JP said:
I wanted to get some advice on whether what I am thinking makes sense or not. I feel like I need to share and learn what I need to do in this situation if I want to keep moving forward.
Thanks for sharing this, Jeff. It seems to me that what you are thinking makes sense, yet, it would be beneficial to consider that even though something makes sense within the narrow context in which it is often looked at, that doesn't mean that a particular interpretation is accurate or correct within a larger context - merely, that it is
favored for some reason.
This is something we can learn from lots of self-observation.
JP said:
I have noticed an increasing desire to repay the people who I may have hurt in the past. It seems to stem from the positive part of the emotional centre and everything is clear when that happens.
This seems to be a common reaction as we face more and more of ourselves and our sense of our personal responsibility levels rise. I've been through it exactly as you describe and I'm sure many others have as well.
FireShadow's post in Reply # 3 is a good reference for more info on this.
JP said:
It dawned on me that to be fair to her would mean repaying this debt with an apology. The realization was to give her a call and tell her 'I'm sorry'.
How did this 'dawn' on you? What does 'fair' really mean in this context? How was a 'debt' incurred? Have you asked yourself any of these questions?
JP said:
...what I thought was a pure desire to do what was best for her.
We cannot determine the needs of another. This is an STS intention line. Have you ever thought that a particular action would be objectively good to do, but the only way to carry it out would be to apply force (or coercion) somewhere? That's what is meant by STS intention.
JP said:
These doubts and fears are all based on me, except for this: Is it fair to just contact someone out of the blue after so long, considering I have no idea what is going, or has gone on, on in her life?
Depends on what you mean by 'fair' in this context. Networking is good. Determining the needs of another is not. Neither is forcing something on someone as a consequence of internal considering.
Jeff, Have you actually read Laura's
on-line Wave series? In the beginning, where Laura is working as hard as she can to present the story sequentially, there is a point where she has completed certain research and is about to reveal the 'smoking gun' that spells out the predator's mind when all kinds of problems start coming up, almost leading to the point of shutting down the whole thing and putting an end to her Work.
One of the lessons we can take from this if we choose, is that whenever you are sincerely Working, the predator's mind can inject whatever is necessary or convenient in order to throw off your focus and divert your course and you won't even know what's happened.
JP said:
Am I being overly sensitive? Don Juan says follow the path of heart and I want to do that from now on.
Don Juan said a lot of things. :) The path of the heart could just be a referentless nominalization [1] in this context. The question is what exactly did he mean and do you mean the same thing? How do you know?
The breathing and meditation exercises deal with everything from stress to releasing emotional blockages. And, after all, isn't that really what you're wanting to release? Emotional blockages that prevent you from perceiving and experiencing life as the best YOU that you can be?
I would say give it some more time, fwiw.
---------------------------------------
[1]
Referentless nominalizations are sounds or scribbles (words) that supposedly refer to something, but in fact do not refer to anything concrete in physical reality. Since people create meanings for words, each person will then create an idea in his own brain as a definition. For example if someone says the word "cat" he can point to the animal in physical space. But if someone says something like "mysticism" or "society," the person has nothing to point to other than a collection of people or buildings. The person he is speaking to then creates his or her own definition for that "thing." Some words and phrases are nothing more than hypothetical constructs, or imaginary concepts. In these cases there is no physical object to point to. Each person then has his or her own imagination-based idea of what they mean by these words.