Session 1 November 2025

[aimarok]

3I/Atlas is much faster than the solar system escape speed (60,000 km/h). All the planets and the brown dwarf are way below that or they would not stay in an orbit around the Sun.

The orbital parameters of the brown dwarf, which the C's gave, indicate a maximum speed of about 6 km/s (20,000 km/h) at its closest approach and about 2 km/s (7000 km/h) currently.

I believe it's still theoretically possible because brown dwarf is much more massive than 3I/ATLAS. During initial gravitation pull a smaller body can be accelerated to much higher speed than bigger object speed, and then thrown like a slingshot.

 

[Gaby]

Oct. 5, 1994

Q: (L) Who built the great pyramid?

A: Atlanteans.

Q: (L) What year was it built?

A: 10643 years ago.

Q: (L) Why was it built? What purpose was it used for?

A: Capture cosmic energy.

Q: (L) And what was this cosmic energy used for once it was captured?

A: Many things. Power, transport, healing, mind control, climate, et cetera

This could explain better why some ancient structures were aligned to it. Like a power grid.

Cassiopaean Session Transcripts Search

cassiopaeatranscripts.org

Q: (A) I don't understand if they were built or were they natural lines of conduction? Was this power grid artificial or natural?

A: An artificial utilization of natural energy fields.

Cassiopaean Session Transcripts Search

cassiopaeatranscripts.org

Q: (A) ) Okay, now we have been brought to electromagnetism, and that was my next question. I got some very old papers by Whittaker...

A: EM generators usually employ a grid. 'Tis for field creation.

 

[thorbiorn]

It seems to me that Kuiper belt bodies are a distinct possibility, other than Oort cloud ones.

Below are some comments. Subjects include the Kuiper belt, long-period comets, semi-major axis, orbital eccentricity, perihelion and aphelion, orbital inclination, the Sun twin as a bowling ball and Kepler's laws of planetary motion, the Oort cloud, outer planets according to the Cs, near-parabolic comets, Halley-type comets, centaurs, and Jupiter-family comets. There are indications that there can be a migration of objects from outer regions to inner regions in which the intermediate phases are not always cometery. The recent passage of the dark star through the Oort cloud, with some perturbed objects not yet having found their place, adds to the complexity.

The Kuiper belt extends from 30 AU to 50 AU

The Kuiper belt (/ˈkaɪpər/ ⓘ)[2] is a circumstellar disc in the outer Solar System, extending from the orbit of Neptune at 30 astronomical units (AU) to approximately 50 AU from the Sun.[3] It is similar to the asteroid belt, but is far larger—20 times as wide and 20–200 times as massive.[4][5] Like the asteroid belt, it consists mainly of small bodies or remnants from when the Solar System formed. While many asteroids are composed primarily of rock and metal, most Kuiper belt objects are composed largely of frozen volatiles (termed "ices"), such as methane, ammonia, and water. The Kuiper belt is home to most of the objects that astronomers generally accept as dwarf planets: Orcus, Pluto,[6] Haumea,[7] Quaoar, and Makemake.[8] Some of the Solar System's moons, such as Neptune's Triton and Saturn's Phoebe, may have originated in the region.[9][10]

The Kuiper belt is named in honor of the Dutch astronomer Gerard Kuiper, who conjectured the existence of a version of the belt in 1951.[11] There were researchers before and after him who proposed similar hypoetheses, such as Kenneth Edgeworth in the 1930s.[12] The most direct prediction of the belt was by astronomer Julio Ángel Fernández, who published a paper in 1980 suggesting the existence of a comet belt beyond Neptune[13][14] which could serve as a source for short-period comets.[15][16]

From the Wiki:

The classical Kuiper belt objects have orbits in the range of 40-50 AU.
The Kuiper belt belongs to the category of trans-Neptunian objects (TNOs):

A trans-Neptunian object (TNO), also written transneptunian object,[1] is any minor planet in the Solar System that orbits the Sun at a greater average distance than Neptune, which has an orbital semi-major axis of 30.1 astronomical units (AU).

Typically, TNOs are further divided into the classical and resonant objects of the Kuiper belt, the scattered disc and detached objects with the sednoids being the most distant ones.[nb 1]

A few explanations of some of the above terms:
Scattered disc objects:

The scattered disc (or scattered disk) is a distant circumstellar disc in the Solar System that is sparsely populated by icy small Solar System bodies,

Although the closest scattered-disc objects approach the Sun at about 30–35 AU, their orbits can extend well beyond 100 AU. This makes scattered disc objects among the coldest and most distant objects in the Solar System.[1] The innermost portion of the scattered disc overlaps with a torus-shaped region of orbiting objects traditionally called the Kuiper belt,[2] but its outer limits reach much farther away from the Sun and farther above and below the ecliptic than the Kuiper belt proper.[a]l.

Detached objects and sednoids

Detached objects are a dynamical class of minor planets in the outer reaches of the Solar System and belong to the broader family of trans-Neptunian objects (TNOs). These objects have orbits whose points of closest approach to the Sun (perihelion) are sufficiently distant from the gravitational influence of Neptune that they are only moderately affected by Neptune and the other known planets: This makes them appear to be "detached" from the rest of the Solar System, except for their attraction to the Sun.[1][2]

At least nine such bodies have been securely identified,[6] of which the largest, most distant, and best known is Sedna. Those with large semi-major axes and high perihelion orbits similar to that of Sedna are termed sednoids. As of 2025, there are four known sednoids, including 2012 VP113, Leleākūhonua, and 2023 KQ14.[7] These objects exhibit a highly statistically significant asymmetry between the distributions of object pairs with small ascending and descending nodal distances that might be indicative of a response to external perturbations; asymmetries such as this one are sometimes attributed to perturbations induced by unseen planets.[8][9]

Orbits
Detached objects have perihelia much larger than Neptune's aphelion. They often have highly elliptical, very large orbits with semi-major axes of up to a few hundred astronomical units (AU, the radius of Earth's orbit). Such orbits cannot have been created by gravitational scattering by the giant planets, not even Neptune.

Maybe it is the anomalies shown by the detached objects that guide some scientists to look for the sources of the disturbances. This leads to the next excerpt which concerns the orbit of the Sun's companion.

Distance of closest passage [of the companion] roughly corresponds to the distance of the orbit of Pluto from Sun.
Session 4 July 1998

Q: (A) But I understand that the distance that the distance between the sun and this brown star is changing with time. Elliptical orbit means there is perihelion and aphelion. I want to know what will be, or what was, or what is the closest distance between this brown star and the sun? What is perihelion? Can we know this, even approximately. Is it about one light year, or less or more?

A: Less, much less. Distance of closest passage roughly corresponds to the distance of the orbit of Pluto from Sun.

The distance from Pluto to the Sun varies between 30 and 50 AU and therefore overlaps with the Kuiper belt and its objects. The Wiki has about Pluto:

Pluto (minor-planet designation: 134340 Pluto) is a dwarf planet in the Kuiper belt, a ring of bodies beyond the orbit of Neptune. It is the ninth-largest and tenth-most-massive known object to directly orbit the Sun. It is the largest known trans-Neptunian object by volume by a small margin, but is less massive than Eris.

On their own the standard objects in the Kuiper belt are not comets, but if they get pushed or moved into more elliptic orbits then they may, eventually, or temporarily, show up as comets. Would the gravity of the Twin at its closest passage have been able to create such an effect? Much would depend on what "roughly corresponds to the distance of the orbit of Pluto to the Sun", as it is expressed in the transcript means more precisely, and whether the strength of the gravity field of the companion would be strong enough to alter the orbits of the Kuiper belt objects significantly. Irrespectively, the space occupied by the Kuiper belt is also traversed by comets, and this is the next topic.

The list of long-period comets, and comets traversing the space of 30-50 AU from the Sun
The Wiki has:

The following list is of comets with very long orbital periods, defined as between 200 and 1000 years. These comets come from the Kuiper belt and scattered disk, beyond the orbit of Pluto, with possible origins in the Oort cloud for many.

The semi-major axis of long-period comets vary between 36 and up to around 100 AU.
The Wiki on Semi-major and semi-minor axes has this explanation and illustration:

In geometry, the major axis of an ellipse is its longest diameter: a line segment that runs through the center and both foci, with ends at the two most widely separated points of the perimeter. The semi-major axis (major semiaxis) is the longest semidiameter or one half of the major axis, and thus runs from the centre, through a focus, and to the perimeter. The semi-minor axis (minor semiaxis) of an ellipse or hyperbola is a line segment that is at right angles with the semi-major axis and has one end at the center of the conic section. For the special case of a circle, the lengths of the semi-axes are both equal to the radius of the circle.

The semi-major (a) and semi-minor (b) axes of an ellipse

An example of a comet with a known semi-major axis

C/1843 D1

Great Comet of 1843

513

0.999914

64.267

0.005527

144.3548

24.75 km[1]

1843/02/27

2356

The comet designation is C/1843 D1. It is known as the Great Comet of 1843, last seen in 1843 on February 27. Its period is 513 years, that added to 1843 gives the last number 2356, the year of expected return. The diameter is 24,75 km.

The semi-major axis is given as 64.267 AU, so the whole major axis will be 128.534 AU.
The Wiki for the long-period comets provides for most comets also the value q. q is explained in the Wiki about Apsis (pl: apsides)

Spoiler: details

There are two apsides in any elliptic orbit. The name for each apsis is created from the prefixes ap-, apo- (from ἀπ(ό), (ap(o)-) 'away from') for the farthest or peri- (from περί (peri-) 'near') for the closest point to the primary body, with a suffix that describes the primary body. The suffix for Earth is -gee, so the apsides' names are apogee and perigee. For the Sun, the suffix is -helion, so the names are aphelion and perihelion.

and corresponds to the distance from the orbiting comet to the Sun when the comet is closest to the Sun at the time of its perihelion. For C/1843 D1, q is only 0.005527 AU.
As another example, had the semi-major axis been 36 AU with a perihelion close to the Sun, then the comet would have moved out to around 70-72 AU well beyond the Kuiper belt.

The opposite of perihelion is aphelion, and the distance between the Sun and aphelion is designated with a Q as opposed to the previous q. The line between the points in the orbit where perihelion and aphelion occur is called the line of apsides, or the apse line and is the same as the major axis on which the foci points are located. The values of Q plus q thus would add up to the value for the major axis.

The illustration from the Apsis Wiki is:

The apsides refer to the farthest (2) and nearest (3) points reached by an orbiting planetary body (2 and 3) with respect to a primary, or host, body (1)

If 1 is the Sun, the distance from the center of 1 to the center of 2 will be the Q value. The distance from the center of 1 to the center of 3 will be the q value.

Since q is small, C/1843 D1 will be (128.534 AU-0.005527 AU) or 128.522 AU away from the Sun when it is at aphelion. This is more than two and a half times further away than the maximum distance from the Sun to Pluto.

In the part of the table that is copied, there are two more values worth explaining: 0.999914 relates to the orbital eccentricity. The Wiki has this explanation:

Long-period comets have orbital eccentricity values close to but below 1.

The other value in the table is orbital inclination, i:

Orbital inclination measures the tilt of an object's orbit around a celestial body. It is expressed as the angle between a reference plane and the orbital plane or axis of direction of the orbiting object.

The Wiki has this illustration of orbital inclination, though not of C/1843 D1, which has an i value of 144.3548 degrees.

If the long-period comets, with periods from 200-1000 years, move out to about 200 AU, much time will be spent beyond the range of Pluto's 30-50 AU. Therefore if the Twin Sun moved close to the orbit of Pluto, even without getting close enough to influence the orbits of the objects within the Kuiper belt, some of the long-period comets could have been affected by this passage.

Next are a few notes about the Oort cloud, as a possible source of comets that reach the inner solar system.

The Oort cloud
Here is what NASA writes about the range of the Oort cloud:

thought to be located between 2,000 and 5,000 AU from the Sun, with the outer edge being located somewhere between 10,000 and 100,000 AU from the Sun.

The English Wiki gives the upper range as 200,000. The Spanish Wiki when translated provides nuances:

The Oort cloud is thought to extend from 2000 AU or 5000 AU[10] to 50,000 AU[2] from the Sun, although some sources place its boundary between 100,000 AU and 200,000 AU. [10] The Oort cloud can be divided into two regions: the outer Oort cloud (between 20,000 au and 50,000 AU), spherical in shape, and the inner Oort cloud (between 2000 AU and 20,000 AU), which is toroidal in shape.

The Portuguese Wiki adds about the structure of the Oort cloud:

The outer cloud is loosely bound to the Sun and is the source of most long-period comets (and possibly Halley-type comets) into the orbit of Neptune. [1] The inner cloud is also known as the Hills cloud, named after J. G. Hills, the astronomer who proposed its existence in 1981. [8] The models predict that the inner cloud should have tens or hundreds of times more cometary nuclei than the outer cloud; [8][9][10] The Hills cloud appears to be a source of new comets to the outer cloud as they gradually deplete, and explains the existence of the Oort cloud after billions of years. [11]

The idea that the migration of the objects could go both ways is interesting. Anyway, when the Hills cloud is much more populated than the outer cloud, it affects the averaged distance to the Sun of the objects in the cloud as a whole, even if the large extension of the cloud is maintained. A low averaged distance matches with what the Cs suggest in the following excerpt:

Oort cloud is located on outer perimeter orbital plane at distance of approximately averaged distance of 510,000,000,000 miles
Session 4 July 1998

Q: (A) I am trying to write down some things about a cosmology, and I have some questions mainly about the coming events. First there was the story of the sun's companion brown star which is apparently approaching the solar system, and I would like to know, if possible, details of its orbit; that is, how far it is, what is its speed, and when it will be first seen. Can we know it? Orbit: how close will it come?

A: Flat elliptical.

Q: (A) But how close will it come?

A: Distance depends upon other factors, such as intersecting orbit of locator of witness.

Q: (L) What is the closest it could come to earth... (A) Solar system... (L) Yes, but which part of the solar system? We have nine planets... which one? (A) I understand that this brown star will enter the Oort cloud... (L) I think they said it just brushes against it and the gravity disturbs it...

A: Passes through Oort cloud on orbital journey. Already has done this on its way "in."

Q: (A) You mean it has already entered the Oort cloud?

A: Has passed through.

Q: (A) So, it will not approach...

A: Oort cloud is located on outer perimeter orbital plane at distance of approximately averaged distance of 510,000,000,000 miles.

The averaged distance of 510,000,000,000 miles corresponds to 5486.4 AU, using that 1AU is 92955807.273026 miles. When one light year is 63241 AU, or 5,270 AU for an averaged month, then the averaged distance of the Oort cloud from the Sun as given by the Cs would be more than a month worth of light speed! This is more than 100 times more distant than the reaches of the Kuiper belt (30-50 AU) and falls within the proposed range of the Hills/inner Oort cloud of 2000 -20,000 AU.

If the Oort cloud only begins at around 2000 AU, then the companion brown star would pass through this area some time before getting close to the orbit of Pluto at 30-50 AU. If the brown star has already passed the Oort cloud on the way "in",was the result of the Sun companion passing through the Oort cloud on the way out, similar? Probably, in the this session there also was:
So is it true that the twin sun to our sun, our companion star, has already come and gone and it came during the Little Ice Age / Maunder Minimum? - Yes

(L) So is it true that the twin sun to our sun, our companion star, has already come and gone and it came during the Little Ice Age / Maunder Minimum?

A: Yes

Q: (L) And from what I have here on my little paper, is that the Little Ice Age lasted from 1450 to 1850, and the Maunder minimum was kind of like a period of particular intensity in the middle of that from 1645 to 1715. So, would it be safe to say that the period of the Maunder minimum within the Little Ice Age was the period when this companion star was closest to earth - or closest to our sun or perihelion?

A: Yes

Q: (L) And since the Little Ice Age lasted from 1450 to 1850, that was the period of its generalized influence?

A: Yes

Q: (L) So that suggests that it takes like 400 years for something like that to pass through the Oort cloud?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) And how long does it take to come back?

A: No dice.

Q: (Joe) Would it be 180 years?

A: No. You will certainly soon be experiencing the effects of this last passage for some time to come.

Some of the problems with the structure of the Oort cloud might be the presence of larger objects not accounted for. Besides the companion star, or little brother, the C's have mentioned three planets beyond the distance of the known planets and dwarf planets but still within the Solar System.

How many planets are in our solar system? 12
Session 30 September 1994

Q: (L) How many planets are in our solar system?

A: 12

Q: (L) Could you tell us the names of all the planets, their distances from the sun, the chemical composition, and the diameter.

A:

* Mercury=Opatanar, 36 million miles from Sun; 3000 mi. diameter.

* Venus=Pemuntar, 67 million miles from Sun; 7,500 mi. diameter.

* Earth=Saras, 93 million miles from Sun; 7,900 mi. diameter.

* Mars=Masar, 141,500,000 miles from Sun; 4,200 mi. diameter.

* Jupiter=Yontar, 483,400,000 miles from Sun; 88,700 diameter.

* Saturn=Zendar, 886,700,000 miles from Sun; 74,500 diameter.

* Uranus=Lonoponor, 1,782,700,000 miles from Sun; 31,566 diameter.

* Neptune=Jinoar, 2,794,300,000 miles from Sun; 30,199 diameter.

* Pluto=Opikimanaras, 3,666,100,000 miles from Sun; 1,864 diameter.

* NI=Montonanas, 570,000,000,000 miles from Sun; solid matter; 7000 miles diameter.

* NII=Suvurutarcar, 830,000,000,000 miles from Sun; 18000 miles diameter; hydrogen, ammonia.

* NIII=Bikalamanar, 1,600,000,000,000 miles from Sun; 46000 miles diameter; hydrogen, ammonia.

End of Session

Converting some of the distances to AU gives for Neptune 30 AU, Pluto 39.44 AU, and the last three NI=6,131.95 AU, NII=8,928.97 AU, and NIII=17,212.48 AU. All three bodies, NI to NIII would then exist within the inner Hills cloud as proposed by current theories. A question might be if the gravitational forces of these planets, sometimes could send comets into the inner inner Solar System, or do they for the most part vacuum up minor bodies just like Saturn and Jupiter collect new moons?

Interestingly, there are estimates for the mass of the outer cloud, but not for the inner. The Portuguese Wiki comments on the collective mass of the outer and inner clouds:

It is believed that the Oort cloud may harbor trillions of comets more than 1 kilometre in diameter[1] and billions with an absolute magnitude brighter than 11, corresponding to approximately 20 km in diameter,[12][3][13] The total mass of the Oort cloud is not known, but taking Halley's Comet as a prototype outer cloud comet, it is estimated that the mass would be 3 x 10^25 kilograms, about five times that of Earth. [1][14] Previously, it was believed that their mass could reach up to 380 times the Earth's mass,[15] but current understanding of the size distribution of long-period comets has reduced the estimates. The mass of the inner Oort cloud remains unknown.

If the mass of the inner Oort cloud remains unknown, is it in part because it is variable? For instance, if the Sun Twin is heavy, its presence or absence in the innter Oort cloud would make a difference.

Sun twin occasionally passing through the Oort cloud like a bowling ball through pins
Session 3 August 1996

A: Ok, change of direction: Oort cloud and comet cluster and sun twin occasionally passing through the former like a bowling ball through pins.

Q: (L) How does the dark star passing through the Oort cloud relate to the comet cluster?

A: Cause and effect.

A difference with a bowling ball compared to the Sun twin, is that pins are not knocked over. Instead lighter objects in the Oort cloud are influenced. Some might even be caught by the pull of gravitation.

A bowling ball is fast compared to the stationary and light pins. If the companion, as it passes through the inner Oort cloud, is faster than the surrounding objects, as far as the direction towards the Sun is concerned, it would allow it's gravity field to influence many ordinary small objects in the cloud within a comparatively short period of time. For an everyday example, consider the dust and sand stirred up by a quick moving truck along a dry dirt road.

This phenomenon that a strong gravitational force, or a suitable sequence of such fields, can be used as an accelerator or a modifier of direction, has found application in the past by space engineers when planing the launch and trajectory of satellites intended to move out of the Solar System. What the engineers look for are favorable positions of Earth and the outer planets that can help swing and speed up their artificial constructs like a sling throwing a stone. This Wiki: List of artificial objects leaving the Solar System has:

In order to leave the Solar System, the probe needs to reach the local escape velocity. Escape velocity from the sun without the influence of Earth is 42.1 km/s. In order to reach this speed, it is highly advantageous to use as a boost the orbital speed of the Earth around the Sun, which is 29.78 km/s. By later passing near a planet, a probe can gain extra speed from a gravity assist.

The above Wiki also has:

Solar escape velocity is a function of distance (r) from the Sun's center, given by

ve=(2GMsun/r)^(½), or as long as the notation holds in the post:

where the product G Msun is the heliocentric gravitational parameter. The initial speed required to escape the Sun from its surface is 618 km/s (1,380,000 mph), and drops down to 42.1 km/s (94,000 mph) at Earth's distance from the Sun (1 AU), and 4.21 km/s (9,400 mph) at a distance of 100 AU.

From this consideration, the speed of the companion would have to remain below the escape velocity, as it moves away from the Sun.

The companion star: Period 28.2 million years, mass 3.4 % of the mass of the sun, semi-major axis 1.7 light years.
Session 30 January 2010

(Ark) Oh, it's predictable on a more or less... I mean, they are small anomalies, not big anomalies. I want to ask about my numbers. So, I put numbers. We were asking for these numbers years ago, you were evasive, and you even admitted that you are evasive for a good reason. Nevertheless, I did calculations with what I could - of course garbage in/garbage out as everyone knows. So, I put for the period 26 million years. Is it approximately true?

A: Very close 28.2 million years.

Q: (Ark) Then I had to put another number which was not told to us. I was asking about the mass of this companion star, and I was told that it was "much less than the sun". So, in my calculations, I put half a percent of the mass of the sun. Is it approximately true?

A: 3.4, closer

Q: (Ark) 3 percent?! And not half a percent?? That would mean that when it approaches, it will induce perturbation of the solar system.

A: Indeed!

Q: (Ark) Hmm.

A: It already has done so in the past. Just check the record.

Q: (Joe) It's already perturbed in the past?

(L) So in other words, you can examine the record and find out what kind of perturbations it does. Like the geological record, historical record, archaeology, etc.

(Ark) I will do this. Now, just one other question to check. I calculated from these data - the difference in the mass between what I thought. And what we just learned will not influence these calculations - it has to do with perturbations - so, I calculated what we call a semi-major axis. So there is the binary system, there is the sun and there is this companion. And they circulate around each other. But the sun moves only a little bit because it's heavy. So I calculated the semi-major axis. It's a flat elliptical orbit. So we know the semi-minor axis because we were told it's around Pluto distance. So I calculated the semi-major axis and I got the answer like 87,000 astronomical units, which is about 1.3 light years, a the semi-major axis of this elongated ellipse. Is this 1.3 light years more or less the right answer?

A: 1.7

If the semi-major axis is 1.7 light years, then the major axis will be 3.4 light years. If the perihelion is close to the orbit of Pluto the aphelion would be that far away from the Sun. Converted to AU using 63,241 AU per light year gives 215019.4 AU, or rounding down to be on the conservative side: 210,000 AU, which is at or slightly above the current estimates for the outer limit of the Oort cloud (200,000 AU).

Regarding the estimate for the mass of the Sun twin at 3.4 percent of the Sun, the ratio of the mass of Jupiter compared to that of the Sun is 9.547919(15)×10−4. This means that one needs more than a thousand times the mass of Jupiter (1047.34) for it to add up to the mass of the Sun. Jupiter is still 2.5 times more massive than all the other known planets combined. From an earthly perspective, one needs 318 Earth masses for it to add up to the mass of Jupiter. If we compare the estimate for the mass of the Sun twin with that of Jupiter, we get 0.034/0.0009547919 = 35.609, or to make it simple 0.034/0.001=34. Either way it is about 35 times more massive than Jupiter, and considering the gravitational pull of Jupiter, the effect of the Sun twin would be markedly larger and impressive, a bowling ball worthy of its name.

