angelburst29
The Living Force
Washington is preparing to mount a campaign to transfer control of Syrian territory currently held by ISIS to rebels who operate under US influence, forming a rebel redoubt from which US proxies can continue to wage war on Damascus, and establishing the foundation of a US puppet state in Syria.
The Pentagon’s Plan to Convert the Islamic State Caliphate into a US-Backed Syrian Rebel Puppet Regime
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-pentagons-plan-to-convert-the-islamic-state-caliphate-into-a-us-backed-syrian-rebel-puppet-regime/5523653
A key to US strategy is the artificial division of the conflict into a part to be resolved by military means, involving ISIS, and a part to be resolved through a political settlement, involving all other rebel formations. Nusra Front, the exception, is to be ignored, and rebranded. As Al-Qaeda’s Syria franchise, it can hardly be embraced openly by the United States, though there is evidence of its being equipped covertly by the CIA.
The designation of non-ISIS rebels as parties to a political settlement follows the shibboleth that the conflict, apart from ISIS’s role in it, cannot be resolved militarily. This may be true, but only because the non-ISIS rebels have been trained and armed by Western states and their regional allies and therefore have a military significance they would not otherwise possess. Damascus’s early efforts to arrive at a political settlement by lifting restrictions on political liberties and amending the constitution went nowhere. This is because the goal of the armed opposition is the replacement of a secular non-sectarian state with one based on a conservative Sunni interpretation of the Qur’an, and because the military backing of powerful Western and regional states offers no incentive for militant Islamists to compromise. At the same time, the reality that the Ba’athist government in Damascus hangs on despite the powerful international forces arrayed against it, speaks volumes about the strong public support it commands. Its political survival, in the fifth year of an open multi-national war against it, and more than a decade after Washington launched a covert program of regime change aimed at purging Ba’athist ideology from the Syrian state [1], would not be possible in the face of widespread opposition from the Syrian public.
The objective of sharply distinguishing between ISIS and other rebel organizations is to legitimize a US-led campaign against the former, and to undermine the legitimacy of the Syrian-Iranian-Russian-Hezbollah effort to defend the Syrian state and its loyalists against all other rebel forces, namely, those backed by the US and its allies. We are to believe that it is perfectly reasonable for the US to wage war on the sectarian, terrorist, ISIS, but that Damascus must negotiate a peace with ISIS’s sectarian, terrorist, ideological cousins.
(Article continues.)
'NATO permanent bases in Eastern Europe would wreck 1997 Founding Act with Russia'
https://www.rt.com/op-edge/341978-general-scaparrotti-nato-statment/
US General Scaparrotti believes the West faces an “aggressive Russia,” and is urging the bloc's forces to be ready to fight. Moreover, NATO is reportedly preparing to send 4,000 troops to Poland and the Baltic States as Moscow warns it will be forced to respond to the provocation. (Article continues.)
To Combat Russian 'Aggression,' Poland Orders New Artillery Vehicles
http://sputniknews.com/europe/20160505/1039154062/poland-artillery-vehichle-order.html
Last month, Polish President Andrzej Duda stressed the importance of the country’s military might, in light of Russian "aggression."
"And all of you in this room can be absolutely sure that today Poland is ruled by people for whom building a strong state and the security of the state, and therefore a state which has a strong and efficient army, is an absolute priority," Duda said, according to Polskie Radio.
In that effort, Poland’s Ministry of Defense has signed a contract worth over $252 million with a consortium led by local manufacturer Huta Stalowa Wola S.A. (HSW) and state-run defense company Rosomak S.A.
The deal includes delivery of 64 self-propelled 120mm RAK (Cancer) mortar vehicles, as well as 32 additional artillery command vehicles. Delivery of the vehicles is to be completed by 2019.
On Wednesday, Polish Defense Ministry spokesman Bartlomiej Misiewicz said that the military also plans to acquire 24 Boeing AH-64 Apache attack helicopters as part of a $1.4 billion deal.
In total, Poland plans to spend roughly $62 billion modernizing its military, twice the budget proposed by the previous government.
"The Polish army will be bigger; we envision a substantial increase in the size of the army, by at least 50 percent, in the coming years, including the creation of three brigades for the territorial defense of the country on the eastern flank," Defense Minister Antoni Macierewicz said.
The buildup has been blatantly described as a way to deter what is claimed to be an ever-more aggressive Russia.
"They say openly that Polish is only the territory on which the military alliance operates, and Poland has no levers of pressure on it…The term 'flank' indirectly recognizes the fact that Poland is only an object of NATO’s gamesmanship, and of the US military industry, which needs a market."
Poland will host a NATO summit in July as part of an effort to encourage alliance partners to increase exercises and expenditures in Central and Eastern Europe.
The Pentagon’s Plan to Convert the Islamic State Caliphate into a US-Backed Syrian Rebel Puppet Regime
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-pentagons-plan-to-convert-the-islamic-state-caliphate-into-a-us-backed-syrian-rebel-puppet-regime/5523653
A key to US strategy is the artificial division of the conflict into a part to be resolved by military means, involving ISIS, and a part to be resolved through a political settlement, involving all other rebel formations. Nusra Front, the exception, is to be ignored, and rebranded. As Al-Qaeda’s Syria franchise, it can hardly be embraced openly by the United States, though there is evidence of its being equipped covertly by the CIA.
The designation of non-ISIS rebels as parties to a political settlement follows the shibboleth that the conflict, apart from ISIS’s role in it, cannot be resolved militarily. This may be true, but only because the non-ISIS rebels have been trained and armed by Western states and their regional allies and therefore have a military significance they would not otherwise possess. Damascus’s early efforts to arrive at a political settlement by lifting restrictions on political liberties and amending the constitution went nowhere. This is because the goal of the armed opposition is the replacement of a secular non-sectarian state with one based on a conservative Sunni interpretation of the Qur’an, and because the military backing of powerful Western and regional states offers no incentive for militant Islamists to compromise. At the same time, the reality that the Ba’athist government in Damascus hangs on despite the powerful international forces arrayed against it, speaks volumes about the strong public support it commands. Its political survival, in the fifth year of an open multi-national war against it, and more than a decade after Washington launched a covert program of regime change aimed at purging Ba’athist ideology from the Syrian state [1], would not be possible in the face of widespread opposition from the Syrian public.
The objective of sharply distinguishing between ISIS and other rebel organizations is to legitimize a US-led campaign against the former, and to undermine the legitimacy of the Syrian-Iranian-Russian-Hezbollah effort to defend the Syrian state and its loyalists against all other rebel forces, namely, those backed by the US and its allies. We are to believe that it is perfectly reasonable for the US to wage war on the sectarian, terrorist, ISIS, but that Damascus must negotiate a peace with ISIS’s sectarian, terrorist, ideological cousins.
(Article continues.)
NATO's new chief military commander in Europe, Curtis Scaparrotti, is calling for a permanent stationing of a third battalion in Europe, a move that will ratchet up tensions with Russia, Hall Gardner, Professor of International and Comparative Politics at the American University in Paris, told RT.
'NATO permanent bases in Eastern Europe would wreck 1997 Founding Act with Russia'
https://www.rt.com/op-edge/341978-general-scaparrotti-nato-statment/
US General Scaparrotti believes the West faces an “aggressive Russia,” and is urging the bloc's forces to be ready to fight. Moreover, NATO is reportedly preparing to send 4,000 troops to Poland and the Baltic States as Moscow warns it will be forced to respond to the provocation. (Article continues.)
As part of its ongoing defense buildup, Poland has placed an order for nearly 100 new military vehicles.
To Combat Russian 'Aggression,' Poland Orders New Artillery Vehicles
http://sputniknews.com/europe/20160505/1039154062/poland-artillery-vehichle-order.html
Last month, Polish President Andrzej Duda stressed the importance of the country’s military might, in light of Russian "aggression."
"And all of you in this room can be absolutely sure that today Poland is ruled by people for whom building a strong state and the security of the state, and therefore a state which has a strong and efficient army, is an absolute priority," Duda said, according to Polskie Radio.
In that effort, Poland’s Ministry of Defense has signed a contract worth over $252 million with a consortium led by local manufacturer Huta Stalowa Wola S.A. (HSW) and state-run defense company Rosomak S.A.
The deal includes delivery of 64 self-propelled 120mm RAK (Cancer) mortar vehicles, as well as 32 additional artillery command vehicles. Delivery of the vehicles is to be completed by 2019.
On Wednesday, Polish Defense Ministry spokesman Bartlomiej Misiewicz said that the military also plans to acquire 24 Boeing AH-64 Apache attack helicopters as part of a $1.4 billion deal.
In total, Poland plans to spend roughly $62 billion modernizing its military, twice the budget proposed by the previous government.
"The Polish army will be bigger; we envision a substantial increase in the size of the army, by at least 50 percent, in the coming years, including the creation of three brigades for the territorial defense of the country on the eastern flank," Defense Minister Antoni Macierewicz said.
The buildup has been blatantly described as a way to deter what is claimed to be an ever-more aggressive Russia.
"They say openly that Polish is only the territory on which the military alliance operates, and Poland has no levers of pressure on it…The term 'flank' indirectly recognizes the fact that Poland is only an object of NATO’s gamesmanship, and of the US military industry, which needs a market."
Poland will host a NATO summit in July as part of an effort to encourage alliance partners to increase exercises and expenditures in Central and Eastern Europe.