I’ve been trying to find out more about the Phrygian cap and instead of continuing in the Mithraism thread, I moved here. I find it strange that a 2000+ year old cap that featured prominently on the head of Mithras would seemingly go dormant, make a resurgence in the 11/12 centuries apparently being worn by European commoners, and then pop up in the American and French Revolutions as the Liberty cap. Why? Where did it get its association with liberty?
The Phrygian cap wiki says:
In late Republican Rome, a soft felt cap called the pileus served as a symbol of freemen (i.e. non-slaves), and was symbolically given to slaves upon manumission, thereby granting them not only their personal liberty, but also libertas – freedom as citizens, with the right to vote (if male). Following the assassination of Julius Caesar in 44 BC, Brutus and his co-conspirators instrumentalized this symbolism of the pileus to signify the end of Caesar's dictatorship and a return to the (Roman) republican system.
These Roman associations of the pileus with liberty and republicanism were carried forward to the 18th century, until when the pileus was confused with the Phrygian cap, then becoming a symbol of those values.
The murder of Caesar brought chaos. Wouldn’t the pileus then be the ‘cap of chaos’? So, did the Phrygian cap have a meaning before it became ‘confused’?
The Phrygian cap has a pretty specific shape. The forward-projecting ‘point’ is of a medium-ish length and does not stand vertical nor rest on the top-front of the head which leads me to assume that it is made out of a material that is structurally strong enough (like felt) to hold its shape- lighter fabric would ‘flop’- or there is a structure under the fabric. So I started out by trying to separate what was and what was not a Phrygian cap. Limiting my search to coins, I found a huge array of headwear. For instance:
This type of headwear is generally referred to as a ‘satrapal headdress’. I’m drawing a hard line by saying none of these are related to the Phrygian cap, but that doesn’t mean there couldn’t be a general influence.
As a note, I ran into some caps misslabled as
Kyrbasia or
Bashlyk, when these two styles are quite distinctive from the ones pictured above and also seem to be worn mostly by kings.
The problem with these depictions is that they all look ‘solid’. There is no colour and I sometimes can’t tell if it’s a hard or soft material. But I
read something that helped add possible clarity.
“The Sakâ tigrakhaudâ ("Sacae with pointed hats") were defeated in 520/519 BCE by the Persian king Darius I the Great, who gave this tribe a new leader. … Herodotus calls the Sakâ tigrakhaudâ the Orthocorybantians ("pointed hat men"), and informs us that they lived in the same tax district as the Medes. … The pointed hat is a kind of turban.”
The turban is one piece of cloth that’s wrapped around the head. Some of the satrapal headdresses look like they might be wrapped. As well, this 8th century Tang dynasty clay figurine at the Museum of Oriental Art in Turin is of a probable Zoroastrian priest from the
Sogdian people. He is also shown wearing a veil- that appears to cover his head as well with two pieces of fabric(?) resting on his forehead- apparently to prevent breath and saliva from contaminating the holy fire.
IMO, this headpiece looks like it’s wrapped and could be closer in style to the turban. If this is the case, could the knob be hair wrapped in cloth like the turban?
As a sidenote, in 1675, French revolutionaries wore a cap known as the bonnets rouges. While it did not look like the later Phrygian cap version, a knot of ribbons formed in the shape of a circle (looking like a flower or radiating star), known as a cockade, was pinned or sewn to the side of the cap. This feels very similar to the Suebian knot. To distinguish Germanic Suebi freemen from slaves, the freemen would tie their hair in an elaborate knot at the side of their head above the temple as evidenced from the Osterby Head bog body. The idea of a ‘knot of hair’ makes me think of the hair ‘bun’ and turban.
So, on coins, if the ‘satraple headdress’ was being worn by political type people, who was wearing the Phrygian cap?
My tally for the Phrygian Cap on coins. The numbers before the names are from
CoinArchives. The numbers in brackets after the name are from
RPC.
1- The Adoration of the Magi (0)
1- Aeneas (0)
0- Ascanius (1)
3- Athena (6) (Athena isn’t depicted wearing the cap)
4- Attis (0)
1- Artemis/Bendis (8)
3- Dido or Tanit (0)
0- Ganymede (14)
27- Mên (195)
5- Midas (6)
7- Misc. (?)
4- Mithras (16)
1- Paris (2)
11- Perseus (2)
The list is of all gods (minus the Adoration of the Magi). I could not find a single human being wearing this cap, so labeled. There are a few exceptions, but mostly they’re in a generalized way with the ‘captive’ representing a people or a country. I started to think that, maybe, who wears what headdress might be a way of distinguishing what is and is not a Phrygian cap: humans wear ‘satrapal headdresses’, gods wear Phrygian caps.
But in the list there is one deity that really stands out. Who the heck is
Mên?
Mên is an Anatolian lunar god that has ties to the Zoroastrian god Mah/Mao, Sin, and Selene/Mene, who his counterpart and from whom his name is derived. He is easily recognized by the crescent moon at his back with the two tips rising like horns from behind his shoulders. He also appears to wear the Phrygian cap exclusively. The Lydian version of him was known as Meis. He was not a Roman god, the pine tree was sacred to him (usually shown holding a pinecone/egg) , and was very closely associated with Cybele, although Mên does not appear to be from Phrygia. It looks as if the original cult, whatever it was, was hellenised first then Romanised, then destroyed.
The dating of the ‘cult of Mên’ flourished between 2nd c. BC- 2nd c. AD though it is suggested that it may have started as early as the 4th c. BC (in Lydia?) and continued, generally, until 4th-5th c. AD. From the considerable and mounting number of inscriptions found from the handful of sites uncovered, he’s just a god that people would address their day-to-day human problems to though there appears to be evidence of animal sacrifice.
Now, a really nice feature from RPC is that they map the coins that are found. I decided to see what the dispersion was for Attis, Mithras and Mên, with Cybele for comparison. I found the results a bit surprising expecting more for Attis and Mithras.
It might be a bit hard to read so the number of cities where coins were found featuring Attis only number 2, Mithras- 5, Mên- 76, Cybele- 115. The vast majority of the Mên coins date from the 1st- 4th century. It was a pretty serious cult in its time.
The cult was brought to an area by individual people. The name of the founder of each individual sanctuary is added behind the name Mên. This tells you who founded it and where it’s located. Only a few are known currently.
Meis/Mên Tiamou- founded by (the Persian?) Tiamou near Maionia in Lydia (possibly c. mid-4th century BCE, which could make this the earliest attestation in Anatolia)
Meis/Mên Artemidorou Axiottenos- founded by
Artemidorou (?) at Axiottenos (Axiotta), near Kollyda (Gölde), Lydia (to be
specific, it’s at Mağazadamları, ~5km NW of Hamidiye just south of the Hermos river, Lydia) (c. 2nd century BCE) A total of 74 inscriptions have been found in the surrounding area.
Mên Pharnakou- founded by Pharnakes I at Ameria near
Cabria, Pontus (c. 2nd century BCE).
Strabo 12.3.31: (A different translation found
here.)
She has also the temple of Mên surnamed of Pharnaces, at Ameria, a village city, inhabited by a large body of sacred menials, and having annexed to it a sacred territory, the produce of which is always enjoyed by the priest. The kings held this temple in such exceeding veneration, that this was the Royal oath, ‘by the fortune of the king, and by Mēn of Pharnaces.’ This is also the temple of the moon, like that among the Albani, and those in Phrygia, namely the temple of Mēn in a place of the same name, the temple of Ascæus at Antioch in Pisidia, and another in the territory of Antioch.
Strabo was born in Amaseia in Pontus around 64 BCE which is not very far to the northwest of Ameria. He would have lived during the existence of Mên Pharnakou.
Mên Askaenos- located near
Antioch of Pisidia (c. 2nd century BCE). The sanctuary of Mên Askaenos, on a hill known as Kara Kuyu (Black Well), ~3.5 km SE of Antioch of Pisidia, is the most well documented to date. See this
excellent site for photos, survey plans and reconstructions of both Antioch and Kara Kuyu from the Kelsey expadition.
Apple map showing the locations of Antioch of Pisidia and the site of Mên Askaenos.
Strabo 12.8.14:
The Paroreia has a mountainous ridge extending from east to west. Below it on either side stretches a large plain, cities are situated near the ridge, on the north side, Philome lium, on the south Antiocheia, surnamed Near Pisidia. The former lies entirely in the plain, the other is on a hill, and occupied by a Roman colony. This was founded by the Magnetes, who live near the Mæander. The Romans liberated them from the dominion of the kings, when they delivered up the rest of Asia within the Taurus to Eumenes. In this place was established a priesthood of Men Arcæus, having attached to it a multitude of sacred attendants, and tracts of sacred territory. It was abolished after the death of Amyntas by those who were sent to settle the succession to his kingdom.
From pp.6-8 of the book
Pisidian Antioch, The Site and its Monuments, by Stephen Mitchell and Marc Waelkens (1998):
The original settlers of Antioch came from Magnesia on the Maeander.(23) …
However, the nearby sanctuary of Mên Askaênos certainly dates back to the second century BC. Indeed there are points of comparison between the ground plans of the two temples at the Mên sanctuary and those of Artemis Leucophryene and Zeus Sosipolis at Magnesia, which could be the result of direct Magnesian inspiration or influence (see pp. 66-7 below). Strabo tells us that before the time of Augustus there was a priesthood of Men Askaeus at Pisidian Antioch, and that it controlled a large number of sacred slaves and sacred lands. (29) There are many well known parallels for such temple organizations. Cappadocian Comana was ruled by a priest, second in rank to the king of Cappadocia. The temple of Enyo or Ma at that place owned an extensive territory and six thousand slaves.(30) At Venasa the temple of Zeus was also endowed with fertile territory and three thousand slaves, and administered by a priest, who held office for life.(31) At Pontic Comana Pompeius appointed his own nominee as high-priest, adding new territory to the sacred land that already existed; here too the temple slaves numbered six thousand. At Zela there was an important temple of the Persian goddess Anaitis, with sacred slaves inhabiting the territory, governed by a priest, (33) and at Cabria the sacred land and slaves belonged to the same god, Men, as was worshipped at Antioch.(34) Closer to Antioch on the western confines of Galatia was Pessinus, which was also originally governed by the priests of the mother goddess.
However, it would be mistaken to press too far the parallel between the temple at Antioch and the temple-states of central and eastern Anatolia. Sacred slaves and sacred lands were a feature of Greek as well as of oriental temple organisation, and there is no reason to believe that a priestly state existed alongside and in competition with the Greek polis at Antioch. In the hellenised environment of hellenistic and Roman Pisidia the city at Kaynar Kale, west of lake Kestel (probably the ancient Codrula), had a temple of Pluto and Kore with numerous sacred slaves attached to it, some of which had been dedicated to temple service by Roman colonists from nearby Comama.(36) In addition, as will be seen, the actual remains of the sanctuary at Antioch are Greek in character and provide no architectural evidence for an ‘eastern’ or ‘Anitolian’ cult. It is an interesting paradox that the remains of the sanctuary, dedicated to an Anatolian god, provide the clearest evidence for the hellinised culture of the Seleucid settlement.
In 25 BC, at the same time as Roman annexed most of central Asia Minor to create the province of Galatia, Antioch was refounded as a Roman colony, Colonia Caesares Antiochia, and it received a new settlement of Roman veterans, drawn from the legions V and VII.(37) Although no legionary camp has been located, epigraphic evidence suggests that the seventh legion may have been stationed as a garrison force in the vicinity of Antioch for most of the reign of Augustus before it was transferred to the Balkans around AD 7.(38)
I’ve kept a little extra in that passage but the main point I’m focusing on here is about the sacred slaves. It’s just an idea, but I wondered if the Phrygian cap might have been worn by the priests or the 100’s/1000’s(?) of slaves and/or followers of Mên? I have no evidence for this though.
What was the fate of the Mên Askaenos sanctuary at Kara Kuyu, Antioch? While one gets the impression that Mitchell didn’t really think all that highly of Ramsay, on p.85 he writes:
However, on one point Ramsay was decisive and with good reason. He argued strongly that the sanctuary, particularly the temple and its immediate surroundings, had been deliberately destroyed in antiquity by Christians. ‘The intention of the Christians who wrecked it was to leave it a howling wilderness into which no man could enter. The entrance was deliberately blocked up, and almost all the votive stelae which were erected in great numbers in the open space of the sanctuary were broken in pieces with he intention of deliberate wreckage. In one case, at least, parts of the same stele were found remote from one another, inside and outside the sanctuary.’ ‘Not a scrap of the temple above the stylobate was found, except two or three blocks of the lowest course. The stones (marble?) were carried away.’ (68) [John George Clark] Anderson had made the same point: ‘In the hour of their final triumph the Christians entered in to destroy the holy place, and they left it a desolate ruin. Only the more massive monuments survived their revel of destruction and many even of these were smashed to fragments, while the lighter stones, slabs, tablets, statues, and the like were dashed to pieces and flung broadcast over the sacred enclosure.’ (69) As will be clear from the early part of this chapter Ramsay’s and Anderson’s archaeological observations should be treated with extreme reserve, but here they surely hit the mark. Delapidation and earthquake damage would account for the collapse but not for the dispersal or disappearance of the temple superstructure. A large and thriving community on the same or at a nearby site might take away the cut stone for its own building needs. But substantial public buildings on a remote mountain top, inaccessible to wheeled traffic in antiquity and up until the very recent past, ought to have been immune from wholesale stone robbing. Blocks from the cella walls, including much of the socle moulding, were reused in the construction of the church, and, if that is correctly dated to the later fourth or fifth centuries, it provides a solid terminus ante quem for the destruction of the temple. As for the remaining elements, the entablature, the columns and their capitals, and the decorative order from the surrounding temenose- all the features which would have helped visitors to identify these hellenistic buildings for what they were- we must follow Ramsay’s view that they were smashed and perhaps buried by the Christians, in one of the more startling testimonies to the conflict between paganism and the Christianity in late Roman Asia minor.
Mên Kamareites-
Nysa on the Maeander in Lydia.
Mên Karou- (‘the Caria Mên’) ~13 miles west of
Laodicea on the Lycus, Caria. Known for its apparently renowned medical school. (2nd c. BCE (or earlier?))
Strabo 12.8.20:
Between Laodiceia and Carura is a temple of Mén Carus, which is held in great veneration. In our time there was a large
Herophilian school of medicine under the direction of Zeuxis, and afterwards of Alexander Philalethes, as in the time of our ancestors there was, at Smyrna, a school of the disciples of Erasistratus under the conduct of Hicesius, At present there is nothing of this kind.
This medical school at Mên Karou brought up an
article which mentioned a ‘Phrygian stone’.
"One of the principles of medicine at that time was that compound diseases required compound medicines. One of the compounds used for strengthening the ears was made from the spice nard (spikenard? an aromatic plant). Galen says that it was originally made only in Laodicea, although by the second century A.D. it was made in other places also. Galen also described a medicine for the eyes made of Phrygian stone. Aristotle spoke of it as a Phrygian powder. Ramsay tries to explain what kind of medicine it was by saying it was not an ointment but a cylindrical collyrium that could be powdered and then spread on the part affected. The term used by John in Revelation is the same that Galen uses to describe the preparation of the Phrygian stone. Would not these medicinal concoctions be a reason why John cautions the Laodiceans to buy 'ointment for your eyes so that you may see' (Revelation 3:18)?" (Blake and Edmonds, Biblical Sites in Turkey, p. 140).
The principal deity worshipped in Laodicea was the Phrygian god Men Karou, the Carian Men. In connection with this god's temple there grew up a famous school of medicine, which followed the teachings of Herophilus (330-250 B.C.) who began administering compound mixtures to his patients on the principle that compound diseases require compound medicines." (Otto F.A. Meinardus, St. John of Patmos, p. 125).
