Jeremy F Kreuz
Dagobah Resident
Nikolai Starikov – WHO SET UP HITLER AGAINST STALIN
He has written many books, most only available in Russian, in general questioning the general accepted version of history or current affairs.
The central thesis of ‘who set up hitler up against Stallin’ is that powers in the UK/US have been grooming Hitler from the beginning to create a formidable aggressive force to attack Russia. Hitler was scouted from very early on by a german-american agent, Hanfstaengel, and made into the man he became. Starikov even indicates that Mein Kampf would if not written by, be inspired to a large extent by conversations of Haenfstangel. He was financed from the beginning by the UK/US and brought to power in Germany. The reason for this was that the Bolshevik Revolution, set up by the English to destroy Tsarist Russia went bad after Lenin did not follow the original plan. It was then decided that the Soviet needed to be destroyed as well, preferably by the Germans, in order to guarantee continued empire of the British. Once Hitler was brought to power, he was allowed to expand the German territory, relaunch the industry and armament, all in preparation of an assault on the Sovietunion. All went to plan, until march 1938, when Hitler refused to annex a part of from Tchechoslovakia, which would brought Germany in direct border contact with the Sovietunion. As with Lenin, it seems that the trained mad dog of the British was barking against is master.
Suddenly, overnight Hitler became the monster that needed to be stopped and pressure started to force him to attack Russia. Things when completely wrong when Germany and the Sovietunion signed a non aggression pact. Polen was used as a bait for Hitler to force his hand. War was declared when Hitler invaded Poland, but a strange non war continued for more than 8 months while pressure was continued on Hitler to attack Russia. As with Poland, France was abandoned and sacrified bythe British, and when Hess went to London to negotiate peace between Londen and Berlin but got a definitive no, Hitler finally attacked the Sovier Union.
A second part of the book appears to be in the making, covering the Great Fatherland war of the Soviet Union and the aftermath of it.
With the info available in this forum, the recommended books and SoTT, the explanations of Starikov make absolute sense. Many of the often not convincing explanations of mainstream, western scholars on the WW2 for apperent illogical decisions and evolutions make much more sense when adapting the central thesis of Starikov – Hitler and Germany were used to attack Russia.
mbol
What I also found interesting it that it is very likely that a similar strategy is adapted in the current war in Ukraine. Once again the UK/US are attacking Russia, but once again they do not do the real fighting and are setting up/pushing others to engage in the battle. Ukraine seems like Poland, France, Austria, Tchechoslovakia to be sacrificed for pushing others to start the fight. Ukraine is somehow a bit supported; but not fully, it seems to be used as bait for a bigger fight. In that light, this book of Starikov helped me better to understand what is been repeated again in current events.
It also could explain why Putin is called Hitler by several politicians in the West. Beyond comparing the both on the level of monstrosity, it could also be an indication that Putin like Hitler is betraying the West and its plans. Several leaders have been compared with Hitler and it seems it was always when they turned against the West. The use of the name Hitler seems to become a symbol of betrayal.
Other books that seem to explore a indentical thesis as Starikov are ‘Conjuring Hitler: How Britain and America Made the Third Reich’ from Guido Preparata and ‘Wall street and the rise of Hitler’ by Antony Sutton.
On a negative note: the book is badly translated with many grammatical and spelling mistakes.
He has written many books, most only available in Russian, in general questioning the general accepted version of history or current affairs.
The central thesis of ‘who set up hitler up against Stallin’ is that powers in the UK/US have been grooming Hitler from the beginning to create a formidable aggressive force to attack Russia. Hitler was scouted from very early on by a german-american agent, Hanfstaengel, and made into the man he became. Starikov even indicates that Mein Kampf would if not written by, be inspired to a large extent by conversations of Haenfstangel. He was financed from the beginning by the UK/US and brought to power in Germany. The reason for this was that the Bolshevik Revolution, set up by the English to destroy Tsarist Russia went bad after Lenin did not follow the original plan. It was then decided that the Soviet needed to be destroyed as well, preferably by the Germans, in order to guarantee continued empire of the British. Once Hitler was brought to power, he was allowed to expand the German territory, relaunch the industry and armament, all in preparation of an assault on the Sovietunion. All went to plan, until march 1938, when Hitler refused to annex a part of from Tchechoslovakia, which would brought Germany in direct border contact with the Sovietunion. As with Lenin, it seems that the trained mad dog of the British was barking against is master.
Suddenly, overnight Hitler became the monster that needed to be stopped and pressure started to force him to attack Russia. Things when completely wrong when Germany and the Sovietunion signed a non aggression pact. Polen was used as a bait for Hitler to force his hand. War was declared when Hitler invaded Poland, but a strange non war continued for more than 8 months while pressure was continued on Hitler to attack Russia. As with Poland, France was abandoned and sacrified bythe British, and when Hess went to London to negotiate peace between Londen and Berlin but got a definitive no, Hitler finally attacked the Sovier Union.
A second part of the book appears to be in the making, covering the Great Fatherland war of the Soviet Union and the aftermath of it.
With the info available in this forum, the recommended books and SoTT, the explanations of Starikov make absolute sense. Many of the often not convincing explanations of mainstream, western scholars on the WW2 for apperent illogical decisions and evolutions make much more sense when adapting the central thesis of Starikov – Hitler and Germany were used to attack Russia.
mbol
What I also found interesting it that it is very likely that a similar strategy is adapted in the current war in Ukraine. Once again the UK/US are attacking Russia, but once again they do not do the real fighting and are setting up/pushing others to engage in the battle. Ukraine seems like Poland, France, Austria, Tchechoslovakia to be sacrificed for pushing others to start the fight. Ukraine is somehow a bit supported; but not fully, it seems to be used as bait for a bigger fight. In that light, this book of Starikov helped me better to understand what is been repeated again in current events.
It also could explain why Putin is called Hitler by several politicians in the West. Beyond comparing the both on the level of monstrosity, it could also be an indication that Putin like Hitler is betraying the West and its plans. Several leaders have been compared with Hitler and it seems it was always when they turned against the West. The use of the name Hitler seems to become a symbol of betrayal.
Other books that seem to explore a indentical thesis as Starikov are ‘Conjuring Hitler: How Britain and America Made the Third Reich’ from Guido Preparata and ‘Wall street and the rise of Hitler’ by Antony Sutton.
On a negative note: the book is badly translated with many grammatical and spelling mistakes.
