Putin Recognizes Donbass Republics, Sends Russian Military to 'Denazify' Ukraine

It sounds like we either agree with you about the quality of your posts or the entire forum is undergoing ponerization. But I suppose thanks for the good wishes and I wish you the best in return.

It does, if anyone's posts are unintelligible, then the quality is low. And if someone points it out and you blow up, then it doesn't help the discussion.

The result of endorsing AI on a forum intending to cultivate the mind would be the concordant consequence: brain killing. It is reasonable to assume that such work is already in progress - I am sorry that your statement which may have been valid at the time, about me seeing the devil instead of looking in my own mirror, may be off track.

There seems to be an over-reliance on AI around here. Are some members, by occurence, using "forum post generator" / "forum post analysis"? Admins? This would translate with a very quick demise. There have been very unnatural and insane reactions to some of my posts and an absence of reactions from the part of the admins. Such things, if duly considered, would have been deserving an appropriate answer, too. This shows me that something is slipping through the drops.

I mean, look at your fellow @youlik : as he did not (seemingly) understand any thing (!) that I have been writing, he has been enjoying the liberty than to make a parralel with "diarrhea". Next to this, we got what appears to be a genuine STS signature... I cannot make this up and this has, there, nothign to do with me. Will such thing be assessed? What about axj? He asserts that my post is non-understandable. is it really the case? It's the first time that I am facing such bold statement in regard of my writings. I do believe that you may be conflating his alleged "requirement for perfection" with impeccability (when it's actually damage-based service to self that he is providing to the forum).

At St. Peter, a C will be waiting for you & will require firm & solid explanations & clarifications in regard of this license to go chatgpt. They will re-precise you that they had been warning you not to go, etc etc. I urge you, before I leave, than to proceed to an immediate full ban on everything AI on the forum, in order to get "the brain" back! I am sorry than to leave like that but I face as well the consideration of NOT participating in such an entreprise - because I will get hit. I will now log off. Sorry and good luck
 
@palestine oh sorry! it’s seems that you are very “enlightened” and knows exactly what is happening with our forum and everybody else who can’t follow your thoughts or whatever you are writing about, is at fault!

He asserts that my post is non-understandable. is it really the case?
So far, yes.

It's the first time that I am facing such bold statement in regard of my writings.
Was that a very bold statement for you? Mm ok.

At St. Peter, a C will be waiting for you & will require firm & solid explanations & clarifications in regard of this license to go chatgpt. They will re-precise you that they had been warning you not to go, etc etc. I urge you, before I leave, than to proceed to an immediate full ban on everything AI on the forum, in order to get "the brain" back! I am sorry than to leave like that but I face as well the consideration of NOT participating in such an entreprise - because I will get hit. I will now log off. Sorry and good luck
More nonsense... I do think is a good idea if you really take time off from posting and just read the threads developing and the recommended books we always post in the newbies introduction. If then, you feel this is not the place for you, because we are getting very “STS by endorsing AI”, then you’ll know that indeed, this is not the right forum for you!
So far, with that last post you just wrote, it seems like the latter could be the case.
 
I mean, look at your fellow @youlik : as he did not (seemingly) understand any thing (!) that I have been writing, he has been enjoying the liberty than to make a parralel with "diarrhea". Next to this, we got what appears to be a genuine STS signature... I cannot make this up and this has, there, nothign to do with me. Will such thing be assessed?
I also encourage everyone to take a closer look at me, and if anyone sees what this participant saw, please let me know. I am referring to his statement about the parallel I drew between his posts and "diarrhea", which in my understanding did not apply to him at all, but was a separate story.

I would like to say about the "STS signature". I am under no illusions and fully accept C's statement that we are all STS here. STO in my case is still only an aspiration. I try to make progress in this direction, but how I do it is not for me to judge. If this participant saw the "STS signature" in my posts, then this is certainly bad, but I don't find anything surprising here. What is surprising, in my opinion, is something else, namely-did this participant imagine himself to be 100% STO? If so, then this, along with the first part of this post, already smacks of a clinical diagnosis.