Here is
Rev. 3:14-18 for comparison:
To the Church in Laodicea
(14) “To the angel of the church in Laodicea write:
These are the words of the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the ruler of God’s creation. (15) I know your deeds, that you are neither cold nor hot. I wish you were either one or the other (16) So, because you are lukewarm—neither hot nor cold—I am about to spit you out of my mouth. (17) You say, ‘I am rich; I have acquired wealth and do not need a thing.’ But you do not realize that you are wretched, pitiful, poor, blind and naked. (18) I counsel you to buy from me gold refined in the fire, so you can become rich; and white clothes to wear, so you can cover your shameful nakedness; and salve to put on your eyes, so you can see."
After looking around, this stone is apparently pumice that when ground up into a powder has an astringent quality. However, and I might be completely off here, when I read about the Phrygian stone, ‘gold refined in the fire’, ‘ointment for the eyes’, ‘strengthening the ears’ (made me think of Proverbs 20:12)… it started to sound like a ‘Philosophers’ Stone’ thing. I think I also remember reading that the Rev. passage was about choosing one’s alignment and being the best at that alignment instead of being 'lukewarm'. I'm not suggesting that this was being taught at the temples of Mên.
There is also the other ‘Phrygian stone’ that was a meteorite located at the Temple of Cybele in Pessinus, Phrygia before it was taken to Rome in 203 BCE.
One of the oldest coins depicting Mên is a c. 25-50 BCE semi-autonomous coin from Antioch, Pisidia. On the reverse side is a humped bull. The next oldest is a c. 69-79 AD semi-autonomous coin from Nysa, Lydia.
The bull is interesting because in my coin searches, I was running into the bucranium in association with Mên. So I had another look (first number WildWinds, number in brackets RPC):
28- Antioch, Pisidia (115)
1- Esbus, Arabia (22)
1- Julia/Iulia, Phrygia (3)
5- Nysa, Lydia (9)
0- Sillyum, Pamphylia (7)
There were other cities that had this combination but I didn't bother listing them since nothing compared to Antioch. When I did a search for ’Phrygian cap’ + ‘bucranium’, I could not find a single coin without Mên.
Here is the reverse side of a
coin from 238-244 AD, Antioch, Pisidia.
Mên standing facing, head to right and left foot on bucranium, holding scepter in his right hand and Nike on globe in his left, resting left arm on column; at feet to left, rooster standing left, head right.
There is an
older coin dated 193-211 AD from Antioch where the reverse side depicts the same image only the ‘cippus’ (column, Kore?) has a snake wrapped around it.
On the ForumAncientCoins, a
writeup of Mên on coins was made.
Mên (MHN) was the male Anatolean moon god. His name is corresponding to the masculine form of Selene (MHNH). In Hellenistic times his cult spread out from Phrygia over Lydia, Pisidia and the whole Asia Minor to Attica and Athens. Here he was under the name
TYRANNOC the god of the slaves, and like in Asia Minor ruler of the city and owner of the land, often together with the local MHTHR. Numerous inscriptions with law character show Mên with various, not always explicable, epitheta. Mên is depicted occasionally riding on a horse, but mostly standing in Phrygian clothing with spear or scepter, crescent with horns and cock, stepping on the head of a bull, as on this coin. As syncretistic deity he soon was
melted with Attis,
Sabazios, Zeus Dolichenos and Mithras. Finally he was the god of heaven (MEGAS MHN OYRANIOC) and ruler of the underworld (MHN KATACHTHONIOC), yes, even the one and only god (EIC THEOC). In Antiochia was a great sanctuary of Mên.
When it comes to ‘TYRANNOC, the god of slaves’, I have no idea where this is coming from. I can’t find any god specifically for slaves let alone a god named Tyrranoc οr Τυρρανοψ, although I’ve run into this name sporadically without any further clarification. Many, if not all, sanctuaries and temples had many slaves, servants, etc, so that might be what this is being referred to (even though I don’t know how the term ‘slave’ is being used. Could it be even more encompassing like, perhaps, everyone being ‘bound to earthly existence’?). Otherwise, the only info I have been able to find is a definition from
Wiktionary:
τύραννος
Ancient Greek
Etymology
Perhaps a borrowing of a Lydian word for “king” or a similar word in another language of Asia Minor.
Compare Hittite [script needed] (šarawanaš), [script needed] (tarawanaš), Philistine 𐤈𐤓𐤍 (ṭrn, “lord, ruler”), and Etruscan 𐌕𐌖𐌓𐌏𐌍 (turon, “mistress, lady”), a surname of Venus, which is probably related.
[Robert S. P.] Beekes argued for a Pre-Greek origin.
Pronunciation
IPA: /tý.ran.nos/ → /ˈty.ran.nos/ → /ˈti.ra.nos/
Noun
τῠ́ρᾰννος • (túrannos) m or f (genitive τῠρᾰ́ννου); second declension
1. absolute ruler (i.e. of gods, kings), initially applied to Lydian king Γύγης (Gúgēs)
2. (with negative connotation) tyrant, dictator, despot
If ‘TYRANNOC’ is being used as a name, rather than a description or title, than the only deity that I can find that might be related is
Taranis, a Celtic thunder god. But I’m not sure about this.
I didn’t want to turn this into a ‘Mên’ post, so lastly, here are the oldest coins showing the Phrygian Cap:
Corinthia, Corinth- c. 375-400 BCE; Pegasos flying left on front. On reverse, Athena wearing Corinthian helmet looking left with Phrygian cap behind. (
Link)
Kingdom of Macedon- c. 301-310 BCE; On front, head of Herakles wearing lion-skin headdress. On reverse, Zeus Aëtophoros seated to left, holding eagle, sceptre; AΛEΞANΔPOY to right, monogram in left field, male head facing left, wearing Phrygian cap, below throne. (
Link)
Phaloria, Thessaly- c. 225-275 BCE; Apollo facing right on front. Bendis on reverse wearing short chiton, hunting boots and Phrygian cap, seated left on a rock, holding arrow in her right hand, spear in her left, and with bow and quiver over her shoulder. (
Link)
Astypalaia, an Island off Caria- c. 1st-2nd centuries BCE; Perseus wearing a Phrygian cap. (
Link)
Eumenia, Phrygia- c. 1-133 BCE; On the front is the bust of Mên looking right. On the reverse is an eight-pointed star with the letters ‘E-Y-M-E-N-E-Ω-N’ between the rays. (
Denizli Museum 8863) The cap looks like it has bumps, almost like scales, all over it. This could be the earliest depiction of Mên on a coin. Another copy of this coin carries the same wide date of c. 1st-2nd centuries BCE. (
Link)
When trying to find where Eumenia was, I ran into this curious
bit of info.
EUMENEIA (Εὐμένεια: Eth. Εὐμενεύς: Ishékle), a town of Phrygia, situated on the river Glaucus, on the road from Dorylaeum to Apameia. ... It is said to have received its name from Attalus II, who named the town after his brother and predecessor, Eumenes II. ... On some coins found there we read Εὐμενέων Ἀχαίων [Eumenes of Achaea], which seems to allude to the destruction of Corinth, at which troops of Attalus were present.
Corinth was completely destroyed in 146 BCE by the Romans. ”When he entered the city, Lucius Mummius killed all the men and sold the women and children into slavery before burning the city, for which he was given the cognomen Achaicus as the conqueror of the Achaean League.” I found an
example of the coin dated c. 244-249 AD dipicting Apollo-Mên riding a horse carrying a double-axe. I find it odd that this suggested connection between Eumenia and Corinth would be on a coin ~390 years after the event. A current town named Isikli appears to be where Eumeneia was.
Just my thoughts of what else the Phrygian cap looks like:
-a mushroom (eg: the psychoactive
Liberty Cap)
-a bell