New format...

I'm having problems like unable to access the home page, I've mentioned it all here:

http://www.cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=4665

I'm using firefox 2.0.0.1

Edit: I thought I'd try IE 7, didn't want to load the main page but after about 30-40 secs loaded ok, runs faster than on firefox
 
rs said:
Keit said:
It's not explorer (IE) friendly ;)
One could consider this a "feature" not a "bug"...

:O
I know..I know :) But it's still the most popular browser, and if the goal is to be accesible to many (and user friendly), this should be taken into account.
 
As far as the butterfly/wasp/bug... I think it's a bee collecting nectar.

From the Wave:
Laura said:
The word shaman, may be related to Sarman. According to John G. Bennett, Sarmoung or Sarman:

"The pronunciation is the same for either spelling and the word can be assigned to old Persian. It does, in fact, appear in some of the Pahlawi texts...The word can be interpreted in three ways. It is the word for bee, which has always been a symbol of those who collect the precious 'honey' of traditional wisdom and preserve it for further generations. A collection of legends, well known in Armenian and Syrian circles with the title of The Bees, was revised by Mar Salamon, a Nestorian Archimandrite in the thirteenth century. The Bees refers to a mysterious power transmitted from the time of Zoroaster and made manifest in the time of Christ."
I think Hedsel wrote of the esoteric symbology of the bee in The Zelator too, and I think it was pretty similar as the above - I can't quote cause I gave my copy away.
 
Well I don't know about all that, but I do consider the Bee or Wasp to be indicative of something somewhat STO for lack of a better word. Bees, Wasps and Hornets all fall into a similar category of matriarchal insects that has a certain personality profile that I identify with. For me, the Bee or Wasp is the ultimate warrior, peaceful when left alone, but attacks when disturbed.

Wasps tend to make many small nests, so I saw this as a species type of a non centralized network, they are social and hard working.

There is also the story once told to my by my Aikido sensei about bees. He always said that a good martial artist must be like a bee. He used the example of the bee to explain fearless commitment and how it affects others. A grown man, many many times the size of a bee or wasp, will flail and run in fear from this tiny insect, even knowing that though it's sting is painful, it is not fatal, for most. He will do this because he knows that the bee will sting him. He knows subconsciously that the bee or wasp knows that it will die to sting him, and that is terrifying. Anything that does not fear death frightens those who do.

Furthermore, there is the old Ali saying, Float like a butterfly, sting like a bee.

Then there is the saying that "The flapping of the wings of a butterfly in south america can cause a tornado in kansas" or some such.

Also, we always look at animals like dogs and cats but never insects as models for behaviour, I have attempted in my small way to correct this. As insects are inherently more moral and hard working. I also thought that the representation of the group was best symbolized by the joining of a wasp and a butterfly, that it symbolized philosophical and esoteric concepts of stinging, shocks, commitment, metamorphosis, collective behaviour and on and on and on.

I elected to use a wasp for several reasons, firstly it was more convient as I found better references for wasps that I did for bees. Secondly, I prefer wasps because they have a more aggressive and proactive disposition, and a more aggressive reputations. The three parts of the wasp are more clearly delineated, and lines would be less likely to be lost. The three sections of the wasp represent the motor, emotional, and intellectual separations more clearly.

It is at this point, we depart from what was originally in my mind when creating the logo. I have sense found many more deeper meanings behind the bee that were not consciously present during its creation, on a further note, I don't think it looks like a flying ant at all...Even if it did, it would keep alot of its symbology.
 
I see.

Thanks for your elaborations, atreides - much appreciated!



In terms of technical performance: ALL pages need hours to load, also on this forum.
 
Knowing how much work goes into the design of website, I hope this comment is taken in a positive way.

I have to say that the layout really makes it a lot harder to read than the former layout. There's "accroche oeils" everywhere, but not by design it seems. Frankly, it's hard to read. Maybe putting side borders to break the induced side-to-side flow (going to unrelated pieces on the side bars) of the horizontal lines would help.

My 2 cents worth.


Cheers and congrats on some cool work.

Addendum: I just noticed that the articles in the middle have a coloured background but they are faint. Increasing their contrast may alleviate the effect of the horizontal lines I mentioned above (and not need to use vertical borders).
 
Hi,

the new updates are very nice. I KNOW you most likely have more planned but just from the top of my head.

1.Integrate forum into the top bar. Take a look at http://joomla.sscontinuum.com/ as an example.

2.Integrate like forum the current archive page.

Anyhow, I really like the changes from 2003 to now. THIS is how I envisioned the site.
 
