By the way I never support chopping of heads of anyone.
That's good to know!
By the way I never support chopping of heads of anyone.
I am not claiming that everyone is ignorant just those who claim that Ahmad al Sharaa and Syrian government are puppets of Israeli zionists.
How can you know that when story is still not over ? Ahmed Al Shara is still president of Syria and how can you claim that his "installation" was always going to end in disaster when story is still not over ? It's not like he is not president for 10 years already and you can look back at the past from the distance and make your conclusion ?The installation of "al-Julani" as "President of Syria" was always going to end in disaster, and perhaps that was the point. Or at least, it was just a temporary ploy, because the main goal, pursued at least by Israel, is to "balkanize" Syria into separate "states", making it more easily controllable. Israel is currently using the justification of "protecting the Druze" in Southern Syria to attack the pseudo regime and increase the chances of Balkanization. That's the short version.
How can you know that when story is still not over ? Ahmed Al Shara is still president of Syria and how can you claim that his "installation" was always going to end in disaster when story is still not over ? It's not like he is not president for 10 years already and you can look back at the past from the distance and make your conclusion ?
Yes Israel wants weak and destroyed Syria but Syria or better to say "assad regime" was going to be destroyed anyway because it was corrupt and criminal regime dominated by Alawite sect (or at least wealthy and powerful individuals in Alawite sect), especially in military in country where over 70% of population are Sunni Muslims located in the MENA region where perhaps 90% pf population are Sunni Muslims ruled and dominated by similarly corrupt and criminal regimes whether it is Sisi in Egypt or Salman in Saudi Arabia or Zayed in UAE.
And what happened in Syria in 2011 and forward as well as in Tunis, Libya, Egypt, Yemen and with lesser extent in other Arabic countries was caused and ignited by powers and energies that likely originate beyond this planet.
Same energies and powers that will likely cause destruction of Israel by May/June 2026 perhaps earlier and same ones that will likely cause civil war in USA in next 8 years and likely it's destruction.
I am not talking about 4D STS.
It sounds like for some reason you're quite invested in a specific outcome and timeline of events. Wouldn't it be better to be open to the possible alternatives? More importantly, to pay attention to the reality of the present?
Whatever you think about the Assad regime, it should be considered in its larger geopolitical context. It was a stabilising force, the people behind its overthrow have all in their own ways contributed to destabilising the region. The regime change has already been a disaster, opening the airspace for Israeli attacks on Iran, leading to pogroms against Alawites and Druze etc. Often filmed by the Takfirist nutjobs themselves, with the 'authorities' asking them not to broadcast their crimes. It will likely get worse. Even if the plan was a stable, free market Western-aligned country (which could be argued is a stabilising force of a different kind) it looks like more chaos is the result. Maybe that will change, we also have to remain open to that possibility.
I don't think anyone here would deny the likelihood that such events were inspired by powers and energies beyond the visible human ones. It serves their agenda well - chaos, suffering and fear.
I can't help to react to what you wrote.Assad regime couldn't be stabilizing force because it was minority regime(Alawites were 10-15% of population while Sunni Muslims were 70-80% before 2011.), dominated by one sect, especially in high positions in military and certainly many in business. It was corrupt and employed criminal and brutal methods to keep it's power even before Syrian revolution.
It's really funny, western countries are far less corrupt than most of the Slavic countries especially in the south, from Slovenia to Bulgaria, with Slovenia being the least and Bulgaria perhaps the most.I can't help to react to what you wrote.
On a scale, any occidental country is by far more corrupted than what you allegate regarding Syria (except hungria and maybe a few other occidental countries, but only a few)
Did Assad forced his population to be injected (only 39% received a first dose and +/- 5% a second one)
Did Assad brough tons of migrant to get rid of his population ?
Was he also crushing its citizens with ever-increasing taxes and freedom-destroying laws?
Just these 3 things, and above all the 2 first ones, put our countries, and by far, quite higer on the scale of corruption, betrayal of a whole population, hidden mass murderring and so on. I do not much follow what happened to Syria, just the headlines, but I Syria was roughly a stable country, and I simply wonder why you do not first focus on the corruption of the occidental countries than trying to justify what was clearly one more regime change piloted by Israel and his minions ? In comparison, what you focus on are details, in the meantime, the stability of the country went abruplty down since this new false president, ex headchopper, was put at this position, and that's a fact.
Assad regime couldn't be stabilizing force because it was minority regime(Alawites were 10-15% of population while Sunni Muslims were 70-80% before 2011.), dominated by one sect, especially in high positions in military and certainly many in business. It was corrupt and employed criminal and brutal methods to keep it's power even before Syrian revolution.
How can such regime be considered stabilizing force when by it's very nature is unstable and can explode and divide country just like it did in 2011 and onwards.
Regime change in Syria did not open space for Israelis because Syria had weak air defense . Israel had basically had air superiority in latest war with Iran and they probably did not lose even F 35, if they did even one please show me evidence, Iranians would certainly be more than happy to show it just like they did show Israeli drones.
Now you can compare Syrian and Iranian military and if Israel had air superiority (and probably did not lose even 1 airplane) over Iran which has so many times stronger military than Syrian had even before revolution you can conclude that asad regime would not be any obstacle for Israeli attacks against Iran.
Massacres against Alawites did occur before few months after they staged military uprising on the coast and they were crushed. They were committed by many Syrian soldiers and I do not approve it but I at least understand it after what assad criminal regime did to Sunni Muslims bombing them and massacring during the war.
Attacks against Druze before few days started because As Suwayda Governorate is ruled by Druze gangs and military formations who are not part of the Syrian military and are widely involved in criminal activities and drug trafficking.
Please tell me what happened after Catalonia made independence referendum in Spain in 2017 ? Why did not Spanish state allowed Catalonia to be outside of Spanish law, ruled by gangs and criminals ?
You see that is way Syria also wats to establish control over all of it's territory.
For example, imagine Provence region separates from France and starts to be ruled by criminal gangs, and France attempts to bring it in order and Italy starts bombing ministry of defence in Paris as well as Versailles palace and starts to call Macron regime terrorist regime and French people outside Provence terrorists.
Would it be justified ?
I politely disagree.With Russian involvement it was. Larger geopolitical context.
Russian air defence, now mostly gone. Israel used the Syrian and Caspian routes to attack Iran, and only had air superiority over part of Western Iran.
Man who is freedom fighter for one is terrorist for another. From British perspective those who started American war for independence in 18th century could be called terrorists, but perhaps they really are, they really became terrorists considering the amount of terror and death USA caused in 20th and 21st century.Who benefits from these divisions? If religious extremists with a background in terrorism come to power, is it likely to improve things stability wise?
Massacres and humiliation is hard to justify but can be understood when party which is committing massacres was previously massacred by that same party.Different situation. Depends on the means used against them. Massacres and ritual humiliation would not be justified.
USA armed forces, Israeli armed forces, Mossad, CIA and so on are bigger terrorists and murderers than Al Qaeda and HTS will ever be perhaps.
Iraq never attempted to confront Israeli attacks on Iran over it's territory.