Session Date: March 21st 2026
Laura and Andromeda at the board
Niall, Joe, Gaby, Ark, Possibility of Being, Chu, Scottie, Princess Leia, Bella, Falkor
FOTCM Members attending via Zoom:
3DStudent, A Jay, Adobe, Aeneas, aimarok, Alana, Alejo, Aliana, Altair, aluminumfalcon, Ana Huitzil, Anamarija, anartist, AndrewMn, Andrian, Ant22, Anthony, Approaching Infinity, aragorn, axj, Aya, Beau, Bluefyre, Breton, cassandra, Cosmos, daddycat, Deliverance, dugdeep, Eboard10, Ellipse, Ennio, fabric, Finduilas495, France, Gawan, genero81, Glenn, gottathink, Gwenllian, herondancer, hesperides, Honzap, iamthatis, iscreamsandwish, Jacques, Jeanne T, JEEP, Jefferson, Jenn, jess, Josi, Juba, Keyhole, Konstantin, Korzik18, Laurs, Learner, LQB, luc, Lucius, Luis Miguel, Mark, maiko, Manitoban, marek760, Mari, Mark7, Martina, meadow_wind, Meg, Mililea, Miracle, Mrs. Peel, msante, Natus Videre, Navigator, neema, Nicholas, Nienna, Ollie, OrangeScorpion, Oxajil, Pecha, PopHistorian, RedFox, Regulattor, rrraven, rylek, ryu, Saman, seek10, seeker2seer, sid, Stoneboss, sToRmR1dR, T.C., Theodor, thorbiorn, Timótheos, Tristan, Tuatha de Danaan, Turgon, Voyageur, Vulcan59, whitecoast, Windmill knight, Yas, Ysus
Q: (L) Everybody's here? And it's been another week of throwing our hands up in the air at the stupidity of the world. Did anybody watch the interview Tucker Carlson did with that… I guess he's a Chinese guy, who does the analyses, he's kind of like a historian...
(Scottie) Professor Jiang.
(L) Yeah, Professor Jiang or whatever, where he's talking about how dreadful things are going to be and that it's going to be fairly quick and in some places quicker than others because they're all messed up and we're all screwed. And he's probably right. That's the worst. Yeah. Yeah.
(Andromeda) Several people on Twitter were attacking him so he must have been saying something good.
(L) Yeah. And I also watched an interview on the Jeremy… what's his name… Corbell? And he was talking to Matthew, Matthew something or other, one of the whistleblowers.
(Approaching Infinity) Brown.
(L) And, you know, he made the remark at some point that he gets up and cries nearly every morning because humanity is not doing what they need to be doing and we're starting to - not his exact words - but basically escape the fate that is awaiting us because of what these various whistleblowers are saying. And I keep thinking to myself, as more and more stuff comes out that matches everything the C's have been saying for years and years and years...
And, you know, I kind of, you know, he talked about the problem of ontological shock, that people would, you know, once they understood what was really going on, it would just, you know, would just completely take their reality away from them, everything they thought was real. Well, we already know that. We've already been there and done that.
I mean, maybe not in the in-your-face, here's an alien on the White House lawn kind of way, but we've done it at least kind of theoretically, mentally thought about it, considered it to be a viable possibility, even a probability based on, you know, a lot of circumstantial evidence. And I'm not going to say that makes us more prepared than anybody else, but I think it does. I think, and I, you know, and I just wish, I just wish that people would not be so instantly turned off because the material is channeled.
But that was by design, I'm sure. I mean, Yahweh came along fairly early on and said, "I'm the only one and anybody else who says anything that I'm not saying is, you know, is a demon. I am the only God and you should have no other gods" and so on and so forth.
Yeah, so if… and then there was this Chinese guy, Professor Jiang. Is that what you said his name was? And he's talking about how all of these different plots and plans are coalescing or converging at this point, you know, like the Masons, the Evangelicals, the Jews, you know, even probably the Muslims, they've got some kind of end-of-the-world scenario going on, Illuminati, etc., etc. And, you know, these people don't even stop to think about where all those people got those ideas and why they came up with those plans and what's been guiding and directing it. And it's like I said years ago, on each and every one of these individual conspiracy theories, you know, I followed so many of them back… you know, the paper trails and so forth, and always would come up against that brick wall where you can't go any further.
And then you realize that individuals that would formulate such plans - individuals as we understand them in human terms - that would formulate such plans and attempt to carry them out, are the type of individual who doesn't really care about the future. They only care about getting what they're getting right now. And, you know, it's difficult to imagine a bunch of psychopaths saying, you know, we'll form something like the Freemasons, and we'll plan to, you know, 2,000 years from now, we'll plan to bring about the end of the world along with the Jews and everybody else.
And then, you know, our descendants 2,000 years from now will benefit from this in some way, which is difficult to imagine. And you just, you know, you can't wrap your head around that because it's so contradictory to the psychology of such individuals. And that's when I realized, you know, that was another one of those moments when you realize that what the C's are talking about is a hyper-dimensional manipulation where time is irrelevant to them, and it's a long, slow manipulation to create an infrastructure that they can move in and take over.
So then that makes sense, but, you know, the idea of a bunch of Freemasons, Jews or Evangelicals or Illuminati or whatever doing that because, you know, 2,000 years in the future it's going to come to fruition just doesn't, you know, hold water. That dog don't hunt. And...
(Joe) It's not a legitimate prophecy if the prophecy says there will be a big war. You know, suppose a prophecy says, from 2,000 years ago, says there will be a big war and that will be the end of the world, and then you go about provoking the big war. That's not your God doing that.
(L) Yeah, yeah.
(Joe) That's you doing that. That's not a valid fulfillment of a prophecy.
(L) Yeah. I mean, there's so many contradictory elements and all the research I read, like, for example, the book of Revelation indicates, and there's some real careful, close work done on this. You know, like, you'd have to read it to really understand but it pretty much, in my opinion, demonstrates that this, the fundamental part, the main part of the book of Revelation was written as a coded message and encouragement to the Jews who were revolting against Rome.
The word studies on it show, you know, the time period in which it was written, which was, you know, prior to the destruction of Jerusalem. And they used the same kind of language that was used in the Dead Sea Scrolls and we know what they were up to. They were all about, you know, killing off as many Romans as they could.
And, obviously, later redactions were done and maybe some interpolations. They tried to turn it into a Christian document. But what it seems to me is that there are things in there that, you know, really applied to situations at the time that are now being used as models.
You know, I mean, the C's said that the people in charge of these things, they know about prophecies and so forth and they, you know, either use things or they contravene them depending on their mood or their purpose. And, I mean, you think about the phrase in Revelation, you know, the beast that appeared to be wounded in the head but lived and you think about Trump with his ear getting nicked and...
(Joe) The rabbis are all over that. In the Talmud, the Talmud says that, you know, a servant who wants to remain with his master has to have his ear pierced.
(L) Oh, yeah.
(Joe) They're saying that about Trump, basically.
(L) Well, that's a different angle on it.
(Joe) Yeah, they're taking all sorts of angles. But in that part of the Talmud, it's basically about a master and a slave and it's basically a Jew master and a slave that a Jewish person has when a Jew offers indentured servitude, wants to stay with the family and he has to go through this process of having his ear pierced. So this rabbi was saying that that's... He chopped his ear. But he kind of twisted it, saying, so Trump is like the servant of God. But the text that he's describing is that the person who has their ear pierced in that way is the servant of a Jew, not the servant of God.
(L) Yeah. Yeah. But I will point out that the Book of Revelation was written to encourage Jews to resist Rome and kill all the Romans because their messiah was going to come with his twelve legions of angels and help them fight the war right at the end. And he never came. And I suspect that whatever they expect to happen this time is probably not going to happen, at least not the way they think it is. And maybe at the hyper-dimensional level they even know that.
Maybe the whole thing is being... They're being drawn through the eye of the needle for a purpose and, you know, in any kind of battle situation, if you have a traitor from the other side that comes over and gives you all the dope about his side because he... I mean, Josephus, for example, he did that. Turned, changed sides when it suited his advantage. He was all gung-ho to kill Romans until the army of Vespasian had him in their clutches and then he was ready to... "Oh, Lord, you're going to be emperor because you're going to be crowned in the Holy Land" or in Palestine or whatever.
But they don't trust him. The rest of his life was, you know, not a life of triumph of a turncoat because he was hated by his own people and the Romans didn't trust him because he turned traitor. Well, I think that's fairly true in most situations. You know, the traitor comes over to your side and if you realize that he has turned into a traitor for his own advantage, not because he is ideologically enamored of your position, then you're not going to trust him.
And I don't think that hyper-dimensional overlords are more stupid than humans so that those individuals that will turn traitor to their own people for the sake of this demonic ideology, I think that they might be the first to pay the price. At any rate, that's what I think.
So we plan on having a session tonight. I guess we will. Are you ready?
(Andromeda) Ready. We've got questions.
(L) Yesterday was the equinox, by the way, so now we're heading into the summer thing. Today is March the 21st, 2026. [Review of those present] and a bunch of puppies laying around on the floor chewing on their toys. And so without further ado, I guess...
A: Kotloiaea of Cassiopaea here with you tonight. Now, we should remind you that we are not here to underwrite your reality and understanding. That is not helpful to your growth and state of being. We are aware of the questions prepared for tonight. You might want to do research and review and network. Then you must assign probabilities and make a commitment to a probable conclusion. This is like exercising a muscle and makes you stronger. Do not clamor for the answers to everything that piques your curiosity. Sometimes you must wait for confirmation only after you have committed to a conclusion. Also, sometimes this is part of the reality shaping process. Do you understand?
Q: (Andromeda) That was a lot!
(Joe) Yes. Basically, do your own research, come up with your own conclusions, and then commit to them. Have them form part of your awareness or whatever. And then see what happens.
(L) So basically, these questions, I don't guess all of them are bad, but I can see what you're saying. I mean, like this question:
(Beau) Did Erica Kirk recruit women for the Epstein Cabal?
(L) Beau? Is Beau here?
(Beau) I'm here.
(L) What do you think?
(Beau) I think that there is some evidence of that. Though there's no real smoking gun evidence. So based on what I saw, I thought there was a probability that she might have been involved in something like that.
(L) What percentage would you give it?
(Beau) Uh, 70.
(Joe) But you would have to have come up with some evidence to support your hypothesis.
(Beau) Okay, I will do that.
(L) Okay. And then you ask:
(Beau) Was Melania Trump an Epstein girl? If yes, did Trump meet her through Epstein?
(L) Well, I think there is evidence that he did meet her through Epstein, isn't there?
(Beau) Yeah, there's a little bit out there. Again, it wasn't totally clear, so I was just… I could do some more research into that.
(L) I would think that it's probably highly possible that Epstein did introduce her to Trump. And… but it doesn't mean she was an "Epstein girl".
(Joe) Epstein was involved with, what do you call him, the French guy, Victoria’s Secret, and talent agencies and modeling agencies. And it's from that kind of contact that he then recruited certain women. But obviously not all of them, or only a small percentage of them. And it's possible that we know Melania was part of a talent modeling agency. So it's, you know, he could have… he probably met her directly or indirectly via Epstein or via Epstein’s network. But that doesn't mean that…
(L) [looking at next question] Is there any evidence that Pete Hegseth was involved in Pizzagate?
(Beau) No, I mean, not like there was with Howard Lutnick. Just curious if there were other cabinet members who were involved besides Lutnick. But I can look more into that too.
(L) Okay, and Ennio, you ask:
(Ennio) Is Epstein a host for or possessed by a 4D STS being?
(L) Didn't we ask something about… along that line already?
(Ennio) What was asked was whether or not he was an undergrounder, and the answer I think was no. And it was just confirmed that he was a psychopath.
(Chu) But you talked about it with Jay Campbell.
(L) What did we say?
(Chu) That it was possible, I think.
(L) Yeah, I think it's possible, and if nothing else, that he's periodically used.
(Joe) That kind of question is very... it's quite difficult, especially given the cosmology or the context in which you're asking it because, you know, supposedly everybody is STS, and in that sense everybody on the planet has the mind of STS, let's say, to one extent or another. And you could easily interpret that as being some kind of a type of possession or influence or whatever. It's a spectrum or it's by degrees in a certain sense. But if you're asking if Epstein was like a fully embodied 4D STS being, and it was... I doubt it.
(L) Yeah, I wouldn't think so. All the stuff that happened to him. And then you ask:
(Ennio) Was Epstein in close proximity to the Consortium?
(L) I would say, based on everything I've read, that he was a tool of the Consortium, but I don't think he was even in that close proximity.
(Joe) Again, it's a kind of question that... we don't know anything about the Consortium, really. We don't know how they operate or, you know, who they are and do they have direct ‘hands-on’. And I mean, you're talking about levels as well. If you're talking about the Consortium, you're talking about this elite group at the very top of a relatively small number of people, and then there's a network or there's, you know, degrees below that, let's say, through which they exert their influence down through the chain. So, close? I don't know. Four degrees of separation or something? I don't know.
(Ennio) Just getting to the first question first. I think, Laura, that in the discussion with Jay and Harrison, Ted Bundy was brought up, and there were, in previous sessions, answers as to the idea that he was possessed by something 4D or manipulated. But then you have Epstein, who was not only a monster, but he was so connected and influential in so many ways. I think that that's another thing that blew our minds about him. And so if it wasn't the idea that he was either perfectly possessed or completely taken over by a 4D STS being, you know, there just seems to have been something extra at work, perhaps, in maneuvering him, an extra influence or maneuvering. So that's where I was coming at with that question.
(Joe) That's fairly well known. I mean, a lot of people have talked about Epstein, who are in a position to know, and have described him basically as a cut-out. He's basically an intelligence asset, probably Mossad/CIA/Deep State. He's a cut-out. He's a person who was made. Like, what do you call him, Eric Weinstein, described him, and a couple of other people described him in a similar way, that he's basically, it's almost like, you know the way...
(L) He himself is a front.
(Joe) Yeah, he's a front, like intelligence-run front companies. But he was a front person, like a fake person in a certain sense. He was, his image and his whole background and all that kind of stuff, created for the express purpose of insinuating himself into the groups of people that they wanted to gain intelligence of, or gain leverage over a company.
(L) All right, I want to get to a couple of these questions. Beau asks:
(Beau) Will there be a ground invasion of Iran by the U.S.?
A: Will be attempted. But it will be more like a tar baby.
(L) You know what a tar baby is? Everybody know what a tar baby is? Well, there's a set of stories from the Deep South. And the Cassiopaeans are obviously Southerners. [laughter] And I think there's the “Tales of Uncle Remus”, and he would tell about these animals. And there was Br'er Rabbit, Br'er is an abbreviation that means brother, Br'er Rabbit. And then there's Br'er Fox. And Br'er Fox is always after Br'er Rabbit, because the fox wants to get the rabbit.
(Scottie) I just love that story! [laughter]
(L) Br'er Rabbit gets stuck in the Tar Baby. "And he becomes more and more stuck as the tar clings to him. The more he struggles, the deeper he gets entangled. Br'er Fox emerges laughing, thinking he's won, until Br'er Rabbit cleverly tricks him into throwing him into a briar patch, allowing escape. So it's a classic trickster tale, emphasizing wit over brute force." Yes, very cunning rabbit. And everybody knows what tar is, I hope. Or has had some experience with it.
(Joe) It's quite appropriate, it's a petroleum product. [laughter]
(L) Yeah, it's a petroleum product. But anyhow, the rabbit gets stuck in the tar baby and he can't let go. So that's pretty self-explanatory. If the U.S. get in there...
(Joe) I mean, it's been announced that they have X number of thousand troops making their way. They'll be there in two or three weeks, whatever. They're probably going to try and take some of those islands and they'll maybe land on the southern coast of Iran or something. But the problem with that is once they start getting killed, to whatever extent, then they're stuck. It becomes a quagmire, basically. Especially with Trump. US soldiers get killed, then it's like you can't just turn and run away. Because you look like you've been...
(L) So a quagmire is the same thing as a tar baby.
(Joe) You put more troops in and then it eventually becomes a... Middle East quagmire that Trump said they'd never get involved in...
(L) Okay, next:
(Beau) Why did the US bomb the children's school in Iran?
A: At the instigation of Israel. Supposed to anger the Iranians so they would engage.
Q: (L) So basically they were just trying to piss them off and engage because they want them to engage.
(Joe) They want a war.
(L) They want a war. I think we could have probably figured that out.
(Joe) That was actually said that it was Israel's deliberate targeting.
(L) Niall wants to know:
(Niall) Who or what shot down 3 US fighter jets over Kuwait?
(L) Who do you think shot them down, Niall?
(Niall) Best guess is a Kuwaiti.
(Joe) We think it was friendly fire. But we want to know if it was... Is it true that it was a Kuwaiti who shot down three other planes? Did he do it by accident or did he do it on purpose?
(L) That's a much better question. So break it down into the two questions.
(Joe) So three F-15s I think were shot down a couple of weeks ago over Kuwait in quick succession. And the Americans said it was neither friendly fire nor hostile fire. And they're investigating and they haven't really explained what actually happened. But the report is saying that it was shot down by another American jet but flown by a Kuwaiti.
(L) Is that true?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) And was it done by accident? Was it lack of proper training or did they do it on purpose?
A: Purpose. Sympathizes with Iran.
Q: (Joe) We kinda thought that.
(L) Okay, Niall wants to know:
(Niall) How many U.S. and Israeli military aircraft have the Iranians successfully targeted?
(L) I don't think that's a very good question.
(Joe) Probably better to be more specific. How many have been shot down, apart from those three? And we mean here not drones but actual planes. With people in them.
A: 7
Q: (Niall) Have they hit any U.S. Navy vessels?
A: Yes
Q: (Niall) How many?
A: 5
Q: (Niall) Have any sunk?
A: No
Q: (L) Now, what does that do for you? How does that expand your knowledge and being base?
(Joe) Well, all of those questions in that section are basically to give us a better idea of just how badly it's going for America.
(Niall) Officially, none of this has happened.
(Joe) Compared to what they're saying.
(Niall) How many U.S. military personnel have been killed by Iran in this war?
A: 286
Q: (Niall) So officially, it's six. How many Israelis have been killed in Iranian strikes against Israel itself?
A: Hundreds moving toward thousand.
Q: (Niall) What was the reason for Netanyahu's apparent absence from meetings over the last two weeks?
A: Wait and see!
Q: (Joe) Okay, is Netanyahu dead?
A: No dice.
Q: (L) [laughter] Is that one of those realities that is in flux?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) It's really hard...
(L) Is the cat alive or dead? [laughter]
(Joe) It's really hard to... They have access to AI capability that is seamless. So there's no way for us really to know. But I suppose they'll have to announce it at some point. Is there no way we could ask another question that would give us more information?
(L) You want to get closer to that, huh? Is there a...
(Niall) "Wait and see" suggests we're going to find out.
(L) "Wait and see" sounds almost like there's something really serious. I mean, what possible reason could he have for disappearing and his son stopping posting...
(Joe) Right, for about a week and then starting again.
(Andromeda) Unless his dad was seriously injured. He could have been seriously injured.
(Chu) He could be injured, he could be in a coma...
(Joe) So if we ask, for example, over the last week, all of the video evidence of Netanyahu... at a cafe, talking to people, talking to camera, giving press conferences and stuff. Can we ask if that's all AI?
A: Study the videos carefully.
Q: (Chu) Well, we have a pretty good idea that most of them are AI.
(Joe) None of them... they all have to be AI.
(L) Okay, Niall:
(Niall) Are some of the strikes against either US military sites or regional infrastructure, like energy facilities, being carried out by Israel or some 'third actor'?
(L) What do you think?
(Joe) Yes.
(L) Yeah, I mean, if it's obvious that they want to get the US out of there...
(Joe) Well, they want a war. They attacked the school because they want a war. They want a generalized war, so of course it's probably true that they're the ones who did them. Especially in the context of Iran...
(L) So we're going to go with it's very likely that Israel is...
(Joe) A few. To provoke the Gulf states.
(Niall) Yeah.
(L) Next:
(Niall) What are the odds of some kind of energy lockdowns in the near future, where there is effectively a ban or limitation on public consumer use of oil, gas, and home heating and car usage?
A: High!
Q: (Niall) Is a global economic crisis likely to result from this war?
A: Yes!
Q: (L) And I would suggest that that's intentional. Okay, aimarok:
(aimarok) What's the reason behind the recent mass cattle extermination in Russia?
(L) Okay, of the three possible explanations, which is most likely?
A: 2
Q: (L) A vaccine. Well, that would explain why they didn't do any testing. If they knew that a cow had been vaccinated already, then they wouldn't test them for anything.
(Gaby) Is it like a prion disease?
A: Similar.
Q: (Andromeda) Something people could get from eating it.
(Joe) So that means that it's generally... I mean, the government is doing this to protect the population, essentially, even though it's their fault.
(Gaby) Yeah.
(L) Yeah.
(L) irjO, do you really want to know the answer to that question? He asks:
(irjO) Are human parts introduced into processed food in the United States?
A: Sometimes.
Q: (Andromeda) Why?
A: Sometimes it is accidental. Sometimes it is intentional. But it is not very common.
Q: (Joe) Of course. Just ask Grok or someone how much food human beings consume every day. And then consider how many human beings or bodies you would need to have any significant amount of human flesh in that massive amount of food. Where would they get them from? Dig them up or something?
(Niall) Cured...
(Joe) Just on that last thing about Israel, would it be true to say that Netanyahu is not very important in terms of running the country of Israel, the government of Israel and the war?
A: Yes
Q: (L) So somebody else is running things.
(Joe) Which just means if he is dead, it's not a problem.
(L) Okay. Mandatory Intellectomy asks:
(Mandatory Intellectomy) What are the key elements required for AI developing some kind of consciousness?
A: Developing some kind of independent metabolism.
Q: (Mandatory Intellectomy) What abilities would this give the AI beyond what it does now?
A: Self-replication without oversight.
Q: (Mandatory Intellectomy) When talking about "conscious AI", are we talking about large language models (LLMs)?
A: No
Q: (Mandatory Intellectomy) Something more advanced that is not available to the public?
A: Yes
Q: (L) Okay. Gaby wants to know about this William Neil McCasland:
(Gaby) William Neil McCasland, retired commander of the Air Force Research Laboratory at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, was last seen on February 27th 2026. He walked out of his Albuquerque home and into the Sandia Mountain foothills. He left his phone. Left his glasses. Left his wearable devices. Took a gun and his wallet. What happened to him?
A: Driven to madness.
Q: (L) Okay, so you think that he maybe went out and shot himself?
A: Yes
Q: (L) Was he driven to madness by some kind of beaming technology of the human variety?
A: Yes
Q: (L) So they were beaming shit into his head.
(Joe) Why?
(Gaby) He was a consultant for...
(Niall) Black projects. Reverse-engineered alloys or something...
(Joe) Okay.
(L) Okay, now the next question:
(Gaby) Monica Jacinto Reza, aerospace engineer, disappeared 9 months ago into thin air (as witnessed by the person she was with) while hiking near Mount Waterman in the Angeles National Forest. Her work was funded by the U.S. government and was part of a program overseen by retired Air Force Major General William Neil McCasland. What happened to her?
(L) What do you mean "into thin air"?
(Gaby) She was waving and 30 feet before her was the friend she was hiking with. And then he turned back to wave and she was gone.
(L) So she literally disappeared?
(Gaby) While they were hiking.
(L) What happened to her?
A: Taken to 4D.
Q: (Joe) And what was her claim to fame?
(Gaby) She's an engineer, she made a nickel alloy that could be used for propulsion systems.
(Joe) So she was on to something?
A: Yes
Q: (Gaby) On October 25th, 2025, Jacob Prichard killed his wife Jaymee and also Jaime Gustitus and then killed himself. All three were research employees of Wright-Patterson Air Force Base. Was it related to the disappearances of McCasland and Reza?
A: No
Q: (Gaby) What was the motive of these deaths?
A: Jealousy.
Q: (L) Okay.
Background:
Khara-Khora cave is in Kabardino-Balkaria, Russia's North Caucasus. Khara-Khora is a mountain range consisting of several sharp and gentle peaks. In 2011, after a landslide, local residents discovered an underground cave that goes deep into the mountain, with straight and polished narrow walls 40 meters deep into the mountain, which then passes into a wide underground hall, the height of which is 36 meters. In total, the explored dimensions of the cave from the upper part to the lower platform are about 100 meters. Many rectangular tunnels from 5 to 20 centimeters high go from the underground hall into the thickness of the rocks. A "floating" megalith was also found in the underground hall, which is attached to the wall with only one rib, which makes it appear to be floating in the air.
Original source: Mountain cave | Khara-Khora | Kabardino-Balkaria - 3D model by 3D SPLOSHNOFF (@3dsploshnoff)
(Gaby) How many years ago was the Khara-Khora Shaft built?
A: 55KYA.
Q: (Gaby) Who built it?
A: Descendants of Kantek.
Q: (L) I knew it! I knew it! I knew it!
(Joe) What was it used for?
A: Part of a power generator.
Q: (Joe) Was it similar in function to the pyramids of Giza?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) So, are there many kinds of structures like that buried around the planet that are undiscovered?
A: A few. Such power generators did not require multiplicity.
Q: (L) So one...
(Niall) They were that powerful.
(Andromeda) Didn't need that many.
(L) So maybe they just had them on, like, certain quadrants of the planet. Okay.
(Approaching Infinity) Can I have just a quick comment, not even necessarily a question, on the Neil McCasland thing? So if he committed suicide, like from what I've read, the area around his house... there isn't very much cover. It's pretty wide open. It would seem that he couldn't get very far on his own, like walking. So how come they haven't found a body yet?
A: Taken.
Q: (Approaching Infinity) Well, so the people who were beaming?
(Niall) Probably military.
(Joe) Yeah, probably. They were watching him, knew what was happening, keeping tabs on him, and took the body, sort of.
(Niall) They were driving him mad, so they knew what to expect.
(L) That reminds me of what... Who was that guy that... they drove him crazy.
(Niall) A few scientists, right?
(L) Yeah, I'm trying to remember what his... I can't remember what his name was. Honey, do you have any questions tonight?
(Ark) I have. Yes.
(L) Go.
(Ark) Well, I would like to know what kind of physics I need to describe densities. What kind of math? How to get to densities?
