Session 21 March 2026

Ruth said:
Maybe it was something Netanyahu said..... or been trying to do, ever since he arrived at some level of power in Israel (go to war with Iran)?

This has been a fond vision of his for decades (and he's said so - repeatedly - especially when he's in Washington). Infact, he's not shy about saying so. So, a lot of people were very well aware of it. Many even agreed with him.

James Corbett thinks that the part that may not be true is the Chinese professor part.
Click to expand...
Well yes, but on another side I feel reality was that it would be irrealistic for Israel than to engage against Iran. I think it's more or less a sort of constatation that we would unconsciously have been reaching: on one side, we've got little barking Netanyahou, but not seriously willing to fight Iran.

A thought that has been keeping my mind busy is that Trump may have been made to go to war against Iran because of blackmail. This wouldn't make a conflict becoming useful - in fact we see the US and Israel cannot really win that war. So, perhaps, going to war against Iran is something that was out of the tables - but it nevertheless happened.

Ideas are not contradictory, after all. Netanyahu ever dreamt of going against iran, but couldn't (or at least, he boasted about that war, years after years... But we know those types of bullies... They speak a lot and do nothing except targeting the weaks - See Palestine - they don't attack a stronger person). A good question would be to know if Israel really wanted to become involved into a conflict with Iran. I think Israel is stuck in and will have to face the consequences of it.

But the main point of all of this would be if Trump never ever wanted to go to war against Iran. I think it's a possibility, and that he has been forced to do it. if such a case, I mean, we'd need to re-think all & everything based on this observation, like a dual-consideration. Trump being committed etc etc.
 
palestine said:
Well yes, but on another side I feel reality was that it would be irrealistic for Israel than to engage against Iran. I think it's more or less a sort of constatation that we would unconsciously have been reaching: on one side, we've got little barking Netanyahou, but not seriously willing to fight Iran.
Click to expand...
No, of course Netanyahu's not willing to fight Iran. It's why he (and others of his ilk) spent so much time and money infiltrating American society - including politics. The Israeli's expect America to fight Iran FOR them. Most people are aware of this. It's very manipulative and it's been happening over a long period of time.

Perhaps you ask "how long"? Well, how about starting in the early 1960's, for politics (forcing LBJ onto Kennedy)? And the turn of the 20th century (and early part) for organised crime and law inforcement?

This didn't just happen in the last five minutes and Trump was never a free agent.
 
Ruth said:
No, of course Netanyahu's not willing to fight Iran. It's why he (and others of his ilk) spent so much time and money infiltrating American society - including politics. The Israeli's expect America to fight Iran FOR them. Most people are aware of this. It's very manipulative and it's been happening over a long period of time.

Perhaps you ask "how long"? Well, how about starting in the early 1960's, for politics (forcing LBJ onto Kennedy)? And the turn of the 20th century (and early part) for organised crime and law inforcement?

This didn't just happen in the last five minutes and Trump was never a free agent.
Click to expand...

I hope the US can find a way to stop the hemorragy because it is counter-productive. I could swear I noticed a freshly elected Trump stating "we are about to rebuild the country, now that Biden ransacked it".
 
Ruth said:
This is probably a stupid question, but does there need to be a space between the a and the b here? Can't find the darn thing in the Sessions! Sorry.
Click to expand...
I presume you're thinking a biotic oil? No, it's definitely abiotic. And btw, I usually have a very difficult time trying to find specific references in sessions, particularly past ones. But, as to your question:
Laura said:
(Ellipse) Does oil extraction have some nasty effect on Earth?

A: Not really. Oil is abiotic.
Click to expand...

Google AI:
Abiotic refers to the non-living physical and chemical components of an ecosystem that affect living organisms and the functioning of the environment. These include factors like sunlight, water, soil, air, temperature, and nutrients. Together with biotic (living) factors, they form ecosystems.
Click to expand...
Abiotic oil is the theory that petroleum is synthesized deep within the Earth's mantle through high-pressure, high-temperature chemical reactions between hydrogen and carbon, rather than from ancient biological organic matter. Proponents suggest this primordial material travels up through faults, meaning oil is not a finite fossil remnant but a continuously generated resource.
  • No Dependency on Fossils: Because the ingredients (carbon/hydrogen) exist within the Earth's core, the process can theoretically produce hydrocarbons without any biological input.
  • Presence in Inorganic Environments: Proponents point out that hydrocarbons have been found in spaces where no life ever existed, such as on Titan (Saturn's moon) or in volcanic rock on Earth.
Click to expand...

Considering all the discussion on this forum regarding water, should water be considered non-living?

AI again:
Water is generally not considered conscious by scientific standards, as it lacks a nervous system or biological mechanisms for awareness. However, some alternative theories and spiritual viewpoints suggest water has "memory" or reacts to human emotions and intentions, proposing it is a carrier of consciousness.
Click to expand...

And to really get off-topic here, remember in the session about stones having consciousness and I believe holding ancient memories? 🤔
 
Thank you, Laura, and the group for this wonderful session. Even though everything seems to be getting worse and worse, you know how the seasons change; winter seems like it will never end. If a new horizon is to be reached by passing through the shadow valley, then surely all this chaos is part of the love for truth. As the Cassiopeians said before, if no addiction lasts long enough to break the cycle, then is the end of the road finally coming for the hyper-dimensional masters exploiting humanity above and the collaborating elites sucking the blood of humanity on the planet below? Perhaps that's what this session hinted at, I think, the possibility of emerging from this terrible time loop at the end of this cycle and empowering a new and alternative future. Despite all the negative and seemingly adverse conditions, it's only here, in the kitchen, that we can prepare this possibility. That magnificent possibility.
 
April drop dead date was brought up 20 years ago.

Q: (Guest:SD) Is there a time by which I should definitely be in France?

A: April drop dead date.

Q: (Galahad) “Drop dead date”. God! (Perceval) That’s a loaded answer. (Galahad) Does “drop dead” apply to Guest:SD or is this more general?

A: General.

Q: (Mr. Scott) Oh, great! (Alana) What does it mean “Drop dead date”? (Perceval) What does it sound like? A date that somebody or something drops dead.

A: Wait and see.
Click to expand...

In 2007, there were more details:

(H) So was the April Drop Dead date you referred to, did that have some link to the timing of the French elections? They started at the end of April.

A: Yup, and more yet to be revealed.

Q: (H) Any chance we'll get a little revealing of this tonight?

A: What was Dubya doing in April? Blair? Sarkozy?

Q: (S) They were having meetings about blowing up Iran! That was my theory.
Click to expand...

2022:

Q: (Tomek) What about April Drop Dead Date? Is this "the" April?

A: Very possible... But who is going to "drop dead"?
Click to expand...

April 23rd, 2022

(Pierre) Previously, the C's said that, triple bad day for Rockefeller and the like. Social, economic, and health wise. And they added in a subsequent session: FRV alteration. So, we might contribute to their fall. Now, is there any relation between the triple bad day remark and the April Drop Dead date remark?

A: Weak relationship.
Click to expand...

I couldn't find any specific reference to the economy, more like "maybe" this year, considering the state of affairs in the Middle East.

drop-dead date:

a date by which something must be done or finished : a deadline that must be met
Click to expand...
 
T.C. said:
Have you done any research on the veracity of this?
Click to expand...
My first impression was that it was an attempt to muddy the waters. Some concepts may be true but introducing significant amounts of human meat into the food system seemed like it was invented to fool the goy, just as there seems to be push to introduce the concept of "clones" like Biden is a clone, Jim Carey is a clone. Obviously not true and makes the conspiracy look stupid.
 
Gaby said:
April drop dead date was brought up 20 years ago.



In 2007, there were more details:



2022:



April 23rd, 2022



I couldn't find any specific reference to the economy, more like "maybe" this year, considering the state of affairs in the Middle East.

drop-dead date:
Click to expand...

Going by that definition, like a deadline, and taking into consideration the hyperdimensional perspective, do 4D STS sense an urgency in instituting more control because of what's happening cosmically, and do they have a certain deadline by which they assume certain things must take place or else they won't achieve their plans for total control? I mean we're seeing increasing earth changes as one sign of cosmic changes, and who knows what other changes are happening that we might not be aware of. If part of their plans are to lock people into their homes, or something similar, this time due to oil and economic issues that they created, I guess I can see the logic behind it. They isolate people, hook them to the digital world that's largely under their control, all of which would presumably make controlling people easier. Unless their wishful thinking gets them into trouble, and something unexpected takes place. Going by what the C's said, I'd bet on the latter.
 
JEEP said:
I believe there was a mention of a real plague . . .
Click to expand...
The best timing for a space virus is during a pronounced solar minimum when the heliosphere would be weaker. There are already studies with correlations. By that measure , the Black Death was favored by Nemesis perihelion with the sun on the seventeen century which grounded the sun for centuries, leading to the multiple remarkable minimums. However, it was the comets that had the space virus. Now with a comet cluster in the immediate neighborhood, yeah, it can happen. Next solar minimum scheduled for 2030.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom