Predictive History (YouTube Lecturer)

[Huila]

Professor Jiang Xueqin calls out Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg, Google, and Facebook, saying their billionaire origin stories don’t add up.“Really strange. A 19-year-old drops out of Harvard and becomes a billionaire?”

https://twitter.com/x/status/2021125097508270203

 

[Puma]

Professor Jiang mentions six stages for the collapse of the current world order and the emergence of a new one.

1- Collapse of the old monetary order (fiat currency) and economic depression: Refers to the end of the fiat currency system and a severe global recession.

2- Civil War in the US and the rise of the Palantir Police State: Internal conflicts in the United States, along with increased state control through surveillance technologies such as those developed by Palantir.

Comment. Palantir is expanding contracts with the US government (sales driven by surveillance and defense, according to Reuters), pointing to an early "rise" in technological control.
​

Palantir CEO defends surveillance tech as US government contracts boost sales
Palantir Technologies, CEO Alex Karp defended the firm's surveillance technology as it reported a big jump in sales on Monday, saying it has safeguards to prevent government overreach, without mentioning U.S. immigration enforcement efforts in Minnesota that have drawn widespread protests.
The data analytics company said revenue derived from the U.S. government spiked 66% in the fourth quarter from the year-ago period to $570 million. Total sales of $1.41 billion exceeded analysts' estimates and the firm anticipates a big jump in sales, in part due to government contracts in 2026.​

3- US invasion of Iran and World War III: Direct military escalation against Iran triggering global conflict.

4- Full disclosure (JFK, 9/11, Covid, Epstein) and discrediting of elite authority: Massive revelations about historical conspiracies eroding trust in leaders and elites.

5- Rise of Israel and Pax Judaica: Regional and global domination by Israel, establishing a new order of peace under Jewish influence.

6- Controlled implosion of the Anglosphere and Europe: Planned disintegration of the Anglo-Saxon powers (US, UK, etc.) and continental Europe.

We are in the preliminary or incipient stages of Stage 1 (monetary collapse and economic depression), with isolated signs that could prelude Stages 2 and 4, but none of which have fully materialized.

As we can see, Professor Jiang's stages show events controlled by the elite but do not take into account changes on Earth or the possibility of a comet bombardment that could ruin their plans (unless we consider World War III as an effort to conceal "Celestial" intentions)
​

Celestial Intentions: Comets and the Horns of Moses

...in the beginning of such times of trouble, people want to believe that their government - their kings and ruling elite - are powerful enough, or pure enough, to control nature such that the floods, wildfires, earthquakes and volcanic eruptions cease and all returns to normal. And the ruling elite take advantage of this during such times by trying to find likely scapegoats in other nations, some minority group in their own country, or their personal enemies - including those who are pointing out that it just might be their corruption that is bringing on all the evils - so as to distract the larger populace from their own possible sins of commission or omission. This means that such a period can include protracted wars and the accompanying necessary burden of taxes, persecutions of this group or that group, generally increasing social hysteria and unrest, until finally, one day, the people, as a whole, wake up and see that their rulers have behaved very badly and all the blame gets dumped on them. This is ironic because an anthropocentric worldview where man believes he is in control stops people - even people in power - from being aware of the realities of our existence on this planet which include civilization destroying cosmic events.​

 

[palestine]

Following-up from this post:
Predictive History (YouTube Lecturer)

Is Tucker Carlson unaware & inviting the enemy in his home base?!

Perhaps the prof' is a CIA agent; that's what Tucker kind of has been fighting and trying to keep at bay. Now he invites him in his show. If a CIA agent, we would have a common & usual motion: inviting the enemy after years of caution.

Honestly, I find the Chinese professor's take on "history" too weak; it does not mean that he is wrong, or that I am right. But I find it simply too off-track in comparison of other "models" that we know of. Take for instance "pathocracy", which is an explanation of "big motions" - "how things are shaped, built, destroyed". It's solid & it makes sense.

Take for instance guy Peter Turchin's model: it's very 3D but it is solid too, because it appears it gathers strict 3D motions so as to amke sense of it. And I believe it's a success.

Both A. Lobaczewski & Peter Turchin, I believe, managed to translate higher subtle motions (4D, perhaps 6D and 7th) in discerning the results in our world. What I mean is that I believe part of big trends & events participate from higher "motions". What those are, what those excatly are - I don't know. In addition, 3D people have free-will - so it's difficult than to bind the exact share of "responsibility" to both (higher worlds, sending information down there & our world, intercating with the above or 3D).

Nevertheless, the Chinese prof's take is not that much "solid" in terms of accessibility. He seems to have a few points in terms of "the future will be ... because ... and ...". But I don't know. He explains that the nitty-gritty are people versed in religious eschatologies and it's what conditions the "mapping" if we were to correctly analyze "our world".

In addition to A. Lobaczewski & P. Turchin, I would be eager than to bring by the comets & the anthropocosmic connection. Seems comets are the true conditioner of the future - because the Information Field manages the 3D world at will. This indicates that the real motions are stable, natural and part of the Universe. Eschatologies may be playing a part in tailoring events, but it seems too far from all the various elements we know of.

(I would suggest that the forum has sufficient elements for fashioning its own predictive model - I am sure it's something that which could be done; otherwise, if not heading towards a "predictive model", I assume we could tailor a really solid & objective model with for instance the elements I wrote above:

• pathocracy - the existence of psychopathy (low-human normaility) sometimes exacerbating crisis to the point of totalitarianism (A. Lobaczewski); so, stable times, when psychopathy is at bay or non-manifesting, and, when it turns wrong
• cyclicity of up's & down's (P. Turchin); same: when it's okay, prospering, when it goes wrong
• comets - The Information Field as a conscious & willing "game changer" - the anthropocosmic connection so the ability to polarize events, depending on the quality of the connection; in addition, when it turned wrong

The above trhee points have the ability to form a very complex ( and interesting) model IMO. What do you think? I would dream of a book intelligently gathering those three principles! And you know, I am just spitting back what the forum taught me, I just happen to deal with those three concepts, and I think I see they constitute parts of a whole.

Eschatologies would be, if true, at best to be considered as the ideologies of A. Lobaczewski.

Again, I have nothing against the Chinese Prof. It's the opposite: I wish him good and hope he's not an agent! But if he is, then, that's wrong. And he will harvest what he will harvest - nothing. But I found it interesting that somebody was able to relay information about this teacher... I don't like this, honestly. And today we've got him at Tucker Carlson... I am tempted to see the basic pressure fooling, that Intel services do to Candace Owens (you know, that sort of atmosphere of people wanting them down at all costs).

I would say: words of caution to the forum - the Chinese professor is suspicious. It can be defamation of course. I would say the best would be to stick a sort of "card", saying "there is data, stating he's CIA". Just that.

 

[gottathink]

I would suggest that the forum has sufficient elements for fashioning its own predictive model - I am sure it's something that which could be done; otherwise, if not heading towards a "predictive model", I assume we could tailor a really solid & objective model with for instance the elements I wrote above:

I think that is an excellent idea. A conceptual model first and then figure out how to include probability distributions.

I wonder if we could actually incorporate Bayesian statistical modelling to produce a posterior distribution of outcomes.
We would use historical priors. The questions are:
What are the variables?
How to define them?

 

[gottathink]

I have this weird sense that what we as a global network could do if we choose to is-

1.Understand the system I.e. how our reality functions. That’s been Laura’s and Arks main mission.

2. Provide information to others to learn- the Fellowship and the Forum (as opposed to Quorum).

3. Build the model for reality based on our Understanding and then introduce new variables (information). I.e. The new information comes from our free will and desire to align with creative principles of DCM, STO. This new information from free will increases the density of our reality as densities relate to information. Adding another column to the Matrix, increasing the sub space we exist in.

4. This new model then introduces into the human collective consciousness how a world of free will and STO would come about.

5. Understanding the mechanisms imparts a believable potential reality that as more people become exposed to it proportionately it becomes more probable.

What do we think?
Any value in that idea?

 

[palestine]

I have this weird sense that what we as a global network could do if we choose to is-

1.Understand the system I.e. how our reality functions. That’s been Laura’s and Arks main mission.

2. Provide information to others to learn- the Fellowship and the Forum (as opposed to Quorum).

3. Build the model for reality based on our Understanding and then introduce new variables (information). I.e. The new information comes from our free will and desire to align with creative principles of DCM, STO. This new information from free will increases the density of our reality as densities relate to information. Adding another column to the Matrix, increasing the sub space we exist in.

4. This new model then introduces into the human collective consciousness how a world of free will and STO would come about.

5. Understanding the mechanisms imparts a believable potential reality that as more people become exposed to it proportionately it becomes more probable.

What do we think?
Any value in that idea?

I just think of the idea from time to time and I came up to the understanding that here were kind of a rather impressive list of "big elements" (for example the ones I've been trying to "list") - so yeah, I kind of thought there may be an opportunity than to formulate things a little... Or perhaps to try to agglomerate the variou sthings we know of.

But then it is difficult to understand where to head for... And I appreciate your post which tries to do so: what would we be exactly "trying to do"? Building a predictive model would be an option but a specific road, so that the uphill work would be relative to the outcome. SO, for instance, what would be the basics for a predictive model! I am asking myself this question.

It is difficult for me to think of building up anything, too, because the basic C cosmology pops up and all the elements "meddle" together so it becomes difficult to decide which element fits where...

I think I did not take the time to seriously think of it, and that I / anybody could come up with something substantial (and objective).

A foundational question coming to mind would be: what are we to do? Building a predictive model? Building the 3D cosmology? Build up a basic model of cross-density?

I am happy to see a positive reaction from you, and I think it is a good idea. We should see how the admins see the matter - perhaps there is "no need", something which I could understand. But on my part, I would be really eager to try to see if anything could come up with pathocracy / P. Turchin's cycles / comets.

Addition: the comets seem to be all there is IMO. Studying the chemical markers and the curves of the weather (ice cores etc etc) showed me: things are a stable line, throughout centuries - and the only up's & down^'s are due to comets. Somehow, I noticed how a big big span of stability was affected by ... comets. Kind of the disruptor. When one keep in mind the work of the forum (anthropocosmic connection) - something starts to make so much sense... And it's like the belief that people have, which would go by "when economy crashes, it's bad for humans" - turns up to be completely different, and in a very different area. So - comets, all the time. Throughout centuries and thousands of centuries. This is something really crazy and interesting. Nothing happens when no comet. Seems overall comets have been a constant.

Let us see if the idea is worth exploring. The idea would be not to do again a homemade model of everything, a theory of everything - but to agglomerate the known cosmological elements we know of. Slight difference, I believe. Instead of trying to "re-know the Universe", the approach would be trying to agglutinate various known models, without knowing what would come up. A theory of everything would imply we'd start up with a fixed destination (which is not wrong); somehow, we already more or less know about it, in fact. (Just trying to formulate a couple of ideas!)

Thank you and good luck any way!

 

[gottathink]

Let us see if the idea is worth exploring

Yes, may be too big a task as you outlined but perhaps it could evolve into something useful.