A: Geometric algebra.
Q: (Ark) Geometric algebra. Finite dimensional or infinite dimensional? Can you help me?
A: Infinite.
Q: (Ark) Do I need quantum theory mathematics for this?
A: Not much. Quantum theory, for the most part, describes elements of 3rd density and lower.
Q: (Ark) Well, are these densities... should they be treated like phases, like water can be as an ice, or as a liquid, or as a gas?
A: Yes
Q: (Ark) Okay. That gives me something to start. Okay, thank you.
(L) All right.
(Joe) Can I ask... Just on the tar baby thing, with Americans coming to invade Iran, is it likely that Russia would deploy soldiers to the Bushehr nuclear power plant in advance of American soldiers coming to protect it? Because it has got several hundred Russian citizens working there, and...
A: There are already some present. Wait and see!
Q: (L) So there are surprises in store for everybody all the way around?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) You should always aim to ask a question that provokes the answer, "wait and see". [laughter]
(L) Oh, because we know what that means.
(Joe) It means you've asked a question that you're not allowed to know the answer to.
(Andromeda) You've asked a really good question, but you're not allowed to know about it yet.
(Joe) You've asked a really frustrating question.
(Niall) You know, that's something that the prophecy-obsessed fundies in the U.S. talk about. That for Armageddon to happen in the correct sequence, the Russians MUST be going into it.
(L) Oh, yeah, so they're really going to work on that.
(Niall) They've been working on that since the 1980s. It has to happen.
(Ark) I want some precision.
(L) Okay.
(Ark) Geometric algebra can be over real numbers, complex numbers, quaternions, perhaps other fields. Can you help me with this? What kind of geometry? Real, complex, quaternions, octonions, all of them?
A: Complex.
Q: (Ark) Okay. Thank you.
(Joe) So, basically, what they were saying at the start was that because things are in such flux right now, that it's a good idea for us not to limit our thinking about things and to stay open.
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) Because that can help to leave the possibilities open, which might be beneficial, better than...
(Andromeda) ...trying to pin them down.
(Alejo on the chat) I think they're inviting us to make the effort to learn, and then the patience to see the answers confirmed by reality, and not simply use the sessions as a curiosity-satisfying tool.
(L) Yeah! [laughter]
(Alejo on the chat) Like, question reality with research, and maybe even the waiting for the answer and observing reality has an impact on how we learn. Skipping that process, the uncertainty, that is, may not be conducive to learning.
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) It also goes back to the thing they said a long time ago about staying open. And even a lot of the answers to a lot of questions they give is "open", you know?
(L) Yeah. And they said if they hand things to us, it won't help us.
(Chu) And they also said that sometimes they will give us something so that it doesn't happen. Just because they answer something, it doesn't mean suddenly you have the answer to everything.
(Joe) Right.
(JEEP) Candace will find the answers if we wait. [laughter]
(Joe) And it's like, in terms of Ennio's questions and stuff, maybe they're a good example of that. You don't want to rely too much on historical answers or the cosmology that they presented going back many years, because it's all evolving. And the way it was presented in the past may not be the case today, you know? And that goes for everything.
(L) So there we go. Go back up just a little bit.
(Ant22) I'd say the ones connected directly to the Consortium operate in the shadows. They have their minions to do the dirty work. So if anything goes wrong, those minions can be thrown under the bus while the puppet masters remain unseen.
(L) Exactly what happened to Epstein.
(JEEP) Fire on the USS Ford: Sabotage by its own sailors to keep it out of war?
(L) Well, do we know it was sabotaged by its own sailors?
(Andromeda) Yeah. It's the going...
(Niall) That's the best alternative. Well, officially, no. That's the best conspiracy theory to the wall of non-information.
(Joe) But it fits with the previous session. We asked about the toilets.
(Niall) Oh, yeah.
(Joe) They said that...
(Andromeda) It was sabotage.
(Joe) By a small number of people. So this would fit with the same...
(L) Yeah, but it's not necessarily what's happening. So we have (from the chat) Schrödinger's Netanyahu. [laughter]
(Chu) And we have (also from the chat) "Tar Bibi". [laughter]
(L) Oh, God, you guys are funny!
(whitecoast) What if he was one of those revived dead people?
(L) Well, that's always possible. Let's not limit ourselves. If he shows back up, we know he's been revived.
(Navigator) Is the supposition that Iran is pretty much still in the fight and strong, true?
(L) That's a good question.
A: Yes
Q: (L) So Iran is probably holding back, if you ask me.
(Ark) I need more precision: Geometric algebra, complex, infinite, dimensional. Infinite, countable or uncountable?
A: Countable!
Q: (Ark) All right.
[Laura goes back to reading the chat]
(Lucius) Hmm, April drop dead date?
(L) We'll see!
(Alejo) irjO almost ruined breakfast, LOL! [laughter]
(L) Yeah. I guess y'all won't be eating any more of those McDonald's breakfast sandwiches. [laughter]
(Joe) What about April drop dead date? That was what, fifteen, ten years ago?
(L) At least. And it was something about financial markets.
(Joe) And we never got it. Is it still on the cards? Is the band gonna make it? [laughter]
(L) Was that one of those predictions that was out of time sequence?
A: Yes
Q: (L) Do we still have an April drop dead date coming?
A: Indeed!
Q: (L) Is it going to be this year?
A: Maybe.
Q: (L) Okay. [Back to reading the chat]
(Alejo) [About the AI questions.] Metabolism... Huh, so energy transmutation? That's interesting.
(L) Yeah.
(axj) [About the answers regarding the Khara-Khora shaft.] Sounds like Kantekkians brought some advanced technology with them.
A: Advanced knowledge. It took a couple of generations to begin preparing the infrastructure.
Q: (JEEP) Is GEET energy transmuting technology worth pursuing?
(L) What is GEET technology?
(JEEP) It's a device that Paul Pantone invented. I actually talked about it before in the past on the forum. And he was subjected to a kangaroo trial and in prison, got cruel treatment. But his advocates and friends got him out. He left America and went to France. And it's a device he puts on engines, and you put fuel in it that's liquid with maybe some oil or gas, very little. And it gets transmuted to like a plasma powering thing. That's the best I can describe it as, because I'm not a mechanical person or a person who knows that much about it. But he has put it out there to the world. And a lot of people have bought the plans for how to make the devices and are using them. And if we're short on energy, it sounds like it's something that could keep us going. You know, he says you could even run an engine on something like soda pop. So it's really remarkable.
A: Try it and see!
Q: (L) So, some of you mechanical people out there, why don't you get these plans and try it out? And report back.
(Ant22) Any chance we could ask about the outbreak of bacterial meningitis in the UK? Is it planted like covid was? Or is it a real virus - possibly overhyped to push another lockdown and/or vaccines? The media is making a LOT of noise about it here and the government mentioned possible measures to contain it.
A: Overhyped.
Q: (Gaby) It's a small outbreak. It's bacterial too.
(Scottie) Ah, not viral.
(Joe) They just liked to sensationalize it.
(msante) Trump says he has a 100% approval rating. What is his approximate approval rating in the United States today?
A: 23
Q: (L) 23%?
(Joe) What's his approval rating among conservative Republicans?
A: 47
Q: (All) Wow.
(Andromeda) They're pretty unhappy with him too.
(Joe) Is Trump inclined to want to find an exit from this conflict in the near future?
A: Trump is terrified.
Q: (Joe) He's terrified of the implications of the conflict?
A: For his family.
Q: (Joe) So he's terrified of the Israelis, of the deep staters.
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) So what chances would they give of him being able to extricate himself from this, despite those people?
A: Almost 0 at present.
Q: (L) So the thing that he should do, that could get him out of it, he can't do. I mean, he's completely contained in the White House, surrounded.
(Joe) Well, he knows that they're threatening to kill his family, basically. He knows that they would kill his family if he doesn't do what they say.
(L) Anything else?
(Ellipse) Does oil extraction have some nasty effect on Earth?
A: Not really. Oil is abiotic.
Q: (Joe) Is there anything... is our perspective right now, in terms of preparing for the near future, and the things we're doing, is that all appropriate? Is there anything we should be doing that we're not?
A: You are doing well, but do more networking and thinking!!
Q: (L) All right, so any other advice? You already told us to watch, that there were things going to be on the land and in the sea and in the air. And boy, did that turn out to be true!
A: Big booms too!
Q: (Gaby) We love those.
(Joe) There was a drone swarm over Ohio?
(Niall) Louisiana?
(Joe) A drone swarm over Louisiana, was it a military base?
(Niall) Yes.
(Joe) Twelve or thirteen or something like that, or some relatively small number. Were those terrestrial drones, or were they similar to New Jersey?
A: Ultra!
Q: (Joe) Ultra? Oh, Ultraterrestrial.
A: Yes
Q: (L) All right then, I guess that's it for tonight. So we'll say goodnight.
A: Good night and sweet dreams to all! Goodbye.
