Predictive History (YouTube Lecturer)

[palestine]

As we know from Laura’s work, the likelihood is a cometary intrusion into the story.

Hello,

I had a look in the chemical markers and here is what it shows for the 430 BC period:

From what I've read, a potential match with a comet is when those four markers are present together (ammonium, sulfate, chloride, nitrate):

It was then observed that there is a large concentration of ammonium in the American GISP2 ice core at the time of the Tunguska impact.

... there were also high levels of chlorine, nitrate (nitric acid) and sulphate (sulphuric acid) in exactly the same layers of ice

The first chart shows four spikes, and the other charts show five spikes, the additional being around -401. Could it be a volcano?

The above dates may not be extra accurate, so just for the illustration!

 

[lunar7]

The lecture series is entering the final week now and is probably the best I've ever seen. Coming from a self-acknowledged pessimist the real message that spans across the entire series seems to invite those less pessimistic to find a way to break from the patterns that make the concept of "predictive history" possible.

There will inevitably be some mistakes in such a broad range of interwoven topics, but I'm curious if anyone knows of material that might be a good next step after watching something like the Secret History series.

In particular it would be good to find something that suggests how previous (disappeared) civilizations were able to break from the loop, though something like that is going to be very esoteric as history is not written by the spirits who have ascended to higher dimensions!

Can't help but feel like a big split is coming up, and soon. I have personally been perceiving it as a series of gates spaced 13 years apart since 1999. So there was one in 2012, and another this year in 2025. The next gate is in 2038, and then seemingly three more until 2077.

Not all the gates are relevant to all beings in the same way because they will mean different things for different orientations on the STO/STS spectrum.

I guess what I'm asking is whether there is any record of previous splits, and were there direct acts of human will that allowed the STO to split from the STS that were left behind?

This must have happened after both Lemuria and Atlantis.

 

[T.C.]

The lecture series is entering the final week now and is probably the best I've ever seen. Coming from a self-acknowledged pessimist the real message that spans across the entire series seems to invite those less pessimistic to find a way to break from the patterns that make the concept of "predictive history" possible.

There will inevitably be some mistakes in such a broad range of interwoven topics, but I'm curious if anyone knows of material that might be a good next step after watching something like the Secret History series.

In particular it would be good to find something that suggests how previous (disappeared) civilizations were able to break from the loop, though something like that is going to be very esoteric as history is not written by the spirits who have ascended to higher dimensions!

Can't help but feel like a big split is coming up, and soon. I have personally been perceiving it as a series of gates spaced 13 years apart since 1999. So there was one in 2012, and another this year in 2025. The next gate is in 2038, and then seemingly three more until 2077.

Not all the gates are relevant to all beings in the same way because they will mean different things for different orientations on the STO/STS spectrum.

I guess what I'm asking is whether there is any record of previous splits, and were there direct acts of human will that allowed the STO to split from the STS that were left behind?

This must have happened after both Lemuria and Atlantis.

Have you read The Secret History of the World, and How to Get Out Alive by Laura Knight-Jadczyk?

 

[lunar7]

I'll give it a read. Haha I though you were recommending two books, and also found a book called The Secret History of the World by Mark Booth that looks pretty good too.

 

[T.C.]

I'll give it a read. Haha I though you were recommending two books, and also found a book called The Secret History of the World by Mark Booth that looks pretty good too.

Sorry. I have a problem with excessive use of commas. That one sneaked past me.

 

[lunar7]

The lecture series has now reached the final episode, meaning another potential way of watching is to work backwards from the final episode until one realizes they already know (or know enough) the material that builds towards the finale.

I'm curious if anyone watched the final episode, and if so, what they thought of it. My impression was that the predictions in this final episode could well prove accurate if no effective way to intervene is found by others. The eschatologies have been developed over thousands of years and that has created a lot of religious momentum that is hard to dismantle overnight. Still, it seems like a portion of humanity is progressing in a different direction than the ones doing all of this, and there are a lot of "neutrals" stuck in the middle just trying to live normal lives and having an increasingly difficult time of it.

 

[Voyageur]

I watched a recent interview, and it is quite interesting, particularly what he says at the end about geophysical catastrophes.

Middle East as Global Flashpoint​

Had also had a look at this from Prof. Jiang Xueqin, where his talk looks at the transfer of empire(s) in history, as he sees it.

https://www.globalresearch.ca/americans-constructed-jewish-state/5909032

Snip as transcribed:

All right. So let’s start with a very simple question that nobody wants to ask. Okay.

How is it that a country that didn’t exist 80 years ago is now the most powerful state in the Middle East?

And why is America giving them $3.8 billion every year?

People will tell you it’s because of the Holocaust, because of guilt, because of the Jewish lobby.

Guys, that’s not how empires work. Okay?

Empires don’t give money because of guilt. Empires give money because of strategy. All right?

So, today we’re going to look at Israel.

His argument, in example, goes something like this:

What empires do is they create local entities that are completely dependent on them. Okay? These entities can only exist because the empire supports them. If the empire withdraws support, these entities collapse immediately. Does that make sense? So let me give you examples.

The British created Pakistan. Why? To divide and weaken India. Okay. The British created Jordan. Why? To control the Arab tribes. The French created Lebanon. Why? To have a Christian state in the Muslim Middle East. None of these countries are natural. They’re all imperial constructs. Okay. Now, Israel is the most successful imperial construct in history. And I’m going to explain why. But first, you need to understand that the British didn’t create Israel because they loved Jews.

Okay? They created Israel to control the Middle East. And this is really important when we read the Balfour Declaration of 1917, right? Lord Balfour writes to Lord Rothschild. He’s not writing because he cares about Jewish suffering. He’s writing because Britain needs to control the Suez Canal. Okay, think about it. The Suez Canal is the most important waterway in the world. It connects Europe to Asia. Whoever controls the Suez controls global trade. But the Suez is in Egypt and Egypt is Muslim. and Muslims might align with other Muslim powers. So what do you do? You create a non-Muslim entity right next to Egypt that is completely dependent on you. That’s Israel. Okay?

All right. So now I’m going to explain to you the three stages that every imperial client goes through. This is a pattern. It happens every time. Okay.

Stage one, complete dependency. The client cannot survive without the empire. They need military protection, economic support, diplomatic cover. Israel from 1948 to 1967 completely dependent on first Britain, then France, then America. Without imperial support, the Arab states would have destroyed them. Okay.

Stage two, mutual benefit. The client becomes useful to the empire. They provide services the empire needs. Israel from 1967 to 2000. They defeat Soviet allies. They provide intelligence. They test American weapons. The relationship is now reciprocal. America needs Israel as much as Israel needs America. Okay.

Stage three, role reversal. The client becomes so powerful that the empire becomes dependent on them. This is where we are now. America cannot act in the Middle East without Israeli approval.