Session 21 December 2024

Thanks to Laura, Andromeda and the Chateau crew for a very informative session. The topic of drones is important to me. I live in eastern Pennsylvania and I have seen drones on 5 separate occasions. Each time it was a singular one, with white and red flashing lights and appears to be a large machine as opposed to a flashing orb. Twice I woke up the next day with a small amount of blood coming out of my nose. It is a bit annoying.
I feel badly for Luigi. I was sure he was a patsy because law enforcement is not that effective except when trying to cover things up.
Thanks to everyone who responded to these threads. I always learn so much.
 
“IF” we are (all humanity) going to be walking into 4D from this our present paradigm and will be seeing and interacting with the locals of 4D, there is a lot to unpack there. And may have something to do with the C’s message of helping people in a completely changed world. And those who survive until the end will be able to help others.

Yep.

If the general population is programed to walk into the new paradigm and experience it as they are programed, and we have refused the programing then what? What are we going to be seeing?

Probably the same as everyone else, although we'll have a frame of reference that they don't. Hence the helping.

And how freaked out will be some of the poorly programed, and those who intuitively refuse programing, but never did the work to have a clue as to what would be going on?

Variably freaked out probably.

Will we be able to grasp quickly enough that we are on level playing field and start to practice our super-powers?

Might not be much different to 3D, at least initially.

In a shielded 3D environment, we get physic attacks but we cannot see our attackers. Will we be able to see our attackers in the future and be on a level playing field with them?

Probably. In 4D, "thoughts are things", apparently. So you can see intent more clearly, and respond to it more effectively.

So much for thinking of 4D graduation as a nice trip to 5D and having a warm fuzzy time, getting a graduation button, then off to your first 4D experience. It may turn out more like a ruff slog through the chaotic disappearing of the Vail period and ending up in a 4D battle zone.

I don't think there's any reason to think 4D will be any more of a battle zone than 3D is. But we'll have to wait and see.
 

Doses delivered and administered in New Jersey as of May 10, 2023​

Total number of doses
29,637,655 doses of the COVID-19 vaccine have been delivered in New Jersey

19,826,065 doses of the COVID-19 vaccine have been administered in New Jersey

On vaccine doses across the US. It's strange that 9 of the 11 states with 90% or above vaccination (first dose), are in the NE, (plus D.C.)

Connecticut >95%*
District of Columbia >95%*
Rhode Island >95%*
Massachusetts >95%*
Maine 94.6%
New Jersey 93.2%
New York 92.9%
Maryland 90%
Vermont >95%*

All others, with the exception of New Mexico (91.7%) and Hawaii (90.2%), are below 90%, most of them well below.

 
You're probably right on that. But the detox protocols including natto, bromelain, ivermectin etc. should cut apart the protein antennas and diminish or nullify the effect. Plus, awareness and mental blocking can protect against any sort of beaming that activates the antennas, OSIT.
And don't forget nicotine against the nanobots, which we can get from shedding or even other things like food and what not lately:

September 21st 2024

Q: (Joe) In the study that was done showing one of these nano objects or nano bots in anesthetic, they used nicotine and it was observed to destroy them. Was that true?

A: Yes. We have often pointed out the benefits of nicotine. Why do you think there was such a concerted campaign to eradicate its use?

Q: (Joe) How does nicotine do that? What is about nicotine?

A: How does mental blocking work?

Q: (L) Mental blocking is a certain attitude of mind, and whatever. And…

(Joe) …information.

A: Produces acetylcholine

Q: (Joe) So nicotine produces acetylcholine, or mental blocking does?

(L) Mental blocking produces acetylcholine?

A: Yes.

Q: (Joe) So we should be asking, how does acetylcholine…

(L) Well, we know that nicotine increases the production of acetylcholine in the brain.

(Joe) Chemically it's very similar to the structure of acetylcholine.

A: Yes.

Q: (Joe) So then the question is, how would acetylcholine destroy physical artifacts like nanobots, in that sense? It's information?

A: Yes.

Q: (Joe) So it's at that level that it's working.
 
"A: Review plans to amalgamate and rule humans after the changes."
Oh crap. We are going to be up against our govts and the aliens. Sounds like they are in cahoots and probably influenced the makeup of the jabs to further their plans????
Vigilance and situational awareness required more than ever now and going forward.
Many thanks Chateau crew. I needed this reminder
 
Q: (Andromeda) Have they tried to shoot one down?

A: Yes

One assumes that the attempt to shoot one down was unsuccessful. However, we know downed/crashed ufos exist, so maybe it's not impossible to take the 4D drones/orbs down. And with the veil thinning, maybe that 4D protection isn't as invincible as before? Here's Russia's latest defense against manmade drones at least:

Russian forces have begun using improvised counter-drone buggies armed with a weapon made up of 24 barrels that fire shotgun-like ammunition, as well as six AK-series infantry rifles on a single mount. The cluster of shot-firing barrels highlights how shotguns have become a go-to option for both sides of the conflict in Ukraine to help provide local defense against uncrewed aerial threats, but also the limitations of those weapons in this role.

A video from the Russian Ministry of Defense, seen below, shows a pair of the new counter-drone vehicles. An accompanying official post on the Telegram social media network says they are based around a chassis taken from an unspecified model of the long-popular 4×4 Lada Niva series.

Sooo - something akin to buckshot from a shotgun is proving effective. That rather explains why the public was told not to shoot at the drones!
 
W: (Joe) Surely reading and influencing of members of the population could be done without such a visible display of lights in the sky and stuff. So it seems that the main agenda here is obviously to spook the population and prepare them, like I said, acclimatize them to lights in the sky, UFOs...
What does "W" refer to? or was it a typo?

Thank you for the session! it was much appreciated.
 
I was under the impression that shedding was related to the viral part, as opposed to the vaccine injection that is filled with nano lipids, graphene oxide, and whatever else no one was able to figure out, and it's those ingredients that get triggered with certain electromagnetic frequencies to be assembled inside the body, which then transform a person into a transmitters/receivers.

I'm not sure about the role of this spike protein other than to create as much damage as possible. So my guess was that by catching Covid from someone's shedding, you don't get contaminated with the graphene/nano lipid stuff.

This was discussed in the August 17th 2024 session:
(Chu) So if these "nanobots", as they are called, exist, what is their main purpose? Mind control or health deterioration or something else?

A: Either/or.

Q: (Joe) Can they be shed? Can you contract them from people who have had them in the batches of vaccines…?

A: Cut them up.

Q: (Joe) What was that?

(Niall) Cut them up.

(Joe) Huh?

A: Chemical cleaving.

Q: (Gaby) Like detox?

A: Yes.

Q: (Joe) What would you use for that?

(L) Like serrapeptase. Doesn't serrapeptase digest stuff like that?

(Gaby) Yeah. The protocols we discussed. Bromelain, nattokinase, ivermectin...

(Joe) So it is possible for them to be shed, and contracted by other people.

(L) Well, you have to cut them up and get rid of them out of your body.

(Joe) But my question was, people who have had them injected into them via the vaccine, and who have these nanobots in them... Are they "sheddable"?

A: Under some circumstances.

Q: (L) Well, I guess sex, or sharing body fluids of some sort, or...

(Gaby) Blood transfusions.


(L) Yeah, things like that.

(Joe) Yeah. But not just coughed in your face.

(Andromeda) Not like a germ.

(Joe) Not like the way you can shed the spike protein. You can't contract it the same way.
 
This was discussed in the August 17th 2024 session:
And in the September session:

September 21st 2024

(L) All right. Now we want to ask about these so-called nanobots that are being seen from the Pfizer vaxx, incubated in distilled water for various days of… okay, What are these things?

A: Antennae for future use.

Q: (Joe) And are they coded in the mRNA in the shot to produce these things in bodies?

A: Yes.

Q: (Joe) So we're talking about super, super high tech.

(L) When you say future, how much future do you mean?

A: Future from time of injection.

Q: (L) So some of these nanobots could be doing whatever it is they do now, since so many people have had these injections. Yeah?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) And are some of the things that they're used for to generate cancers, or illnesses, or diseases?

A: Some, yes.

Q: (Joe) There was another paper with a claim that this kind of nanotech was in dental anesthetic. I suppose in some cases it was found in dental anesthetic. Is that true?

A: Yes.

Q: (Joe) Was that very widespread?

A: No. Experimental. You should be aware that the extent of this type of experimentation is far more than widespread than you can imagine.
Correct error of transmission please.

Q: (Joe) "is far more widespread than you can imagine." Is that what you meant to say?

A: Yes.

Q: (Joe) And so, just on that point, are we talking about in foods as well?

A: Yes.

Q: (Joe) In water supplies?

A: Yes.

Q: (Joe) But this is all experimental, right?

A: Yes.

Q: (Joe) So the experimentation is widespread, but it's not widespread in terms of application.

(L) Right.

A: Yes.

Q:
(Joe) Okay, so should we not go to the dentist anymore?

A: No!

Q: (Andromeda) Gaby was right! [Laughter]

(Joe) Gaby was recommending non anesthetic dental treatment the other day.

(Niall) Just take the pain! [Laughter]

A: The human body is not without defenses that can be augmented by physiological and psychological means.
 
Sooo - something akin to buckshot from a shotgun is proving effective. That rather explains why the public was told not to shoot at the drones!
So, yes - definitely shooting shotguns! From the referenced article that expounds on this topic:


1735335658808.png

I dunno - should one consider having a shotgun with buckshot handy just in case one or a swarm starts threatening maneuvers towards one's home or person? Funny that the former past population of mostly farmers and ranchers always had shotguns at hand be it varmints animal or human posing a threat (maybe I'm watching too many Gunsmoke reruns . . . ). Can't help but wonder just how crazy things are going to get next year.
 

