Evan
The Living Force
He’s a master of the art. Never contemptuously overt, still cutting to the bone.
Putin Recognizes Donbass Republics, Sends Russian Military to 'Denazify' Ukraine
- Thread starter bjorb
- Start date
Seato
Jedi Master
I have watched a number of commentaries on the summit meeting including one with John Helmer and another with Pepe Escobar.
Interestingly both suspect a goal of the meeting or result for Trump was about allowing the USA to publicly push the responsibility for the war onto Europe. This is following from the pressure to get Europe to fund the bill for any future weapons deliveries to Ukraine. Ultimately this will likely involve continued US involvement with satellite and targeting assistance, but Europe would oversee responsibility for the transfer of weapons and take the blame for defeat or continued attempts to strike Russia.
Though there may be indications Russia might be willing to play along, I cannot really say why other than perhaps hoping to keep on reasonable terms with the Trump administration. Maybe Russia’s battlefield advantage now has grown so strong, and they feel victory is inevitable so there is little consequence and in fact something to be gained by giving Trump an opening to save face in Ukraine.
Perhaps with enough luck Trump might be able to pass the buck to Europe for American audiences, but I struggle to see European Powers buying into this. They have already been squirming at the prospect of funding the Ukraine war out of their own pocket, and economically are not in a state to do so. I do not see Trump being able to disengage from the conflict even if only in a performative manner without inviting blame from Europe in the event of a defeat. They seem thoroughly deluded and I am starting to suspect they actually believe that Lindsey Graham’s sanctions package (against Russia and more importantly its many trading partners) will finish off the Russian economy and don’t even perceive the risk to the American market and what’s left of their own.
The summit seems at least a good start for improving Russia and American relations and dialogue. With the bonus of panicking the European warmongers for the time being.
Interestingly both suspect a goal of the meeting or result for Trump was about allowing the USA to publicly push the responsibility for the war onto Europe. This is following from the pressure to get Europe to fund the bill for any future weapons deliveries to Ukraine. Ultimately this will likely involve continued US involvement with satellite and targeting assistance, but Europe would oversee responsibility for the transfer of weapons and take the blame for defeat or continued attempts to strike Russia.
Though there may be indications Russia might be willing to play along, I cannot really say why other than perhaps hoping to keep on reasonable terms with the Trump administration. Maybe Russia’s battlefield advantage now has grown so strong, and they feel victory is inevitable so there is little consequence and in fact something to be gained by giving Trump an opening to save face in Ukraine.
Perhaps with enough luck Trump might be able to pass the buck to Europe for American audiences, but I struggle to see European Powers buying into this. They have already been squirming at the prospect of funding the Ukraine war out of their own pocket, and economically are not in a state to do so. I do not see Trump being able to disengage from the conflict even if only in a performative manner without inviting blame from Europe in the event of a defeat. They seem thoroughly deluded and I am starting to suspect they actually believe that Lindsey Graham’s sanctions package (against Russia and more importantly its many trading partners) will finish off the Russian economy and don’t even perceive the risk to the American market and what’s left of their own.
The summit seems at least a good start for improving Russia and American relations and dialogue. With the bonus of panicking the European warmongers for the time being.
The first guy, greg, is a notorious shitposter and likely knew what he was doing when he posted that. He got a lot of people with that troll.
Bloomberg reveals how many countries would send troops to Ukraine once war ends
Read more
In Bryansk Oblast,
Russian Security Forces have liquidated a team of Ukrainian terrorists.Graphic
Iskander Over Ukraine Pushes Zelensky To Peace In Washington
#EU#FROMTHEFRONT 19.08.2025 Video
A statement from the White House has indicated that no US military personnel will be on the ground in Ukraine.
Fact 2: Ukraine attacks this pipeline, and because of these Ukrainian strikes, oil supplies to Hungary are repeatedly cut off. This is against Hungary’s interest.
As Hungary’s Foreign Minister, my mandate is clear: Hungary’s interest comes first. Period.
And let’s not forget: a significant part of Ukraine’s electricity comes from Hungary…
Марочко: Киев готовит серию ударов по Краматорску и обвинит в них армию России
Сотрудники украинских и западных СМИ, которые должны будут освещать эти удары, уже прибыли в город, отметил военный эксперт
tass.ru
“From the agent source received information that the administration of Zelensky in the conditions of an information background about a possible settlement of the Ukrainian conflict after the talks of Russian President Vladimir Putin with his American counterpart Donald Trump is planning an armed provocation in the city of Kramatorsk in the DPR for the subsequent discrediting of the leadership of the Russian Federation. So, servicemen of the AFU (armed formations of Ukraine - approx. TASS) until the end of August intend to carry out shelling of social facilities and multi-storey residential buildings located on the southeastern outskirts of the city. A fire strike can be carried out using a Soviet-style MLRS from the airfield under the control of Ukrainian troops,” he said, citing its own sources.
Marochko said that the photo and video materials from the places of the so-called strikes of the forces of the Russian Federation in Kramatorsk Kiev intends to place in Ukrainian and foreign media, including in social networks and Telegram channels, to present them "as the fact of aggression of the military personnel of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, as well as violation of the norms of international law." According to him, on August 18, a group of foreign journalists has already arrived in Kramatorsk - they were spotted in the area of the railway station. “The planned provocation in Kramatorsk is aimed at exerting psychological pressure on the population of the city, forming a negative attitude to the Russian military command and undermining Moscow’s authority in the international arena,” the military expert stressed.
"Triton Oil Depot in Izmail, Odessa region, after 28 Geran strikes!"
Gabe @GabeZZOZZ
Karoline Leavitt
calls out the media for sabotaging the peace talks between Trump and Putin. 
Russia's Special Military Operation in Ukraine: How It is Progressing
In February, Russia launched a military operation in Ukraine after Kiev intensified attacks on the people's republics of Donetsk and Lugansk. President Vladimir Putin emphasized that Moscow was aiming to stop the eight-year conflict being waged by Ukraine against the people of Donbass.
sputnikglobe.com
Only half of the group was destroyed, the other half was captured. The link contains a fragment of the statement of the captured commander of the Ukropskaya DRG, where he voices all the facts given in the article.n Bryansk Oblast,
Another unofficial data on Ukrainian losses. The numbers are shocking. I have mixed feelings when I see these numbers. On the one hand, the higher these numbers are, the less likely it is that my son will fall into this meat grinder, on the other hand, "Ukrainians and Russians are one people" ("C"Putin) and these are not empty words. On the third hand, the more these numbers grow, the more Russia's losses grow (which will not be announced to us in this life). Let the Russian losses be lower relative to the Ukrainian ones (I hope so), but they cannot decrease while the fighting is going on.
Уничтожили только половину группы, другую половину взяли в плен. По ссылке есть фрагмент заявления пленного командира укропской ДРГ, где он озвучивает все факты, приведенные в статье.
Очередные неофициальные данные украинских потерь. Цифры шокируют. Я испытываю смешанные чувства при виде этих цифр. С одной стороны, чем больше будут эти цифры, тем менее вероятно, что мой сын попадет в эту мясорубку, с другой стороны "украинцы и русские- один народ" ("С" Путин) и это не пустые слова. С третьей стороны чем больше растут эти цифры, тем больше растут и потери со стороны России (которые нам не озвучат в этой жизни). Пусть российские потери относительно украинских меньше (я на это надеюсь), но они не могут уменьшаться пока идут боевые действия.
Очередные неофициальные данные украинских потерь. Цифры шокируют. Я испытываю смешанные чувства при виде этих цифр. С одной стороны, чем больше будут эти цифры, тем менее вероятно, что мой сын попадет в эту мясорубку, с другой стороны "украинцы и русские- один народ" ("С" Путин) и это не пустые слова. С третьей стороны чем больше растут эти цифры, тем больше растут и потери со стороны России (которые нам не озвучат в этой жизни). Пусть российские потери относительно украинских меньше (я на это надеюсь), но они не могут уменьшаться пока идут боевые действия.
A really good interview (37 min) by Diana Panchenko (the one who made the famous interview with Lukashenko in the past) with Pavel Shchelin. Different perspective, several points that I didn't hear from others. It's in Russian, so I'm including a short AI summary. For those who prefer reading over watching, a transcription in English (also made by AI) is attached.
The interview can be watched on Rutube, YouTube and VK.
YT - turn on automatic subtitles and translation into Eng or another language of your choice
Video description:
AI summary:
The video discusses the Trump-Putin meeting in Alaska, analyzing the goals and expectations of both sides. Expert Pavel Shchelin emphasizes that the meeting is not aimed at immediate peace, but rather is an attempt by Russia to offer the USA a separate peace and test the possibilities of interaction. The positions of Russia, various American elite groups (neocons, Trump supporters), and their interests are discussed. Special attention is paid to the absence of a final document, which is an important signal. The video also considers a possible truce, its conditions, and historical parallels with the Paris Agreements. It touches upon the issues of Western influence on Ukraine and the independence of the Ukrainian people in decision-making, as well as the future of Volodymyr Zelenskyy. In conclusion, symbolic gestures and possible agreements on the Arctic are analyzed.
That's Shchelin's journalistic face. On the same topic and partly overlapping, but more nuanced, with a wider perspective, is another interview, this time by political scientist Ruslan Safarov. Also in Russian but AI-made English audio is available (actually, plays by default for me). 57 min.
Peace in Ukraine in the Mirror of Confrontation of Civilizations | Pavel Shchelin and Ruslan Safarov
For those who have trouble with accessing YouTube and are happy with Russian version, here it is on VK:
Язык силы: как изменится мировой порядок после Украины? Павел Щелин и Руслан Сафаров
The interview can be watched on Rutube, YouTube and VK.
YT - turn on automatic subtitles and translation into Eng or another language of your choice
Video description:
The symbolism of the meeting in Alaska: what Putin and Trump actually discussed. Pavel Shchelin. Broadcast with D. Panchenko
The meeting of the leaders of Russia and the United States in Alaska became not just a diplomatic event, but a symbol of a possible reformatting of world politics. In this video – a detailed analysis of the hidden meanings of the negotiations:
Why won't there be a final document, but that doesn't mean failure?
AI summary:
The video discusses the Trump-Putin meeting in Alaska, analyzing the goals and expectations of both sides. Expert Pavel Shchelin emphasizes that the meeting is not aimed at immediate peace, but rather is an attempt by Russia to offer the USA a separate peace and test the possibilities of interaction. The positions of Russia, various American elite groups (neocons, Trump supporters), and their interests are discussed. Special attention is paid to the absence of a final document, which is an important signal. The video also considers a possible truce, its conditions, and historical parallels with the Paris Agreements. It touches upon the issues of Western influence on Ukraine and the independence of the Ukrainian people in decision-making, as well as the future of Volodymyr Zelenskyy. In conclusion, symbolic gestures and possible agreements on the Arctic are analyzed.
That's Shchelin's journalistic face. On the same topic and partly overlapping, but more nuanced, with a wider perspective, is another interview, this time by political scientist Ruslan Safarov. Also in Russian but AI-made English audio is available (actually, plays by default for me). 57 min.
Peace in Ukraine in the Mirror of Confrontation of Civilizations | Pavel Shchelin and Ruslan Safarov
For those who have trouble with accessing YouTube and are happy with Russian version, here it is on VK:
Язык силы: как изменится мировой порядок после Украины? Павел Щелин и Руслан Сафаров
Another Russian record for the number of "goodies". We are slowly approaching the "magic" figure of 1,000 units per day.
One of the hit targets.
It's just a fact. I won't write anything, evaluate it for yourself.
One of the hit targets.
It's just a fact. I won't write anything, evaluate it for yourself.
Очередной российский рекорд по количеству "гостинцев". Мы потихоньку приближаемся к "магической" цифре в 1000 единиц в сутки.
Одна из пораженных целей.
Просто вот такой факт. Ничего не буду писать, оценивайте сами.
Одна из пораженных целей.
Просто вот такой факт. Ничего не буду писать, оценивайте сами.
The X account @RWApodcast (Russians With Attitude) seems to be pointing to a increasing adversarial relationship between Russia and Azerbaijan. He cites the declaration of a United Russia member and popular media personality being declared a foreign agent for his praise of Azerbaijani President Aliyev in Baku. He sees this as evidence the Kremlin is cleaning house on the Azeri lobby. He also cites the attack on Urkaine-Azeri joint refineries in Ukraine as well.
Since Azerbaijan is an ally of Turkey and Israel, I have to wonder if this is a prelude to some of Russia's future strategic maneuvers in West Asia, once Ukraine gets wrapped up this year according to the C's?
Since Azerbaijan is an ally of Turkey and Israel, I have to wonder if this is a prelude to some of Russia's future strategic maneuvers in West Asia, once Ukraine gets wrapped up this year according to the C's?
Seems everything is right. Both the fact that Markov was a fairly prominent figure in the Russian media space (now, I think, it will become quieter, in accordance with the newly acquired status of a foreign agent), and the fact that recently there has been quite serious pressure on formal and informal Azerbaijani organizations operating in Russia. But I would have asked the above question in a slightly different way.
For example, like this.
Since the Anglo-Saxon influence is becoming more and more noticeable in Azerbaijani politics (almost all "Azerbaijani oil" is controlled through British offshore companies, do we recall where the agreement between Azerbaijan and Armenia was recently signed and where Aliyev, Pashinyan and Trump warmly shook hands? The answer is the glorious city of Washington.), will Azerbaijan turn out to be the next "kamikaze ram" after Georgia and Ukraine in the West's attempts to break up Russia?
If we put the question in this way, then Azerbaijan's anti-Russian efforts will certainly provoke some retaliatory actions from Russia.
By the way, about the fact that Aliyev "won the war." In Azerbaijan, they are shouting with all their might that they took revenge on Armenia for the defeat in the 90s, but the trick is that thanks to Pashinyan, Armenia practically did not participate in the last "war" and if Azerbaijan won against anyone, it won against the Karabakh militia. This must be understood. Unfortunately, the euphoria of this victory and the substitution of concepts indicated by me may lead Azerbaijan far from where it would like to go. Azerbaijan will not be the first among those who have lost their way. I have already mentioned Georgia and Ukraine, which are currently reaping the fruits of their own delusions.
In addition, if we draw an analogy between current Azerbaijan and current Ukraine, then it is appropriate to discuss it here, otherwise, I think that this discussion should be moved to this thread.
Как будто все правильно. И то, что Марков был довольно заметной фигурой в российском медийном пространстве (теперь, надо думать, станет потише, в соответствии со свежеполученным статусом иноагента), и то что в последнее время происходит довольно серьезный нажим на формальные и неформальные азербайджанские организации, действующие в России. Вот только процитированный вопрос я бы задавал несколько по другому.
Например вот так.
Поскольку англосаксонское влияние все более заметно в политике Азербайджана (почти вся "азербайджанская нефть" контролируется через британские офшоры, вспоминаем где совсем недавно подписывался договор между Азербайджаном и Арменией и где Алиев с Пашиняном и с Трампом душевно пожимали друг другу руки? Ответ- это славный город Вашингтон.), не окажется ли Азербайджан следующим "камикадзе-тараном" после Грузии и Украины в попытках Запада развалить Россию?
Если ставить вопрос таким образом, то антироссийские усилия Азербайджана конечно же вызовут некие ответные действия со стороны России.
Кстати, по поводу того, что Алиев "выиграл войну". В азербайджане изо все сил кричат о том, что они взяли реванш у Армении за поражение в 90х, но фишка в том, что благодаря Пашиняну Армения практически не участвовала в последней "войне" и если Азербайджан у кого то и выиграл, то выиграл он у карабахского ополчения. Это надо понимать. К сожалению эйфория от данной победы и указанная мной подмена понятий может завести Азербайджан далеко не туда, куда ему бы хотелось. В этом ряду заблудившихся Азербайджан не будет первым, я уже вспоминал Грузию и Украину, которые в настоящее время пожинают плоды собственных заблуждений.
Помимо того, если проводить аналогию между нынешним Азербайджаном и нынешней Украиной, то тогда это уместно обсуждать здесь, в противном случае, я думаю, что данное обсуждение надо перенести в данную ветку.
Например вот так.
Поскольку англосаксонское влияние все более заметно в политике Азербайджана (почти вся "азербайджанская нефть" контролируется через британские офшоры, вспоминаем где совсем недавно подписывался договор между Азербайджаном и Арменией и где Алиев с Пашиняном и с Трампом душевно пожимали друг другу руки? Ответ- это славный город Вашингтон.), не окажется ли Азербайджан следующим "камикадзе-тараном" после Грузии и Украины в попытках Запада развалить Россию?
Если ставить вопрос таким образом, то антироссийские усилия Азербайджана конечно же вызовут некие ответные действия со стороны России.
Кстати, по поводу того, что Алиев "выиграл войну". В азербайджане изо все сил кричат о том, что они взяли реванш у Армении за поражение в 90х, но фишка в том, что благодаря Пашиняну Армения практически не участвовала в последней "войне" и если Азербайджан у кого то и выиграл, то выиграл он у карабахского ополчения. Это надо понимать. К сожалению эйфория от данной победы и указанная мной подмена понятий может завести Азербайджан далеко не туда, куда ему бы хотелось. В этом ряду заблудившихся Азербайджан не будет первым, я уже вспоминал Грузию и Украину, которые в настоящее время пожинают плоды собственных заблуждений.
Помимо того, если проводить аналогию между нынешним Азербайджаном и нынешней Украиной, то тогда это уместно обсуждать здесь, в противном случае, я думаю, что данное обсуждение надо перенести в данную ветку.
I have already compared the ukrops Nazis to rabid dogs and wrote the same way that those who think they can control rabid dogs are very mistaken. Here are examples of the actions of these rabid dogs. Yes, so far this is happening "on the periphery", but where is the guarantee that they will not consider something like this useful for themselves on the territory of their owners? Today, for example, it's reported an explosion and fire at a refinery in Louisiana, USA, and the evacuation of a neighboring town. Have anybody seen any ukrop nearby? I'm not saying anything, but they're good at doing things like that.
The loss figures are quite close, but the severity of these losses is incomparably different.
The loss figures are quite close, but the severity of these losses is incomparably different.
Я уже как то сравнивал укропских нацистов с бешеными собаками и писал так же, что те, кто считает, что может контролировать бешеных собак сильно ошибается. Вот примеры действий этих бешеных собак. Да, пока это происходит "на периферии", но где гарантия того, что они не посчитают для себя полезным что то подобное на территории своих хозяев? Сегодня, например, сообщали о взрыве и пожаре на НПЗ в Луизиане, США с эвакуацией соседнего городка. Укропов поблизости случайно не видели? Я ничего не утверждаю, но они хорошо умеют делать подобные вещи.
Цифры потерь довольно близкие, но тяжесть этих потерь несопоставимо разная.
Цифры потерь довольно близкие, но тяжесть этих потерь несопоставимо разная.
axj
The Living Force
Yes, it seems like Georgia refused being another Ukraine and instead both Azerbaijan and Armenia are now much closer to the US. Though realistically, neither of the two can threaten Russia - not unless Turkey gets involved, which is very unlikely.
It does look like the globalist madmen want a war between Russia and the EU at some point, maybe in a few years. And according to some analysts, the US could benefit massively from the resulting capital flight and migration from the EU - basically a continuation of the US plunderning of Europe on a much larger scale.
Evan
The Living Force
Russian squad commander interviewed by Patrick Lancaster. An eye opening view. In Russian with English subtitles.
The Importance of Multiple Perspectives
- The speaker emphasizes the necessity for individuals to understand situations from various viewpoints, highlighting that no single perspective is entirely correct.
- They argue against those who discourage the exploration of information that contradicts a specific narrative, asserting that everyone has the right to access diverse information.
- The speaker advocates for independent thought and urges viewers to not simply follow mainstream media narratives without question.
Introduction to the Report
- The speaker introduces themselves as Patrick Lancaster, an independent crowdfunded journalist, and invites viewers to support their work through provided links.
- They indicate that the report will cover ongoing events in the Kharkiv region of Ukraine, specifically focusing on interactions with Russian forces.
- The speaker expresses excitement about the upcoming reports and the information they are prepared to share from the frontline.
Journey to the Frontline
- The speaker details their travel through the Belgorod region of Russia towards the Kharkiv frontline, indicating the proximity to active conflict zones.
- They mention the dangers associated with the roads leading to the frontline, describing them as perilous and often littered with destroyed vehicles.
- The speaker interviews a commander from the Akhmat special forces, who shares insights about the ongoing situation and the risks involved in their operations.
Conditions on the Frontline
- The commander describes the frontline conditions as challenging, indicating that the area is fraught with danger and that they must navigate carefully to avoid detection.
- The speaker notes that Ukrainian forces are approximately 900 meters away, emphasizing the tense atmosphere as they approach their military positions.
- Upon reaching the positions, they observe the construction of trenches and bunkers, which are designed to provide protection from aerial surveillance and attacks.
Reflections on Military History
- An interview with a battalion commander reveals his personal history, including his family’s military background and experiences during past conflicts.
- He recounts the struggles faced by his ancestors during wartime and their sacrifices, providing a human dimension to the ongoing conflict.
- The commander reflects on the generational impact of war on families, illustrating how historical events shape personal identities and motivations in the current conflict.
Current Conflict Dynamics
- The discussion shifts to the broader implications of the ongoing war, with the speaker asserting that the conflict has not reached its conclusion and could extend for several years.
- The speaker expresses skepticism about diplomatic resolutions, suggesting that military actions will continue until significant territorial gains are achieved.
- They highlight the role of external powers, such as the United States and NATO, in exacerbating tensions and the potential for a prolonged military engagement.
Perceptions of Warfare
- The speaker argues that the current state of conflict should be viewed as a form of World War III, characterized by economic warfare and strategic maneuvers rather than traditional military engagements.
- They contend that the lack of formal declarations of war does not negate the reality of hostile actions and that the global landscape is increasingly polarized.
- The speaker encourages viewers to reconsider their understanding of warfare, emphasizing that modern conflicts often involve indirect engagements and economic sanctions.
Call to Action and Conclusion
- The speaker concludes by urging viewers to seek out diverse perspectives and to critically evaluate the information presented by mainstream media.
- They encourage active engagement with the content, inviting comments and discussions about the nature of the conflict and its implications for the future.
- The speaker reiterates their commitment to providing frontline reports and urges viewers to support independent journalism for a more nuanced understanding of global events.
- The speaker emphasizes the necessity for individuals to understand situations from various viewpoints, highlighting that no single perspective is entirely correct.
- They argue against those who discourage the exploration of information that contradicts a specific narrative, asserting that everyone has the right to access diverse information.
- The speaker advocates for independent thought and urges viewers to not simply follow mainstream media narratives without question.
Introduction to the Report
- The speaker introduces themselves as Patrick Lancaster, an independent crowdfunded journalist, and invites viewers to support their work through provided links.
- They indicate that the report will cover ongoing events in the Kharkiv region of Ukraine, specifically focusing on interactions with Russian forces.
- The speaker expresses excitement about the upcoming reports and the information they are prepared to share from the frontline.
Journey to the Frontline
- The speaker details their travel through the Belgorod region of Russia towards the Kharkiv frontline, indicating the proximity to active conflict zones.
- They mention the dangers associated with the roads leading to the frontline, describing them as perilous and often littered with destroyed vehicles.
- The speaker interviews a commander from the Akhmat special forces, who shares insights about the ongoing situation and the risks involved in their operations.
Conditions on the Frontline
- The commander describes the frontline conditions as challenging, indicating that the area is fraught with danger and that they must navigate carefully to avoid detection.
- The speaker notes that Ukrainian forces are approximately 900 meters away, emphasizing the tense atmosphere as they approach their military positions.
- Upon reaching the positions, they observe the construction of trenches and bunkers, which are designed to provide protection from aerial surveillance and attacks.
Reflections on Military History
- An interview with a battalion commander reveals his personal history, including his family’s military background and experiences during past conflicts.
- He recounts the struggles faced by his ancestors during wartime and their sacrifices, providing a human dimension to the ongoing conflict.
- The commander reflects on the generational impact of war on families, illustrating how historical events shape personal identities and motivations in the current conflict.
Current Conflict Dynamics
- The discussion shifts to the broader implications of the ongoing war, with the speaker asserting that the conflict has not reached its conclusion and could extend for several years.
- The speaker expresses skepticism about diplomatic resolutions, suggesting that military actions will continue until significant territorial gains are achieved.
- They highlight the role of external powers, such as the United States and NATO, in exacerbating tensions and the potential for a prolonged military engagement.
Perceptions of Warfare
- The speaker argues that the current state of conflict should be viewed as a form of World War III, characterized by economic warfare and strategic maneuvers rather than traditional military engagements.
- They contend that the lack of formal declarations of war does not negate the reality of hostile actions and that the global landscape is increasingly polarized.
- The speaker encourages viewers to reconsider their understanding of warfare, emphasizing that modern conflicts often involve indirect engagements and economic sanctions.
Call to Action and Conclusion
- The speaker concludes by urging viewers to seek out diverse perspectives and to critically evaluate the information presented by mainstream media.
- They encourage active engagement with the content, inviting comments and discussions about the nature of the conflict and its implications for the future.
- The speaker reiterates their commitment to providing frontline reports and urges viewers to support independent journalism for a more nuanced understanding of global events.
This is a old article and I am not sure whether it is covered before. you can make your own judgement about this weird article.
www.irishmirror.ie
'Vladimir Putin is advised by ALIENS': Councillor makes bizarre claims
Simon Parkes, a Labour councillor in Whitby, North Yorkshire, has previously claimed he lost his virginity to a extraterrestrial being at the age of five
Trending content
-
Thread 'Coronavirus Pandemic: Apocalypse Now! Or exaggerated scare story?'
- wanderingthomas
Replies: 30K -
-
-
