New show: NewsReal with Joe & Niall

Eboard10 said:
True and this possibly goes back to the idea that objectives vary at different levels of the power structure, the lower levels not knowing the real intentions of the higher ups.
Click to expand...
Which brings to mind the now near forgotten 'drop dead' videos from Wuhan (clearly mostly if not all faked and baring no relation to what COVID actually did when it hit the West) that were synchronized between China and the UK and rolled out over social media with high saturation and success (terror porn). This may suggest some kind of 5th column coordination between UK intel and elements within China (e.g. Hong Kong?) that was not wholly at the behest of the CCP leadership....? The ongoing 'blame China' game and to some degree the Chinese having to sit back and take it with only minor diplomatic grumbles (on the basis its really meant for domestic consumption in the West), has all the hallmarks of the way in which Saudia Arabia has taken most of the pressure relieving flack for 9-11 whilst all along Israel was the real non-US culprit (though Saudi links are also in there). Each side, knowing the rules of the Game, has to play along - even within the Chinese hierarchy. We should always remember the Chinese CDC took a prominent role at Event 201. I have heard it suggested that the 201 refers to 2021 with the 0 in the middle relating to a unified and coordinated fully global activity....
 
I'm really curious about your 'WTH is going on in Afghanistan' as events there are progressing at lightning speed as we speak:
15 Aug, 2021 09:09
VIDEOS show Taliban fighters lounging in luxurious ex-home of US-backed warlord as pundits blame grift for collapse of Afghan army
15 Aug, 2021 15:53
Taliban ‘enter presidential palace’ in Kabul after Afghan president leaves country, say NO transitional government on the table
15 Aug, 2021 16:14
US Embassy warns Americans in Kabul to take shelter, says airport reportedly UNDER FIRE amid hasty evacuation of western missions
Priceless:
The evacuation took place under the protection of thousands of American troops, ordered in by President Joe Biden as the Taliban advanced faster than the US could get its staff out.
Click to expand...
:rotfl:
 
Last edited:
Gentlemen - a genius show (and I'm not just talking about Joe's shirt!)

Among so many insightful gems, this out of time indicator was my personal favorite. Priceless. And of course, Tony Blair was so committed to the peace process... as a true humanitarian... for the children's sake...


Untitledcon3.jpg

A muse...

If we take it that the cost benefit analysis has been done on the western population and we've all come out in the red column (as per Catherine Austin Fitts evaluation)...
If we take it that the theft of the public orientated purse over the last 25+ years is now complete and that the $25++++ trillion they have stolen is safely siphoned away - off planet, wherever - with the final asset grab taking place now before too late under the ironically revealing 'Going Direct' initiative...
Do we think it is possible that the once vital but now bloated US military has also gone through the same cost benefit analysis and that its time and usefulness is up a la game theory... ?
That actually we might be looking at a 1947-2021 closing event...
That actually its now perhaps perceived as being more of a threat as the lumbering, bloated, costly, Trump voting beast it is...
That it now needs taking down a 100 pegs or so - for what will a military of that size with no further purpose - be worth spending all that money on... if all the wars are over....?
Wasnt it the infamous Deagol.com that forecast a fall in US militray budget to $32 billion by 2025... along with a large reduction in population...
I suppose they might be kept occupied floating and posturing up and down the China seas ad infinitum (still cannot imagine a scenario in which such a conflict goes live. In no ones best interest)...
Maybe 'capture' and use Australia as a single grand last base... once the COVID mob there have cleansed it of all its Australians...
But could the mass vaccination push on the combined forces be a short way of obtaining a reduction in that cost benefit analysis...?
Just musing...

In Clown World we've reached a stage where absolutely nothing would surprise me.

Great shows guys, thank you for the sanity... and the shirt!
 
Joe said:
yes!
Click to expand...
Placing my order for 6 now please! I have a few zombies in my life that could do with... a good cup of tea...

Another great show guys, thank you both and production team (so slick looking!!)

I've been saying for a while how much of 'reality' is now identical to the 1976 Sidney Lumet satire Network that its no longer funny. That CNN interview with ISIS straight out of 'terrorist of the week' - she even looks like Faye Dunaway! Thinks like Faye Dunaway's character...


Have to wonder if the system isn't weighing up the pros and cons of at some point terminating Biden's contract live on TV at the hands of an anti-vaxxer. Make great ratings and kill many birds with one stone...


terrifying when something as crazy as that now sounds completely logical within the current paradigm of non stop fantasy becomes reality...

On the 13 Us Marines, apart from the symbolic value - when added to the evidence for shots from above - would it be logical to conclude that special forces did the shooting (having 'replaced' normal watchtower contingent) and that the Marines had to been 'removed' as collateral damage witnesses. Obviously needed inclusion though for the narrative back home. Whatever, beyond sickening.

Lastly the 100,000 that the Brits alone have rushed out in their compassionate brilliance of course perfect cover for ISIS cells to pop up everywhere around 9/11 - perfect cover... in our urgent need for compassion we had no way of knowing or finding these embedded cells in such a large number... it was such a humanitarian emergency...

You just get the feeling that every 'story' in the narrative feeds into the next and the S show just keeps on rolling, rolling...
 
Michael B-C said:
On the 13 Us Marines, apart from the symbolic value - when added to the evidence for shots from above - would it be logical to conclude that special forces did the shooting (having 'replaced' normal watchtower contingent) and that the Marines had to been 'removed' as collateral damage witnesses. Obviously needed inclusion though for the narrative back home. Whatever, beyond sickening.
Click to expand...

Possibly, but not necessary to replace all normal watchtower contingent. Bombings that target and kill soldiers often lead to their surviving comrades opening fire at anything and everything. This 'normal' process could have been helped along by some of the replaced watchtower Marines getting the shooting going, or keeping it going.
 
Someone who sees all knows exactly what this 'humanitarian' action is really about...

Vladimir Putin says he’s not allowing Afghan refugees into Russia

August 22, 2021 2:10pm

Russian President Vladimir Putin said Sunday his country won’t accept Afghan refugees because he doesn’t want to deal with “militants” masquerading as asylum-seekers.

The Russian strongman slammed Western nations for placing Afghan refugees in countries even near his border while their US and European visas are being processed.

“Does that mean that they can be sent without visas to those countries, to our neighbors, while they themselves don’t want to take them without visas?” Putin raged to the Russian TASS news agency. “Why is there such a humiliating approach to solving the problem?’

He said he will not accept “militants showing up here under cover of refugees.”
...

Russian officials have not joined in the effort to evacuate thousands of desperate Afghans at Kabul airport seeking to flee the country.

Rather, the Kremlin has praised the Taliban for “restoring order” to Afghanistan.

“We are seeing the statements the Talibs made about ceasing combat actions, an amnesty for all of those involved in the confrontation, about a need for a nationwide dialogue,” Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said. “They are being implemented.”
Click to expand...
 
Thanks for the show guys! Your discussion brought to mind something I've read on Orlov's blog a few years back about a strategy that the imperial powers use when they are about to get booted out from a country that they have been exploiting, he calls it "Poison all the wells", and I think that this is not too far off when it comes to latest US/PTB actions and attempts in Afghanistan. Here's how he decribes it:

Much more specifically, their playbook always called for a certain strategem to be executed whenever their plans to dominate and exploit any given country finally fail. On their way out, they do what they can to compromise and weaken the entity they leave behind, by inflicting a permanently oozing and festering political wound. “Poison all the wells” is the last thing on their pre-departure checklist.

• When the British got tossed out of their American Colonies, they did all they could, using a combination of import preferences and British “soft power,” to bolster the plantation economy of the American South, helping set it up as a sort of anti-United States, and the eventual result was the American Civil War.

• When the British got tossed out of Ireland, they set up Belfast as a sort of anti-Ireland, with much blood shed as a result.

• When the British got tossed out of the Middle East, they set up the State of Israel, then the US made it into its own protectorate, and it has been poisoning regional politics ever since. (Thanks to Kristina for pointing this out in the comments.)

• When the British got tossed out of India, they set up Pakistan, as a sort of anti-India, precipitating a nasty hot war, followed by a frozen conflict over Kashmir.

• When the US lost China to the Communists, they evacuated the Nationalists to Taiwan, and set it up as a sort of anti-China, and even gave it China's seat at the United Nations.

The goal is always the same: if they can't have the run of the place, they make sure that nobody else can either, by setting up a conflict scenario that nobody there can ever hope to resolve. And so if you see Anglo-imperialists going out of their way and spending lots of money to poison the political well somewhere in the world, you can be sure that they are on their way out. Simply put, they don't spend lots of money to set up intractable problems for themselves to solve—it's always done for the benefit of others.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom