PETER BOUDREAU aka “Ken Adachi” of educate-yourself.org

Re: Ken Adachi of educate-yourself.org

[quote author=Possibility of Being]
[quote author=Guardian]
A VERY interesting blog that's been removed, but is still available in google's cache.

“General Jeremiah” update: just WHOIS “Ken Adachi” – Peter Boudreau?
[/quote]

For the reference here is a link to google cache.

That's what "labvirus" (Alex S.) says on his new blog about his WordPress blog's disappearance:
_http://labviruscom.blogspot.com/2011/08/former-website-was-shut-down-due-to.html

The former website was abruptly shut down by Wordpress after false allegations of "copyright infringement" and being given no chance to challenge the false claims

Thanks to the false allegations of copyright violation, "gangstalking" and other ridiculous claims from Lenny "Horrorwitch" and "Scary Pain" - who are squirming from the embarrassment of my most recent video production - to the host company of my Wordpress account, the Wordpress folks have arbitrarily decided to censor my voice and suspend my account and all the years of research collected at the site. [...]

Followed by links leading back to Ken Adachi and Barbara Hartwell.

A heads up: this Alex S. guy is a fan of dutchsinse and Jay Weidner:

_http://labviruscom.blogspot.com/2011/06/instead-of-chemtrail-brand-x-today-its.html
Instead of chemtrail brand X, today it’s chemtrail brand Y

...Add this to the research of dutchsinse whose videos Ive been regularly posting and who shows a local radiation reading of 55 CPM, things things to me add up to trouble.


_http://labviruscom.blogspot.com/2011/03/jay-weidner-322-secret-societies.html

Jay Weidner: 322 - Secret Societies, Depopulation and the Health Care Plan

[thanks for visiting; be sure to click on the "labvirus.com" logo above to view the most recent posts. comments from Dr. A. True Ott PhD follow as they were emailed to me along with this article of Jay Weidner.]
I have been researching and questioning this “coincidence” as well. Not only is Weidner right on point with his writing, there is much more that he has overlooked–March 22 is the “first day” of the Satanic calendar. [...]
[/quote]
 
Re: Ken Adachi of educate-yourself.org

[quote author=Guardian]
Yeah, I saw a lot of links to Weidner and Bridges. Unfortunately, it looks like Barbara Hartwell is a few french fries short of a full Happy Meal too. :rolleyes:

It looks like Boudreau (who's from Connecticut) founded the "Survival Community Network" in 1998 and attracted all kinds of SERIOUS nutcases into the Y2K hoax. He merged the SCN with a Y2K group that belonged to a guy named "Bruce Beach" then they created a matchmaking site that attracted some seriously warped individuals.

Boudreau then tries to divorce himself from the whole mess after 9/11, including some DANGEROUS survival types and starts accepting donations in the name "K Adachi" which may actually be his Japanese girlfriend.

Since he was kind enough to post his Social Security number on his own website, I've harvested a TON of data that I haven't had a chance to go through yet. There's a wealth of info on this guy, sex scams, pyramid schemes, etc. in my dumps, and I'll get to them as soon as I can.

GAWD ...so many pervs, so little time :mad:

It doesn't help that I'm a LOT better at harvesting than I am at writing. Spotting the patterns is one thing, and trying to explain them to other people is quite another. :-[
[/quote]
 
Re: Ken Adachi of educate-yourself.org

[quote author=Guardian]
Well, well, well, look whose site has been suspended :shock:


_http://educate-yourself.org/cgi-sys/suspendedpage.cgi

Visitors, we are sorry, however, this site is experiencing difficulties at this time. Please return later.

Webmaster, please contact us by email at support@lunarpages.com or via Lunarpages Helpdesk at http://support.lunarpages.com. Thank you for choosing Lunarpages (http://www.lunarpages.com).

2010 © Lunarpages Web Hosting
[/quote]
 
Re: Ken Adachi of educate-yourself.org

And then, a post from Ark analyzing all this nonsense from another thread, but one that is accessible to members:

ark said:
"These people really don't like what Laura is learning, or that she's actually getting important information out there. "

I don't think that this is why they do what they do. They don't like many things and yet they spend their time and energy on spamming the net with BS and nonsense with one definite target.

There are probably several factors involved here.

1) Laura is a woman and men often like to attack women. It gives them more sadistic pleasure.
2) Certainly some aspect of COINTELPRO is involved.
3) Some attackers are simply stupid. For instance they attack Laura for extensive quoting and referencing other researchers. This is completely stupid. These people probably never read any scientific publications and they will never care to read. Research is always being based on the previous research, done by other people before. Some scientists did not bother to quote the sources - Einstein was one such well known a case.
4) Those who are not stupid and yet criticize Laura for the same, they do so because they probably (rightly) think that many of the readers are stupid - this is the well known Goebbels method. If a lie is repeated often enough, it will be accepted as a truth and repeated further.
5) The attackers do not care about the truth at all. They have their goal and any means to achieve this goal is good for them. That is hard to explain without 2)
6) Part of the deal is simply jealousy. The attackers are simply jealous. They are not creative and Laura is. The only thing they know is how to destroy.
7) Part of the strory may be their brain damage. That explains part of their activities - though not all.
8) Evidently they have a doctrine, a theory and a plan. At least some of them - see 2). Part of this plan is simply to engage, so that little time would be left for anything truly creative. So when someone engages in the dispute - that alone makes them happy. They know that most of the people take the view that when someone says A and someone else sayz Z, then the truth is somewhere in between. This is a stupid assumption, but many people follow stupid assumptions. The truth is rather where the real research is, not where opinions are exchanged. But most people do not care.
9) Once i a while they try to attack me - with most idiotic accusations. Which confirms 2) and 7).

So what to do? What is the best defense against brainless idiots and agents? I think there is one simple solution - expand, be more creative and more productive. The attack may serve as wonderful boosts for being even more productive!!! And this is, I think, the best method for everyone in every case under every circumstance.

Also humor helps. But taking attacks with humor is only good provided all details are being taken into account and provided humor is just an addition to a real and hard and productive work.
 
Re: Ken Adachi of educate-yourself.org

As someone who was pursued by the scientologists for around a decade I know what a 'cult' is, and Laura's community is, quite simply, not a cult.

I read Colleen Johnson's 'article' and by the second paragraph intended to show, by giving examples, how she uses a tabloid style of writing that twists truth to delivers lies and non-facts. But by the end of the article I had seen so many lies and non-facts, and so much deception that I would have needed to write a small book to cover it all.

So I'll just say to anyone who worries about the authenticity of Laura Knight-Jadczyk, her work, and this community - do the research, but do it in this forum and by reading her books. There is zero risk to that. If on the other hand you fall for the disinformation and lies then you will miss out on something which is, quite frankly, wonderful.
 
Holy hell!
This bloke has certainly been busy dealing out his brand of fallacy.
Please note, Laura and all others who posted. My bringing this up was simply something I uncovered when doing my own research, offending or challenging any one or their beliefs was the furthest thing from my mind.

Thank you all for putting my mind at ease.
 
When I hear that someone is a "cult leader", considering the propoganda machine workings, I'm inclined to think now - well this person might just have something worth looking into. The real cult leaders are certainly found in greater supply where they are accepted and promoted - politicians, media personalities, rock stars, religious leaders etc. etc.

I was curious how "normal" society fits some standard characteristics of a cult. By "normal" I'm meaning the rather clear boundaries of "normal" outlined to us from mainstream media for example. I found this checklist _http://www.csj.org/infoserv_cult101/checklis.htm and by just replacing words like "leader" with something like "accepted public figureheads" that applies more to a larger context, the mainstream cult-ure ticks all the boxes.
 
Re: Another angle of attack? We are not a cult.

Hi Infernal, I see that you still have not posted an introductory post in the Newbies thread. It would be nice if you would do so. See below for link.

Nienna said:
Hi Infernal,

I see that you have not yet introduced yourself here on the forum. We suggest that all new forum members tell us a little bit about themselves and how they found the forum in an introduction post in the Newbies section. Nothing personal needs to be said.

If you are unsure of what to write, take a look at other posts there to get an idea.
 
Hi Nienna,
Please forgive my delay in making my "newbies" post, it is on my to do list, I am currently testing the waters in the forum whilest formulating what I want to say to introduce myself. So my introduction is coming, just please be patient with me.
 
Infernal said:
Hi Nienna,
Please forgive my delay in making my "newbies" post, it is on my to do list, I am currently testing the waters in the forum whilest formulating what I want to say to introduce myself. So my introduction is coming, just please be patient with me.

Testing the waters ... whilst formulating your introduction? Chill out, Infernal. Seriously - it's safe here :)
 
The Strawman said:
Infernal said:
Hi Nienna,
Please forgive my delay in making my "newbies" post, it is on my to do list, I am currently testing the waters in the forum whilest formulating what I want to say to introduce myself. So my introduction is coming, just please be patient with me.

Testing the waters ... whilst formulating your introduction? Chill out, Infernal. Seriously - it's safe here :)

Goodness, it's just an introduction, nothing personal need be said. But, whenever you are ready is fine.
 
The Strawman said:
Testing the waters ... whilst formulating your introduction? Chill out, Infernal. Seriously - it's safe here :)

Don't worry strawman, I'm well aware I'm safe. My time is limited, due to two beautiful children, a social life and terminal illness.
As for my introduction, I don't want to simply put mindless rival down, if I am to introduce myself I'd rather put down the essence of who I am, where I've been, what I've done, where I'm at and where I'm going.
But thanks for the input. :-)
 
Infernal said:
The Strawman said:
Testing the waters ... whilst formulating your introduction? Chill out, Infernal. Seriously - it's safe here :)

Don't worry strawman, I'm well aware I'm safe. My time is limited, due to two beautiful children, a social life and terminal illness.
As for my introduction, I don't want to simply put mindless rival down, if I am to introduce myself I'd rather put down the essence of who I am, where I've been, what I've done, where I'm at and where I'm going.
But thanks for the input. :-)

I understand, Infernal. There's a wealth of information here that you might be able to consult in terms of the terminal illness you mentioned.
 
Back
Top Bottom