SEG - The workable answer to our global energy crisis?

sorry, I don't want to manipulate your observation,... please, forget what I've just said. I could be wrong! Maybe I am tired! Think about it! :)
 
Thanks floetus. That's on what I am now calling the dis-info site. Blam. You could disable that link!
If you want to learn about Searl, try the other site: _www.searleffect.com. That fancy site gives me
the creeps as well.
 
potamus said:
There are hits at _www(dot)searlsolution(dot)com


_http://www(dot)searlsolution(dot)com/technology4.html

Hi Potamus,

When you give a website link in beginning with a _ , it is not necessary to use the (dot) to replace the ".".

Just put an _ before the link, that will be ok; as _http://www.searlsolution.com/technology4.html

So the members of this forum will have just to copy the link and paste it on another page without replacing the (dot).
 
floetus said:
Although... I don't understand mathematics and I am wondering why there are photographs of normal, smiling, living and feeling people, that illustrate those abstract, mindblowing formulas! Maybe this is the fools point of view! But as a graphic artist, I would suggest: Appearence does matter, doesn't it? Unfortunately this seems to be the work of a psychopath! Please prove me otherwise! I rather would like to be wrong! Gut feeling? DAMN! Who would illustrate his abstract formulars with family pictures? DAMN! Psychopaths and alike are emotionally stupid!That is deceiving manipulation-style! Fraggin BASTARDS! But please, judge for yourself. If this one, Prof. John Searl is real, I would suggest: NEVER combine emotional-kind-of family pictures with magic formulas, that proves approved scientists wrong! What a mess! I am feeling misused (maybe by myself) I'll call it a day!

:-[ While I was reading my last post again, I started to feel embarrassed. I freaked out that night! "...the work of a psychopath"? Those are strong words! My statement is extremely emotional. It seems that I wanted this stuff to turn out false. Truth is: I can't judge those things, those mathematical theories! I don't know. This 'Professor' could be a lunatic or even a con man, but not a psychopath. My words seem to be the product of fatalistic thinking, as if I wanted something strong to happen, something real. I am tired of all these fantastic claims! Maybe I freaked out after realizing that I was completely helpless in the face of those tempting, magic possibilities, that may be true or may be not, the twilight zone, the mystery stuff you can read about, dream about, ect... BUT you can't touch it! So this man could also be a weird genius, I don't care anymore. :)

It's strange that this thread stopped short after my freak out. What about you Potamus? You were thrilled by this new site! Why do you think this is fake?
 
Because:

1) It does not sell, specify, or link to John Searl's books.
2) It does not embrace John Thomas
 
potamus said:
Because:

1) It does not sell, specify, or link to John Searl's books.
2) It does not embrace John Thomas
Ok :) But what makes you think that it's not the other way around? (I do respect your research. You will have good reason to think that way, I'm sure. I guess it's just out of my league, like many things :()

Well, I don't know this guy John Thomas either. How could I trust him? How could I trust anyone?
 
Good rhetorical questions. As for Searl, his books describe his technology. The book I listed above, by John Thomas, contains an order form in the back for for the same books you find on _www.searleffect.com. The fact that _www.searlsolution.com does not have them is only a clue, but a pretty good one. Whether the searlsolution site is just rip-off or COINTELPRO, who knows? The fact that they espouse Myron Evans and American Antigravity is also a clue for me, as I don't place much faith in either.

These words from searlsolution.com

"Note: _sisrc.com is a defunct website and not authorized to use
Searl's copyrights; we have no actual association with it."

plus these words from searleffect.com:

These are the basic questions that are put to SISRC,Ltd.

My answers to these questions are in BLUE .

I'm waiting for a response from SISRC, Ltd.

Do you have a signed, valid contract or license to work on the technology of Prof. John R. R. Searl?. NO
Is Prof. John Searl working with SISRC,Ltd. or under contract to them? NO
Was the equipment taken from Prof. Searl's home originally purchased with the money paid to Prof. Searl for license fees and consulting fees? YES
Was he reimbursed for the value of the equipment? NO
Does SISRC,Ltd. have the signed rights to use copyrighted material and the name of Prof. John Searl on their web site or in their company information? NO"

reveal at least one prior heist. However floetus, I cannot say that the original JohnThomas and even the "Law of the Squares" is not dis-info as well. All I can say is that what I examined in the late 90's is at _www.searleffect.com

EDIT: This is all turning to mush before my eyes. I'm going to pick around some more see you later.
 
Interesting. But it seems hard to separate the wheat from the chaff, if not totally impossible in that case. It would be an improvement to separate at least the fake-Searl from the real one. The question, if this magic-square-theory really leads to a workable answer to whatever, is a whole different story. What's the main objective of your investigation anyway?

I guess if a real Prof. Searl really wants to build a revolutionary engine, he would be well adviced to go into hiding until his 'magic' tree yields fruit. And until then we have to be patient. Some fine day one of our dreams will come true, that's for sure! Let's hope that it's not a nightmare.
 
floetus, I do have that DvD: _http://www.searleffect.com/free/store/store.html "S.E.G. Concept Review" and it is not bad.
I am kinda with drygol on this one. Bearden's web administrator Anthony Craddock (formerly web admin at CSETI) sent me link to buy a Bedini Motor Kit on the very day I started posting to this thread. The last home power kit friend & I wanted to experiment with looks a lot harder than we thought.

_http://www.magniwork.com/

If you look into many of these devices, you'll find that the machining and construction is outrageous. Perhaps some of them are 'bogs?'
Maybe we'll try Bedini's kit instead.
 
Hey drygol & floetus;

This is the infommercial sent out by Bearden's web admin:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nA2KtZ45nXA
 
woow , I haven`t seen that one before ! Thanks for an update potamus.
I am thinking about buying this full size kit. It is hard to work with small coils (especially coil winding ;P ) and reverse engineering what Bedini achieved.
 
Back
Top Bottom