Menna said:
I thought about this post during the day and I came to the realization that WANTING something is ego based the fact that I WANT to be a 4D candidate is the wrong idea and is a 3D human being way of thinking.
This is correct. Doing something for a reward or an expectation of a return for said deed is STS.
Menna said:
Its funny sometimes when I talk to people I find myself saying things that feed my ego. I recognize this right after the conversation and I feel shameful that I am not bigger then my ego and that I can't stop it. I guess realizing that I am doing it is the first step but I feel that its unnecessary and would like to stop. I am going to try to stop/reduce my ego building during conversations.
This is a very crucial first step. In fact, Gurdjieff says that we should only self-observe (which is what you are doing) and nothing else for a time. What you want to do is see yourself doing these things. Get the feel of the program, understand it and where it comes from, then you will start to see it happening sooner and sooner until you will see it as it is happening. Then, one time you will be able to stop it before it happens. But it takes work. This is what is called rewiring the brain.
It is good to be able to understand our programs, this gives us more ammunition to be able to get them under control once we know the dynamics of it. This is where reading the
Narcissism "Big Five" books come in. These books help us to identify our programs, how we may have gotten them, give us clues as to what to look for while we try to find out how they started, etc.
Menna said:
I am almost done reading the wave I will be done by tomorrow night. What I have gathered so far is that we are all STS if you are a human being on this earth you are an STS...You might be a STO candidate but you are still a STS...Also what I have learned is that we should...
"Just be and experience everything - learn from experiences don’t attach to anything just be and learn – help others when asked – network talk about ideas – talk about the wave make people aware."
This is correct up to a point. I think that talking to people about the Wave may not be a good idea. Most people out there do not want to know about the Wave, they don't want to know about the things you know. Have you read about
strategic enclosure and
external consideration yet?
Menna said:
What I am trying to figure out right now is - do you have to be a STO candidate to move to the 4D can non candidates make the leap to 4D and can you reincarnate to a STO before the wave comes?
From what I understand, if you are totally committed to only serving others, not infringing on anyone else's free will, only do things because they should be done, not because you will get a payback or it makes you feel good, etc. then you would go to an STO 4D environment. But just wanting to go to 4D is STS. What we should be doing here is learning our lessons and karmic understanding. That is what is in front of us to do and that is what we really should be concerned with. Not if we will be rewarded in the end.
Menna said:
Also anything that is "good" is also "bad" something that is "good" has a "bad" polarity and vise versa so that means that what the Lizzies are trying to do might not hurt us it might help if they are trying to do something "bad" then it can turn out to be "good"?
The lizzies have free will to do whatever they want to do. It is not meant to be good for us, only for them. It is up to us to decide whether we want to do as they want us to do or not. To do this, we need knowledge about the world and ourselves.
To the lizzies, I am sure that they think what they are doing is good....good for them. It is the same as us eating plant and animals life (2D beings). We do it to survive. We are in an STS world, it cannot be otherwise. But we don't have to calmly sit here being lunch for the lizzies. We can "choose" to NOT be lunch by learning as much as we can about our situation and how to get out of here.
And there is this, There is Good, there is Evil and there is the Specific Situation that determines which is which.