Hey Atreides,

Are you using a Rails CMS or Typo or was this all hammered out in-house? Can you spill some of them technical beans?
How would you feel about a rails-ified glossary? ;-)


Azur said:
I have to say that the layout really makes it a lot harder to read than the former layout. There's "accroche oeils" everywhere, but not by design it seems. Frankly, it's hard to read. Maybe putting side borders to break the induced side-to-side flow (going to unrelated pieces on the side bars) of the horizontal lines would help.
If you have registered and logged in on the website you can change the style sheet which will in turn change the look (click on settings in the navigation menu)

Under Css replace the section for #middle { ...} with the following to get the borders you would like:

#middle {
position: absolute;
left: 20%;
top: 38px;
width: 58%;
padding: 8px;
border-right: 1px solid;
border-left: 1px solid;
}

Press Edit to confirm the changes and you're done.

C'est genial!

If you really want to experiment, install the Firebug extension for Firefox.


Dominique.
 
Congratulations on the new layout for the Signs home page. Ive found it easy to use and so far bug free, I'm looking forward to any more changes and additions to the style and layout. It's handy to be able to personalise how many articles from each category show up on the main page, and encourages me to delve and read each story instead of skimming through like I sometimes used to do. Thanks for all the hard work.
 
atreides said:
Well I don't know about all that, but I do consider the Bee or Wasp to be indicative of something somewhat STO for lack of a better word.
While I was thinking that the esoteric symbology of the bee was being used on the page I didn't mean to imply the Signs were representing all the stuff in the quote, i.e. 'preserving wisdom for future generations, mysterious powers transmitted in the time of Zoraster and Christ' and all. Mostly I thought of it as finding high signal news out there as collecting nectar or truth.
 
domivr said:
Hey Atreides,

Are you using a Rails CMS or Typo or was this all hammered out in-house? Can you spill some of them technical beans?
How would you feel about a rails-ified glossary? ;-)
No, everything is customized and was built from the ground up using ruby and erb. I played with several plugins but found them lacking so everything was built and edited custom like. Even the voting system has been hacked. There are also some very cool features to the signs page that haven't been released yet, and a couple in the works, so look forward to awesome new features that are currently not used by any news sites.

On the topic of settings, those of you who have good CSS knowledge can now create themes for the signs page, v1 themes right now can only be CSS, however makers, once I flesh out a new working templating system, small code snippets might be included in themes to fundamentally change displays, that's iffy, but possible. For now, people can submit their CSS's to me or scott and we will check them out, if they are good, we will create a themes section that will allow registered users to change their themes with one click. Static images will also be available, such as the signs logo and menu bar, subscription image etc so that they can be changed to match themes. As soon as I fix that up, I will write a mini tut on where images etc will be stored.
 
domivr said:
Hey Atreides,

Are you using a Rails CMS or Typo or was this all hammered out in-house? Can you spill some of them technical beans?
How would you feel about a rails-ified glossary? ;-)


Azur said:
I have to say that the layout really makes it a lot harder to read than the former layout. There's "accroche oeils" everywhere, but not by design it seems. Frankly, it's hard to read. Maybe putting side borders to break the induced side-to-side flow (going to unrelated pieces on the side bars) of the horizontal lines would help.
If you have registered and logged in on the website you can change the style sheet which will in turn change the look (click on settings in the navigation menu)

Under Css replace the section for #middle { ...} with the following to get the borders you would like:

#middle {
position: absolute;
left: 20%;
top: 38px;
width: 58%;
padding: 8px;
border-right: 1px solid;
border-left: 1px solid;
}

Press Edit to confirm the changes and you're done.

C'est genial!

If you really want to experiment, install the Firebug extension for Firefox.


Dominique.
Super! Merci Dominique!
 
I just commented on an article http://signs-of-the-times.org/articles/show/125144-"Confessions+of+an+Economic+Hit+Man" but noticed a spelling mistake once I posted it (happens to me a lot) but I could not go back to "edit" the comment. I tried anyway, by going backwards in the browser and came indeed back to where I enter the comment. I fixed the mistake hit the key on the bottom-right and now there are two comments. One with and one without the spelling mistake. Hm.

Also, I must have entered my screen-name wrong when I signed up (Fifth way instead of Fifth Way). Again I noticed that right away but to late. There seems to be no way to edit your name once signed up.
 
What does the Article.evil? up and down heart arrows mean? I take it this is some kind of a rating system? Are we rating how interesting we find the article or how 'bad' the things it's writing about, is?
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom