mada85
The Cosmic Force
I came across this on UK MSN news today and added some comments.
Original here http://news.uk.msn.com/Article.aspx?cp-documentid=3295162
Iraq tour for 'over the moon' Harry
Over the moon? What is he so excited about? The chance to rape and butcher some more innocent Iraqi people perhaps. He can get the Americans to show him how its done.
Prince Harry is going to Iraq, the MoD has confirmed
Prince Harry is to serve on the front line in Iraq after becoming the first royal in 25 years to be deployed to a war zone.
The 22-year-old third in line to the throne was "over the moon" after winning his battle to see action alongside his fellow soldiers.
Don't make me laugh. As if he will face any real danger. It's a propaganda stunt for the sleeping British sheeple. If our young, handsome Royal PRINCE is so eager to serve in a war zone, you should be too. See, folks, it's quite safe, really...we even send our third-in-line-to-the-throne royal prince out there.
His deployment with the Blues and Royals is part of the next rotation of troops for Operation Telic.
He could head out to Iraq in April, in as early as eight weeks' time, for a six-month tour of duty.
The Prince reportedly threatened to quit the Army if he were not allowed to serve in a conflict zone.
The Army would have been a lot better off without him - at least there would have been one less soldier in Iraq.
Clarence House and the Ministry of Defence confirmed he will take on a "normal troop commander's role" in Iraq, rather than a desk job.
He will lead 12 men from 'A Squadron' of the Household Cavalry Regiment in four Scimitar armoured reconnaissance vehicles, each with a crew of three.
His uncle, the Duke of York, was the last royal to serve in a conflict zone when he flew helicopters on dangerous decoy missions for the Navy during the Falklands War a quarter of a century ago.
The Royal Household was consulted as the military held high level talks on whether to send the senior royal to the front line. Chief of the General Staff, General Sir Richard Dannatt gave the final go-ahead.
We hereby give our most gracious permission for Prince 'Dirty' Harry to see action in Iraq, as long as said Prince remains at a very safe distance away from any insurgents, terrorists, armed Americans and, erm, action. Very bad show to have one of our royals shot at. He can have a nice cup of tea while he is 'seeing some action'.
However, there are fears that having such a high-profile target as a member of the Royal Family in the country could spur on insurgents to attack the Army and concern for both the Prince's safety and those serving alongside him.
Fears? What fears? We've all got much better things to think about than Prince 'Dirty' Harry.
* * * * * * *
The PTB might find it useful to have Harry in Iraq; they can always have him killed and blame it on the Iraqis/Iranians/Syrians/Jordanians... thus fomenting more anti Arab sentiment in the West. Perhaps the normal people in the UK just aren't getting the idea that they're supposed to be hating these Muslims, Arabs...anyone with a brown skin, since black Africans, Caribbeans and so on have been quite well assimilated and corporatised. I don't think though that Harry has the same kind of place in the public heart that Princess Diana had.
We are seeing the widespread demonisation of Muslims in the UK at present with two well publicised anti-terror raids carried out against Muslim people in the past year, various court cases challenging Muslim womens' right to wear the veil and so on. Young idealistic Harry probably has no idea what a useful pawn he is for the PTB.
Original here http://news.uk.msn.com/Article.aspx?cp-documentid=3295162
Iraq tour for 'over the moon' Harry
Over the moon? What is he so excited about? The chance to rape and butcher some more innocent Iraqi people perhaps. He can get the Americans to show him how its done.
Prince Harry is going to Iraq, the MoD has confirmed
Prince Harry is to serve on the front line in Iraq after becoming the first royal in 25 years to be deployed to a war zone.
The 22-year-old third in line to the throne was "over the moon" after winning his battle to see action alongside his fellow soldiers.
Don't make me laugh. As if he will face any real danger. It's a propaganda stunt for the sleeping British sheeple. If our young, handsome Royal PRINCE is so eager to serve in a war zone, you should be too. See, folks, it's quite safe, really...we even send our third-in-line-to-the-throne royal prince out there.
His deployment with the Blues and Royals is part of the next rotation of troops for Operation Telic.
He could head out to Iraq in April, in as early as eight weeks' time, for a six-month tour of duty.
The Prince reportedly threatened to quit the Army if he were not allowed to serve in a conflict zone.
The Army would have been a lot better off without him - at least there would have been one less soldier in Iraq.
Clarence House and the Ministry of Defence confirmed he will take on a "normal troop commander's role" in Iraq, rather than a desk job.
He will lead 12 men from 'A Squadron' of the Household Cavalry Regiment in four Scimitar armoured reconnaissance vehicles, each with a crew of three.
His uncle, the Duke of York, was the last royal to serve in a conflict zone when he flew helicopters on dangerous decoy missions for the Navy during the Falklands War a quarter of a century ago.
The Royal Household was consulted as the military held high level talks on whether to send the senior royal to the front line. Chief of the General Staff, General Sir Richard Dannatt gave the final go-ahead.
We hereby give our most gracious permission for Prince 'Dirty' Harry to see action in Iraq, as long as said Prince remains at a very safe distance away from any insurgents, terrorists, armed Americans and, erm, action. Very bad show to have one of our royals shot at. He can have a nice cup of tea while he is 'seeing some action'.
However, there are fears that having such a high-profile target as a member of the Royal Family in the country could spur on insurgents to attack the Army and concern for both the Prince's safety and those serving alongside him.
Fears? What fears? We've all got much better things to think about than Prince 'Dirty' Harry.
* * * * * * *
The PTB might find it useful to have Harry in Iraq; they can always have him killed and blame it on the Iraqis/Iranians/Syrians/Jordanians... thus fomenting more anti Arab sentiment in the West. Perhaps the normal people in the UK just aren't getting the idea that they're supposed to be hating these Muslims, Arabs...anyone with a brown skin, since black Africans, Caribbeans and so on have been quite well assimilated and corporatised. I don't think though that Harry has the same kind of place in the public heart that Princess Diana had.
We are seeing the widespread demonisation of Muslims in the UK at present with two well publicised anti-terror raids carried out against Muslim people in the past year, various court cases challenging Muslim womens' right to wear the veil and so on. Young idealistic Harry probably has no idea what a useful pawn he is for the PTB.