Session Date: June 13th 2015
Laura, Andromeda, and Galatea at the board
Pierre, Perceval, Chu, PoB, Data, Niall, Scottie, Alana, Noko the Wonderdog, Penelope the Superkitty
Q: (L) Today's date is the 13th of June 2015. It's Saturday the 13th, not Friday the 13th. It's been awhile since we've sat down to have a session. For those readers of the sessions who don't read the rest of the Cassiopaea forum, they will be unaware that I've been engaged in a prolonged experiment in overcoming rheumatoid arthritis which is a brutal protocol. I haven't been in any fit shape to do anything because half the time, I'm unable to fight gravity. But in any event, I have gone through 5 weeks of this treatment and I only have one week left to go. I'm much better now. So, we're going to have a session despite the fact that I'm still just a little bit peaked. Just a tad. We'll see what happens. We hope that I didn't get rid of all the critters that were the antenna for the C's! [laughter]
(Andromeda) The amoebas!
(L) So, hello?
A: Good evening children!
Q: (L) And who do we have with us this evening?
A: Ceressiaea of Cassiopaea transduction point.
Q: (L) Alright, I have a series of questions here from forum members. Apparently, there was a conference with Barbara Marciniak where she was doing some trance channeling. Several of the forum people had a look at it and condensed the major points of the event. Out of what was said in that particular channeling, some questions arose... Not particularly about the channeling, but about some of the issues that were covered. Of course, everybody knows how I feel about trance channeling and that sort of thing. But anyhow, one of the questions that came up was:
A: We once told you that your computers would overpower you. Thus neither question is precisely to the point. Internet was initially manifested for practical purposes, then other applications were developed. It could be said that the "experiment" in consciousness appeared in reaction to more positive uses. At present the internet is more a source of confusion and propaganda than anything else. Thus the opening statement is fulfilled.
Q: (L) In other words, the overpowering of people by their computers would be the use of the internet for confusion and propaganda. Is that what we're getting at here?
A: Yes
Q: (L) So, people being taken over in their minds by disinformation, propaganda, lies and so forth on the computer are literally being taken over by their computers?
A: Yes
Q: (L) Okay, the next part of that question is:
A: If you consider the ramifications of the previous answer, not likely until the power grid goes down.
Q: (L) In other words, why would they shut down something that so easily enables them to control the masses?
A: Exactly.
Q: (L) Next question:
A: Again, we believe that we have addressed this in the past: "Walls have ears".
Q: (L) In other words, there really is no way to keep anything private from those powers that want or need it. If you're worried about privacy, you're only keeping things private from other individuals or from people hacking your password and getting into your bank account. But those are things that should normally be protected anyway. Warning people to get off the grid, to not share, and to not network with each other in order to keep the PTB in the dark seems to me to be offering a false sense of security and is otherwise counterproductive, all things considered.
(Perceval) The opportunity is there to use what the PTB are using - for nefarious purposes - to instead do some good via networking.
(L) Okay, next questions:
(Galatea) Like cyborgs?
(L) I guess so.
(Pierre) Transhumanism.
A: This is already being done to some extent.
Q: (L) What about a divide between people refusing and people wanting this integration?
A: That suggests a state of advancement that will never be achieved.
Q: (L) Why will it never be achieved?
A: We refer you to previous information.
Q: (L) It won't be achieved because humanity is, in a certain sense, going to possibly become extinct. Is that approaching it?
A: Cleansing.
Q: (L) Does that refer to the session when you once said, "Nothing lasts forever, thank goodness"?
A: Yes!
Q: (L) Okay, there's a lot of stuff going around on the net about CERN being a portal or stargate.
[CERN originally stood for "Conseil Européen pour la Recherche Nucléaire", but now the current name is "Organisation Européenne pour la Recherche Nucléaire" - European Organization for Nuclear Research. Nevertheless, the acronym is still CERN. In short, it's a European particle accelerator laboratory.]
(L) So, it's the European nuclear research place. You've been there honey, right?
(Ark) Yeah.
(L) Do you think it's a portal or stargate?
(Ark) There may be something somewhere nearby.
(Perceval) Did you get accelerated?
A: The only "portal" is infrequently utilized by 4D STS.