Я тоже призываю всех приглядеться ко мне повнимательнее и если хоть кто-нибудь разглядит то, что увидел данный участник, то прошу дать мне знать. Я имею ввиду его заявление о проведенной мной параллели между его постами и "диареей", которая в моем понимании совершенно к нему не относилась, а была отдельной историей.
Хочется сказать по поводу "подписи STS". Я не строю иллюзий и полностью принимаю на свой счет заявление C's о том, что мы все тут STS. STO в моем случае это пока только устремление. Я стараюсь продвигаться в этом направлении, но как это у меня получается- не мне об этом судить. Если данный участник разглядел в моих постах "подпись STS", то это конечно же плохо, но удивительного я тут ничего не нахожу. Удивительно, на мой взгляд, другое, а именно- неужели данный участник вообразил себя на 100% STO? Если это так, то это, вместе с первой частью данного поста, попахивает уже клиническим диагнозом.
 
Hmmm ok I will do that if you feel that my posts are incomprehensible.

It is one thing for a member than to hint at my writings as being incomprehensible - going as far as to publicly mock those, and request clarifications - when this very same person would actually make HUGE typos mistakes in, precisely, a post lecturing me about my wrong writing. There is a double-irrespect there and I don't like it, even if it is not that mattering in the end.

I would thus request the admins to take this in consideration, for the sake of impartiality, and then reassess the objectivity of axj's statements. After all, if one has to lecture another, or make the point that a member requires correction, I estimate that such person would come as clean & pristine as possible - which has not been the case. Axj is simply not qualified for expressing that my posts are incomprehensible, simply put, but, you follow this idea.

And so, if you would like to still pursue on that road, this will mean that, indeed, your are not aligned with Truth. This would of course constitutes a good reason for me to stop posting, as I don't have time for such state of affairs.

Two members have been expressing complaints about my posts (axj & Alejo). Alejo was around "I don't see where you want to get". This has nothing to deal with my writings, which leaves axj quite alone in his "idea" of me not writing correct English.

Even more, that a person "does not see where I would like to go" has nothing to do with the objective quality of my posts. I had to state the things to an extreme basic way, which has been quite teaching a 4 yo kid. This is indeed what has been taking place (and it's a shame that there hasn't been any follow-up message from this member, as this was in the context of a discussion - it amounts to some hit'n'run, more or less, then)

Right now, we got a nice "meal" of "let's focus on palestine's incomprehensible writings".

What I have been posting is far from being incomprehensbile, and so, axj's comments are too subjective. I am sure that if I pick a French translator (for example), the sentence would match something comprehensible.

Such "cop" stance from axj has been bugging, and I found him to be over-prompt in his exercise. I preferred to let it go, and clarify for axj. But now that subjectivity is taking over, I won't let it be like that, without expressing my discontent with it. That's "pulling the rope".

I took good note of your request of stopping posting, still, and won't discuss it any more.

I will thus aim for different skies, where basic right hemisphere chit-chat will find an echo ;) I find it dishonest than to leverage such thing against myself, while you would be endorsing it at a different time (for example). You could, this way, make one thing be good and bad, according to a subjective requirement., This isn't proper.

I wonder if you notice that you're being overly defensive here? I don't see any of the feedback given as attacks. They seem quite reasonable, actually, saying that your writing and thinking could use some work.

It can be difficult to receive a critique because it runs counter to our own inflated self-image. And it takes a high degree of humility to be willing to consider the critique as being true. And then it's another step to begin to make changes on the basis of the critique. But that's the essence of networking, that's the essence of the Work, and the forum itself - to receive feedback from others with humility and work on our blindspots and flaws. We all have them. The details differ, but the main message is basically 'you do not know yourself.'

This is expressed pretty strongly by Mme de Salzman. I didn't really understand it when I first encountered it, so it's a good one to return to from time to time:

You will see that in life you receive exactly what you give. Your life is the mirror of what you are. It is in your image. You are passive, blind, demanding. You take all, you accept all, without feeling any obligation. Your attitude toward the world and toward life is the attitude of one who has the right to make demands and to take, who has no need to pay or to earn. You believe that all things are your due, simply because it is you! All your blindness is there! ...

