Possible G W Bush Marriage breakup?

[Appollynon]

Hi there SOTT Team. I wanted to post this topic as it is something I've been hearing about from a few sources around the net recently, and to be honest just wanted a second opinion as to the authenticity of the story posted below in its entirety.

If true this could be a further scandal to not only to tarnish the image of the Bush administration, but also shows that there are many cracks beginning to appear in the administration with such leaks starting to come out more and more into the public eye.

Kinda makes me wonder if someone has an agenda I can't myself figure out. Although such a revelation about the president could send further ripples through the stock markets, which are in an already volatile state, and further push the economy of the US (and maybe others) towards eventual meltdown with repeated shocks and secrets being outed.

Here's the address for anyone interested in this http://mediamatters.org/items/200605260003

Coming soon to The New York Times? Globe reports Bush marriage break-up
Summary: In Patrick Healy's recent front-page New York Times article on the state of the Clintons' marriage, Healy noted that a "tabloid photograph" of former President Bill Clinton "was enough to fuel coverage in the gossip pages." Media Matters does not endorse the decision by elite media figures to take their cues from tabloids, but if they do so, we expect them to be consistent. As it happens, the cover of the May 29 edition of the Globe magazine contains a headline about another high-profile political couple: "BUSH MARRIAGE BREAKUP! EXCLUSIVE! SEPARATE LIVES IN THE WHITE HOUSE."

In his May 23 front-page article in The New York Times, staff writer Patrick Healy asserted that "[w]hen the subject of Bill and Hillary Clinton comes up for many prominent Democrats these days, Topic A is the state of their marriage" and how it "might affect Mrs. Clinton's possible bid for the presidency in 2008." Healy offered no specific reasons for this purported interest among "prominent Democrats" aside from the amount of time the Clintons spent apart, a mention of a decade-old affair, and a reference to year-old "concern[]" over a "tabloid photograph showing Mr. Clinton leaving B.L.T. Steak in Midtown Manhattan late one night after dining with a group that included Belinda Stronach, a Canadian politician." Healy continued: "The two were among roughly a dozen people at a dinner, but it still was enough to fuel coverage in the gossip pages."

It was also enough to fuel a front-page New York Times article, and the rapt attention of the Washington press corps, as Media Matters has documented.

Healy did not identify the "tabloid" in question, but he seems to be referring to the Globe magazine, which in the spring of 2005 ran a headline about Clinton and Stronach that read "Bill caught with blonde AGAIN! New divorce battle with Hillary."

Media Matters does not endorse the decision by The New York Times, NBC's Tim Russert, MSNBC's Chris Matthews, The Washington Post's David Broder, and countless other elite media figures to take their cues from tabloids like the Globe, or to pry into the personal lives of political figures. But if they are going to do so, we expect them to be consistent.

As it happens, the cover of the May 29 edition of the Globe contains another sensational headline about another high-profile political couple:

BUSH MARRIAGE BREAKUP!

EXCLUSIVE!

SEPARATE LIVES IN THE WHITE HOUSE

Nasty fights

Booze problems
Laura urges counseling

On Pages 20 and 21, the Globe announces "Bush and Laura's 29-year marriage FALLS APART," adding: "They barely talk to each other," "[t]hey argue when they do speak," and "he's afraid he'll hit the bottle." Quotes in the article attributed to "a longtime friend" include the assertion that "[w]hen the cameras aren't on, they have nothing to do with one another," and that "[f]or all practical purposes, they've broken up." The "family friend" continues: "After their last fight over booze, they just stopped talking -- period." The Globe's report that Laura Bush is concerned that President Bush may "hit the bottle" is reminiscent of a September 21, 2005, National Enquirer article about "Bush's booze crisis," which reported: "Faced with the biggest crisis of his political life, President Bush has hit the bottle again."

Media Matters wonders when we can expect The New York Times to assign a reporter to tally the number of nights the Bushes spend together and to conduct 50 interviews with Republicans to assess their interest in the state of the Bush marriage, or in President Bush's reported relapse -- and when it will run a 2,000-word front-page article on the topic. If it does so, we wonder if Broder will refer to the article as "anything but unsympathetic" to the Bushes.

Any help to discover the veracity and truth behind such a report would be much appreciated.

Also it's nice to hear that all is not well in Bush land for a change after everything he has helped bring to bear upon the rest of this world. I'm thinking maybe Karma bites back?

 

[Mr. Premise]

Wayne Madsen has been reporting on this for the past couple of weeks. I find Madsen pretty reliable as ex-spooks go. His reporting, significantly, has been picked up by the tabloid Globe. Which means, as you say, that there are efforts to damage Bush by factions in the power structure.

Madsen claims the straw that broke the camel's back for Laura Bush is George's intense affair with Condi Rice!!! The fact that the NYT is not talking about that makes me think that that faction might want to run Rice for president.

Now, if you want to add some really sick oedipal stuff to the whole saga, there is a lot of evidence that George Bush Senior had an affair with Rice back when HE was president. What a sick bunch!

 

[CyberChrist]

[deleted]

 

[Appollynon]

Madsen claims the straw that broke the camel's back for Laura Bush is George's intense affair with Condi Rice!!! The fact that the NYT is not talking about that makes me think that that faction might want to run Rice for president.

Now, if you want to add some really sick oedipal stuff to the whole saga, there is a lot of evidence that George Bush Senior had an affair with Rice back when HE was president. What a sick bunch!

I want to say thanks for that Donald, and a great big ewwww! I hadn't heard of the Condi angle on this story before, so thanks for expanding my awarenesss on the issue. Although part of me wishes I didn't just read that the son may literally be following in the footstpes of his father down to the sleeping with the Condalizzard! Thats pretty sick, words fail me. A psycopath indeed and a very disturbed one at that.

I have before pondered who may be the next in line for the Presidency after Bush (that's if he ever lets go of power there like the C's have suggested) and I have kept on getting a nasty feeling that Condi may be one of them. However I get an even worse sense of foreboding thinking about Hillary, but maybe Condi would be a good bet for the Republicans to run against Hillary to see who comes out on top. I shudder to think how much worse the US state of affairs would be with either of these two in power. I guess there's always hope.

If you watch GW Bush as of late, it's evident that he is grinding his jaw a lot. If anyone has ever been around a cocaine addict, you know what I am talking about.

Its funny you should mention this CyberChrist. Before Bush's recent Photo-Op trip to Baghdad for about 3 months I had noticed his demeanour going from the usual dumb and happy expression to one of a more serious and unhappy/stressed out appearance. The recent trip to Baghdad seemed to alleviate this (and his approval ratings) for a little while, but it will be interesting to see how long this lasts.

I worry about the actions of this Tyrant, and I don't think the alchaholism or drug taking help, but things are bad enough without them, he is a Mr Danger whether he's drunk, high or clean.

 

[Fifth Way]

...sleeping with the Condalizzard

Thanks for that Appollynon.
...makes me think about that Condoleezza in green langauge is con-lizzard.

 

[Appollynon]

...makes me think about that Condoleezza in green langauge is con-lizzard.

Thanyou Fifth Way, I must admit I like the coincidence. Ive never studied Green Language before, although I have heard of it through reading the C's transcripts and The Wave Vol. 1-4.

If I could be so bold as to ask if you know of any good books or Internet sites that would cover some of the basics for a beginner such as me, I'd be gratefull for any recommendations you have. It's one of the topics I'd like to research after my research into Gurdjieff and Carlos Casteneda's works.

 

[wilecoyote]

Um, forgive my ignorance guys, but what is the Green Language?

 

[Fifth Way]

Um, forgive my ignorance guys, but what is the Green Language?

From the "Signs of the Times Esoteric Glossary" that you find at:
http://glossary.cassiopaea.com/glossary.php?id=366&lsel=


Green Language


In alchemical discourse, this term refers to the generally opaque and confusing way the few texts there are are written.

As Fulcanelli puts it, the alchemists of old had to resort to this means in order to obscure from one that which was to be disclosed to the other.

The language plays with phonetic analogies, plays on etymologies and symbols. It may be that the very mental exercise of making sense of the writings in itself is a preparatory exercise in expanding one's mind towards being able to grasp the actual mysteries.

In Fulcanelli's own writings, we have allusions to double meanings, where the seeker of literal transformation of lead into gold will simply get lost whereas the seeker of knowledge not concerned with material wealth or service to self will find keys to a new life, i.e. ascension to a multidimensional state of being, the Great Work.


See Fulcanelli's Mystery of the Cathedrals and Dwellings of the Philosophers for examples. Also Mark Hedsel discusses the Green Language in Zelator, edited by David Ovason.

(Appollynon, I have not read any more about it than what is available here. I'm just trying to get more sensitive to phonetic similarities. Its the general concept of Green Language that suggest that sometimes (often, maybe even always) those similarities are there for a reason. So I stared to look at it more. So basically my above statemnet, that "Condoleezza in green langauge IS con-lizzard" was a bit presumptios! Better : "Condoleezza in green langauge COULD BE con-o-lizzard or con-lizzard" FW)

From Zelator:

'Almost all esoteric systems have developed one form or other of what is called 'The Language of the Birds', or the 'Green Language', as a means of communication.' This is an arcane tongue which permits initiates, and those on the Path, to com- municate secrets to one another in a form which is incomprehensible to those not versed in the language. [...]' There are no words for the higher experiences - only symbols. There is a limit to what one can say with words. Once you step beyond the boundary of the ordinary, and wish to communicate what you have seen, then you have to speak in poetry or symbols. 'Yet even the poetic frenzy will only take you so far. As you continue on the visionary Path, even the rules of art begin to break down. You might, like Dante, make flights of poetic symbolism so sublime that they have the power to carry even the most obtuse reader beyond the familiar, into the Spiritual." Or you might, like Rabelais, throw yourself into a buffoon's burlesque, fooling your way with an arcane language which few even recognize as arcane. You might even, like Mozart, break into music so exquisite that its beams of sunlight touch levels where few men have ever been ... Yet, in spite of this, there is a point beyond which art cannot go.' [end quote]