Secret History 2: How Societies Collapse
Introduction: A World in Decline
Professor Jiang Xueqin opens his second lecture in the "Secret History" series with a stark observation: we live in a world exhibiting unmistakable signs of decline. Building upon his previous discussion of monotheism and its revolutionary impact on human thought—introducing the dominant paradigms of money, individualism, and the nation-state that would create modernity—he now turns to a fundamental question that has haunted humanity throughout history: Why do societies rise, and why do they fall?
The professor's approach is deliberately theoretical and abstract, as he carefully constructs ethical models to understand our contemporary world. He warns his students that while the initial classes may seem removed from concrete reality, this theoretical foundation is essential for comprehending the complex dynamics that govern civilizational cycles. What emerges from his lecture is a comprehensive framework that synthesizes multiple theories of societal collapse into a unified model, one that makes specific, testable predictions about our immediate future.
The Symptoms of a Dying Civilization
Professor Jiang begins by cataloging the manifold signs of societal decline visible in our contemporary world. Wars and conflicts proliferate across the globe—from Ukraine to the Middle East, from Southeast Asia to potential American military interventions in Mexico and Venezuela. Environmental degradation accelerates as climate change intensifies and our air, water, and land become increasingly toxic. Economic indicators paint an equally grim picture: unemployment rises while work ethic deteriorates, captured in the Chinese concept of "bailan" (letting it rot) and the American phenomenon of "quiet quitting," where employees perform the minimum required while mentally checking out.
Perhaps most tellingly, birth rates plummet across virtually every developed society, with only Israel and Georgia as minor exceptions. Young people refuse to marry or have children, effectively choosing species extinction over continuation. This demographic collapse coincides with declining standards of living, where inflation outpaces wages, making basic necessities increasingly unaffordable. Housing prices soar beyond the reach of younger generations, while governments face fiscal crises, spending far more than they collect in tax revenue. Both public and private debt balloons to unsustainable levels.
The social fabric itself unravels as trust and cohesion evaporate. People no longer help strangers in distress; they retreat into atomized individualism. Physical and mental health deteriorate in tandem—diabetes, high blood pressure, anxiety, depression, and stress reach epidemic proportions. Pessimism replaces optimism as the dominant worldview. Immigration, particularly in Western nations, further reduces social cohesion and living standards, though Professor Jiang notes this is less relevant to China's current situation.
In contrast, rising societies exhibit opposite characteristics: high trust, financial prudence, robust health, widespread optimism, and most crucially, high birth rates. People work with enthusiasm, support one another, and invest in the future through their children.
Three Theories of Collapse
Financialization: Thomas Piketty's Economic Determinism
The first theoretical framework Professor Jiang presents comes from French economist Thomas Piketty's "Capital in the 21st Century." Piketty identifies a fatal transition in capitalism's evolution through three distinct phases. Consumer capitalism focuses on creating goods that consumers want to purchase—an era of genuine wealth generation where factories are built, workers hired, and real value created. This gives way to financial capitalism, where accumulated capital seeks returns through stock market speculation rather than productive investment. Finally, monopoly capitalism emerges as a few companies dominate entire sectors, finding monopolistic control more profitable than competition.
The crucial insight is that wealth and money diverge in this progression. While consumer capitalism generates actual wealth through productive activity, financial capitalism merely generates money through speculation. The mathematics are stark: Piketty's analysis of income tax data reveals that in late-stage capitalism, the real economy grows at approximately 2% annually while financial markets return 5%. This differential creates a perverse incentive structure. An entrepreneur with a million dollars could open a restaurant and earn perhaps $20,000 yearly, or invest in stocks and make $50,000. The rational choice drives all capital toward financial markets, starving the real economy of investment.
This financialization creates a vicious cycle. As money floods into speculation rather than production, real employment declines, debt accumulates, and genuine wealth creation ceases. The stock market soars while the actual economy stagnates, creating the illusion of prosperity while the foundation rots. Piketty argues this represents capitalism's natural lifecycle—an inevitable progression that cannot be reversed once it reaches the late stage.
Elite Overproduction: Peter Turchin's Power Competition
Historian Peter Turchin offers a different lens through his theory of elite overproduction, derived from studying numerous historical collapses from Rome to the French Revolution. His central insight: societies collapse when too many powerful people compete for limited positions of power. The elite inevitably produce more children than there are elite positions to fill, creating destructive competition within the ruling class.
Professor Jiang illustrates this concept through James B. Calhoun's haunting "rat utopia" experiments. In the post-World War II era, Calhoun sought to understand what abundance, wealth, and security meant for society. He created sealed environments with unlimited food, water, and shelter for rat colonies. Initially, the rats thrived, multiplying from perhaps ten to hundreds. Yet regardless of configuration, every experiment ended identically: the rats invariably killed each other.
The revelation came in understanding what the rats were actually competing for. With material needs satisfied, they fought not for resources but for status—a zero-sum game where one rat's elevation requires another's subjugation. In nature, defeated rats can flee to establish new colonies elsewhere. But in Calhoun's sealed utopia, there was nowhere to go. The losers remained, perpetually challenging the winners, creating endless conflict until the colony destroyed itself.
This dynamic maps perfectly onto human societies. Elite children—graduates of Peking University, Tsinghua, Harvard, Yale—all expect to become "big bosses" wielding real power. But elite positions are limited. Unlike commoners, elite offspring cannot simply emigrate or accept lesser stations. They must fight for their birthright, and when too many compete for too few positions, the result is either war or revolution—the complete collapse of social order. Turchin's research suggests this pattern is invariable: elite overproduction always precipitates societal collapse.
Civilizational Life Cycles: Oswald Spengler's Organic Model
German philosopher Oswald Spengler provides the third theoretical framework, proposing that civilizations, like organisms, follow an inexorable life cycle: birth, growth, maturity, and death. No civilization can escape this progression any more than a human can avoid aging. Successful civilizations progress from village to town to city to megacity, and at the apex of development—the megacity phase—death becomes inevitable.
In villages, life remains simple and concrete. People work hard, maintain collective mentality, support one another, and produce many children who represent free labor and future security. But civilizational advancement brings increasing abstraction—disconnection from reality. Villagers understand that their food comes from seeds they plant; megacity dwellers have no idea where their sustenance originates. Everything becomes abstract, removed from direct experience.
This abstraction fundamentally transforms human relationships. Villages cohere through emotion, tradition, and genuine relationships. Megacities cohere only through money—the ultimate abstraction. Money eliminates the need for trust or mutual aid. When villagers fall ill, neighbors help; when city dwellers fall ill, they pay hospitals. Individualism replaces collectivism, personal pleasure supersedes communal welfare.
In megacities, people no longer wish to work, preferring that immigrants perform labor. They don't want children, seeing them as burdens rather than blessings. Beijing, Shanghai, Washington, New York, Paris, London—all represent this terminal megacity phase. Spengler insists this progression is natural and irreversible, as inevitable as individual aging. No external threat, not even alien invasion, can reverse this cycle because megacity inhabitants have become too selfish, too atomized, too distrustful to unite against any threat.
The Comprehensive Model: A Synthesis
Professor Jiang synthesizes these three theories into a comprehensive framework for understanding societal dynamics. He acknowledges that while all theories are inherently simplistic and imprecise, they provide essential tools for analysis that can be refined through application to concrete examples.
The Structure of Power
At society's core exist powerful families—perhaps ten, at most one hundred—who truly control the nation. The Roman Empire, despite governing vast territories across Europe, Anatolia, and Egypt, was controlled by merely 200 families. These families exercise power through three essential pillars:
Finance represents central banking and monetary control, the mechanism for creating and distributing money throughout society. Religion controls belief systems—what people think and accept as truth. While historically this meant traditional religions, today science and technology serve this function. Intelligence encompasses the spy networks and information systems that monitor and manipulate society. These three pillars interconnect to form a nexus of power that controls every aspect of society: schools, military, government, media, culture, even organized crime.
The masses—the people—exist at society's periphery, generating the actual wealth through their labor. Between the elite families and the masses exists the middle class, serving as managers of the system. Professor Jiang offers a corporate metaphor: the elite families are owners, the people are workers, and the middle class are managers. This middle class has been known by various names throughout history—scholar-officials in ancient China, the professional-managerial class (PMC) in modern analysis, or the petty bourgeoisie in Marxist terminology.
The Cycle of Rise and Fall
During society's rise, these three groups work harmoniously. The elite families willingly delegate operational control to the middle-class managers, who advocate for treating workers well to maximize productivity. This is democracy in its functional form—not merely voting, but genuine feedback loops where worker welfare translates into societal prosperity. The people feel heard, earn good wages, and everyone benefits from growing wealth.
But elite overproduction disrupts this harmony. As elite families produce more children than the system can accommodate in positions of real power, these surplus elites engage in rent-seeking behavior—extracting wealth without creating value. The corporation (society) falls into debt as too many claim profits without contributing productivity.
One might expect the middle-class managers to advocate for the workers, insisting on fairness to maintain system stability. Instead, something perverse occurs: the managers begin exploiting the people. They lie, deceive, commit fraud—anything to extract more wealth from below. Why? Because the middle class themselves are rent-seekers. Lawyers collect rent because only they can navigate the legal system. Doctors collect rent because only they can provide medical care. Every professional certification, every exclusive credential, every regulatory requirement creates opportunities for rent extraction.
When corporate troubles mount, middle managers recognize their vulnerability. They perform little real work, living comfortable lives through their position rather than their productivity. Fearing they'll be first to face elimination, they must demonstrate value by squeezing workers harder, extracting more productivity through coercion rather than motivation.
As elite conflict intensifies, factions form within the ruling class. These factions recruit allies from the middle class, who in turn mobilize elements of the masses. Society fractures along factional lines, leading inevitably to civil war or revolution—complete societal collapse.
The Inexorable Nature of Collapse
Professor Jiang emphasizes that this cycle is natural and cannot be prevented by external threats. In fact, external invasions often occur because internal factions invite foreign mercenaries to tip domestic power struggles in their favor. These mercenaries then recognize the society's weakness and seize power for themselves. A society in collapse is too consumed by internal conflict, too fractured by factional strife, to unite against any external threat—even hypothetical alien invasion.
The Phases of Civilizational Development
Rise: The Age of Openness
Rising societies exhibit distinctive characteristics centered on openness. Social mobility flourishes—poor people can become wealthy through talent and effort. Meritocracy prevails over nepotism. Innovation is celebrated, criticism welcomed as a tool for improvement. Open debate strengthens society rather than threatening it.
Professor Jiang notes that openness transcends political systems. Both 1950s America (democratic) and 1950s China (communist) were open societies where criticizing leaders was not just tolerated but encouraged. Young societies, regardless of ideology, share this democratic spirit, this meritocratic ethos, this hunger to learn and improve through constructive criticism.
The rise phase operates through consent. Elite, middle class, and masses work together toward shared prosperity. Unity matters more than hierarchy. Empathy and mutual concern bind society. "We need to work together to make society better" becomes the operational principle.
Decline: The Bureaucratic Phase
Declining societies ossify into bureaucracy. As the social corporation hemorrhages money, middle managers desperately justify their existence through paperwork, rules, and procedures. Society becomes sclerotic, more concerned with process than outcomes.
The decline phase operates through deception rather than consent. Professor Jiang illustrates with a lunch decision: In the rise phase, the group debates and votes on restaurants, reaching consensus. In decline, the authority figure lies—claiming false benefits or fictional guests—to manipulate the group toward his preference.
Stability becomes the paramount concern, maintaining status quo rather than pursuing improvement. Society focuses on preventing change rather than promoting progress.
Collapse: The Authoritarian End
Collapsing societies resort to raw authoritarianism. Rules give way to force. The collapse phase operates through coercion—the authority figure simply threatens violence to impose his will.
Survival supersedes all other values. The social compact dissolves entirely into brutal self-interest: "I want to live, and if I have to kill you, I'll kill you."
The Timeline of Collapse
The temporal dynamics of civilizational cycles follow a consistent pattern: steep rise, slow decline, sudden collapse. This trajectory deceives observers who extrapolate from gradual decline, assuming they have time to adapt. But collapse arrives as an external shock—a perfect storm of simultaneous crises.
Societies prepare for individual challenges: protocols for plague, plans for climate crisis, procedures for drought, strategies for war. But they cannot handle all simultaneously. When plague, drought, war, and revolution converge, systems catastrophically fail.
Why can't societies prepare for multiple simultaneous crises? Because authoritarian-phase societies cannot tolerate criticism. Those who identify problems become enemies rather than heroes. In rising societies, critics are celebrated and rewarded for strengthening the system. In collapsing societies, critics are silenced as threats. Without criticism, societies cannot identify vulnerabilities, cannot prepare for threats, cannot adapt to challenges. Blindness ensures destruction.
Predictions for the Coming Decades
Based on this analytical framework, Professor Jiang makes five specific predictions for the next five to twenty years, particularly for the Western world:
Decline of Democracy and Freedom: The United States and Europe will become increasingly authoritarian as the cycle progresses from bureaucratic decline toward collapse. Trump's increasing use of military force for domestic issues exemplifies this transition already underway.
Economic Collapse: As people lose faith in the system and their right to speak freely disappears, they withdraw their productive energy. Without genuine investment from the population, economic productivity crumbles. The system enters crisis as real wealth generation ceases.
Increased Immigration: Governments, recognizing that their native populations refuse to work within the corrupted system, attempt to replace them with immigrants willing to accept exploitation. This represents not benevolence but desperation—a last attempt to maintain productivity as social cohesion dissolves.
Civil Conflict: Native populations won't accept replacement passively. Streets become battlegrounds as different groups fight for resources and recognition. Society fractures along ethnic, economic, and ideological lines, with violence becoming commonplace.
Stupid Foreign Wars: Recognizing that domestic conflict will eventually target them, elites channel popular rage outward through meaningless foreign wars. These conflicts serve no strategic purpose except distraction and disposal—better to send potential revolutionaries to die abroad than face revolution at home. The choice becomes stark: war or revolution. Elites invariably choose war.
Professor Jiang emphasizes these five phenomena may not occur sequentially but will manifest simultaneously or in varying order across different Western societies. They represent not moral judgments but mechanical outcomes of the civilizational cycle he has outlined.
Conclusion: Understanding Power Beyond Morality
Professor Jiang concludes his lecture with a crucial clarification about his pedagogical approach. He is not making moral arguments about what should happen or what is right or wrong. Morality, he insists, is irrelevant to understanding how power actually operates. His goal is to explain how people in power think and behave, to construct predictive models that can be tested against unfolding events.
If his predictions prove accurate—if Western democracy collapses, if economies fail, if immigration surges, if civil conflicts erupt, if pointless wars proliferate—then the model has explanatory power and deserves refinement. If tomorrow Trump, Putin, and Xi announce eternal friendship and global peace, then the model fails and must be discarded. This empirical approach, grounded in observable outcomes rather than ideological preferences, represents the only path to genuine understanding.
The professor's ultimate aim transcends mere prediction. By understanding how the world actually works—how power operates, how societies rise and fall, how civilizational cycles unfold—humanity might possibly build a more just world. But first, we must see clearly, without moral filters or ideological blinders, the mechanical processes that govern social evolution. Only through such clarity can we hope to transcend the cycles that have trapped every previous civilization in the same inevitable progression from village to megacity, from birth to death, from rise through decline to collapse.
This framework, synthesizing economic, social, and philosophical theories of civilizational cycles, provides a lens through which to view our current moment. We live in megacities at the apex of abstraction, where money has replaced trust, where individuals pursue pleasure over progeny, where elite children fight for positions that cannot accommodate them all. The signs of decline surround us—economic, social, demographic, spiritual. The question is not whether collapse will come, but when and how it will manifest.
Professor Jiang's lecture serves not as prophecy but as warning, not as fatalism but as framework. By understanding the patterns that have governed every previous civilization's rise and fall, we gain the possibility—however slim—of conscious intervention. Whether humanity can actually escape these cycles remains an open question, one that only empirical observation of unfolding events can answer. But without understanding the cycles themselves, we remain helpless passengers on a historical trajectory we neither comprehend nor control, destined to repeat the same progression that has claimed every civilization before us—from the villages of our ancestors to the megacities of our present, from birth through growth to the inevitable death that awaits at the apex of development.
predictivehistory.substack.com