You live exclusively according to "I like" or "I don't like," you have no appreciation except for yourself. You recognize nothing above you-theoretically, logically, perhaps, but actually no. That is why you are demanding and continue to believe that everything is cheap and that you have enough in your pocket to buy everything you like. You recognize nothing above you, either outside yourself or inside. That is why, I repeat, you have no measure and live passively according to your likes and dislikes.

Yes, your "appreciation of yourself" blinds you. It is the biggest obstacle to a new life. You must be able to get over this obstacle, this threshold, before going further.

This test divides men into two kinds: the "wheat" and the "chaff." No matter how intelligent, how gifted, how brilliant a man may be, if he does not change his appreciation of himself, there will be no hope for an inner development, for a work toward self-knowledge, for a true becoming. He will remain such as he is all his life.

The first requirement, the first condition, the first test for one who wishes to work on himself is to change his appreciation of himself. He must not imagine, not simply believe or think, but see things in himself which he has never seen before, see them actually. His appreciation will never be able to change as long as he sees nothing in himself. And in order to see, he must learn to see; this is the first initiation of man into self-knowledge.

... If he sees one time he can see a second time, and if that continues he will no longer be able not to see. This is the state to be looked for, it is the aim of our observation; it is from there that the true wish will be born, the irresistible wish to become: from cold we shall become warm, vibrant; we shall be touched by our reality.

Today we have nothing but the illusion of what we are. We think too highly of ourselves. We do not respect ourselves. In order to respect myself, I have to recognize a part in myself which is above the other parts, and my attitude toward this part should bear witness to the respect that I have for it. In this way I shall respect myself. And my relations with others will be governed by the same respect.

You must understand that all the other measures - talent, education, culture, genius-are changing measures, measures of detail. The only exact measure, the only unchanging, objective real measure is the measure of inner vision. I see - I see myself - by this, you have measured. With one higher real part, you have measured another lower part, also real. And this measure, defining by itself the role of each part, will lead you to respect for yourself.

But you will see that it is not easy. And it is not cheap. You must pay dearly. For bad payers, lazy people, parasites, no hope. You must pay, pay a lot, and pay immediately, pay in advance. Pay with yourself. By sincere, conscientious, disinterested efforts. The more you are prepared to pay without economizing, without cheating, without any falsification, the more you will receive. And from that time on you will become acquainted with your nature. And you will see all the tricks, all the dishonesties that your nature resorts to in order to avoid paying hard cash. Because you have to pay with your ready-made theories, with your rooted convictions, with your prejudices, your conventions, your "I like" and "I don't like." Without bargaining, honestly, without pretending. Trying "sincerely" to see as you offer your counterfeit money.

Try for a moment to accept the idea that you are not what you believe yourself to be, that you overestimate yourself, in fact that you lie to yourself. That you always lie to yourself every moment, all day, all your life. That this lying rules you to such an extent that you cannot control it any more. You are the prey of lying. You lie, everywhere. Your relations with others - lies. The upbringing you give, the conventions - lies. Your teaching - lies. Your theories, your art- lies. Your social life, your family life - lies. And what you think of yourself - lies also.

But you never stop yourself in what you are doing or in what you are saying because you believe in yourself. You must stop inwardly and observe. Observe without preconceptions, accepting for a time this idea of lying. And if you observe in this way, paying with yourself, without self-pity, giving up all your supposed riches for a moment of reality, perhaps you will suddenly see something you have never before seen in yourself until this day.

You will see that you are different from what you think you are.

You will see that you are two.

One who is not, but takes the place and plays the role of the other. And one who is, yet so weak, so insubstantial, that he no sooner appears than he immediately disappears. He cannot endure lies. The least lie makes him faint away. He does not struggle, he does not resist, he is defeated in advance. Learn to look until you have seen the difference between your two natures, until you have seen the lies, the deception in yourself. When you have seen your two natures, that day, in yourself, the truth will be born.

