pope francis rape/child sacrifice article taken down on sott.net - was it fishy?

[othree]

i saw the article today on sott.net at the url

"http://www.sott.net/article/277847-Witnesses-testify-that-Pope-Francis-raped-them-while-participating-in-child-sacrifice-rituals"

it did sound too good to be true - was it a hoax? or why has it been taken down? does anyone know?

 

[Joe]

Was from a rather suspect source to say the least.

google "Kevin Annett"

 

[Approaching Infinity]

i saw the article today on sott.net at the url

"http://www.sott.net/article/277847-Witnesses-testify-that-Pope-Francis-raped-them-while-participating-in-child-sacrifice-rituals"

it did sound too good to be true - was it a hoax? or why has it been taken down? does anyone know?

It was fishy. For one, it is based on a single source (Kevin Annett), with no corroborating evidence. Unless some more information is forthcoming, I'd say take the article with a grain of salt.

 

[Kisito]

For me it is strange. It is the only Pope to be attacked finances of the Vatican and the Mafia. The abbot Pierre said that it was a pious and modest man. Moreover he criticizes all the bishops and the cardinals on their financial expenditure. Perhaps that one tries to destabilize it!

 

[Yozilla]

For me it is strange. It is the only Pope to be attacked finances of the Vatican and the Mafia. The abbot Pierre said that it was a pious and modest man. Moreover he criticizes all the bishops and the cardinals on their financial expenditure. Perhaps that one tries to destabilize it!

Me thinks it's all veneer. Hounds are barkin' while caravans just passing by... But i agree that some anti-vatican agenda is unfolding...

 

[Corvus]

Me thinks it's all veneer. Hounds are barkin' while caravans just passing by... But i agree that some anti-vatican agenda is unfolding...

Think it is no coincidence after all pedophile scandals that here is a new "hope". Maybe he is honest but maybe it is by design. Maybe those in Vatican wanted someone like that and he is uncoscious that he is a pawn in their game, but there was a while ago article on sott about his involvment with junta in Argentine were he testified against preists at state court who were helping people and probably were more open to some socialist ideas in that way. On the other hand if he is really honest and more then they bargained for it would not be first time the pope died in "strange" circumstances like John Paul I. About black rituals it is nothing new but think those popes do not have to be even conscious about that and directly involved. Jesuit order and Opus dei are on the other hand probably deeply involved. I remember on college one student had seminar about Opus dei and and totally fell for their mask about charity, etc... but she mentioned there were cases of their members suddenly dying in strange circumstances like cesna accidents, etc..., but brushed it as normal accidents but it was typical intelligence agencies method of assasination.

 

[psychegram]

I'm honestly not sure what to make of Annett. I've been aware of his work for some time, and of the (numerous, and often vitriolic) criticisms against him. It's often said that he's an opportunist, feeding off of the real-life misery of the Native Canadian residential schools ... but from what I can tell, he doesn't make a lot of money from this, and having discussed him with some First Nations friends I met from Idle No More, they certainly don't feel hostile towards him, and are indeed grateful that he's brought so much attention to an issue the Canadian government and people would frankly be quite happy remained dead and buried (so to speak). He basically threw away his career with the Church in order to pursue this line of inquiry, which doesn't sound to me like the actions of a man acting in bad faith.

I also recall, the last time I googled him, coming across a number of frankly defamatory blog posts written by one Greg Renouf of 'genuinewitty', a disturbed individual who some friends of mine had direct experience with. Renouf attached himself to Occupy Toronto and proceeded to do his best to sow dissent and chaos in every way he could, including bringing legal action against activists on the most ridiculous grounds. Opinion was divided as to whether he was crazy or a spook; either way, he was ultimately banned outright from more or less every activist gathering in the city. Renouf also seems to have made it a personal mission to hound Annett on the internet. That this vicious man has gone after Annett with such gusto made me instantly more sympathetic to Annett.

Now at the same time, Annett's claims - e.g. to be indicting everyone from the Queen of England to the Pope to the U.S. President - are clearly way over the top. His ITCCS has no enforcement power and no legal standing. It seems to me that he's accurately perceived the demonic nature of the global power elite, but has perhaps been driven a bit off the deep end, seeming to have picked up something of a messiah complex, along the lines of 'well if no one else will do it I have to do it all myself'. Since this is clearly impossible, he comes off as an insane clown to the majority of the population, and any truth to the charges he lays (and I expect many of them to be true ... say what you will, he does gather quite a bit of eyewitness testimony) are discredited by the grandiosity of his pretensions to influence. I feel like this might be a case of 'David Icke Syndrome': driven so fast on the truth train that he went off the rails.

 

[rymw]

Just like to add a hodge-podge of somewhat interesting trivia gleaned from googling the net on and off that do seem to point to the current state of affairs/rumours and trends or whatnot in the pontifficate:
-St Malachy prophesied 112 popes, the last being 'Peter Romanus', which we all have been told is realized through Cardinal Bergoglio who took on the papal name of St Francis of Assisi who was originally christened Francesco di Pietro (hence Peter) di Bernardone, plus both the saint and the current pope were descended from Italy (sic, Rome).
-Some sources claim St Malachy only prophesied 111 popes which means Cardinal Ratzinger aka Pope Benedict should rightly be the last and his prophecy of this pope as Glory of the Olives too apparently came true as St Benedict was an Olivetan. So the 112 papal prophecy was apparently added after St Malachy died and the damnest bit is that when you realize most of the other papal prophecies carried such stimulating phrases as Angelic Shepard, Pastor and Mariner, Religion Laid Waste, and etc, Peter Romanus does sound like hey that's like what you would call the guy next door, get what I mean?
-Rumour has it that Francis is being steered by Benedict who continues to reside in the vatican while Francis lives in a nunnery in Rome. Francis apparently leads a singularly unlavish life with no throng of servs, aides nor pomp to carpet his every step day in, day out.

Coincidental? Or has the vatican been inventing history according to St Malachy's prophecies (plus adding to it after his death, and it were if so that's one helluva visionary Roman Catholic church!)? Is Francis really being strung and wound up by Benedict to act out a show? Or is Francis venting his frustration for being duped into puppet-dom by mouthing off Bishops, washing the feet of women and the invalid during Easter, which is no-no? Be really interesting to see what all this leads to seeing as St Malachy's prophecies for the last days was destruction of Rome and the Dreadful Judge will judge after the last pope...but who?

 

[gdpetti]

One simple fact is that this new Pope didn't take a stand against the dictatorship in his country back in the day... to protect his own priests... the little we hear of it is denial. Do you really need to hear more? Seems he's been vetted beforehand or he wouldn't be where he is today. He's not an accidental tourist like Jimmy Carter, who was still surrounded by the usual suspects. This new pope reminds me of Obama after Bush Jr.'s reign of power/terror... he made a better PR tool... for a while anyway. Look at the usual PR games he's playing.... looks like the usual puppet show to elict the usual edict of 'give the guy a chance'... seems the same pattern, just in a new suit... like Obama, and how much has changed? Anything? Seems the script is playing out, no matter which actors are up on stage under the lights.

 

[Possibility of Being]

Me thinks it's all veneer. Hounds are barkin' while caravans just passing by... But i agree that some anti-vatican agenda is unfolding...

This is funny in a way, but given that nothing in politics happens without a reason, perhaps another sign that something bigger is in the air:

_http://vaticaninsider.lastampa.it/en/world-news/detail/articolo/ortodossi-ortodoxa-orthodox-francesco-francisco-francis-33491/

04/15/2014
Two Orthodox bishops accuse the Pope of heresy

Two Greek Metropolitans, Andrew of Dryinoupolis, Pogoniani and Konitsa and Seraphim of Piraeus and Faliro have written a harsh 89-page letter to the “Head of State of the Vatican City”, asking Rome to renounce its “satanic pride”

One of the signatories is new to these kinds of actions but this time the mile-long letter (89 whole pages of it) sent to Pope Francis by two Metropolitans of the Greek Orthodox Church - Andrew of Dryinoupolis, Pogoniani and Konitsa and Seraphim of Piraeus and Faliro – has been published in Greek and English on a popular Greek religious website. [PDF here]

The two Greek Metropolitans address the Pope as “His Excellency, Francis, Head of State of the Vatican City”, making no mention of his Bishop status. In the opening line of their missive they state that their letter is addressed to him with “sincere love” and motivated by the need to remind “heretics” of their “holy obligation to return to the Orthodox Church” which the “Pope” (whose title appears in quotation marks throughout the text) decided to detach himself from. The authors of the letter separate themselves (though they really need not have, it is obvious) from “western and especially ecumenist “Christianity””, branding Rome’s “heresy” and “spiritual and ecclesiastical delusion” as “Papism”. The two Greek bishops say they “unceasingly pray that our Lord Jesus Christ gather together the deluded “Pope” and his followers, through repentance and the renunciation of your delusion and heresy, into the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Orthodox Church.”

The pages about ecumenism which they describe as “syncretistic” are especially harsh: The letter’s authors do not recognize the Catholic Church as a Church, neither do they see its sacramental celebrations as valid or recognize the Pope’s status as Bishop. They define the “Petrine” primacy of power over all the Church” as “blasphemous” as well as “Scripturally and Patristically groundless and non-existent”. The doctrine of “Papal Infallibility”, meanwhile, is described as “blasphemy against the Holy Spirit” which shows “the satanic pride of which” the Pope is “possessed”. “Papism” is not a “Church” but a religious community, a parasynagogue, a heresy … a total perversion of the Truth,” the two Orthodox Metropolitans write in their long letter.

The letter also gives a detailed description of what the two Metropolitans see as the most grave sins of the Catholic Church, including “accept[ing] the Devil’s proposal to make you almighty earthly rulers in return for your allegiance to him.” They then bring up the age-long issue of the “Filioque” in the Niceno - Constantinopolitan Creed, infallibility, jurisdiction, Baptism by sprinkling and the separation of it from the mystery of Chrismation, the method of Eucharistic consecration, the depriving of the Blood of Christ to the laity and of Holy Communion to children, the dogma of the “immaculate conception” and the “bodily assumption” of the Mother of God, purgatory, indulgences, the mandatory celibacy of the clergy and the recognition so-called Uniate communities.

More accusation-packed pages follow, with references from websites and newspapers, to try to prove that the Vatican is a breeding ground for sin and obscenities. The letter mentions some “romantic” and pornographic films were allegedly downloaded onto Vatican PCs and it recalls how Vladimir Luxuria was given Communion during the funeral held for Don Gallo.

Francis is accused of everything under the sun, from blessing Harley Davidson motorbikes to the style of the World Youth Day in Rio de Janeiro and the indulgences the Pope apparently gives on Twitter. The Metropolitans mention Ernst von Freyberg’s nomination as President of the IOR following Benedict XVI’s resignation and the ousting of the Institute’s former chief, Ettore Gotti Tedeschi. They even dredge up old allegations made against Francis’ collaboration with Argentina’s military regime.

Many pages are also dedicated to the destruction of the Second Vatican Council and the openness towards interreligious dialogue. A violent attack was launched against Judaism and the line taken by Benedict XVI, who is accused of “exonerate[ing] the Jewish people for the crucifixion of Christ”, while Judaism now and throughout time with the satanic Kabbalah and the demonic Talmud crucify daily the Savior of the world!”

Neither is Francis forgiven for washing the feet of the young offenders at the Casal del Marmo prison in Rome last Holy Thursday or for the upcoming canonizations of John XXIII and John Paul II.

The Orthodox Metropolitans also dedicate some pages to the issues of same-sex unions, Vatican finances and the Scarano case. They conclude by saying that as ““Pope” of the Jews, of the Rabbis, of the masons, of the dictators, of America, of Ecumenism, of Pan-religion, of the “New Age of Aquarius,” and of the “New World Order”” Francis has nothing to offer the Orthodox Church. “There can exist no form of compromise between Orthodoxy and Papism”. They go on to say that Orthodox Christians can “in no way take part in mixed marriages” or “enter into “relations with those who are heretics and unbelievers.”

Some of the beliefs expressed in the letter can be found on extreme right-wing Catholic websites and publications. What is clear from this immense letter written by Andrew and Seraphim, is that the target is not so much Francis, but rather the entire history of the Catholic Church and the Papacy after the schism with the Eastern Orthodox Church, especially the developments which occurred after the Council.

In March 2012, Metropolitan Seraphim made a series of condemning statements, including one direct one against Benedict XVI. The following month, the Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople, Bartholomew, sent a stern letter to Archbishop Ieronimos of Greece, denouncing the actions of some hierarchs of the Greek Orthodox Church as unacceptable as they opposed a decision taken by all Orthodox Churches to engage in dialogue with other Churches. The Orthodox world is well aware of the unacceptable attitudes of these two bishops and they are not shared. In fact their attitude is seen as rather Taleban-like. It is quite surprising therefore, that their comments are tolerated by the Synod of the Greek Orthodox Church.

 

[Kisito]

It seems to me that on several occasions the pope François suggested that it was before all the bishop of Rome. He is equalizes it other bishops catholic. That is a cataclysm, because that means papal end and the abolition of Catholicism. The bishop of Rome (pope) tests a bringing together with the orthodoxe ones and the Protestants. He knows that the true scissions of the churches Christian woman is corruption, the power and the temptation of the diocese of Rome.
However I do not trust with the Jesuits very. But can it have a lamb in the wolves?

 

[davey72]

I am curious as to why the article was put up to begin with?

 

[Sol Logos]

Possibility of being, I read a few similar claims about Catholic Churches subservience to a small group of Ashkenazi Jews and elite groups in Judaism and Catholicism worshiping lucifer in this:
_http://iamthewitness.com/books/Andrew.Carrington.Hitchcock/Synagogue.of.Satan/0740-1818.htm

It a long read but goes date by date till very recently outlining this argument.