Researchers develop basic computing elements for bacteria

H-KQGE

Dagobah Resident
I like the idea but it's based in a world not run by whackos that want to make you stupid & ill to better control us.

http://newsoffice.mit.edu/2015/basic-computing-for-bacteria-0709

Researchers develop basic computing elements for bacteria
Sensors, memory switches, and circuits can be encoded in a common gut bacterium.


The “friendly” bacteria inside our digestive systems are being given an upgrade, which may one day allow them to be programmed to detect and ultimately treat diseases such as colon cancer and immune disorders.
In a paper published today in the journal Cell Systems, researchers at MIT unveil a series of sensors, memory switches, and circuits that can be encoded in the common human gut bacterium Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron.
These basic computing elements will allow the bacteria to sense, memorize, and respond to signals in the gut, with future applications that might include the early detection and treatment of inflammatory bowel disease or colon cancer.
Researchers have previously built genetic circuits inside model organisms such as E. coli. However, such strains are only found at low levels within the human gut,
according to Timothy Lu, an associate professor of biological engineering and of electrical engineering and computer science, who led the research alongside Christopher Voigt, a professor of biological engineering at MIT.

“We wanted to work with strains like B. thetaiotaomicron that are present in many people in abundant levels, and can stably colonize the gut for long periods of time,” Lu says.
The team developed a series of genetic parts that can be used to precisely program gene expression within the bacteria. “Using these parts, we built four sensors that can be encoded in the bacterium’s DNA that respond to a signal to switch genes on and off inside B. thetaiotaomicron,” Voigt says.
These can be food additives, including sugars, which allow the bacteria to be controlled by the food that is eaten by the host, Voigt adds.


Bacterial “memory”

To sense and report on pathologies in the gut, including signs of bleeding or inflammation, the bacteria will need to remember this information and report it externally. To enable them to do this, the researchers equipped B. thetaiotaomicron with a form of genetic memory. They used a class of proteins known as recombinases, which can record information into bacterial DNA by recognizing specific DNA addresses and inverting their direction.
The researchers also implemented a technology known as CRISPR interference, which can be used to control which genes are turned on or off in the bacterium. The researchers used it to modulate the ability of B. thetaiotaomicron to consume a specific nutrient and to resist being killed by an antimicrobial molecule.
The researchers demonstrated that their set of genetic tools and switches functioned within B. thetaiotaomicron colonizing the gut of mice. When the mice were fed food containing the right ingredients, they showed that the bacteria could remember what the mice ate.

Expanded toolkit

The researchers now plan to expand the application of their tools to different species of Bacteroides. That is because the microbial makeup of the gut varies from person to person, meaning that a particular species might be the dominant bacteria in one patient, but not in others.
“We aim to expand our genetic toolkit to a wide range of bacteria that are important commensal organisms in the human gut,” Lu says.
The concept of using microbes to sense and respond to signs of disease could also be used elsewhere in the body, he adds.
In addition, more advanced genetic computing circuits could be built upon this genetic toolkit in Bacteroides to enhance their performance as noninvasive diagnostics and therapeutics.
“For example, we want to have high sensitivity and specificity when diagnosing disease with engineered bacteria,” Lu says. “To achieve this, we could engineer bacteria to detect multiple biomarkers, and only trigger a response when they are all present.”

Tom Ellis, group leader of the Centre for Synthetic Biology at Imperial College London, who was not involved in the research, says the paper takes many of the best tools that have been developed for synthetic biology applications with E. coli and moves them over to use with a common class of gut bacteria.
“Whereas others have developed tools and applications for engineering genetic circuits, or biosensors, in bacteria that are then placed in the gut, this paper stands out from the crowd by first engineering a member of the Bacteroides genus, the most common type of bacteria found in our guts,” Ellis says.
The study has so far shown the efficacy of the approach in mice, and there will be a long road ahead before it can be approved for use in humans, Ellis says.
However, the paper really opens up the possibility of one day having engineered cells resident in our guts for long periods of time, he says. “These could do tasks like sensing and recording, or even in-situ synthesis of therapeutic molecules as and when they are needed.”


"The 21st century cures act" article on SOTT reminded me of this & the opening of doors to all sorts of unverified, "independent" research. This sounds unsettling. More to the point, we wouldn't need techno-crap in our guts if we actually ate right.
 
This is the only thread found mentioning the following genetic science. In this regard, SoTT.net has also featured a number of articles (example) on CRISPR, or in this case, on the "CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing" tools in this rapidly expanding genetic engineering now being developed - and it sure makes one think just what is around the corner if not harnessed ethically (almost a given it will not be). As such, came across this interesting radio interview while driving today featuring a number of discussions on where CRISPR is going and how quickly it is being adapted. There were also a great deal of ramifications with its use discussed, as can be imagined if not well thought through. Some uses seem to point to very quickly decoding genetic disease and fixing same (at the sample/cell level thus far), and this also comes with responsibility of how to proceed in this science that has the potential to literally change the evolution of a species; they use the malaria mosquito/bacteria as one example among many in agriculture and animals (and humans).

Here where those taking part in the discussion:

Dr. Elizabeth Simpson, a Professor of Medical Genetics and Senior Scientist at the Centre for Molecular Medicine and Therapeutics at the University of British Columbia. She's begun using CRISPR in her work on aniridia, a genetic eye disease.

Dr. Ronald Cohn, Chief of the Division of Clinical and Medical Genetics, and co-Director of the Centre for Genetic Medicine at the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto. He's just published on his first successful cell-based experiments in using CRISPR to correct a genetic mutation that causes Muscular Dystrophy.

Dr. Sylvain Moineau, Professor in the Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Bioinformatics at the University of Laval. He was part of a team that discovered the natural role of CRISPR as a microbial defence against viruses.

Dr. Feng Zhang, an Assistant Professor in the Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and core member of the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard. Dr. Zhang is one of the key innovators who transformed the natural CRISPR system into a gene editing tool.

Dr. Udo Schüklenk, Professor and Ontario Research Chair in Bioethics in the Department of Philosophy at Queen's University. He has engaged with questions around the ethics of using CRISPR to alter the human genome, and, more widely, its use in the agricultural and natural world.

So in some research areas, this may well put the usual players (Monsanto et al.) into a whole new level of gene manipulation. And because the tools are cheap, seem fast, and the results relatively dependable, the adaptation potentials seem staggering. From the way it sounds, each year from now on we may see exponential changes in its development and use. Also, due to its ease of use and smaller costs, no longer will it necessarily be just big labs experimenting with it.

Here is the radio interview and preamble if interested: http://www.cbc.ca/radio/quirks/quirks-quarks-for-jan-2-2016-1.3378142/crispr-the-genetic-engineering-revolution-1.3378171

The Audio player is here - http://www.cbc.ca/player/play/2681039049/

Over the last three years, a new genetic engineering technology has exploded on the scene in biology. CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing has been called revolutionary, game-changing and transformative, due to the fact that it is easier, faster and more powerful, precise, and efficient than any tool we've had for making changes to the genome.

CRISPR seems poised to revolutionize the way we study and treat a whole range of genetic diseases. It also will have profound impact on genetic engineering of agricultural crops and animals, and on the pharmaceutical and chemical industries. And the fact that it could allow us to make permanent changes in the human genome means we might influence human evolution itself.

The power and potential of CRISPR means it raises as many ethical issues as scientific ones, as society will have to deal with new questions about whether we're wise enough to use the power over the genome that CRISPR provides.
 
Back
Top Bottom