There's also a biological correlate to being unable to See ourselves in this way. Critique from others registers in the pain region of the brain:

A recent imaging study by psychologist Drew Westen and his colleagues at Emory University provides firm support for the existence of emotional reasoning. Just prior to the 2004 Bush-Kerry presidential elections, two groups of subjects were recruited - fifteen ardent Democrats and fifteen ardent Republicans. Each was presented with conflicting and seemingly damaging statements about their candidate, as well as about more neutral targets such as actor Tom Hanks (who, it appears, is a likable guy for people of all political persuasions). Unsurprisingly, when the participants were asked to draw a logical conclusion about a candidate from the other - "wrong" - political party, the participants found a way to arrive at a conclusion that made the candidate look bad, even though logic should have mitigated the particular circumstances and allowed them to reach a different conclusion. Here's where it gets interesting.

When this "emote control" began to occur, parts of the brain normally involved in reasoning were not activated. Instead, a constellation of activations occurred in the same areas of the brain where punishment, pain, and negative emotions are experienced (that is, in the left insula, lateral frontal cortex, and ventromedial prefrontal cortex). Once a way was found to ignore information that could not be rationally discounted, the neural punishment areas turned off, and the participant received a blast of activation in the circuits involving rewards - akin to the high an addict receives when getting his fix.

In essence, the participants were not about to let facts get in the way of their hot-button decision making and quick buzz of reward. "None of the circuits involved in conscious reasoning were particularly engaged," says Westen. "Essentially, it appears as if partisans twirl the cognitive kaleidoscope until they get the conclusions they want, and then they get massively reinforced for it, with the elimination of negative emotional states and activation of positive ones." {...}

Ultimately, Westen and his colleagues believe that "emotionally biased reasoning leads to the 'stamping in' or reinforcement of a defensive belief, associating the participant's 'revisionist' account of the data with positive emotion or relief and elimination of distress. 'The result is that partisan beliefs are calcified, and the person can learn very little from new data,'" Westen says. Westen's remarkable study showed that neural information processing related to what he terms "motivated reasoning" ... appears to be qualitatively different from reasoning when a person has no strong emotional stake in the conclusions to be reached.

The study is thus the first to describe the neural processes that underlie political judgment and decision making, as well as to describe processes involving emote control, psychological defense, confirmatory bias, and some forms of cognitive dissonance. The significance of these findings ranges beyond the study of politics: "Everyone from executives and judges to scientists and politicians may reason to emotionally biased judgments when they have a vested interest in how to interpret 'the facts,'" according to Westen.

So we resist and get defensive because critique is experienced as pain. The brain is always seeking to conserve energy and run on these self-pleasing circuits. It can be re-wired, but it takes time and effort to do so - and intentional suffering. The saving grace in taking on board the critiques offered by others gives us the opportunity to get over our false and inflated self-image. I know that's what it did for me.

All that starts with networking, AKA being willing to at least consider critiques as valid and admit that we don't know ourselves. See if you can consider the feedback given from this perspective.

I've already mentioned the Big 5 Narcissism books to you. I agree with others that it would probably be a good idea to take a break from posting so much and read more of the recommended reading list.
 
I also encourage everyone to take a closer look at me, and if anyone sees what this participant saw, please let me know.

Not to worry, palestine's responses have more to do with him than anything else.

I do think is a good idea if you really take time off from posting and just read the threads developing and the recommended books we always post in the newbies introduction.

I agree with others that it would probably be a good idea to take a break from posting so much and read more of the recommended reading list.

It would be better for him to set aside all things forum and Work related in order to focus on getting grounded in the day to day of normal life for the foreseeable future.

Continuing to engage with material here would likely serve as an impediment to his progress.
 
Not to worry, palestine's responses have more to do with him than anything else.





It would be better for him to set aside all things forum and Work related in order to focus on getting grounded in the day to day of normal life for the foreseeable future.

Continuing to engage with material here would likely serve as an impediment to his progress.
Completely in agreement. This small p palestine has opened up a bunch of threads, posts several times in a row in the same thread in succession, when with some consideration could condense into one cogent post. His activity is manic and getting annoying already. He needs to just relax and observe, and if he can't do this on his own, possibly posting rights could be put on hold for awhile.
 
This is a pretty big announcement by Putin:

Russia will ‘finish off’ Kiev’s forces – Putin​

The Ukrainian people must realize they were duped by the Western dream of inflicting a “strategic defeat” on Russia, the president has said.

President Vladimir Putin has declared that Russian forces are gaining momentum across the entire line of contact and could soon “finish off” Ukraine’s military, while commenting on attempts by Kiev’s European backers to derail a diplomatic resolution of the conflict.

The Russian president made the remarks on Thursday during a meeting with the crew of the Arkhangelsk nuclear submarine, which is equipped with Zircon hypersonic missiles. Putin reiterated that Moscow has always sought to resolve the conflict through diplomatic means but was met with deception and obstruction from the West – first with the failed Minsk Agreements and then during the 2022 Istanbul peace talks.

“Their European handlers… convinced the Ukrainian leadership that they had to continue armed resistance, essentially to the last Ukrainian, with the goal of inflicting a strategic defeat on Russia,” he said.

Putin accused Western leaders – specifically former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson – of underestimating Russia’s resolve, and warned that the country’s military capabilities should not be taken lightly.

“He must have forgotten that there are people like you – and weapons like your submarine,” Putin told the naval crew. “Apparently, he forgot, or maybe they simply do not understand what the Russian people are made of.”

The Russian president said the conflict is reaching a turning point and expressed confidence in the outcome, noting that “across the entire line of combat engagement, our troops hold the strategic initiative.”

Not long ago I said, ‘We’ll squeeze them.’ Now there’s reason to believe we’ll finish them off. Then, I think a moment of realization must come to the Ukrainian people themselves.
Despite his hardline tone, Putin reiterated that Russia remains open to peace negotiations – as long as the core causes of the conflict are addressed.

“We are in favor of resolving these issues by peaceful means… But the root causes must be eliminated. We must ensure Russia’s security for the long historical perspective,” he said.
 
Another big announcement by Putin during the same visit to Russia's most modern submarine (of which 5 more will be constructed):

Key points from Putin’s speech on placing Ukraine under UN control​

The current authorities in Kiev have lost the legitimacy needed to sign any peace agreements, the president has said

Russian President Vladimir Putin has proposed placing Ukraine under a temporary international administration as one possible way of resolving the ongoing conflict. The idea, he said, draws on international precedent and would aim to restore legitimate governance before any peace deal could be finalized.

During his meeting with Russian nuclear submarine officers on Thursday, President Putin described a possible international mechanism for stabilizing Ukraine – placing it under temporary external administration coordinated by the United Nations.

Here are the key takeaways from Putin’s proposal:

Problem: Collapse of legitimacy in Kiev
Putin argued that Ukraine’s constitutional legitimacy has broken down due to the expiration of Vladimir Zelensky’s presidential term last year and the lack of elections since – rendering all of his government’s claims to authority invalid.

“Presidential elections weren’t held... under the constitution, all officials are appointed by the president. If he himself is illegitimate, then so is everyone else.”

Consequence: Power vacuum filled by radicals

Putin has warned that groups with neo-Nazi views, such as the notorious Azov battalion – which receive Western weapons and actively recruit followers – could increasingly exert de facto control in Ukraine, potentially replacing formal civilian authorities.

“Amid the de facto illegitimacy… Neo-Nazi formations are receiving more weapons,” and could take “the actual power in their hands.”

Putin argued that this makes negotiating with Ukraine’s current government even more unreliable and unstable: “It’s unclear who you’re even signing any documents with – tomorrow new people could come and say, ‘We don’t know who signed this – goodbye.’”

Suggestion: UN-led temporary external administration
Putin proposed the use of a UN-led transitional authority, referencing prior international missions such as in East Timor, Papua New Guinea, and parts of former Yugoslavia.

“In such cases, international practice often follows a known path – under UN peacekeeping, through what is called external governance, a temporary administration.”

Purpose: Restoring constitutional order and setting a legal framework for stable peace

The main goal, according to Putin, would be to organize democratic elections and install a functioning, legitimate government trusted by citizens and recognized globally. He stated that only such leaders could sign peace agreements that would be recognized worldwide and upheld over time.

“Why do this? In order to hold democratic elections, in order to bring to power a government that is capable and enjoys the trust of the people, and then begin negotiations with them on a peace treaty, sign legitimate documents that will be recognized worldwide and will be reliable and stable.”

Not the only option – but a viable one
Putin emphasized that this idea is not the only possibility, but an example drawn from historical precedent.

“This is just one option... I’m not saying other options do not exist, but it is hard right now, or maybe even impossible, to lay everything out clearly because the situation is changing so fast,” he said.

Multilateral cooperation beyond the West

Putin said such an initiative should involve not just the UN or the US, but a broader coalition, including BRICS nations and others Russia considers reliable.

“We will work with any partners – the US, China, India, Brazil, South Africa, BRICS countries… and, for example, North Korea.”

He also stressed that Russia remains open to working with the EU, even though Moscow’s trust in the Western European countries has been fundamentally undermined by their manipulation of peace efforts as a tactic to buy time and rearm Ukraine.
 
Apparently, about this Putin said, saying that there is an opportunity to "finish off" the AFU.
DS: Russian forces increased the number of attacks by 17%, reaching a record 200 assaults per day at the end of March
Russian forces in March 2025 dramatically increased the intensity of offensive operations against Ukrainian positions, bringing the number of attacks to a record level. This is evidenced by data from the Ukrainian analytical project DeepState, published on March 28. According to the information, since the beginning of the month, the number of assaults has increased by 17% compared to February, and in recent days it has reached a peak — more than 200 attacks per day. This indicator was the highest since the beginning of the year, signaling a new stage of escalation at the front.

DeepState analysts note that the surge in activity of Russian forces has covered several key areas at once. The greatest concentration of assaults was recorded on Kupyansky, Limansky, Pokrovsky, Vremyevsky and Kursk sections of the contact line. These areas, according to the project, have become the scene of fierce fighting, where Russia seeks to break through the Ukrainian defense, using numerical superiority and increased artillery support. In the last days of March, Russian troops, according to reports, switched to the tactics of massive strikes.

The increase in the number of attacks began in the first days of the month, when the Russian command probably adjusted its plans after the winter period of relative calm. According to DeepState, during the period from March 1 to March 26, the total number of assault operations significantly exceeded the February figures, which indicates a strategic shift in Moscow's approach. Experts attribute this activity to an attempt to consolidate the successes and put pressure on the Ukrainian forces before possible negotiations initiated by international mediators.

And that's probably what he meant, too.
Russia and Ukraine exchanged bodies of military personnel-43 for 909 (PHOTO)

Ukraine has received the bodies of 909 dead soldiers, the Ukrainian coordination Headquarters for prisoners of war confirms the fact of the exchange.

They were eliminated by Russian fighters in the Kurakhovsky, Pokrovsky, Artemovsky, Ugledarsky, Zaporozhye directions and in the LPR.

Some were returned from morgues in Russia.

►On February 14, the bodies of 45 Russian soldiers were exchanged for 757 Ukrainians.
►January 24 — 42 on 503.
►December 20 — 42 on 508.
►November 29 — 48 on 502;
►November 8 — 37 to 563.

Zelensky dared to violate the agreements reached by the Americans, i.e. act against Trump, relying on Britain and France, but do they have enough "gunpowder"to effectively support ukrops? For some reason, it seems to me that they will not be enough for a long time.
Kremlin: Russia reserves the right not to comply with the moratorium on energy attacks

Russia reserves the right not to comply with the constantly violated Kiev moratorium on attacks on energy. This was reported today in the Kremlin.

The Armed Forces of Ukraine do not listen to the orders of the Ukrainian leadership, striking power facilities of the Russian Federation, there is total lack of control, Russian Presidential press Secretary Dmitry Peskov explained.

National units in Ukraine are gaining strength and expanding, which indicates the loss of control by the Kiev regime.

Lifting sanctions against Rosselkhozbank is an integral part of the Black Sea initiative, the Kremlin recalled.

If Europe does not want to follow the path of easing sanctions under the Black Sea initiative, it means that it does not want to follow the path of peace.

Видимо вот об этом говорил Путин, заявив что просматривается возможность "добить" ВСУ.
И это он тоже, скорее всего имел ввиду.
Зеленский осмелился нарушать договоренности, достигнутые американцами, т.е. действовать против Трампа, опираясь на Британию и Францию, но хватит ли у них "пороху" для эффективной поддержки укропов? Мне почему то кажется, что их на долго не хватит.
 
There are those wits that call it The Coalition of the Killing and very rightly so.
What else does one call these peace haters , Britain and France as the leaders in the failed EU .
War is their only way out of their dire economical straits and of their insane promises to Ukraine.
Once they are committed they cannot back without losing face and be pointed at as unreliable.
And then there is their extreme Russophobia and their insane Greed , Jealousy and Hate.
Demonic entities have always come through for Europe.
It has been behind all wars that ravished nations for hundreds of years .

" What's dead cannot die. All you got is past glories and it is over for you."

After our slow and dire crash for it is Eurasia and the Bricks that matter now and all that British hate without a vent...

We may end up very unlucky.
Either part of the minority searching for salvage material as we survey the rabble. or
Britains waters might be nuked .
The prophecies of Nostradamus state that in our future, most of Britain will be under the water.
 
Nothing about it on RT yet, even though it seems to be a major development:

Trump says he is 'pissed off' with Putin over lack of peace progress​

Putin called for a transnational government for Ukraine on Friday

President Donald Trump is "pissed off" at Russian President Vladimir Putin for lashing out at Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy this weekend, he told NBC News in an interview.

Trump told the outlet that he was frustrated with Putin for not moving in the right direction toward a peace agreement with Ukraine. Putin disparaged Zelenskyy's leadership on Friday, arguing that a trans-national government may be necessary for Ukraine.

"If Russia and I are unable to make a deal on stopping the bloodshed in Ukraine, and if I think it was Russia’s fault — which it might not be — but if I think it was Russia’s fault, I am going to put secondary tariffs on oil, on all oil coming out of Russia," Trump told the outlet.

"That would be that if you buy oil from Russia, you can’t do business in the United States," he continued. "There will be a 25% tariff on all oil, a 25- to 50-point tariff on all oil."
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-says-he-pissed-off-putin-over-lack-peace-progress-report

I wonder why such oil sanctions against Russia were not implemented by the US already. There must be a good reason, eg. maybe it is potentially more damaging to the US than Russia.
 
I wonder why such oil sanctions against Russia were not implemented by the US already. There must be a good reason, eg. maybe it is potentially more damaging to the US than Russia.
A quote from an Aljazeera's article (March 30) point in that direction, this may lead to some "tension" with BRICS members :

Trump’s threat of “secondary tariffs” on Russian oil came less than a week after his administration imposed a 25 percent tariff on US imports from any country buying oil or gas from Venezuela.

A similar tariff on US imports from countries that buy Russian oil could hit China and India, two of Moscow’s biggest customers, particularly hard.

In his NBC interview, Trump said Putin knows he is angry with him, but added that he had “a very good relationship with him” and “the anger dissipates quickly … if he does the right thing”.

Trump's relationship with Zelensky isn't at its best either :

US officials have been separately pushing Kyiv to accept a critical minerals agreement, a summary of which suggested that the US was demanding all of Ukraine’s natural resources income for years.

Zelenskyy has said Kyiv’s lawyers needed to review the draft before he could say more about the offer.

Speaking on board Air Force One later on Sunday, Trump accused the Ukrainian leader of attempting to back out of the deal.

“If he does that, he’s got some problems, big, big problems,” Trump told reporters.

“He wants to be a member of NATO, but he’s never going to be a member of NATO. He understands that.”

Meanwhile in Ukraine "busification" is still going on, Russia is pushing/advancing from every sector of the front except in Toresk where they're stalled for the moment. The odds of any ceasefire are slim, there's rumors of elections in july :

LONDON, March 30. /TASS/. The presidential election in Ukraine may be held in July, The Economist reports, citing a source in the Ukrainian government.

Vladimir Zelensky will attempt to catch his competitors by surprise, hoping that they will fail to arrange an efficient campaign within a short term, the source said.

According to the news outlet, Zelensky instructed his office last week to start working on the election after the full-fledged ceasefire that might be achieved by the end of April, as the US administration believes.
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom