me to better visualize what I am reading. The further away I am from awakening, the better I am at visualizing things, for some reason. And I noticed that the deeper I immerse into the book, the stronger effect it will have on my sleep.

So, a proper reading environment, and timing, could help you to better immerse into the book world.
 
Back
Top Bottom