potamus said:There are hits at _www(dot)searlsolution(dot)com
_http://www(dot)searlsolution(dot)com/technology4.html
floetus said:Although... I don't understand mathematics and I am wondering why there are photographs of normal, smiling, living and feeling people, that illustrate those abstract, mindblowing formulas! Maybe this is the fools point of view! But as a graphic artist, I would suggest: Appearence does matter, doesn't it? Unfortunately this seems to be the work of a psychopath! Please prove me otherwise! I rather would like to be wrong! Gut feeling? DAMN! Who would illustrate his abstract formulars with family pictures? DAMN! Psychopaths and alike are emotionally stupid!That is deceiving manipulation-style! Fraggin BASTARDS! But please, judge for yourself. If this one, Prof. John Searl is real, I would suggest: NEVER combine emotional-kind-of family pictures with magic formulas, that proves approved scientists wrong! What a mess! I am feeling misused (maybe by myself) I'll call it a day!
While I was reading my last post again, I started to feel embarrassed. I freaked out that night! "...the work of a psychopath"? Those are strong words! My statement is extremely emotional. It seems that I wanted this stuff to turn out false. Truth is: I can't judge those things, those mathematical theories! I don't know. This 'Professor' could be a lunatic or even a con man, but not a psychopath. My words seem to be the product of fatalistic thinking, as if I wanted something strong to happen, something real. I am tired of all these fantastic claims! Maybe I freaked out after realizing that I was completely helpless in the face of those tempting, magic possibilities, that may be true or may be not, the twilight zone, the mystery stuff you can read about, dream about, ect... BUT you can't touch it! So this man could also be a weird genius, I don't care anymore. :) Ok :) But what makes you think that it's not the other way around? (I do respect your research. You will have good reason to think that way, I'm sure. I guess it's just out of my league, like many things :()potamus said:Because:
1) It does not sell, specify, or link to John Searl's books.
2) It does not embrace John Thomas