Q: (L) So in other words, it would be something like multi-level bases in the USA where there are portals to 3rd, 4th, and 5th density? Something like that?
A: Yes
Q: (L) So the reader can refer to the underground bases discussion for further understanding of the potential of CERN to be a portal/stargate?
A: Yes
Q: (L) Is there some kind of dangerous activity going on there that could generate a black hole or something and swallow the Earth?
(Perceval) And send us all into an antimatter universe?
A: They only wish! The more interesting work is of a different nature and location.
Q: (L) Okay, I'll bite. What kind of work is that, and what is the location?
A: We refer to previous discussions about such things as Montauk.
Q: (L) Okay. Yeah, people ought to be reading the sessions and putting things together. Next question… hmmm… Didn’t we ask before what the booms in the sky were caused by? The trumpet sounds and strange noises in the sky?
(Niall) They said it was increased energy input into the Earth/atmosphere system.
(Data) In one video, I saw a guy walk with the camera to find the source of the noise, and it was a bulldozer scraping a baseball field nearby.
(L) That's a debunking video. I don't believe it. They found a way to reproduce the sound and made a video.
(Perceval) Or, in some cases, that kind of sound can be made in a few different ways. But the amount of them in so many different locations...
(Pierre) Yeah, it doesn't mean all the sounds are made by bulldozers.
(L) So let's ask about your video. I don't believe it for a minute.
(Chu) There are lots of places where there would be nowhere for a bulldozer...
(Perceval) Yeah, the sounds have been heard in the middle of nowhere.
(Data) Well, I'm very critical. This guy debunked several of them, but he was very reasonable. I'm not saying all of them are fake, but some of them could be.
(L) It's like Doug and Dave and the crop circles. They have to find somebody who can reproduce something, and then they claim it's all explained!
So, next question. The previous answer to the mysterious sky sounds was increased energy input into the system. So, the question is:
A: No.
Q: (Perceval) See previous answer.
(L) Anything more than "no"?
A: They come from the neutral cavity between the Earth and upper atmosphere/radiation belts.
Q: (L) Well, what about this video that Data watched, but didn't share with anybody else in the house and just waited for the session to spring it on us, where apparently some guy has debunked these sounds? My response was that it's like Doug and Dave debunking crop circles?
A: Exactly. Some are "ordinary".
Q: (L) But I notice you say "some", and not "most"?
A: Yes
Q: (L) Okay. Next question:
A: No. Sigh...
Q: [laughter] (Andromeda) Somebody really wants an underworld space war!
(L) This is what people on the forum are asking! Obviously, people need to be reading the transcripts. A lot of these issues have already been dealt with. Next:
A: Of course!
Q: (L) Um... Now here is something supposedly from this Marciniak channeling. Don't everybody groan at once...
A: As could be said: Puleeeze spare us this New Age nonsense.
Q: [laughter] (L) Okay, well, obviously people need to start reading the earlier sessions!
A: Take note however, that there are those at 4D STS "HQ" who take some pleasure fomenting wars and confusion for sport.
Q: (L) So, forget Anunnaki. It's just 4D STS.
A: Yes
Q: (L) Now, changing topics... Well, let's stay on the world affairs business. Okay, one person on the forum wrote:
(Pierre) Well, it's quite a true depiction.
(Perceval) Maybe.
(L) So, what do you have to say about Putin?
A: He has a team of good and smart helpers. But it can be said that that is a good analysis and close conclusion.
Q: (L) Okay, now here's another question. I think people will probably be interested in this one. So, let's go with it:
(L) That's a good question.
A: It is a little of both.
Q: (L) So, the guy has a conscience...
(Chu) But he also wants to appease the people...
(Perceval) Well, there's also a power behind the pope. There are a bunch of cardinals who see the problem of everybody leaving and the money flying out of the coffers. They probably picked Francy because he's a nice guy and he wants to do good. Then people will come back to the Catholic Church, and they'll get their money back, and so on.
(L) So, it's basically like psychopaths that come to an understanding that they've gotta put somebody more human out there on the front so that they can survive because their sources are drying up. Is that fairly accurate?
A: More or less. Francis really wants to do good but he also understands the forces in play.
Q: (L) Now, the next question is: Some people are wondering if all the information that we get about North Korea is just pure propaganda, and if maybe Kim Jong Un is not as bad as he is portrayed?
A: Bad enough, but certainly not the monster he is portrayed. The key is the intense secretiveness and belligerence.
Q: (L) Okay. Somebody wrote:
(L) Any comment on that?
A: See previous answers.
Q: (L) I assume that means answers about Putin, 4D STS having fun playing games with people, and so forth. Okay, let's go back to this other topic here. A forum member writes:
(L) Does a person's taste in music reflect their state of awareness, development, and being?
A: Yes, more or less, though there is a range of preferences at various "levels".
Q: (L) Okay, next question:
Q: (L) Okay:
A: The sound opens the door for the lyrics to enter for good or ill.
Q: (L) Does that mean that a song that sounds really horrible and mechanical and like somebody just beating on a pot or clanging on the hood of their car or something, and if that's the kind of music the person likes, but it also has good lyrics, then that's okay?
A: Not exactly. The sound can open gates at - or of - different levels and parts of the internal makeup.
Q: (L) Okay, next forum question:
A: Of course.
Q: (L) Next:
A: Sadly, in some circles, yes.
Q: (Galatea) So, if people like anarchy music about hating the government and law, then they're gonna stir up some trouble?
(L) I dunno. Maybe they would track somebody like that and think that they could turn that person to their own uses.
(Perceval) They said there are some types of music that are listened to by certain types of people... Certain types of emo music or whatever that certain types of young people listen to, like outsiders or loners and that kind of thing, and those people could be tracked as candidates for "use"...
A: The 70's were the time of development of such concepts and technologies. The 80's were the period when implementation became more widespread. At present 90 percent of broadcast music has corrupting elements.
Q: (Pierre) So we have to listen to old music. Music from before the 70's. Or classical music.
(L) Obviously we need to be paying much closer attention to our musical tastes, and analyzing what it is about songs that we like. And obviously, we need to pay a lot more attention to what we listen to in the background. But that means I'm safe since I only listen to old classic rock like Bob Seger, whose music is the best! [laughter]
A: Yes. Goodbye.
END OF SESSION
Laura, Andromeda, and Galatea at the board
Pierre, Perceval, Chu, PoB, Data, Niall, Scottie, Alana, Noko the Wonderdog, Penelope the Superkitty
Q: (L) Today's date is the 13th of June 2015. It's Saturday the 13th, not Friday the 13th. It's been awhile since we've sat down to have a session. For those readers of the sessions who don't read the rest of the Cassiopaea forum, they will be unaware that I've been engaged in a prolonged experiment in overcoming rheumatoid arthritis which is a brutal protocol. I haven't been in any fit shape to do anything because half the time, I'm unable to fight gravity. But in any event, I have gone through 5 weeks of this treatment and I only have one week left to go. I'm much better now. So, we're going to have a session despite the fact that I'm still just a little bit peaked. Just a tad. We'll see what happens. We hope that I didn't get rid of all the critters that were the antenna for the C's! [laughter]
(Andromeda) The amoebas!
(L) So, hello?
A: Good evening children!
Q: (L) And who do we have with us this evening?
A: Ceressiaea of Cassiopaea transduction point.
Q: (L) Alright, I have a series of questions here from forum members. Apparently, there was a conference with Barbara Marciniak where she was doing some trance channeling. Several of the forum people had a look at it and condensed the major points of the event. Out of what was said in that particular channeling, some questions arose... Not particularly about the channeling, but about some of the issues that were covered. Of course, everybody knows how I feel about trance channeling and that sort of thing. But anyhow, one of the questions that came up was:
(L) I don't exactly know what the person means... I guess it would be one or the other. Is it a window of opportunity, or is it an experiment in human consciousness?
A: We once told you that your computers would overpower you. Thus neither question is precisely to the point. Internet was initially manifested for practical purposes, then other applications were developed. It could be said that the "experiment" in consciousness appeared in reaction to more positive uses. At present the internet is more a source of confusion and propaganda than anything else. Thus the opening statement is fulfilled.
Q: (L) In other words, the overpowering of people by their computers would be the use of the internet for confusion and propaganda. Is that what we're getting at here?
A: Yes
Q: (L) So, people being taken over in their minds by disinformation, propaganda, lies and so forth on the computer are literally being taken over by their computers?
A: Yes
Q: (L) Okay, the next part of that question is:
A: If you consider the ramifications of the previous answer, not likely until the power grid goes down.
Q: (L) In other words, why would they shut down something that so easily enables them to control the masses?
A: Exactly.
Q: (L) Next question:
A: Again, we believe that we have addressed this in the past: "Walls have ears".
Q: (L) In other words, there really is no way to keep anything private from those powers that want or need it. If you're worried about privacy, you're only keeping things private from other individuals or from people hacking your password and getting into your bank account. But those are things that should normally be protected anyway. Warning people to get off the grid, to not share, and to not network with each other in order to keep the PTB in the dark seems to me to be offering a false sense of security and is otherwise counterproductive, all things considered.
(Perceval) The opportunity is there to use what the PTB are using - for nefarious purposes - to instead do some good via networking.
(L) Okay, next questions:
(Galatea) Like cyborgs?
(L) I guess so.
(Pierre) Transhumanism.
A: This is already being done to some extent.
Q: (L) What about a divide between people refusing and people wanting this integration?
A: That suggests a state of advancement that will never be achieved.
Q: (L) Why will it never be achieved?
A: We refer you to previous information.
Q: (L) It won't be achieved because humanity is, in a certain sense, going to possibly become extinct. Is that approaching it?
A: Cleansing.
Q: (L) Does that refer to the session when you once said, "Nothing lasts forever, thank goodness"?
A: Yes!
Q: (L) Okay, there's a lot of stuff going around on the net about CERN being a portal or stargate.
[CERN originally stood for "Conseil Européen pour la Recherche Nucléaire", but now the current name is "Organisation Européenne pour la Recherche Nucléaire" - European Organization for Nuclear Research. Nevertheless, the acronym is still CERN. In short, it's a European particle accelerator laboratory.]
(L) So, it's the European nuclear research place. You've been there honey, right?
(Ark) Yeah.
(L) Do you think it's a portal or stargate?
(Ark) There may be something somewhere nearby.
(Perceval) Did you get accelerated?
A: The only "portal" is infrequently utilized by 4D STS.
Q: (L) So in other words, it would be something like multi-level bases in the USA where there are portals to 3rd, 4th, and 5th density? Something like that?
A: Yes
Q: (L) So the reader can refer to the underground bases discussion for further understanding of the potential of CERN to be a portal/stargate?
A: Yes
Q: (L) Is there some kind of dangerous activity going on there that could generate a black hole or something and swallow the Earth?
(Perceval) And send us all into an antimatter universe?
A: They only wish! The more interesting work is of a different nature and location.
Q: (L) Okay, I'll bite. What kind of work is that, and what is the location?
A: We refer to previous discussions about such things as Montauk.
Q: (L) Okay. Yeah, people ought to be reading the sessions and putting things together. Next question… hmmm… Didn’t we ask before what the booms in the sky were caused by? The trumpet sounds and strange noises in the sky?
(Niall) They said it was increased energy input into the Earth/atmosphere system.
(Data) In one video, I saw a guy walk with the camera to find the source of the noise, and it was a bulldozer scraping a baseball field nearby.
(L) That's a debunking video. I don't believe it. They found a way to reproduce the sound and made a video.
(Perceval) Or, in some cases, that kind of sound can be made in a few different ways. But the amount of them in so many different locations...
(Pierre) Yeah, it doesn't mean all the sounds are made by bulldozers.
(L) So let's ask about your video. I don't believe it for a minute.
(Chu) There are lots of places where there would be nowhere for a bulldozer...
(Perceval) Yeah, the sounds have been heard in the middle of nowhere.
(Data) Well, I'm very critical. This guy debunked several of them, but he was very reasonable. I'm not saying all of them are fake, but some of them could be.
(L) It's like Doug and Dave and the crop circles. They have to find somebody who can reproduce something, and then they claim it's all explained!
So, next question. The previous answer to the mysterious sky sounds was increased energy input into the system. So, the question is:
A: No.
Q: (Perceval) See previous answer.
(L) Anything more than "no"?
A: They come from the neutral cavity between the Earth and upper atmosphere/radiation belts.
Q: (L) Well, what about this video that Data watched, but didn't share with anybody else in the house and just waited for the session to spring it on us, where apparently some guy has debunked these sounds? My response was that it's like Doug and Dave debunking crop circles?
A: Exactly. Some are "ordinary".
Q: (L) But I notice you say "some", and not "most"?
A: Yes
Q: (L) Okay. Next question:
A: No. Sigh...
Q: [laughter] (Andromeda) Somebody really wants an underworld space war!
(L) This is what people on the forum are asking! Obviously, people need to be reading the transcripts. A lot of these issues have already been dealt with. Next:
A: Of course!
Q: (L) Um... Now here is something supposedly from this Marciniak channeling. Don't everybody groan at once...
A: As could be said: Puleeeze spare us this New Age nonsense.
Q: [laughter] (L) Okay, well, obviously people need to start reading the earlier sessions!
A: Take note however, that there are those at 4D STS "HQ" who take some pleasure fomenting wars and confusion for sport.
Q: (L) So, forget Anunnaki. It's just 4D STS.
A: Yes
Q: (L) Now, changing topics... Well, let's stay on the world affairs business. Okay, one person on the forum wrote:
(Pierre) Well, it's quite a true depiction.
(Perceval) Maybe.
(L) So, what do you have to say about Putin?
A: He has a team of good and smart helpers. But it can be said that that is a good analysis and close conclusion.
Q: (L) Okay, now here's another question. I think people will probably be interested in this one. So, let's go with it:
(L) That's a good question.
A: It is a little of both.
Q: (L) So, the guy has a conscience...
(Chu) But he also wants to appease the people...
(Perceval) Well, there's also a power behind the pope. There are a bunch of cardinals who see the problem of everybody leaving and the money flying out of the coffers. They probably picked Francy because he's a nice guy and he wants to do good. Then people will come back to the Catholic Church, and they'll get their money back, and so on.
(L) So, it's basically like psychopaths that come to an understanding that they've gotta put somebody more human out there on the front so that they can survive because their sources are drying up. Is that fairly accurate?
A: More or less. Francis really wants to do good but he also understands the forces in play.
Q: (L) Now, the next question is: Some people are wondering if all the information that we get about North Korea is just pure propaganda, and if maybe Kim Jong Un is not as bad as he is portrayed?
A: Bad enough, but certainly not the monster he is portrayed. The key is the intense secretiveness and belligerence.
Q: (L) Okay. Somebody wrote:
(L) Any comment on that?
A: See previous answers.
Q: (L) I assume that means answers about Putin, 4D STS having fun playing games with people, and so forth. Okay, let's go back to this other topic here. A forum member writes:
(L) Does a person's taste in music reflect their state of awareness, development, and being?
A: Yes, more or less, though there is a range of preferences at various "levels".
Q: (L) Okay, next question:
A: It can be strongly affected if only subconsciously.
Q: (L) Okay:
A: The sound opens the door for the lyrics to enter for good or ill.
Q: (L) Does that mean that a song that sounds really horrible and mechanical and like somebody just beating on a pot or clanging on the hood of their car or something, and if that's the kind of music the person likes, but it also has good lyrics, then that's okay?
A: Not exactly. The sound can open gates at - or of - different levels and parts of the internal makeup.
Q: (L) Okay, next forum question:
A: Of course.
Q: (L) Next:
A: Sadly, in some circles, yes.
Q: (Galatea) So, if people like anarchy music about hating the government and law, then they're gonna stir up some trouble?
(L) I dunno. Maybe they would track somebody like that and think that they could turn that person to their own uses.
(Perceval) They said there are some types of music that are listened to by certain types of people... Certain types of emo music or whatever that certain types of young people listen to, like outsiders or loners and that kind of thing, and those people could be tracked as candidates for "use"...
A: The 70's were the time of development of such concepts and technologies. The 80's were the period when implementation became more widespread. At present 90 percent of broadcast music has corrupting elements.
Q: (Pierre) So we have to listen to old music. Music from before the 70's. Or classical music.
(L) Obviously we need to be paying much closer attention to our musical tastes, and analyzing what it is about songs that we like. And obviously, we need to pay a lot more attention to what we listen to in the background. But that means I'm safe since I only listen to old classic rock like Bob Seger, whose music is the best! [laughter]
A: Yes. Goodbye.
END OF SESSION
... 
