meta-agnostic said:The response of members of the crowd in that video sure did look creepy, and Seaman does seem to have some problems in the way he conducts himself based on my very recent and limited knowledge of him, but calling out who is and is not a valid researcher seems like an entire mine-filled topic in itself. The way this forum has "COINTELPRO" and "New Age COINTELPRO" sub-boards, seems like "Pizzagate COINTELPRO" could be at least a thread of its own if this forum were to attract a bunch of Pizzagaters. I just started to become aware of this infighting while trying to follow the protest yesterday and it is messy to say the least, and of course not unexpected. No doubt there is some level of Pizzagate COINTELPRO and it runs deep. Maybe the best thing to do for now is focus on the merits of the data that the individual researchers present, while not so much attacking them personally but still making a note of such things if a 'file' on them ever does need to be opened. Sort of like we do here with Alex Jones, or Noam Chomsky for that matter.
meta-agnostic,
I think there may be something a bit off about Seaman too. I forced myself to watch a David Wilcock video to kind of see what he's been up to and was surprised that he mentioned the Ra material's Law of One book. Then in part 2 he talks about Seaman who he says he tried to bring up to speed with the alien agenda. There is a technical presentation glitch just after Wilcock mentions pedophile arrests are coming and before he talks about Seaman. It sounds fishy to me that he would talk to David Wilcock.
Here's a clip of the video where he talks about David Seaman: