The principle of competence forms the basis for the selection process in a wide variety of fields. It is widely accepted to the point of second nature by most today, especially in high-stakes fields. No one wants an untrained neurosurgeon; they want the best, if possible, which in today’s world often means the most educated and qualified, with a lot of experience and a proven track record. A recent failure of this principle was in the news last year: the issuing of commercial driver’s licenses to unqualified immigrants, leading to several fatal road accidents in the U.S. But one area where its implementation is often explicitly verboten is democratic politics.
This is where Lobaczewski’s fundamental criticism of universal suffrage comes into play. Competence should play a role both in the selection of elites as well as that of the electorate. In a logocracy, therefore, voting is restricted to those citizens able to pass exams on a range of subjects (e.g., economics, psychology, national history, economic geography, law), effectively disqualifying about 10-20% of the population from the possibility of voting in most western countries, either due to low intelligence or lack of interest. Candidates for higher offices would require more advanced preparation. The logocratic ideal is for competence to guide all aspects of social life, with each individual finding work in a field and in a position suited to their aptitudes and degree of education.