END OF SESSION
Laura and Andromeda at the board
Niall, Joe, Gaby, Ark, Possibility of Being, Chu, Scottie, Princess Leia, Bella, Falkor
FOTCM Members attending via Zoom:
3DStudent, A Jay, Adobe, Aeneas, aimarok, Alana, Alejo, Aliana, Altair, aluminumfalcon, Ana Huitzil, Anamarija, anartist, AndrewMn, Andrian, Ant22, Anthony, Approaching Infinity, aragorn, axj, Aya, Beau, Bluefyre, Breton, cassandra, Cosmos, daddycat, Deliverance, dugdeep, Eboard10, Ellipse, Ennio, fabric, Finduilas495, France, Gawan, genero81, Glenn, gottathink, Gwenllian, herondancer, hesperides, Honzap, iamthatis, iscreamsandwish, Jacques, Jeanne T, JEEP, Jefferson, Jenn, jess, Josi, Juba, Keyhole, Konstantin, Korzik18, Laurs, Learner, LQB, luc, Lucius, Luis Miguel, Mark, maiko, Manitoban, marek760, Mari, Mark7, Martina, meadow_wind, Meg, Mililea, Miracle, Mrs. Peel, msante, Natus Videre, Navigator, neema, Nicholas, Nienna, Ollie, OrangeScorpion, Oxajil, Pecha, PopHistorian, RedFox, Regulattor, rrraven, rylek, ryu, Saman, seek10, seeker2seer, sid, Stoneboss, sToRmR1dR, T.C., Theodor, thorbiorn, Timótheos, Tristan, Tuatha de Danaan, Turgon, Voyageur, Vulcan59, whitecoast, Windmill knight, Yas, Ysus
Q: (L) Everybody's here? And it's been another week of throwing our hands up in the air at the stupidity of the world. Did anybody watch the interview Tucker Carlson did with that… I guess he's a Chinese guy, who does the analyses, he's kind of like a historian...
(Scottie) Professor Jiang.
(L) Yeah, Professor Jiang or whatever, where he's talking about how dreadful things are going to be and that it's going to be fairly quick and in some places quicker than others because they're all messed up and we're all screwed. And he's probably right. That's the worst. Yeah. Yeah.
(Andromeda) Several people on Twitter were attacking him so he must have been saying something good.
(L) Yeah. And I also watched an interview on the Jeremy… what's his name… Corbell? And he was talking to Matthew, Matthew something or other, one of the whistleblowers.
(Approaching Infinity) Brown.
(L) And, you know, he made the remark at some point that he gets up and cries nearly every morning because humanity is not doing what they need to be doing and we're starting to - not his exact words - but basically escape the fate that is awaiting us because of what these various whistleblowers are saying. And I keep thinking to myself, as more and more stuff comes out that matches everything the C's have been saying for years and years and years...
And, you know, I kind of, you know, he talked about the problem of ontological shock, that people would, you know, once they understood what was really going on, it would just, you know, would just completely take their reality away from them, everything they thought was real. Well, we already know that. We've already been there and done that.
I mean, maybe not in the in-your-face, here's an alien on the White House lawn kind of way, but we've done it at least kind of theoretically, mentally thought about it, considered it to be a viable possibility, even a probability based on, you know, a lot of circumstantial evidence. And I'm not going to say that makes us more prepared than anybody else, but I think it does. I think, and I, you know, and I just wish, I just wish that people would not be so instantly turned off because the material is channeled.
But that was by design, I'm sure. I mean, Yahweh came along fairly early on and said, "I'm the only one and anybody else who says anything that I'm not saying is, you know, is a demon. I am the only God and you should have no other gods" and so on and so forth.
Yeah, so if… and then there was this Chinese guy, Professor Jiang. Is that what you said his name was? And he's talking about how all of these different plots and plans are coalescing or converging at this point, you know, like the Masons, the Evangelicals, the Jews, you know, even probably the Muslims, they've got some kind of end-of-the-world scenario going on, Illuminati, etc., etc. And, you know, these people don't even stop to think about where all those people got those ideas and why they came up with those plans and what's been guiding and directing it. And it's like I said years ago, on each and every one of these individual conspiracy theories, you know, I followed so many of them back… you know, the paper trails and so forth, and always would come up against that brick wall where you can't go any further.
And then you realize that individuals that would formulate such plans - individuals as we understand them in human terms - that would formulate such plans and attempt to carry them out, are the type of individual who doesn't really care about the future. They only care about getting what they're getting right now. And, you know, it's difficult to imagine a bunch of psychopaths saying, you know, we'll form something like the Freemasons, and we'll plan to, you know, 2,000 years from now, we'll plan to bring about the end of the world along with the Jews and everybody else.
And then, you know, our descendants 2,000 years from now will benefit from this in some way, which is difficult to imagine. And you just, you know, you can't wrap your head around that because it's so contradictory to the psychology of such individuals. And that's when I realized, you know, that was another one of those moments when you realize that what the C's are talking about is a hyper-dimensional manipulation where time is irrelevant to them, and it's a long, slow manipulation to create an infrastructure that they can move in and take over.
So then that makes sense, but, you know, the idea of a bunch of Freemasons, Jews or Evangelicals or Illuminati or whatever doing that because, you know, 2,000 years in the future it's going to come to fruition just doesn't, you know, hold water. That dog don't hunt. And...
(Joe) It's not a legitimate prophecy if the prophecy says there will be a big war. You know, suppose a prophecy says, from 2,000 years ago, says there will be a big war and that will be the end of the world, and then you go about provoking the big war. That's not your God doing that.
(L) Yeah, yeah.
(Joe) That's you doing that. That's not a valid fulfillment of a prophecy.
(L) Yeah. I mean, there's so many contradictory elements and all the research I read, like, for example, the book of Revelation indicates, and there's some real careful, close work done on this. You know, like, you'd have to read it to really understand but it pretty much, in my opinion, demonstrates that this, the fundamental part, the main part of the book of Revelation was written as a coded message and encouragement to the Jews who were revolting against Rome.
The word studies on it show, you know, the time period in which it was written, which was, you know, prior to the destruction of Jerusalem. And they used the same kind of language that was used in the Dead Sea Scrolls and we know what they were up to. They were all about, you know, killing off as many Romans as they could.
And, obviously, later redactions were done and maybe some interpolations. They tried to turn it into a Christian document. But what it seems to me is that there are things in there that, you know, really applied to situations at the time that are now being used as models.
You know, I mean, the C's said that the people in charge of these things, they know about prophecies and so forth and they, you know, either use things or they contravene them depending on their mood or their purpose. And, I mean, you think about the phrase in Revelation, you know, the beast that appeared to be wounded in the head but lived and you think about Trump with his ear getting nicked and...
(Joe) The rabbis are all over that. In the Talmud, the Talmud says that, you know, a servant who wants to remain with his master has to have his ear pierced.
(L) Oh, yeah.
(Joe) They're saying that about Trump, basically.
(L) Well, that's a different angle on it.
(Joe) Yeah, they're taking all sorts of angles. But in that part of the Talmud, it's basically about a master and a slave and it's basically a Jew master and a slave that a Jewish person has when a Jew offers indentured servitude, wants to stay with the family and he has to go through this process of having his ear pierced. So this rabbi was saying that that's... He chopped his ear. But he kind of twisted it, saying, so Trump is like the servant of God. But the text that he's describing is that the person who has their ear pierced in that way is the servant of a Jew, not the servant of God.
(L) Yeah. Yeah. But I will point out that the Book of Revelation was written to encourage Jews to resist Rome and kill all the Romans because their messiah was going to come with his twelve legions of angels and help them fight the war right at the end. And he never came. And I suspect that whatever they expect to happen this time is probably not going to happen, at least not the way they think it is. And maybe at the hyper-dimensional level they even know that.
Maybe the whole thing is being... They're being drawn through the eye of the needle for a purpose and, you know, in any kind of battle situation, if you have a traitor from the other side that comes over and gives you all the dope about his side because he... I mean, Josephus, for example, he did that. Turned, changed sides when it suited his advantage. He was all gung-ho to kill Romans until the army of Vespasian had him in their clutches and then he was ready to... "Oh, Lord, you're going to be emperor because you're going to be crowned in the Holy Land" or in Palestine or whatever.
But they don't trust him. The rest of his life was, you know, not a life of triumph of a turncoat because he was hated by his own people and the Romans didn't trust him because he turned traitor. Well, I think that's fairly true in most situations. You know, the traitor comes over to your side and if you realize that he has turned into a traitor for his own advantage, not because he is ideologically enamored of your position, then you're not going to trust him.
And I don't think that hyper-dimensional overlords are more stupid than humans so that those individuals that will turn traitor to their own people for the sake of this demonic ideology, I think that they might be the first to pay the price. At any rate, that's what I think.
So we plan on having a session tonight. I guess we will. Are you ready?
(Andromeda) Ready. We've got questions.
