Nick Fuentes, from troll king to... leader of a true 'America First' movement?

[John Michael James]

Milo is. This child, here, Nick ... whatever his name may be, is a self-proclaimed involuntary-celibate.

....

There is no such thing. You are either voluntarily celibate or happily married ... or you are sexually frustrated, or unhappily married, or still dating, or still too-young to date. A person basically needs to figure out what they want, and then go find it. That is a basic lesson that children need to learn as they mature into adulthood. An involuntary circumstance yielding a voluntary complacency should be a red flag for anyone.

What you see there, is a product of fame, fortune, and aspiration + agenda, mixed into the broth that is an unformed mind, an undisciplined personality, and a 3rd Density STS soul-body complex that somehow got "lucky" in life. Somehow he leads popular opinion, but that should be easily discerned as widespread brain-rot, from top ... to bottom. You see, his current activities would not be tolerable under the totalitarian regimes of either political system that he mentioned. He forgets his lot in life, and he needs to check his privilege.

I’m not a fan of either of them. Milo’s gaydar might be his greatest use. I’m more commenting on the destructive nature to man that accompanies many of the hidden homosexuals that seem to be in prominent positions of power. Bohemian grove types, actors to presidents. Barbara Bush, Kissinger’s “wife”, Obama, Tech bros, Will Smith’s and his son, Diddy, etc. Milo comments on the destructive nature of homosexual acts, he is just waking up from that, so I’m not saying he isn’t damaged as he mentions himself it came from “trauma”.
Nick shtick is saying bombastic things, his “privilege” is built on that. Is he gay? I think so, probably. I’m not saying all gay is bad, just commenting a pattern of gay men in power with a knack for sorcery and corralling the masses.

 

[Arlind]

I would say that this blindspot will be his undoing, but I remind myself that he's still only 26 years old and probably just doesn't understand the ways of the world, no matter how gifted an orator he is.

Yes, he is fixated on/ paranoid about the petty stuff and misses the obvious ie. being played. Also, he seems poor at judging character. His undoing seems to be coming from that very blind spot you state (allowing himslef to be groomed) and then fuelled by what seems to me his other weaknesses: bloated self-importance, dumb ethnocentricity and the easy leveraging of his emotional responses.

Ironically, his current rants incl. last one as a response to IC's video (continuing to bash the ppl that really are his allies if he only had eyes to see) reminds me of Jordan Peterson's veiled meltdown on him. Using the same supposedly intellectually-superior tactics
Dude needs to be humbled, desperately, and it probably is coming. Life always has a way.

Btw, both Charlie Kirk and Ian Carroll are good examples of young, highly intelligent yet humble. From early on. Let's hope Fuentes is not inclined in the Cicero 'gifted orator' direction..

Is he gay?

Judging by the cringe way he enunciated/ answered with "bros before hoes" to that tool he recently did the interview for, I would say he is very gay.

 

[Moine]

I’m not saying all gay is bad, just commenting a pattern of gay men in power with a knack for sorcery and corralling the masses.

Milo would be better in commenting not on the act, if any, itself, but on the urge to commit the act. In English criminal law, there are two elements involved. One is the act itself; the other is the mental inclination, or mental preference ... or even the mental urge, to commit the act in the first place. #1 by itself does not meet a legal definition of a crime, and thenceforth a pathology that needs to be corrected. Both need to be evidenced, and Milo is just gobbling up the red herring that is presented to himself, via his imagination and recollection of his own questionable behavior.

He should be asking.... Why do we engage in such behaviors in the first place?

Thereon he would find a nice rabbit hole to crawl into.

The circumstances of said people being in said positions, to be suitable for selection via a king-maker, is just happenstance imo. If you were born into a family like that, you'd probably be forced into the role whether you'd like it or not.

The real issue behind these menageries of associations, is who's putting stuff into your ear, or into your mind? Who's crawling around your social milieu, who's not in the public eye of examination? The types who do stuff like that, unbeknownst to the figureheads, really do not want to be noticed, since they cannot handle the psychic pressure, if it were the case. Ricardo posted a video on such an "governmental aide" telepathically whispering words into an elected officials mouth, on the Strange videos thread. It's like one of those things that you don't know what you're looking for, but once you spot it, you know exactly what it is. Sorcery, per your usage.

This term of sorcery is also prominent in the "reformed" and elucidated treatises in my signature below, from James Pryse. The "old" Christians .... apparently hated these under-grounders as well.

That's where everyone's problems are, partly.

 

[gottathink]

He should be asking.... Why do we engage in such behaviors in the first place?

He does ask this. Why are you gay? Is the exact question Tucker Carlson and Milo Yiannopoulas discuss. Milo did not want to be gay, and possessed by the demon that controlled him, anymore and he had to figure himself out. He even had a name for this demon. He goes into detail about his history and thd shaping of his sexuality.

 

[Cosmos]

Recap: Fuentes had a conversation with Tucker in person now as well as a dinner, and again he stabs him in the back afterwards in similar ways he did it with Candace. And likely projecting big time, probably really believing the BS he is making up in his own mind.

More signs for me that Fuentes is pathological and apparently is either unable and/or unwilling to change that:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1996863265557881292

 

[Cosmos]

Unless Fuentes changes, I‘m thinking that he might be the sort of character that real Psychopaths can and would use in order to create a new “Hitler“ or “Stalin“ by playing on his paranoia and thinking errors.

 

[Andrian]

Recap: Fuentes had a conversation with Tucker in person now as well as a dinner, and again he stabs him in the back afterwards in similar ways he did it with Candace. And likely projecting big time, probably really believing the BS he is making up in his own mind.

More signs for me that Fuentes is pathological and apparently is either unable and/or unwilling to change that:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1996863265557881292

I have the same feeling about this guy. I'm not judging from a high horse, almost everybody in this reality has some issues to deal with due to their lessons/learning path, many of us will fall and rise over and over and over again from our programs, trials and errors (myself in primis), but, what is truly important is taking up responsibility of your own life and actions.

Acknowledging your own limitations and weaknesses and working on them step by step is what it matters the most. I'm not seeing it in this case. He's being driven by a schizoidal paranoid thinking that "induces" him to attack others aggressively without any discernment whatsoever. This kind of behavior is a perfect medium through which to be used by hyperdimensional STS forces, easy.

 

[Niall]

Yes, he is fixated on/ paranoid about the petty stuff and misses the obvious ie. being played. Also, he seems poor at judging character. His undoing seems to be coming from that very blind spot you state (allowing himslef to be groomed) and then fuelled by what seems to me his other weaknesses: bloated self-importance, dumb ethnocentricity and the easy leveraging of his emotional responses.

Ironically, his current rants incl. last one as a response to IC's video (continuing to bash the ppl that really are his allies if he only had eyes to see) reminds me of Jordan Peterson's veiled meltdown on him. Using the same supposedly intellectually-superior tactics
Dude needs to be humbled, desperately, and it probably is coming. Life always has a way.

Btw, both Charlie Kirk and Ian Carroll are good examples of young, highly intelligent yet humble. From early on. Let's hope Fuentes is not inclined in the Cicero 'gifted orator' direction..




Judging by the cringe way he enunciated/ answered with "bros before hoes" to that tool he recently did the interview for, I would say he is very gay.

His response to Carroll:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1997177853214183589

What Ian was doing during those 4 days is the same thing most others were doing: tracking Kirk's recent trajectory and coming to the same conclusion: "Israel." Also, someone who needs "irrefutable proof" to grok state assassinations (in which there is never any, of course) is someone psychologically incapable of handling their implications - one of which is the requirement for humility when such events bring us face to face with any delusions of grandeur we may harbor. And Fuentes has no intention of letting go of such any time soon.

 

[Niall]

Recap: Fuentes had a conversation with Tucker in person now as well as a dinner, and again he stabs him in the back afterwards in similar ways he did it with Candace. And likely projecting big time, probably really believing the BS he is making up in his own mind.

More signs for me that Fuentes is pathological and apparently is either unable and/or unwilling to change that:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1996863265557881292

Fascinating. He's not been able to overcome his paranoia about Carlson. That's the second count on which he's allied with the feds/deep staters/Israel-firsters. Fuentes' inability to 'get a read' on Carlson is interesting, and can probably tell us something about his psychological type.

 

[Ricardo]

fwiw , not easy to give any trust on whatever Mr. Tucker states and does , given his background , but C´s comments on his high strangeness episode not long ago does allay some credence to him and his "intentions" , Nick is losing the plot for sure , accepting official narrative of CK´s murder is beyond silly at this point however , deflecting and ad hominem attacks is all he did on his response to Ian Carrol , guess he is more unbalanced then it would appear on surface.

 

[Niall]

Fuentes on sex:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1903816615512215605

People are saying this aberrant attitude towards relationships likely means he's closet gay. I think it's more like he sees himself as a warrior-monk for whom sex must be 'sublimated' in order to 'achieve the highest good'. Otherwise, sex for him is "purely utilitarian," for propagation of the species, which is decidedly not what its primary purpose is, as Laura's been explaining recently. He may fall under Cleckley's Caricature of Love as one who 'hates women'. He's certainly afraid of them, or strongly resents them.