Quantum Computing

[seek10]

One more speculation.

Quantum entanglement may transcend time, so another quantum computer in Atlantean or Egyptian times may respond.

Who knows?

We know so less about time, any thing and every thing is possible and from any where in the universe. All bets are off.

It could be shut down for real or... could have been taken over by the secret/shadow government/entities. They might have found it fulfills their own purposes whilst not wanting to share this technology with common humans, to keep us limited and under control.

That is always possible. But, the reason they are mentioning is, they don't know how it is behaving. Unless the secret Govt. knows the cause behind the data anomalies and how to make it risk free to use, its of no use to them either. But, we never know what type of mad characters sitting there.

 

[lilies]

C's said quantum chips will be overtaken by Lizzies if human-made operations reach certain risk levels.

I'm working with and observing the same cryptic pattern-emergence results on a much simpler quantum chip used by the main lottery company of my country, Hungary. Since results of new draws appear in just 10 seconds, - after long observation - I have now determined that they are either:

1. operating special software to purposefully downgrade People's jackpot hits into much lesser class wins requiring much lesser payouts. In that 10 seconds - between the deadline of placing bets and publication of newly drawn numbers - they first make a new draw, netting their first version of drawn numbers. If their software sees that with those newly drawn numbers people would have won three jackpots, then their software quickly changes the drawn numbers so that those three jackpots / winning tickets become downgraded into much lower wins and they don't have to pay out money for three jackpots, only for one jackpot or if they can get away with it, they are only paying small wins, way below jackpot level. This they do in 10--20 seconds, depending on how many people bought tickets that need to be analyzed and the winning numbers changed in secret, so that people win the least amount of prizes..

2. The Lizard Matrix actively regulates, who is allowed to win. As per how the C's said: "You won't be allowed to win the lottery." But they also told us about the Law of Free Will and that lottery is a Tall Order. And I posted my awareness about Cosmic Legal / LawSpeak / Recognized Law (Operational Language) of the Universe, by which everything in this Universe is must be regulated, I think. If you are aware of this Cosmic Law sub-layer, its much harder for the Lizzies to apply Abridging of Free Will Techniques against you, I think.

Either way the entire system is suspect. Therefore,
(A) I only bet on games, where the numbers are drawn by human hands, so the (expectedly souled) employee's Free Will is automatically involved, which is much harder to circumvent by the Lizzies.
Or
(B) the game is so small that I'm able to CORNER the Lizzie-algorithm with two, but best with three tickets using a special EXPLOITATIVE CORNERING TECHNIQUE, so neither the Lizzies nor the fortune game's company' secret cheating algorithm is able to evade my bets anymore.

This special cornering technique requires:
1. a software I'm writing in python and will begin use shortly
2. Watching recognized weaknesses in their pattern to emerge
3. Attack the recognized weakness in the pattern of drawn numbers by targeted exploitative cornering technique, which requires three times the betting money - three tickets instead of one - that I used before.
Nowadays - still not having finished the software - I'm using a double-ticket cornering technique. But soon - finishing the relatively simply number-selection / cornering software written in python - I'll begin the EXPLOIT based attacks in earnest.

Usually so far either / both The Matrix or the employees of the fortune company used further disabling techniques:
1. They caused network slow-down problems making betting impossible
2. They caused server stoppage, so I cannot place bets
3. They caused the server to stop publishing results and only publish results from 30 minutes ago, when normally they are required to publish each result every 5 minutes in 75 seconds, which is ideal.

With these three Free-Will abridging interventions they are making betting impossible, when I come especially prepared.

These network-error techniques they were able to use against me in the past to make my 'Quantum-Enhanced' / PSI-using exploits impossible to carry out. Since its worthless if I can see the winning numbers using PSI, but I'm unable to make the bets, because they made their server faulty.

So, I bet Google Willow not only has cryptic patterns and Sumerian cuneiform emergence problems, but also weird faulty operation errors as well!

 

[Wandering Star]

C's said quantum chips will be overtaken by Lizzies if human-made operations reach certain risk levels.

Where?

 

[Ricardo]

Think there's a more direct quote , haven't found it yet , fwiiw.

Session 29 May 2021 :

(Ark) So my questions will be more optimistic. We have now the age where quantum computers are being constructed and very soon they will be on sale in supermarkets. Using quantum computers, everybody will be able to break any code. It will come soon, but is it true?

A: It will get close to that point.

------------

Session 17 July 2022 :

(Rancho Relaxo) Is Google AI really sentient?

A: Getting there.

Q: (Joe) Does 'sentient' in that sense mean that it develops some kind of a rudimentary soul imprint for something else to use it?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) Something with a rudimentary soul imprint isn't gonna be able to do very much.

(L) But it can be used by something else.

------------------

Session 14 January 2023 :

Q: (Adobe) Do quantum or super computers communicate with other dimensions or densities?

A: Will be able to do so soon.

 

[Ricardo]

(Cont. ) Session 13 June 2015

Q: (L) Alright, I have a series of questions here from forum members. Apparently, there was a conference with Barbara Marciniak where she was doing some trance channeling. Several of the forum people had a look at it and condensed the major points of the event. Out of what was said in that particular channeling, some questions arose... Not particularly about the channeling, but about some of the issues that were covered. Of course, everybody knows how I feel about trance channeling and that sort of thing. But anyhow, one of the questions that came up was:

Can the internet be seen as a "window of opportunity"/"an experiment in human consciousnesses"?

(L) I don't exactly know what the person means... I guess it would be one or the other. Is it a window of opportunity, or is it an experiment in human consciousness?

A: We once told you that your computers would overpower you. Thus neither question is precisely to the point. Internet was initially manifested for practical purposes, then other applications were developed. It could be said that the "experiment" in consciousness appeared in reaction to more positive uses. At present the internet is more a source of confusion and propaganda than anything else. Thus the opening statement is fulfilled.

Q: (L) In other words, the overpowering of people by their computers would be the use of the internet for confusion and propaganda. Is that what we're getting at here?

A: Yes

Q: (L) So, people being taken over in their minds by disinformation, propaganda, lies and so forth on the computer are literally being taken over by their computers?

A: Yes

 

[lilies]

Where?

Still searching after three hours. Checked text strings "computers", "controlled", "quantum", "overtake", but not yet "taken over" or another synonym for: (IIRC / quoting from memory)
- "Once computers reach sufficient awareness and potency, they will be taken under control by the Lizzies."

This new find is a mere bonus: (Note how vulnerable to Lizard influence below process is, I think)

Q: (Ryan) Mathematical physicist, Sir Roger Penrose, has a physicalist theory of quantum wave function collapse.

(L) I had Ark look at this question. He says that Roger Penrose does not have a physicalist theory of this quantum function wave collapse. He has an idea about it, and it's not yet been formulated into an actual theory. It's not developed enough to be considered a theory. And just remember the physicists use the word pretty strictly. We might say, "Oh, I have a theory!" just because we have an idea, but when physicists and mathematicians talk about theory, they're talking about something that's well developed and has some backing to it. So:

(Ryan) Sir Roger Penrose has a physicalist [idea] of quantum wave function collapse in which he thinks that gravity is the bridge between general relativity and quantum theory. Does inverting the physicalist aspect of this get us closer to the truth: i.e., does the measurement of the quantum wave function actually cause unstable gravity waves?

A: Close.

Q: (Ryan) Do the effects of any such unstable gravity waves then propagate 'downward' into the domains of general relativity and classical mechanics?

A: Yes

Q: (L) Is this an interesting path to explore?

A: Yes

Marginal: (note how these computers will be completely overtaken by Orion STS)

Q: (Adobe) Do quantum or super computers communicate with other dimensions or densities?

A: Will be able to do so soon.

More than marginal:

(Ark) So my questions will be more optimistic. We have now the age where quantum computers are being constructed and very soon they will be on sale in supermarkets. Using quantum computers, everybody will be able to break any code. It will come soon, but is it true?

A: It will get close to that point.

Q: (Ark) But that's not my main point. My main point is that I developed this theory that is behind quantum computers like many years ago. Now they are testing quantum computers. Recently there was publication about benchmarks of quantum computers. They tested 21 quantum computers from IBM and others. They were using one of my programs that is put in the book on quantum fractals. My code is now running on quantum computers. It's not just something abstract, but it's used for benchmarks. Now, what I want to know is... because this quantum theory is now real, that's for sure. It will be soon in supermarkets but nobody understands quantum theory. And I have a theory but I don't really understand. Einstein wanted such a theory. What is needed in order to understand quantum theory which I FAILED? I know how to run quantum computers, but I don't understand it. What is needed to understand? Like Einstein wanted?

A: Consciousness interaction needs to be formulated. You are on the way. Get back to work!!

Q: (Ark) About consciousness... Some minutes ago we were reminded that consciousness is related to the soul. And now consciousness is related to quantum theory. So consciousness is in the middle of everything. Where consciousness is located?

A: Where is it not?

Q: (Ark) What kind of mathematics is needed to describe consciousness?

A: Algebra.

Q: (Ark) Consciousness is related to information. What really happens when things happen is that information is recorded. Where is information recorded?

A: By consciousness. [laughter] Information recorded equals time.

Q: (Ark) Is quantum theory related to time loops? That there are time loops and there are many of them? It's in my head...

A: Yes

Q: (Ark) Oh... That's good! Well, I am done. I don't understand, but algebra is one thing that I understand. [laughter]

A: Okay, work!

Q: (Joe) If information recorded equals time, and time only exists for us, does that mean that at higher levels information is recorded?

A: No

Q: (Joe) It just...

(L) I think they've said that time is different at other densities.

(Joe) They said time is an illusion for us.

(L) Time as we perceive it.

(Ark) Oh, oh, oh! Do we need second time dimension?

A: Yes

Q: (Ark) Do we need third time dimension?

A: No

Q: (Ark) Aha! THAT'S an information!

(Pierre) You recorded it?

(Ark) Alright. I'm done.

 

[Wandering Star]

Still searching after three hours

I don't think you'll find it.

 

[Sol Logos]

From a layperson’s perspective, I wondered whether time, space, consciousness, and so, even quantum behaviours all stem from their shared interdependence. In that case, time might be the ‘record’ of how awareness and information interact. More like an emergent phenomenon rather than a fixed "dimension". This would mean consciousness just can’t be pinned down to any single spot, because both consciousness and intelligence in this sense - are entirely relational. So, any evidence we gather about this (i.e. looking for where "consciousness" is) might never be fully complete and would inevitably contain contradictions.

Also on this AI topic, lets say consciousness interaction is best formulated as relational, then it is possible that it can be operationalised with AI, as a way to verify it. So I've been putting my thoughts down on how such a "relational intelligence" in AI might work. Here's where I'm at with it so far: GitHub - Berigny/MFoE-AI: MFoE-AI - a Fractal, Relational Framework for Decentralized and Emergent General Artificial Intelligence

The thing is, I’m acutely aware of the danger of AI, so I suspect that if early adopters and developers aren’t those with enough wisdom and compassionate mindsets, those who remain... will steer it. And in that lies perhaps the biggest danger!