nature
Dagobah Resident
Good for the animal? Are you serious?? Before these substances act, the animal suffers. Do you know what suffering is? Especially when the harm is deliberately provocked?Well, I also thought about this more, and I think that this would actually be good even for the animals. Because the goal would be to produce these substances which, among other things, reduce the pain. Well, if we trigger the production of those substances before the animals get killed, then at the time of animal's death she would not feel much pain.
Rapists say same thing: they say that the girl (or boy) didn't suffer, and even was consentant. Some use this immobility as a dishonest excuse, but some others really believe it, as the vistim was immobile (no other choice when beating is impossible). This doesn't prevent suffering in the immediate moment and long-term psychic harm.
Yes, the DCM loves all its creatures. Intelligent Design had so well conceived the Nature's fonctionning; easing suffering with endorphins' secretion, in the kingdom of carnivores eating herbivores. But you can't apply this to your right to cause pain. Because:And I think that we can also see this in nature. I remember seeing documentary where lion was eating some animal. I was wondering how come the animal doesn't produce any sounds while she was being eaten. And the narrator said that she doesn't feel any pain because her body releases some kind of opioids. Well, adrenaline could be one of those substances. It is known that humans can sustain many injuries as long they have a surge of adrenaline in their bodies. But once they "cool off", the pain hits them. Something similar could be happening in animals.
- The animal has no other means to eat. You, yes.
- The animal is 2 nd density, you are 3rd density. You have more consciousness. The cat has no enough consciousness when the mouse dies after he played with it.
- You have a brain that animals don't have: STO oriented humans can find respecful means before taking animals' life. Example: As you used to watched at animal documentaries, you maybe also saw forest people in Amazonia or Africa hunting by throwing anesthetic/poisonned arrow. That way, they are respectful towards the nourrishing animal. At the contrary, some people perform sacrifices on young victims in a state of wakefulness in order to create suffering before eating their organs and meat, for their own benefit. Like you'd like to do.
Is an animal's life less valuable than a human's one?