Attachments

  • 1735335472362.png
    1735335472362.png
    362.4 KB · Views: 3
A humble thank you to all for providing the sessions - and on the Winter Solstice from your location.

A: Part of ongoing plans falling into place. [ferocious dogs growl and bark during answer :)]
A: As previously noted, there was a change in plans, thus some recalibration is needed.

Seems so on both accounts.

Concerning proteins and antenna, the C's have often left tracks on the subject. In 2014 there was discussion on DNA modifications related to tribes and the soul (with a reference to session from 2000):


(just a snip, do read the rest)

(L) It's getting to be regular. Okay, now... I printed out some session extracts from a few years back because I started thinking about them in relation to trying to find some answers to certain questions that I'm going to get to in a minute. The first one is from September 23rd, 2000. I was asking about DNA and about INTRONS and so forth:

Q: ... It is now known that there are pieces of DNA within a gene that are not translated into protein. These intervening sequences, or INTRONS, are somewhat of a mystery, but appear to be a very common phenomenon." Now, is this thing they are talking about, these INTRONS, are these the core that you were talking about?
A: In part.
Q: What about this ALU repeat with over 300,000 copies of the same base pair sequence. What is it?
A: Tribal unit.
Q: What is a tribal unit?
A: Sectionalized zone of significant marker compounds.
Q: What does this code for?
A:Physiological/spiritual union profile.
Q: Could you define "tribal" for me?
A: You define.
(L) Well, I think that obviously "tribal" means physiological spiritual union profile, and that that may have something to do with what we were talking about at a previous session when we asked about Caesar's soul group. Physiological spiritual union profile would be what defines what tribe you belong to, but it's a spiritual tribe and not necessarily specifically physical. You can grow into it according to some criteria... “graduate” was the term used. Am I correct here about a tribal group being like a soul group? Is that an accurate way of putting it?

A: Very close.

Q: (L) Is there anything that can get me closer?

A: In some cases there is also a supersensory component.

Q: (L) What is a supersensory component?

A: Externally driven mutation.

Q: (L) Externally driven by what?

A: Most often by the occupying soul itself.

Q: (L) So are you saying that if a soul selects a body or gets a close frequency match to a body that it wants to use, that it can also modify that body for its own purposes if it needs to and if the DNA match isn't quite to its taste or purposes?

A: Yes.

Q: (Andromeda) So our souls can cause mutations?

A: Yes.

Q: (Perceval) Does that happen pre-birth?

A: No, it can happen once the soul is seated and as needed.

Q: (L) So, what are some of the processes that can effect this in a physical way?

A: Diet is one. Also "arrangement" to contract the needed sickness.

Q: (Pierre) So you contract a sickness because the soul wants to learn something and experience something, and it's through this sickness that this learning will occur?

A: No. The soul and its helpers wants to trigger DNA modification!

Q: (L) They're saying no, that it's far more pragmatic. Okay, next question... I'm never going to get to my questions that I have! [laughter] Okay, when you say, "the soul and its helpers", what the heck are the soul's helpers?

A: Tribal unit members both in the body and out.

Q: (L) So if you're a member of a tribal unit, you are in a way connected via DNA connections or signals or frequencies with your other tribal members, whether they are incarnated or not? Is that what we're saying here?

A: Pretty much; no man is an island!

This perhaps, kind of goes back to the initial Fort Detrick viral release when the PTB were terrified of it being out there, taking drastic steps to cover it up and redirect. If that was a beneficial 'sickness' as described (and later it was), it might be no wonder that they had us isolated and locked down, and quickly rolled out a counteraction vax-tech-poison (which, as above, is described in how successful the uptake was).

So, from as far back as 1994, the C's and Laura worked through discussion of the soul, the "Soul composition," humans as containers, "But it is the soul that matters" et cetera, et cetera. Suddenly, there has been this mass 4d/3d experiment with the human container (to use that word) with a new ability (yet an old plan) to activate through proteins and antenna.

It is such a big subject - perhaps the 3d subject of subjects as the C's let on, and all seems interconnected.

A: Review plans to amalgamate and rule humans after the changes.

As said, these are long-term plans as they are, with modifications to realize their 4d endgame.

Q: (L) Pretty fancy stuff. So is the government using their drones to send signals to people and...?

A: Yes and those who have been vaccinated have transmitters and receivers.

Q: (Joe) So we're talking here maybe already or very quickly, we're getting to the point where so-called alien tech and human tech is merging or indistinguishable to some extent, or not indistinguishable, but difficult...

(Andromeda) Difficult to distinguish from a distance.

Q: (L) Would you say it's difficult to distinguish without careful analysis?

A: Yes

Oh boy!
 
Back
Top Bottom