The Sun twin as a bowling ball and Kepler's laws of planetary motion
How could the speed of the Sun twin be faster than other objects in the regions of the Oort cloud closer to the Sun? One approach to this question would be to use Kepler's laws of planetary motion, discovered by Johannes Kepler in the early 17th century, based on the unusually precise measurements of Tycho Brahe, and later explained mathematically by Isaac Newton through his laws of motion, and the law of gravity.

The three laws state that:

1. The orbit of a planet is an ellipse with the Sun at one of the two foci.
2. A line segment joining a planet and the Sun sweeps out equal areas during equal intervals of time.
3. The square of a planet's orbital period is proportional to the cube of the length of the semi-major axis of its orbit.

From the second law it follows that an object with an elliptic orbit will move faster closer to the Sun. Maybe the difference in speed between the objects in the Oort cloud and the Sun twin are not numerically that different, but if the small objects are moving steadily along in their orbit around the Sun, while the sun Twin moves more or less perpendicular to them at the same speed, then there will be an effect.

To connect the above discussion with the observations of comets and their orbits, a question might be?

Do the orbits of some of the near-parabolic comets move into the Oort cloud?
Earlier in the post, there were comments on the Wiki with the List of long-period comets and the orbits these have. The same Wiki, when defining its scope, refers to another category of comets:

For comets with an orbital period of over 1000 years (semi-major axis greater than ~100 AU), see the List of near-parabolic comets.

The list of near-parabolic comets is long and they keep adding to the list each year. From this year, the following are just some of the newly discovered comets.

Considering that the Oort cloud is "only" an estimated 2000 AU out, as soon as we have a case with a semi-major axis for a comet which is about half of that, then its orbit should extend to, or into the range of the Oort cloud. On the other hand, and this is a question, does the semi-major axis always give a true picture in case it is a newly discovered object? One would have to exclude that the object recently, but unnoticed, passed an object with a strong gravitational field that altered its previous orbit. From this perspective, when the companion like a bowling ball with its gravitational force destabilizes the orbits of smaller objects in the Oort cloud and some of these objects begin to move further in toward the Sun, even become observable, maybe we will not always perceive them as coming from the Oort cloud.

About the Oort cloud as a source of comets
The Wiki for the Oort cloud has:

the cloud is thought to be the source that replenishes most long-period and Halley-type comets, which are eventually consumed by their close approaches to the Sun after entering the inner Solar System. The cloud may also serve the same function for many of the centaurs and Jupiter-family comets.

While the long-period comets have periods of 200-1000 years, the Halley-type comets have periods of 20-200 years and semi-major axis in the range of 7-35 AU. This means that some of the Halley-type comets should have aphelions about twice as far out as Neptune.

In the above excerpt there were two other categories, the centaurs and Jupiter-family comets. Next are a few notes about them.

A Centaur is a small solar system body

In planetary astronomy, a centaur is a small Solar System body that orbits the Sun between Jupiter and Neptune and crosses the orbits of one or more of the giant planets. Centaurs generally have unstable orbits because of this; almost all their orbits have dynamic lifetimes of only a few million years,[1]

If centaurs have unstable orbits where have the newer ones come from? There more than one answer, because there are a lot of centaur class objects.

Observational bias toward large objects makes determination of the total centaur population difficult. Estimates for the number of centaurs in the Solar System more than 1 km in diameter range from as low as 44,000[1] to more than 10,000,000.[4][5]

Any centaur that is perturbed close enough to the Sun is expected to become a comet.

No centaur has been photographed up close, although there is evidence that Saturn's moon Phoebe, imaged by the Cassini probe in 2004, may be a captured centaur that originated in the Kuiper belt.[6]

A recent orbital simulation[4] of the evolution of Kuiper belt objects through the centaur region has identified a short-lived "orbital gateway" between 5.4 and 7.8 AU through which 21% of all centaurs pass, including 72% of the centaurs that become Jupiter-family comets.

Dynamical studies of their orbits indicate that being a centaur is probably an intermediate orbital state of objects transitioning from the Kuiper belt to the Jupiter family of short-period comets.

Short-period comets include Encke-type comets and Jupiter-family comets

At the shorter orbital period extreme, Encke's Comet has an orbit that does not reach the orbit of Jupiter, and is known as an Encke-type comet. Short-period comets with orbital periods less than 20 years and low inclinations (up to 30 degrees) to the ecliptic are called traditional Jupiter-family comets (JFCs).

For examples and details, see the List of periodic comets.

The impression as a whole is that there is a migration of object from the Oort cloud to the Kuiper belt to the centaur region, with comets occuring in all regions. This does not mean that all migrations are gradual. If that was the case, there would only be comets with short periods, and this is very far from the case.

In the Session, there was:

A: [...] You will certainly soon be experiencing the effects of this last passage for some time to come.

(Gaby) In October 2019, it was announced that Saturn had 20 new moons, bringing the total amount of moons to 82. In 2023, they discovered 62 new moons, and they said that brings the total count to 145. In March 2025, it's 128 new moons. Officially, it's now 274 moons. What is causing this increase in new moons around Saturn?

A: Passage of the dark star back then.

Were some of the new moons around Saturn previously in the Kuiper belt, and pushed in by the dark star passing by close to the orbit of Pluto? Even if that is so, some of the objects that were pushed around during the recent passage through the Oort cloud of the dark star still have to complete the first full orbit of their new trajectory. On the way in, some these orbits can be modified by the gravitational pulls of the large planets, and it may not always be possible to say with certainty where these objects really originated from.

Between all the different categories of objects and comets in the wider Solar System, it is safe to say that is like a jungle out there, even if not in a literal sense? And no matter what we think of comets from a 3D point of view, what if, due to the Wave, some of these objects occasionally travel in 4D where the concepts of space and time are different? Until we get a handle on such possibilities, there is enough to look out for.

 

[John G]

A. Lobaczewski speaks of "schizoïds" who are people affected by a mild (probably DNA based) anomaly. He explains that during specific times of relative calm, schizoïds tend to come up public with "ideas" who find an echo in society. What happens then is that it gives birth to a pathocracy, a long process during which the schizoïd and his ideas are gradually discarded in favour of a basic STS agenda. Is this what happened with Bacon and Rosicrucians? From your knowledge of Bacon, was he more a kind of guy who wouldn't know that his manifesto was that wrong? Or a real bad guy? If the latter, the whole schizoïd appraoch would not apply.

In addition, I can see a very interesting point: Bacon sees a comet, and he writes his manifesto. I posted, the other day, about the idea of comets as "information flux", rather than "a simple rock" (so, a comet polarity would vary, from a negative information flux to positive). But this is high speculation on my part. Could be that a comet was carrying very negative ideas and that this is what influenced Bacon. As a schizoïd, his DNA-bit would have acted as a tuning receptor for the data - and he wrote the manifesto in turns. This would explain "Bacon was very impressed by the supernovae... and ...". Idea here would be that schizoïds such as Marx, and others who really wrote the big ideologies turning pathocracy - had a comet right in front of their eyes, at some point in time. Could be that those comets were of the family of "negative comets". A catalyst. The specific bit of A. Lobaczewski goes by "during stable times, schioïds believe they found a way to fix the world"; they would "come public" and "tell others". What if there was a trigger for this?

Every macroscopic social evil has its genesis in the mind of some individual who suffered from a characteropathy which caused him to elaborate a pathological ideology. The schizoid declaration is the first phase of this process. The schizoid person, thanks to his oversimplified and overly complicated thinking, creates a system of ideas which normal people would consider contradictory or absurd. However, this very content, with its gaps and contradictions, becomes attractive to hysterics and other characteropaths, who later elaborate it into a full-fledged pathocratic ideology.

…a lot of infps and people high in openness they fall in love with a body of information which is kind of like the autistics narrow deep set of interests that monopolize their concentration in what they talk about with other people… and I've tried to come up with all sorts of explanations maybe maybe it's not just infp maybe it's avoidant personality disorder or now I've got my first murmurings from people that hey Aaron maybe maybe you're on the spectrum and I think a lot of maybe introverted intuitive… i think social anxiety you know just being this sensitive as a sensitive and socially thoughtful as an infp is I think it comes with a natural amount of anxiety and when you look at somebody's eyes you know with autistics it's it's distracting right… I have settled on Schizotypal, but I actually think I am at least comorbid with AVPD which has spurned its own set of debates with fully diagnosed Schizotypal people especially when I recently found that AVPD is arguably on the same schizo spectrum as Schizoid and Schizotypal…

Bacon was quite simply an enigma. If you read my article, Francis Bacon – The Man Behind the Curtain, which I attached to my earlier post, you will see that he was a highly secretive man but then he had very good reason to be... As I pointed out, he lived in an age where one wrong word could cost you your life. Remember here that he was a contemporary of Giordano Bruno (someone he may have met in London) and consider what happened to him. Mrs Henry Pott’s in her excellent book on Sir Francis Bacon titled Francis Bacon and His Secret Society devoted a whole chapter to competing views on Bacon. He had a wide circle of friends who thought the world of him and saw him as a modest and generous man who was very loyal to his friends. On the other hand, others viewed him as intellectually arrogant, haughty, ambitious, cold and lacking in generosity. These qualities might suggest he was a schizoid but then they were made by his enemies who had every reason to smear him. The truth is that for such a famous man, we know very little about his private life and thoughts despite the fact that he wrote so profusely.
As Mrs Henry Potts states:

“… but search the records of the time which are, up to the present date, published, and see how far you can enlighten yourselves as to any particulars of Bacon’s domestic life. It becomes after long search, impossible to resist the idea that Bacon has some great purpose to serve by keeping himself always in the background – behind the curtain. Whenever you catch a glimpse of him, “he goes away in a cloud”.

​

I think maybe the INFP gives a hint of Schizoid/Schizotypal behavior for a normal personality. They genuinely like to connect complicated ideas into their simple big picture even though they don't overly master the complicated parts. The connections can be so wide as to seem odd. The INFP can fit himself anywhere but not be like the others anywhere. A personality journal editor once asked me who the real me was and that's probably a common unanswerable question for the INFP. People think I'm the math/sciency NT not an NF. In another forum for a personality book author, the son of the author who ran the forum was the only one to recognize I wasn't an NT.

 

[palestine]

Hello, sorry for asking; this is really a super basic question about cometary events.

There are many sources and interactions.

If I refer to the following sessions:

Session 30 September 1994

Q: (L) Well what is the cause that recurs like clockwork? Is there some cause that is a regular pulsation? [33]

A: Cometary showers.

Q: (L) Where are these cometary showers from?

A: Clusters in own orbit.

Q: (L) Where is the orbit of these clusters? Is it the Oort cloud? [34]

A: No.

Q: (L) Where is the orbit of clusters of comets located?

A: More specific.

Q: (L) A specific orbit containing clusters of comets?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Does this cluster of comets orbit around the sun?

A: Yes.

...

Q: (L) Does this cluster come into the plane of the ecliptic and cause havoc in the solar system?

A: Exactly.

Q: (L) How often does this cluster of comets come into the plane of the ecliptic?

A: 3600 years.

Session 5 October 1994

Q: (L) Now, this cluster of comets, when was the last time it came into the solar system?

A: 3582 yrs ago?

Q: (L) What is the cycle?

A: 3600 yrs.

Q: (L) So, when is this cluster expected to hit the plane of the ecliptic again?

A: 12 to 18 years.

If I understand right:

• There is a belt of rocks gravitating around the Sun. And we name it "the comet cluster".
• This "comet cluster" refers to "the 3600 year cycle".
• Every 3600 years, "this cluster of comets come into the plane of the ecliptic" ("causing havoc in the solar system").

Is this cometary cluster like a perfect belt, forming a periphery to the sun? I mean - another Oort+Kuipert belt? That would be three layers / three "belts".

Thank you!

So, yeah, I am sorry I need to revisit the basics. Please excuse me if this question is very simple.

 

[DrD]

Session Date: November 1st 2025

Laura and Andromeda at the board

Niall, Joe, Gaby, Ark, Chu, Scottie, Princess Leia, Falkor, Bella

FOTCM Members attending via Zoom:

3DStudent, Adobe, Aeneas, aimarok, Alana, Alejo, Aliana, Altair, aluminumfalcon, AnaHuitzil, Anamarija, anartist, Andrian, Ant22, Anthony, Approaching Infinity, Aragorn, Aya, Beau, Bluefyre, Bo, Bobo08, brandon, Breton, cassandra, Cosmos, daddycat, Deliverance, dugdeep, Eboard10, Ellipse, Ennio, fabric, Faith, Finduilas495, Gawan, Glenn, gottathink, goyacobol, Harmony99, herondancer, hesperides, Honzap, iamthatis, irjO, IronFloyd, iscreamsandwish, Jacques, Jeanne T, Jenn, Jono, Josi, Juba, Keyhole, Kinyash, KJN, KJS, Konstantin, Learner, Lilou, loreta, LQB, luc, Lucelle, Lucius, Luis Miguel, Mark, maiko, Mark7, Martina, meadow_wind, Meg, Mikkael, Mililea, Miracle, mkrnhr, mommycat, Mrs. Peel, msante, Natus Videre, Navigator, Nicholas, Nienna, Ollie, OrangeScorpion, Pecha, PopHistorian, Renaissance, rrraven, Ryan, rylek, ryu, Saman, ScioAgapeOmnis, seek10, seeker2seer, Stoneboss, sToRmR1dR, T.C., thorbiorn, Timótheos, Tristan, Tuatha de Danaan, Turgon, whitecoast, Windmill knight, Yas, Ysus, Zar, zim

Q: (L) I suppose we ought to get started. We got all this monstrous list of questions and I'm just fiddling around here. All right. We'll get the show on the road and see what we can... Lord, I don't know if we'll get us through all that in one night! This is November the 1st, 2025 and we have the usual suspects. [Review of those present]

A: Mijnoia of Cassiopaea here.

Q: (L) I thought there was gonna be more, but there wasn't. I guess we should just get started.



Q: (L) Ryan wants to know if famous sovereign citizen of Australia who had a shootout with the cops, Dezi Freeman, is still alive?

A: Yes

Q: (Ryan) What is the likelihood he will ever be killed by or captured by the authorities?

A: Remote

Q: (Ryan) If still alive, to what extent does his ongoing freedom concern the Australian government as a symbol of rebellion?

A: Not much with his missing status.

Q: (Ryan) Is the sovereign citizen movement being covertly encouraged by western governments via standard COINTELPRO tactics?

A: Somewhat. Flushes out the troublemakers.

Q: (L) All right. If he's smart, he'll stay gone.

(Joe) There's a question at the top, Laura.

(L) Oh! Now we wanted to ask about our brother Redrock12 who passed over recently. How is he doing?

A: Jumping for joy now.

Q: (L) So I'm assuming that means he had a good transition?

A: He was prepared and ready.

Q: (L) Well, we all need to be prepared and ready when the time comes. irjO wants to know:

View attachment 113347

(irjO) Who made these big stone spheres found in Costa Rica?

A: Local overlords.

Q: (L) So that's who made them. Okay. When you say "local overlords," were those human overlords or alien overlords?

A: Hybrid.

Q: (L) Okay.

(irjO) What was their purpose?

A: Gravity balancers for directed energy.

Q: (L) How did they make them?

A: Directed energy.

Q: (L) What kind of directed energy?

A: EM.

Q: (Joe) What was the source of that directed energy?

A: Purses seen in many statues.

Q: (Chu) Purses?

(L) A pocketbook.

(Joe) Ah, so... In either South American or Egyptian stone carvings…

(L) Yeah. There's these purses and everybody's always wondering about 'em.

(Joe) So they obviously weren't purses then. These are some kind of technological devices that looked like purses?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) And that was a source of the electromagnetic directed energy?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) And the stones were balanced gravity…

(irjO) Can I ask a question about that? Do we know the name of these overlords?

(Joe) Well, when was that? What was the date?

A: Time reference is confused due to cataclysmic events. But approx 14,000 years ago. Redheaded demygods.

Q: (L) Alright. aimarok asks:

View attachment 113349

(aimarok) What technology was used to carve the unfinished obelisk at Aswan quarry in Egypt?

(L) Well, what's the background on this obelisk at the Aswan quarry?

(aimarok) Well, it's unfinished in the quarry weighing more than a thousand tons.

(L) What's it near to, or is there anything standing that's similar to it?

(aimarok) No, it is basically laying inside the quarry and it is still connected to the bedrock from the bottom.

(Approaching Infinity) Is that the one that's relatively close to Baalbek?

(aimarok) Well, I don't know how far from Baalbek is this one quarry, but it is... As far as I remember, it is 700 kilometers from the pyramids.

(L) Okay, so the question is: What technology was used to carve the unfinished obelisk at Aswan quarry?

A: SPA

Q: (aimarok) Yeah, my favorite answer. [laughter]

(Andromeda) What was it going to be used for?

(L) For, I don't know, wait and see and up to you! It was an obelisk. They were going to use it as a monument probably to balance gravity for their directed energy weapons! [laughter]

(Niall) With their purses! [laughter]

(Joe) You said that the Odyssey and Iliad were recordings of cataclysmic events. But there are no obvious depictions of cataclysms in those texts. Just wars and adventures with giants and other creatures and a lot of disasters at sea. Why are there no obvious depictions of cataclysmic events?

A: Implicit in the presence and activity of the gods.

Q: (L) I think it must be like... Remember what Mike Bailey said about what's his name? That he represented a giant comet or something, but he was turned into a god.

(Joe) He could smite people. So the gods at least in the Odyssey to a large extent were smiting people.

(Andromeda) Causing trouble for 'em except for Athena. She was…

(Joe) Yeah, causing trouble for them almost... as part of the... Were the gods in the Odyssey, for example, were they representations of, say, STS and STO forces?

A: Not so much as representing cosmic forces.

Q: (Joe) When was the Odyssey composed?

(Laura) O-R-A-L-L-Y-P-R-I-O-R-T-O 9 1 2. Three zeros. BC

A: Orally prior to 9000 BC

Q: (Joe) So it was the events around what's known to us as the Younger Dryas kind of cometary impact cataclysm?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) When was the Iliad composed?

A: Similar but actually a bit later.

Q: (Joe) Was Odysseus a real person?

A: No

Q: (Joe) Was all of the action in both books centered around what we know today as Northwestern Europe?

A: Not so much, but the composers were located there. Later events at various locations were conflated.

Q: (L) All right, now... switching topics.

[Clock chimes]

(L) Thank you. [laughter]

Q: (seek10) In the 2023 session:



(L) And that's kind of like what we were just talking about with The Odyssey and The Iliad.

(seek10) "The War of the Ten Kings" is from the Rigveda, and it is between the Puru clans and other clans. Do the C's mean that "The War of the Ten Kings" is part of the "Athenians vs. Atlanteans" battle on the Indian front?

A: Memory of similar and simultaneous conflicts.

Q: (seek10) If so, are the Purus, Atlanteans or Athenians (or Kantek descendants/Aryans) or some combination?

(L) Oh dear... Let me... Are the Purus Atlanteans or Athenians?

A: No

Q: (L) Are they Kantek descendants?

A: Yes

Q: (L) Okay.

(seek10) When I asked whether Dwarika (considered the City of the Yadus) is a colony of Atlantis, they said no.

(L) Okay, then so I am assuming this question is about Dwarika?

(seek10) No, I think the C's have already answered that. You can skip it. The later Dwarika portion is just a context, not a question.

(L) Okay.

(seek10) Can I ask one question related to the previous discussion? The C's said that The Odyssey is from 9,000 BC. Can I ask when the Ramayan was orally created? There are some sources that suggest a date of 6,000 BC. Rama is more like Odysseus. Was the Ramayan also created around that time too?

A: Yes

Q: (seek10) Can they give an exact date? Is it around 6,000 BC or 9,000 BC?

(L) Didn't we ask about that? That there was something, it was about a nuclear war…

(seek10) That is the 48,000 BCE event. That's pretty old. Rama is the main character in the Ramayan. C’s told us that Rama was an Indian high priest under the influence of the Confederation and fought with lizards. At that time, I thought that “fought with lizards” meant he was fighting against psychopathy. C’s also told us that the earliest mutation into psychopathy happened around that time in India. Do the C’s mean real lizards, or lizards manifesting as psychopathy? That is at 48,000 BCE.

Q: (L) Now, tell me what he said. It's not.. I have hearing aids and they really mess up certain frequencies.

(Andromeda) He was saying around 48,000 BC there was a mutation of psychopaths in India. That's where it started. And it was because of the lizard’s influence?

(seek10) Yes.

(Approaching Infinity) So was Rama fighting actual lizards or psychopaths?

(L) Ah!

A: Both In some cases. Keep in mind that lizard beings are 4D and can only interact in 3D under special conditions. This is the reason that so-called "fish gods" came and went from the sea on unusual scheduling demands.

(seek10) Can I ask one more question about the same time period? The C’s said that around 48,000 BC, 50% of the land was destroyed due to a nuclear war. They did not specifically say that 50% of the land was in India. I assumed so, but that is the same period when Cayce’s first destruction occurred, where they used their new weapons to blow up volcanoes and Atlantis broke into five large islands. Do the C’s mean the 50% destruction is specific only to India or to the entire world?

A: India.

Q: (seek10) India, okay. Thank you.

(L) All right. We didn't ever ask about that Maunder Minimum thing?

(Gaby) Never.

(Joe) It's mentioned in the sessions, but…

(Gaby) No, in an indirect way. Like Henry was asking, "What do you guys think about our Maunder Minimum conclusions?" And the C's responded, "We were wondering how long it will take you to figure that one out."

(Joe) That was in 2003.

(L) Well, then that kind of answers the question as to why was there an unusually low sunspot occurrence during the Maunder minimum, right? If that's what the C's answered.

(Joe) Well, we don't know exactly what we figured out back then. I think it was probably comets.

(L) I think it was the article I wrote. It was from 2003.

(Joe) What did you write?

(Niall) That the twin sun has already approached and gone past perihelion. And the perihelion occurred roughly synchronously with the Maunder Minimum.

(L) So is it true that the twin sun to our sun, our companion star, has already come and gone and it came during the Little Ice Age / Maunder Minimum?

A: Yes

Q: (L) And from what I have here on my little paper, is that the Little Ice Age lasted from 1450 to 1850, and the Maunder minimum was kind of like a period of particular intensity in the middle of that from 1645 to 1715. So, would it be safe to say that the period of the Maunder minimum within the Little Ice Age was the period when this companion star was closest to earth - or closest to our sun or perihelion?

A: Yes

Q: (L) And since the Little Ice Age lasted from 1450 to 1850, that was the period of its generalized influence?

A: Yes

Q: (L) So that suggests that it takes like 400 years for something like that to pass through the Oort cloud?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) And how long does it take to come back?

A: No dice.

Q: (Joe) Would it be 180 years?

A: No. You will certainly soon be experiencing the effects of this last passage for some time to come.

Q: (Joe) So the last passage that ended in 1850?

(L) It ended more like 1715. Yeah. It takes... Do you know how far away those things are and how many years it takes?

(Joe) But the effects were occurring. The effects were the Little Ice Age, and…

(L) That was just the grounding of the current that caused the drop in sunspots.

(Joe) The perihelion was during the Maunder Minimum.

(L) The sun’s drop in sunspots. The perihelion was during the Maunder Minimum, the closest approach. So it's already the bowling ball that hit the pins.

(Gaby) It has an orbit of millions of years.

(Joe) Exactly. So it's a longer term series of impacts that…

(L) We don't know what's coming our way because if it takes 400 years for it to make a pass through the Oort cloud... Meanwhile the whole solar system is rotating around, and the Oort cloud itself is rotating around, and all that stuff is being stirred up there. So stuff could come from any direction.

(Joe) Right. So the idea then would be that we're not going to experience anything like a Maunder Minimum anytime soon, at least not as a result of the close passage…

(L) Right.

(Joe) But you can get an ice age from other effects.

A: Yes

Q: (L) Because it was kind of an unusual ice agey thing that got stuck in there. It wasn't part of the normal cycle.

(Niall) Especially as it followed the medieval warm period, which was actually quite a warm spike, and then it went WAY down.

(Andromeda) It was short and acute.

Q: (L) All right, so there was pictures of sunspots and Gaby says:



(Gaby) What was the "star" of 1630, and did it have anything to do with the Maunder Minimum 15 years later?

(L) Well, I would say yeah... Did it have anything to do with the Maunder Minimum 15 years later?

A: It was a comet that was part of a group flung by the passage of the dark star.

Q: (Andromeda) A convoi exceptionnel. [laughter] [In French "convoi exceptionnel" = Wide Load, i.e. a truck transporting something BIG]

(Gaby) In October 2019, it was announced that Saturn had 20 new moons, bringing the total amount of moons to 82. In 2023, they discovered 62 new moons, and they said that brings the total count to 145. In March 2025, it's 128 new moons. Officially, it's now 274 moons. What is causing this increase in new moons around Saturn?

A: Passage of the dark star back then.

Q: (Joe) There's all sorts of weird stuff going on out there.

(Niall) They should have said: SPA.



(Gaby) What causes the South Atlantic anomaly? It's a weak spot in earth's magnetic field.

(Andromeda) Been getting bigger…

A: Several factors, the most important being activity in the central heating earth's core.

Q: (L) So the planet is heating up and it really needs to cool down again. Is that it?

A: Yes

Q: (L) Oh, it says:



(L) Does this have anything to do with the reversing of the Earth's magnetic field?

A: Yes

Q: (L) Is that going to be accompanied by any kind of lithospheric disruption?

A: Some.

Q: (Gaby) Is the South Atlantic Anomaly due mostly to electromagnetic fields in the upper atmosphere and above, as James McCanney posits?

View attachment 113348

(L) So he's talking about the electromagnetic field. Most of it is of the non-permanent type. Electrical currents powered by currents passing by Earth in the solar wind. So, is this also related to the Earth's inner Van Allen radiation belt that comes closest to the Earth's surface?

A: Yes

Q: (L) But not so much. Is that correct?

A: Yes

Q: (Gaby) In "Principia Meteorologia", James McCanney says that a large gravitational wave coming from a massive comet nucleus passing at close range (like Venus) can cause Earth's mantle to shift over the core, leading to a True Polar Wander event. Is this one of the missing factors for a True Polar Wander event on Earth?

A: One of them

Q: (Navigator) Is the ECDO theory correct in saying that from time to time a True Polar Wander to about 104 degrees happens?

(L) What is the ECDO theory?

(Gaby) It's the exothermic core mantle decoupling that we asked about in the last session.



(L) [Reading the excerpt above] "...contributing to loss of current influence and...", well, that's kind of like what they were just saying, the heat from the core. So I'd say that that's an affirmation of that question, and the Cs at that time said very close. Okay, so that's a yes for that. Now, next question.

(Joe) Hang on, can we go back to that one for a second? This guy Ethical Skeptic and his ECDO deal, is that whatever dynamics within the Earth's core, these blobs and all that kind of stuff, basically shift the mass of the Earth to such an extent that you have a polar wander event, right? The Earth has to restabilize itself along a different axis of rotation because the mass of the Earth has changed, and that causes the crust and the lithosphere to slide because of these dynamics. It's able to basically slide around possibly 180 degrees or something, where you would basically have... the crust and the lithosphere would slip around the core and you would have a dramatic 104 degrees or whatever. But it doesn't seem that that's possible without basically wiping out all complex life on Earth. But he's suggesting that has happened periodically every 6,000 years, which doesn't seem…

A: No

Q: (Joe) It doesn't seem right to me, because you would have had to have an extinction event within the last six thousand years. And that only happens... that happens, but only maybe once in a great while or at the end of a grand cycle or something like that?

(L) Yeah. Does this polar wander event cause this massive lithospheric disruption?

A: Not usually.

Q: (Niall) It's very rare.

(Gaby) Unless there's a giant comet coming to the solar system.

(L) I'd say there'd have to be other factors.

(Andromeda) Yeah.

(L) Just the polar wander is not going to... because the thing is, is the magnetic poles are not necessarily coupled to the axis of rotation. And it's the axis of rotation. Now, if THAT shifted dramatically, there would be some significant lithospheric movement, but…

(Andromeda) That's what he's talking about, right? The axis of rotation. The poles, not the…

(Gaby) It's like that's the question from James McCanney's "Principia Meteorologia". You know, it says that a big gravitational wave comes from a big comet like Venus, and then it shifts the mantle around the core, but it's got to be a giant body coming close.

(L) Yeah, but I think people that are connecting the changing of the magnetic poles to the axis of rotation, that's not necessarily…

(Andromeda) I think magnetic poles slip rather regularly, right? I mean, that's a…

(L) Yeah, they shift and they reverse, and I mean…

(Andromeda) That could be dramatic itself.

(L) But look, the Sun's magnetic poles reverse..

(Andromeda) Every 22 years?

(L) No, more than that. Fairly regularly.

(Niall and Andromeda) Or every 11 years in a cycle.

(L) Does anybody know how often the Sun's poles, solar magnetic poles reverse?

(seeker2seer) It's 11.1 when it flips around. It's a 22 year cycle, 11 years one pole, 11 years the other pole.

(L) And it doesn't cause any big dramatic…

(seeker2seer) No. No, it is well known.

(L) So, yeah. Okay. Let's get to:

(Joe) What hit United Airlines Flight 1093 a couple weeks ago?



A: Meteorite.

Q: (Joe) Did you see the bolded part in the description of the event?

(L) "The FAA says a collision with space debris is 'less than one in a trillion'."

(Joe) It is pretty much like hitting a bullet with a bullet. It obviously wasn't that big of a piece of rock. It didn't destroy the plane or anything, but what are the odds? So that was just sheer luck?

(L) Yeah!

(Joe) There was no information involved? The fact that it was over Moab, Utah? Mother of all bombs... Moabites... [laughter]

(Andromeda) Maybe there was a bunch of them, and only one of them hit. It was more like a buckshot.

(Gaby) And attractor.

(Joe) Yeah.

(L) Okay, next one:

(Joe) Is the West openly preparing for a new large scale European war as the Russians claim?

A: Very likely. Other events likely to intervene.

Q: (Niall) What caused last week's double "crash" of a US jet and helicopter off the USS Nimitz in the South China Sea?

A: Chinese tech test.

Q: (Andromeda) I knew it!

(Niall) And the Pentagon said that it was bad fuel.

(Andromeda) Yeah, right, both at the same time, within half an hour?

(L) Who said it was bad fuel?

(Niall) The Pentagon. In both craft. Trump was in the air at the time over the waters, on his way to South Korea to meet with Xi. So he met Xi. You saw the handshake. And that had just happened. [laughter]

(L) I see!

(Niall) Was Hurricane Melissa entirely natural in occurrence?

A: No

Q: (Niall) Was it another augmented natural event?

A: Yes

Q: (Niall) What's the percentage of psychopaths in the USA? [We last asked in 2010 and the answer was 23%]

A: 24

Q: (L)So it's not gone up that much.

(Niall) No. The population has exploded, though.

(L) But the population has exploded, yeah. That's a lot!

(Niall) That's a lot. In the US, that's a hundred million psychopaths.

(L) Yeah.

(Niall) Well, we're not sure what "psychopath" is to the Cs, though.

(L) Next question:

(Niall) Why have serial killers dropped way off?



A: Less law and more smarts. Plus, who is going to notice in a sea of homicides and missing persons.

Q: (Andromeda) So in other words, they haven't dropped off.

(L) They haven't dropped off. Yeah, I think there've always been serial killers. On the graph it says "Serial killers by decade of first killing." But they don't really know that. That's only based on what they know. And there's so much they don't know.

(Andromeda) What they've tracked.

(L) Yeah.

(Niall) Why was German banker Alfred Herrhausen, chairman of Deutsche Bank, and advisor to then Chancellor Helmut Kohl, assassinated in November 1989?

(L) Do we even care?

(Niall) Well, it was a very peculiar bomb. Very high-tech. So, why do I care? Why? You know, it's interesting!

(L) Okay. Why?

A: Revenge.

Q: (Niall) Did Napoleon Bonaparte have a specific life mission to help humanity at large?

A: No

Q: (Joe) Was he a deep level punctuator... An undergrounder?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) So that suggests that his intent was nefarious.

(L) To create havoc.

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) And he succeeded, to some extent.

(L) Yes, he did.

(Joe) He was a naughty boy.

(Beau) What is Trump's motivation for bombing boats in the Caribbean?

A: Oil.

Q: (L) He wants to start something with Venezuela, and then get Venezuela's oil. He's posturing and threatening. Is that it?

A: Yes

Q: (Andromeda) Provoking.

(Joe) But Maduro has offered to open the resource market to American companies. Trump admitted that that was the case, but that's not enough. Is it that they don't trust Maduro himself? Is that why they want to get rid of him?

A: Control.

Q: (L) They want control of the oil.

(Joe) Control of their backyard.

(Andromeda) They don't want to buy it fairly.

(Joe) Yeah, they want all for nothing.

(Beau) Are drugs being trafficked from Venezuela to the US via these boats that are being attacked?

A: A few.

Q: (Beau) Have any innocent civilians not involved in drug running been killed from these bombings?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) Oh yeah, there were those fishermen.

(Beau) Is Trump aware that he is ordering the bombing of innocent civilians?

A: Not so much.

Q: (Joe) Because he's fed lines of bullshit by his…

(L) Yeah, he's got all those people around him that don't tell him the truth.

(Beau) Is a direct US military attack on Venezuela proper imminent?

A: Very possible.

Q: (L) But I just heard that Russia is transporting stuff, we don't know. Probably interesting stuff.

(Andromeda) And possibly China too.

(Niall) Anti-ship missiles.

(L) Well, we actually did get through the questions!

(Joe) Was the plane that took off after Charlie Kirk's assassination carrying members of the team that carried out the assassination?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) This was the plane that's being tracked, coming and going from Egypt to the US, yes?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) And Egypt... does that mean there were probably Israelis, or Israeli associated?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) And all of the Google searches that some people have turned up... specific searches of the names of hospital staff and the hospital and the Losee building where he was assassinated... Are they all connected to people who were actively involved in planning the assassination of Charlie Kirk?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) So they're stupid enough to actually use Google searches. "How to assassinate Charlie Kirk?" [laughter]

(Niall) "Hospital, we need the right hospital."

(Joe) Grok, how should I assassinate Charlie Kirk?"

(Niall) "In six weeks time, where to put Kirk after shooting? Okay, super!" [laughter]

(L) All right, I'm done. What about y'all?

(meadow_wind) Why wasn't that question about the murder and torture of Yu Menglong included?

(Chu) We just missed it.

(Joe) Yu Menglong?

(Chu) The Chinese actor that everybody is saying was either murdered by a Satanic ritual or…

(Niall) I don't know. I know the rumor that the Chinese communist party is involved in covering up the disappearance and murder of Chinese actors for reasons unknown. Is this true?

A: Yes

Q: (L) That's all we're going to get right now.

(Joe) They have to keep control.

(L) And there is Harmony99. Are you in Jamaica?

(Andromeda) He's alive!

(Harmony99) Yes I am.

(Joe) We were worried about you.

(L) And how was it?

(Harmony99) Well, where I was, I was only affected by a tropical storm wind. I was not close to where the eye entered the island. I was maybe about a hundred miles from where the eye entered the island.

(L) Well, I'm glad of that because we were worrying about you, and thinking about you.

(Harmony99) Yeah, I was worried too because they stated at one time that it was going to pass through the town that I live in.

(Joe) Did you get a chance to go out? Did you see if things are pretty bad, I mean...?

(Harmony99) Very, very, very bad. It seems like it was like a bomb or a tsunami, a bomb or something like that. But there are people on the ground now who are aware that it's artificial. So, I am hearing from people on the ground who are not trusting the authorities. They're saying that it seems... it appeared to be artificial. So, based on what the C's said, it has confirmed what most people are saying. Because they were giving us information, such as that it was traveling like about six miles per hour. And then eventually when it hit the island, it sped up to about...it sped up rapidly. So people were picking up on the ground that something was not right with it.

(L) Yeah. Well, I was watching it, and that was a scary looking thing. I never saw anything like it.

(Harmony99) But what we're hearing is that they're thinking about one of the locations. They're thinking about a smart city.

(Niall) Yeah, I heard that.

(Harmony99) Yeah. So they're thinking about when they're going to convert it into a smart city, and in 2024, the government did a disaster fund insurance with the World Bank that if there is any disaster, they're going to get some payout. And the insurance was written in 2024, and the hurricane came in 2025. So people are very suspicious.

(Niall) Yeah, they should be.

(L) All right.

(Joe) I have one more question. In the last session, they said that things were about to get "stranger than you can imagine." So, since at the time, especially Andromeda, said that she can imagine a lot of strange things, we just have to check that we're not so jaded that we missed it. That things have actually gotten strange.

(L) You're assuming it's already happened.

(Joe) That's what I'm saying, I'm wondering, [laughter] because we normalize things so much.

A: Wait and see!!! Goodbye.

END OF SESSION

Thank you for this new sesh to all of you who added your energies.

I wonder, on the topic of psychopaths, the kinds of things that cause the increase, 1% increase doesn’t seem like much but in fact it’s quite a lot. I would like to know the increase on a planetary scale since in previous estimates it was said by C’s that a total of 2% world wide. What causes an OP to fail into a psychopath? This is probably discussed somewhere but I haven’t read it. Is it environmental (earth and cosmic) drugs (ie, psychotropics, vaccines) and food, media, unresolved trauma…
What are the implications for soulled beings? Does it mean that a failed OP no longer functions as an organic portal? that would be a good thing in my opinion, can longer directly drain life force through stealing energy from higher centres, although then there’s the issue of having more psychopaths who create more misery for soulled beings… …


As always, be well everyone, do what brings you joy, learn and heal, keep the faith and trust the Universe.

Thank All of You Guys, Especially the C's, for this Highly Informative Session, Very Enlightening, it was.

 

[palestine]

I think maybe the INFP gives a hint of Schizoid/Schizotypal behavior for a normal personality. They genuinely like to connect complicated ideas into their simple big picture even though they don't overly master the complicated parts. The connections can be so wide as to seem odd. The INFP can fit himself anywhere but not be like the others anywhere. A personality journal editor once asked me who the real me was and that's probably a common unanswerable question for the INFP. People think I'm the math/sciency NT not an NF. In another forum for a personality book author, the son of the author who ran the forum was the only one to recognize I wasn't an NT.

You know, there are many interactions with many things out there. To be able to find out what-is-what is extremely difficult and requires clinical testing. And, one needs a skilled psy... Those are very rare.

I had a look at the DISM psychology book, which is a reference for psychiatry. The book lists all the known mind deviancies. Whenever the mind wanders, they write a note, and classify the occurence. In the listing, there are "various causes". For almost all cases, there is a tick for "genetic". The DISM is precise in the aspect of "acquired deviancies", too, and explains many things - but it will list the "genetic" road almost all the time.

I stumbled upon "agoraphobia": it would be "due to genetic causes". In other words, when I feel bad, when I find myself in midst of all those Wall Street banksters, it's not because some are psychopaths and that they have been influencing normal people to carry on like them - but because I would be genetically defective to agoraphobia

And here, you see the gap with modern psychiatry and reality. There are many deviant world views, being spread constantly, out there. A. Lobaczewski insists on the fact that "there exist deviants, hiding in society, among normal people, influencing others in a critical manner".

The DISM factors something else. And the result is that one feels bad, when in society, because of "one's own genetic flaws".

Kind of shifts the blame on normal people, and the result is that we would want to change sane ways of functionning. It does not show the right direction in this case.

I believe that what you describe can have many many many different origins, and even sane ones, such as sensitivity, kindness.