(L) Yesterday was the equinox, by the way, so now we're heading into the summer thing. Today is March the 21st, 2026. [Review of those present] and a bunch of puppies laying around on the floor chewing on their toys. And so without further ado, I guess...
A: Kotloiaea of Cassiopaea here with you tonight. Now, we should remind you that we are not here to underwrite your reality and understanding. That is not helpful to your growth and state of being. We are aware of the questions prepared for tonight. You might want to do research and review and network. Then you must assign probabilities and make a commitment to a probable conclusion. This is like exercising a muscle and makes you stronger. Do not clamor for the answers to everything that piques your curiosity. Sometimes you must wait for confirmation only after you have committed to a conclusion. Also, sometimes this is part of the reality shaping process. Do you understand?
Q: (Andromeda) That was a lot!
(Joe) Yes. Basically, do your own research, come up with your own conclusions, and then commit to them. Have them form part of your awareness or whatever. And then see what happens.
(L) So basically, these questions, I don't guess all of them are bad, but I can see what you're saying. I mean, like this question:
(Beau) Did Erica Kirk recruit women for the Epstein Cabal?
(L) Beau? Is Beau here?
(Beau) I'm here.
(L) What do you think?
(Beau) I think that there is some evidence of that. Though there's no real smoking gun evidence. So based on what I saw, I thought there was a probability that she might have been involved in something like that.
(L) What percentage would you give it?
(Beau) Uh, 70.
(Joe) But you would have to have come up with some evidence to support your hypothesis.
(Beau) Okay, I will do that.
(L) Okay. And then you ask:
(Beau) Was Melania Trump an Epstein girl? If yes, did Trump meet her through Epstein?
(L) Well, I think there is evidence that he did meet her through Epstein, isn't there?
(Beau) Yeah, there's a little bit out there. Again, it wasn't totally clear, so I was just… I could do some more research into that.
(L) I would think that it's probably highly possible that Epstein did introduce her to Trump. And… but it doesn't mean she was an "Epstein girl".
(Joe) Epstein was involved with, what do you call him, the French guy, Victoria’s Secret, and talent agencies and modeling agencies. And it's from that kind of contact that he then recruited certain women. But obviously not all of them, or only a small percentage of them. And it's possible that we know Melania was part of a talent modeling agency. So it's, you know, he could have… he probably met her directly or indirectly via Epstein or via Epstein’s network. But that doesn't mean that…
(L) [looking at next question] Is there any evidence that Pete Hegseth was involved in Pizzagate?
(Beau) No, I mean, not like there was with Howard Lutnick. Just curious if there were other cabinet members who were involved besides Lutnick. But I can look more into that too.
(L) Okay, and Ennio, you ask:
(Ennio) Is Epstein a host for or possessed by a 4D STS being?
(L) Didn't we ask something about… along that line already?
(Ennio) What was asked was whether or not he was an undergrounder, and the answer I think was no. And it was just confirmed that he was a psychopath.
(Chu) But you talked about it with Jay Campbell.
(L) What did we say?
(Chu) That it was possible, I think.
(L) Yeah, I think it's possible, and if nothing else, that he's periodically used.
(Joe) That kind of question is very... it's quite difficult, especially given the cosmology or the context in which you're asking it because, you know, supposedly everybody is STS, and in that sense everybody on the planet has the mind of STS, let's say, to one extent or another. And you could easily interpret that as being some kind of a type of possession or influence or whatever. It's a spectrum or it's by degrees in a certain sense. But if you're asking if Epstein was like a fully embodied 4D STS being, and it was... I doubt it.
(L) Yeah, I wouldn't think so. All the stuff that happened to him. And then you ask:
(Ennio) Was Epstein in close proximity to the Consortium?
(L) I would say, based on everything I've read, that he was a tool of the Consortium, but I don't think he was even in that close proximity.
(Joe) Again, it's a kind of question that... we don't know anything about the Consortium, really. We don't know how they operate or, you know, who they are and do they have direct ‘hands-on’. And I mean, you're talking about levels as well. If you're talking about the Consortium, you're talking about this elite group at the very top of a relatively small number of people, and then there's a network or there's, you know, degrees below that, let's say, through which they exert their influence down through the chain. So, close? I don't know. Four degrees of separation or something? I don't know.
(Ennio) Just getting to the first question first. I think, Laura, that in the discussion with Jay and Harrison, Ted Bundy was brought up, and there were, in previous sessions, answers as to the idea that he was possessed by something 4D or manipulated. But then you have Epstein, who was not only a monster, but he was so connected and influential in so many ways. I think that that's another thing that blew our minds about him. And so if it wasn't the idea that he was either perfectly possessed or completely taken over by a 4D STS being, you know, there just seems to have been something extra at work, perhaps, in maneuvering him, an extra influence or maneuvering. So that's where I was coming at with that question.
(Joe) That's fairly well known. I mean, a lot of people have talked about Epstein, who are in a position to know, and have described him basically as a cut-out. He's basically an intelligence asset, probably Mossad/CIA/Deep State. He's a cut-out. He's a person who was made. Like, what do you call him, Eric Weinstein, described him, and a couple of other people described him in a similar way, that he's basically, it's almost like, you know the way...
(L) He himself is a front.
(Joe) Yeah, he's a front, like intelligence-run front companies. But he was a front person, like a fake person in a certain sense. He was, his image and his whole background and all that kind of stuff, created for the express purpose of insinuating himself into the groups of people that they wanted to gain intelligence of, or gain leverage over a company.
(L) All right, I want to get to a couple of these questions. Beau asks:
(Beau) Will there be a ground invasion of Iran by the U.S.?
A: Will be attempted. But it will be more like a tar baby.
(L) You know what a tar baby is? Everybody know what a tar baby is? Well, there's a set of stories from the Deep South. And the Cassiopaeans are obviously Southerners. [laughter] And I think there's the “Tales of Uncle Remus”, and he would tell about these animals. And there was Br'er Rabbit, Br'er is an abbreviation that means brother, Br'er Rabbit. And then there's Br'er Fox. And Br'er Fox is always after Br'er Rabbit, because the fox wants to get the rabbit.
(Scottie) I just love that story! [laughter]
(L) Br'er Rabbit gets stuck in the Tar Baby. "And he becomes more and more stuck as the tar clings to him. The more he struggles, the deeper he gets entangled. Br'er Fox emerges laughing, thinking he's won, until Br'er Rabbit cleverly tricks him into throwing him into a briar patch, allowing escape. So it's a classic trickster tale, emphasizing wit over brute force." Yes, very cunning rabbit. And everybody knows what tar is, I hope. Or has had some experience with it.
(Joe) It's quite appropriate, it's a petroleum product. [laughter]
(L) Yeah, it's a petroleum product. But anyhow, the rabbit gets stuck in the tar baby and he can't let go. So that's pretty self-explanatory. If the U.S. get in there...
(Joe) I mean, it's been announced that they have X number of thousand troops making their way. They'll be there in two or three weeks, whatever. They're probably going to try and take some of those islands and they'll maybe land on the southern coast of Iran or something. But the problem with that is once they start getting killed, to whatever extent, then they're stuck. It becomes a quagmire, basically. Especially with Trump. US soldiers get killed, then it's like you can't just turn and run away. Because you look like you've been...
(L) So a quagmire is the same thing as a tar baby.
(Joe) You put more troops in and then it eventually becomes a... Middle East quagmire that Trump said they'd never get involved in...
(L) Okay, next:
(Beau) Why did the US bomb the children's school in Iran?
A: At the instigation of Israel. Supposed to anger the Iranians so they would engage.
Q: (L) So basically they were just trying to piss them off and engage because they want them to engage.
(Joe) They want a war.
(L) They want a war. I think we could have probably figured that out.
(Joe) That was actually said that it was Israel's deliberate targeting.
(L) Niall wants to know:
(Niall) Who or what shot down 3 US fighter jets over Kuwait?
(L) Who do you think shot them down, Niall?
(Niall) Best guess is a Kuwaiti.
(Joe) We think it was friendly fire. But we want to know if it was... Is it true that it was a Kuwaiti who shot down three other planes? Did he do it by accident or did he do it on purpose?
(L) That's a much better question. So break it down into the two questions.
(Joe) So three F-15s I think were shot down a couple of weeks ago over Kuwait in quick succession. And the Americans said it was neither friendly fire nor hostile fire. And they're investigating and they haven't really explained what actually happened. But the report is saying that it was shot down by another American jet but flown by a Kuwaiti.
(L) Is that true?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) And was it done by accident? Was it lack of proper training or did they do it on purpose?
A: Purpose. Sympathizes with Iran.
Q: (Joe) We kinda thought that.
(L) Okay, Niall wants to know:
(Niall) How many U.S. and Israeli military aircraft have the Iranians successfully targeted?
(L) I don't think that's a very good question.
(Joe) Probably better to be more specific. How many have been shot down, apart from those three? And we mean here not drones but actual planes. With people in them.
A: 7
Q: (Niall) Have they hit any U.S. Navy vessels?
A: Yes
Q: (Niall) How many?
A: 5
Q: (Niall) Have any sunk?
A: No
Q: (L) Now, what does that do for you? How does that expand your knowledge and being base?
(Joe) Well, all of those questions in that section are basically to give us a better idea of just how badly it's going for America.
(Niall) Officially, none of this has happened.
(Joe) Compared to what they're saying.
(Niall) How many U.S. military personnel have been killed by Iran in this war?
A: 286
Q: (Niall) So officially, it's six. How many Israelis have been killed in Iranian strikes against Israel itself?
A: Hundreds moving toward thousand.
Q: (Niall) What was the reason for Netanyahu's apparent absence from meetings over the last two weeks?
A: Wait and see!
Q: (Joe) Okay, is Netanyahu dead?
A: No dice.
Q: (L) [laughter] Is that one of those realities that is in flux?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) It's really hard...
(L) Is the cat alive or dead? [laughter]
(Joe) It's really hard to... They have access to AI capability that is seamless. So there's no way for us really to know. But I suppose they'll have to announce it at some point. Is there no way we could ask another question that would give us more information?
(L) You want to get closer to that, huh? Is there a...
(Niall) "Wait and see" suggests we're going to find out.
(L) "Wait and see" sounds almost like there's something really serious. I mean, what possible reason could he have for disappearing and his son stopping posting...
(Joe) Right, for about a week and then starting again.
(Andromeda) Unless his dad was seriously injured. He could have been seriously injured.
(Chu) He could be injured, he could be in a coma...
(Joe) So if we ask, for example, over the last week, all of the video evidence of Netanyahu... at a cafe, talking to people, talking to camera, giving press conferences and stuff. Can we ask if that's all AI?
A: Study the videos carefully.
Q: (Chu) Well, we have a pretty good idea that most of them are AI.
(Joe) None of them... they all have to be AI.
(L) Okay, Niall:
(Niall) Are some of the strikes against either US military sites or regional infrastructure, like energy facilities, being carried out by Israel or some 'third actor'?
(L) What do you think?
(Joe) Yes.
(L) Yeah, I mean, if it's obvious that they want to get the US out of there...
(Joe) Well, they want a war. They attacked the school because they want a war. They want a generalized war, so of course it's probably true that they're the ones who did them. Especially in the context of Iran...
(L) So we're going to go with it's very likely that Israel is...
(Joe) A few. To provoke the Gulf states.
(Niall) Yeah.
(L) Next:
(Niall) What are the odds of some kind of energy lockdowns in the near future, where there is effectively a ban or limitation on public consumer use of oil, gas, and home heating and car usage?
A: High!
Q: (Niall) Is a global economic crisis likely to result from this war?
A: Yes!
Q: (L) And I would suggest that that's intentional. Okay, aimarok:
(aimarok) What's the reason behind the recent mass cattle extermination in Russia?
(L) Okay, of the three possible explanations, which is most likely?
A: 2
Q: (L) A vaccine. Well, that would explain why they didn't do any testing. If they knew that a cow had been vaccinated already, then they wouldn't test them for anything.
(Gaby) Is it like a prion disease?
A: Similar.
Q: (Andromeda) Something people could get from eating it.
(Joe) So that means that it's generally... I mean, the government is doing this to protect the population, essentially, even though it's their fault.
(Gaby) Yeah.
(L) Yeah.
(L) irjO, do you really want to know the answer to that question? He asks:
(irjO) Are human parts introduced into processed food in the United States?
A: Sometimes.
Q: (Andromeda) Why?
A: Sometimes it is accidental. Sometimes it is intentional. But it is not very common.
Q: (Joe) Of course. Just ask Grok or someone how much food human beings consume every day. And then consider how many human beings or bodies you would need to have any significant amount of human flesh in that massive amount of food. Where would they get them from? Dig them up or something?
(Niall) Cured...
(Joe) Just on that last thing about Israel, would it be true to say that Netanyahu is not very important in terms of running the country of Israel, the government of Israel and the war?
A: Yes
Q: (L) So somebody else is running things.
(Joe) Which just means if he is dead, it's not a problem.
(L) Okay. Mandatory Intellectomy asks:
(Mandatory Intellectomy) What are the key elements required for AI developing some kind of consciousness?
A: Developing some kind of independent metabolism.
Q: (Mandatory Intellectomy) What abilities would this give the AI beyond what it does now?
A: Self-replication without oversight.
Q: (Mandatory Intellectomy) When talking about "conscious AI", are we talking about large language models (LLMs)?
A: No
Q: (Mandatory Intellectomy) Something more advanced that is not available to the public?
A: Yes
Q: (L) Okay. Gaby wants to know about this William Neil McCasland:
(Gaby) William Neil McCasland, retired commander of the Air Force Research Laboratory at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, was last seen on February 27th 2026. He walked out of his Albuquerque home and into the Sandia Mountain foothills. He left his phone. Left his glasses. Left his wearable devices. Took a gun and his wallet. What happened to him?
A: Driven to madness.
Q: (L) Okay, so you think that he maybe went out and shot himself?
A: Yes
Q: (L) Was he driven to madness by some kind of beaming technology of the human variety?
A: Yes
Q: (L) So they were beaming shit into his head.
(Joe) Why?
(Gaby) He was a consultant for...
(Niall) Black projects. Reverse-engineered alloys or something...
(Joe) Okay.
(L) Okay, now the next question:
(Gaby) Monica Jacinto Reza, aerospace engineer, disappeared 9 months ago into thin air (as witnessed by the person she was with) while hiking near Mount Waterman in the Angeles National Forest. Her work was funded by the U.S. government and was part of a program overseen by retired Air Force Major General William Neil McCasland. What happened to her?
(L) What do you mean "into thin air"?
(Gaby) She was waving and 30 feet before her was the friend she was hiking with. And then he turned back to wave and she was gone.
(L) So she literally disappeared?
(Gaby) While they were hiking.
(L) What happened to her?
A: Taken to 4D.
Q: (Joe) And what was her claim to fame?
(Gaby) She's an engineer, she made a nickel alloy that could be used for propulsion systems.
(Joe) So she was on to something?
A: Yes
Q: (Gaby) On October 25th, 2025, Jacob Prichard killed his wife Jaymee and also Jaime Gustitus and then killed himself. All three were research employees of Wright-Patterson Air Force Base. Was it related to the disappearances of McCasland and Reza?
A: No
Q: (Gaby) What was the motive of these deaths?
A: Jealousy.
Q: (L) Okay.
Background:
Khara-Khora cave is in Kabardino-Balkaria, Russia's North Caucasus. Khara-Khora is a mountain range consisting of several sharp and gentle peaks. In 2011, after a landslide, local residents discovered an underground cave that goes deep into the mountain, with straight and polished narrow walls 40 meters deep into the mountain, which then passes into a wide underground hall, the height of which is 36 meters. In total, the explored dimensions of the cave from the upper part to the lower platform are about 100 meters. Many rectangular tunnels from 5 to 20 centimeters high go from the underground hall into the thickness of the rocks. A "floating" megalith was also found in the underground hall, which is attached to the wall with only one rib, which makes it appear to be floating in the air.
Original source: Mountain cave | Khara-Khora | Kabardino-Balkaria - 3D model by 3D SPLOSHNOFF (@3dsploshnoff)
(Gaby) How many years ago was the Khara-Khora Shaft built?
A: 55KYA.
Q: (Gaby) Who built it?
A: Descendants of Kantek.
Q: (L) I knew it! I knew it! I knew it!
(Joe) What was it used for?
A: Part of a power generator.
Q: (Joe) Was it similar in function to the pyramids of Giza?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) So, are there many kinds of structures like that buried around the planet that are undiscovered?
A: A few. Such power generators did not require multiplicity.
Q: (L) So one...
(Niall) They were that powerful.
(Andromeda) Didn't need that many.
(L) So maybe they just had them on, like, certain quadrants of the planet. Okay.
(Approaching Infinity) Can I have just a quick comment, not even necessarily a question, on the Neil McCasland thing? So if he committed suicide, like from what I've read, the area around his house... there isn't very much cover. It's pretty wide open. It would seem that he couldn't get very far on his own, like walking. So how come they haven't found a body yet?
A: Taken.
Q: (Approaching Infinity) Well, so the people who were beaming?
(Niall) Probably military.
(Joe) Yeah, probably. They were watching him, knew what was happening, keeping tabs on him, and took the body, sort of.
(Niall) They were driving him mad, so they knew what to expect.
(L) That reminds me of what... Who was that guy that... they drove him crazy.
(Niall) A few scientists, right?
(L) Yeah, I'm trying to remember what his... I can't remember what his name was. Honey, do you have any questions tonight?
(Ark) I have. Yes.
(L) Go.
(Ark) Well, I would like to know what kind of physics I need to describe densities. What kind of math? How to get to densities?
A: Geometric algebra.
Q: (Ark) Geometric algebra. Finite dimensional or infinite dimensional? Can you help me?
A: Infinite.
Q: (Ark) Do I need quantum theory mathematics for this?
A: Not much. Quantum theory, for the most part, describes elements of 3rd density and lower.
Q: (Ark) Well, are these densities... should they be treated like phases, like water can be as an ice, or as a liquid, or as a gas?
A: Yes
Q: (Ark) Okay. That gives me something to start. Okay, thank you.
(L) All right.
(Joe) Can I ask... Just on the tar baby thing, with Americans coming to invade Iran, is it likely that Russia would deploy soldiers to the Bushehr nuclear power plant in advance of American soldiers coming to protect it? Because it has got several hundred Russian citizens working there, and...
A: There are already some present. Wait and see!
Q: (L) So there are surprises in store for everybody all the way around?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) You should always aim to ask a question that provokes the answer, "wait and see". [laughter]
(L) Oh, because we know what that means.
(Joe) It means you've asked a question that you're not allowed to know the answer to.
(Andromeda) You've asked a really good question, but you're not allowed to know about it yet.
(Joe) You've asked a really frustrating question.
(Niall) You know, that's something that the prophecy-obsessed fundies in the U.S. talk about. That for Armageddon to happen in the correct sequence, the Russians MUST be going into it.
(L) Oh, yeah, so they're really going to work on that.
(Niall) They've been working on that since the 1980s. It has to happen.
(Ark) I want some precision.
(L) Okay.
(Ark) Geometric algebra can be over real numbers, complex numbers, quaternions, perhaps other fields. Can you help me with this? What kind of geometry? Real, complex, quaternions, octonions, all of them?
A: Complex.
Q: (Ark) Okay. Thank you.
(Joe) So, basically, what they were saying at the start was that because things are in such flux right now, that it's a good idea for us not to limit our thinking about things and to stay open.
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) Because that can help to leave the possibilities open, which might be beneficial, better than...
(Andromeda) ...trying to pin them down.
(Alejo on the chat) I think they're inviting us to make the effort to learn, and then the patience to see the answers confirmed by reality, and not simply use the sessions as a curiosity-satisfying tool.
(L) Yeah! [laughter]
(Alejo on the chat) Like, question reality with research, and maybe even the waiting for the answer and observing reality has an impact on how we learn. Skipping that process, the uncertainty, that is, may not be conducive to learning.
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) It also goes back to the thing they said a long time ago about staying open. And even a lot of the answers to a lot of questions they give is "open", you know?
(L) Yeah. And they said if they hand things to us, it won't help us.
(Chu) And they also said that sometimes they will give us something so that it doesn't happen. Just because they answer something, it doesn't mean suddenly you have the answer to everything.
(Joe) Right.
(JEEP) Candace will find the answers if we wait. [laughter]
(Joe) And it's like, in terms of Ennio's questions and stuff, maybe they're a good example of that. You don't want to rely too much on historical answers or the cosmology that they presented going back many years, because it's all evolving. And the way it was presented in the past may not be the case today, you know? And that goes for everything.
(L) So there we go. Go back up just a little bit.
(Ant22) I'd say the ones connected directly to the Consortium operate in the shadows. They have their minions to do the dirty work. So if anything goes wrong, those minions can be thrown under the bus while the puppet masters remain unseen.
(L) Exactly what happened to Epstein.
(JEEP) Fire on the USS Ford: Sabotage by its own sailors to keep it out of war?
(L) Well, do we know it was sabotaged by its own sailors?
(Andromeda) Yeah. It's the going...
(Niall) That's the best alternative. Well, officially, no. That's the best conspiracy theory to the wall of non-information.
(Joe) But it fits with the previous session. We asked about the toilets.
(Niall) Oh, yeah.
(Joe) They said that...
(Andromeda) It was sabotage.
(Joe) By a small number of people. So this would fit with the same...
(L) Yeah, but it's not necessarily what's happening. So we have (from the chat) Schrödinger's Netanyahu. [laughter]
(Chu) And we have (also from the chat) "Tar Bibi". [laughter]
(L) Oh, God, you guys are funny!
(whitecoast) What if he was one of those revived dead people?
(L) Well, that's always possible. Let's not limit ourselves. If he shows back up, we know he's been revived.
(Navigator) Is the supposition that Iran is pretty much still in the fight and strong, true?
(L) That's a good question.
A: Yes
Q: (L) So Iran is probably holding back, if you ask me.
(Ark) I need more precision: Geometric algebra, complex, infinite, dimensional. Infinite, countable or uncountable?
A: Countable!
Q: (Ark) All right.
[Laura goes back to reading the chat]
(Lucius) Hmm, April drop dead date?
(L) We'll see!
(Alejo) irjO almost ruined breakfast, LOL! [laughter]
(L) Yeah. I guess y'all won't be eating any more of those McDonald's breakfast sandwiches. [laughter]
(Joe) What about April drop dead date? That was what, fifteen, ten years ago?
(L) At least. And it was something about financial markets.
(Joe) And we never got it. Is it still on the cards? Is the band gonna make it? [laughter]
(L) Was that one of those predictions that was out of time sequence?
A: Yes
Q: (L) Do we still have an April drop dead date coming?
A: Indeed!
Q: (L) Is it going to be this year?
A: Maybe.
Q: (L) Okay. [Back to reading the chat]
(Alejo) [About the AI questions.] Metabolism... Huh, so energy transmutation? That's interesting.
(L) Yeah.
(axj) [About the answers regarding the Khara-Khora shaft.] Sounds like Kantekkians brought some advanced technology with them.
A: Advanced knowledge. It took a couple of generations to begin preparing the infrastructure.
Q: (JEEP) Is GEET energy transmuting technology worth pursuing?
(L) What is GEET technology?
(JEEP) It's a device that Paul Pantone invented. I actually talked about it before in the past on the forum. And he was subjected to a kangaroo trial and in prison, got cruel treatment. But his advocates and friends got him out. He left America and went to France. And it's a device he puts on engines, and you put fuel in it that's liquid with maybe some oil or gas, very little. And it gets transmuted to like a plasma powering thing. That's the best I can describe it as, because I'm not a mechanical person or a person who knows that much about it. But he has put it out there to the world. And a lot of people have bought the plans for how to make the devices and are using them. And if we're short on energy, it sounds like it's something that could keep us going. You know, he says you could even run an engine on something like soda pop. So it's really remarkable.
A: Try it and see!
Q: (L) So, some of you mechanical people out there, why don't you get these plans and try it out? And report back.
(Ant22) Any chance we could ask about the outbreak of bacterial meningitis in the UK? Is it planted like covid was? Or is it a real virus - possibly overhyped to push another lockdown and/or vaccines? The media is making a LOT of noise about it here and the government mentioned possible measures to contain it.
A: Overhyped.
Q: (Gaby) It's a small outbreak. It's bacterial too.
(Scottie) Ah, not viral.
(Joe) They just liked to sensationalize it.
(msante) Trump says he has a 100% approval rating. What is his approximate approval rating in the United States today?
A: 23
Q: (L) 23%?
(Joe) What's his approval rating among conservative Republicans?
A: 47
Q: (All) Wow.
(Andromeda) They're pretty unhappy with him too.
(Joe) Is Trump inclined to want to find an exit from this conflict in the near future?
A: Trump is terrified.
Q: (Joe) He's terrified of the implications of the conflict?
A: For his family.
Q: (Joe) So he's terrified of the Israelis, of the deep staters.
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) So what chances would they give of him being able to extricate himself from this, despite those people?
A: Almost 0 at present.
Q: (L) So the thing that he should do, that could get him out of it, he can't do. I mean, he's completely contained in the White House, surrounded.
(Joe) Well, he knows that they're threatening to kill his family, basically. He knows that they would kill his family if he doesn't do what they say.
(L) Anything else?
(Ellipse) Does oil extraction have some nasty effect on Earth?
A: Not really. Oil is abiotic.
Q: (Joe) Is there anything... is our perspective right now, in terms of preparing for the near future, and the things we're doing, is that all appropriate? Is there anything we should be doing that we're not?
A: You are doing well, but do more networking and thinking!!
Q: (L) All right, so any other advice? You already told us to watch, that there were things going to be on the land and in the sea and in the air. And boy, did that turn out to be true!
A: Big booms too!
Q: (Gaby) We love those.
(Joe) There was a drone swarm over Ohio?
(Niall) Louisiana?
(Joe) A drone swarm over Louisiana, was it a military base?
(Niall) Yes.
(Joe) Twelve or thirteen or something like that, or some relatively small number. Were those terrestrial drones, or were they similar to New Jersey?
A: Ultra!
Q: (Joe) Ultra? Oh, Ultraterrestrial.
A: Yes
Q: (L) All right then, I guess that's it for tonight. So we'll say goodnight.
A: Good night and sweet dreams to all! Goodbye.
END OF SESSION
