Session 21 March 2026

I thought the same: "Is he behaving "crazy like a fox"??". Well I do hold a little hope that somewhere down the line he takes whatever opportunity that presents itself to counteract the forces arrayed against him to the extent that he can, but right now he is clearly outmatched. And if there is any part of him that still has a grip on reality, and holds good intentions, then he has to be sorely disappointed at watching his MAGA dreams evaporate before his own eyes.

I keep thinking that in a few weeks or months Trump is probably going to make one of the most important speeches ever made by a high-profile political figure; that the government is acknowledging the reality of 'alien' visitation on earth. But the sad thing (aside from it likely being very limited in scope), is that he will be making this speech almost entirely with the purpose of boosting his own approval rating, ie. "I'll be the president who tells the world the aliens are here -- and they'll love me for it!!".

And then, after all the hoopla, the Donald will summarily drop the subject.

Yeah, I imagine the speech will probably be his usual ego-boosting, plus his whacko ramblings with very little actual information.

"We've got aliens, have you heard of this? Not illegal aliens, we've got Hohman on that, he's doing a fantastic job. Everyone's talking about what a great job he's doing. We've got all kinds of aliens. They said to me, 'Sir, we have little grey men.' Not green men, everybody thinks they're green, but not me, they're grey. Not exactly men, either, and also not women. Nobody knows what they are. They're something else. They said to me, 'Sir, we have these little grey men. But some of them are tall and white. Some of them look like a young Brad Pitt. We call those ones Nordics.' I thought, hey, so long as they're not long those globalist Nordics in the EU. So maybe the ones that look like a young Brad Pitt will be okay. So we've got all kinds of aliens. Maybe some of them are here illegally, I'm not sure, we'll look into that. Obama knew about it, but did he tell you? No, he leaked it on a podcast. Sleepy Joe knew about it, but did he tell you? No, he couldn't stay awake through a podcast. They didn't tell you, so it's up to me. A lot of people said, 'Sir, don't do it', but this is America, the greatest country in the world. I said to them, we've got free speech in this country, did you know that? Free speech. That means talking about aliens."
 
I think so also. The stress of what he has and is going through is causing cognitive decline which is interacting with ego and extroverted personality.
I can’t help but wonder about the Cs message regarding Trump and a “stroke”, and whether perhaps he’s having a series of strokes in his brain, as opposed to one massive fatal one. That would explain the behavior.

Or, you know…all the stuff posted above.😄
 
In relation to:
(Joe) Is Trump inclined to want to find an exit from this conflict in the near future?

A: Trump is terrified.

Q: (Joe) He's terrified of the implications of the conflict?

A: For his family.

Q: (Joe) So he's terrified of the Israelis, of the deep staters.

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) So what chances would they give of him being able to extricate himself from this, despite those people?

A: Almost 0 at present.

Q: (L) So the thing that he should do, that could get him out of it, he can't do. I mean, he's completely contained in the White House, surrounded.

(Joe) Well, he knows that they're threatening to kill his family, basically. He knows that they would kill his family if he doesn't do what they say.
There was also, when Obama was on the way to the White House:

USA heading for destruction! - Review what happened in Germany. - Towards the end of the war. Hitler's madness and the hatred of the world towards Germany.
Session 3 September 2008
A: USA heading for destruction!
[...]
Q: (L) Okay. Why do you introduce tonight's adventures with "US is headed for destruction"?

A: Passed the point when anything could possibly be done to change the outcome.

Q: (L) What is this outcome?

A: Increasing inner turmoil. Review what happened in Germany.

Q: (L) Well, what happened in Germany in what period?

A: Towards the end of the war. Hitler's madness and the hatred of the world towards Germany.

Q: (L) Wasn't a pretty picture, was it? (J) In Germany, the rest of the world bombed Germany...

A: Yes. Expect it in the USA ultimately.

Q: (J) Would that be nuclear bombs?

A: And more.

Q: (A***) Is it going to destroy the rest of the world with it?

A: Not exactly... but the cosmic stuff will take its toll.

Q: (L) Anything else on that topic for the moment since we have other issues we want to cover?

A: Be alert.
If there was no Trump, would the situation be very different?
 
(msante) Trump says he has a 100% approval rating. What is his approximate approval rating in the United States today?

A: 23

Well, some evolution occured!

Remember what was the approval rating of Bush according to the C's.

I would like to know what is the REAL percentage of Americans who think that Bush is doing a good job. I know they put up the results of polls, but I have observed that polls are often published to sway public opinion, and are not an accurate representation of it. What is the real percentage?

A: 53 %.
 
If there was no Trump, would the situation be very different?

I believe that no matter which puppet happened to be president, U.S. hegemony would have fallen anyway, since there are other powers in the world that are cooperating and coordinating with one another, united by the idea of a multipolar world and respect for the sovereignty of each nation.

Where Trump might have had an influence on that process of decline is in accelerating it.

And I’m referring to before his mind went off the rails.
He was never the type to sugarcoat government measures with flowery rhetoric.
The masses were always lulled into complacency by that kind of rhetoric.
Trump broke that pattern. He was direct, making no attempt to conceal the supremacist ideas of the government he represents.
That’s how he earned the hatred of almost everyone, but in reality, they should thank him for it.
In my opinion.

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
 
If there was no Trump, would the situation be very different?

I use to refer to the following article:
Depathologizing America

It shows America was on the verge of collapsing, or to see a mature pathocracy appearing. I would describe "pathocracy" as being a system of governance caracterized by the perversion of "the world of normal people". (perversion, clinical term, meaning "the opposite")

It means all is upside down, and the values are countering "normal human values". Psychopathology becomes the norm. It's what seems to have taken place during Hitler, Stalin, Mao - instead of those main feature's being their respective ideologies (Nazism, Communism).

At the end of Biden, things were dramatic in this aspect and there were glimpses of an exacerbation of ab-normality. All the pronouns, etc. Adding to this Biden's behaviour, which was absurd. It was a sort of parrallel world in terms of normality. Did not go un-noticed. Something was taking place there... Some alien stuff or alike. Something too far away form normal people and humans. Sott was relaying videos of Hunter smoking crak and nude-swimming, etc etc. I think there was a problem! A big one. Something was cooking.

So the idea is that if Biden was still on, or another guy - today would be a continuation of it. I suppose, a culmination so a pathocracy. Hard to think of it, and it shows perhaps things were already being prepared behind the scenes... Detention camps... Soljenizin's alike situations, for the whole USA.

This has been my understanding. I assume it's those forces that are at work, and acting against Trump. No wonder to me he could act erratically, even STS-ish-ly as he did with Venezuela.

And today, Trump is being blackmailed, which muddles the waters for an understanding of his mental state. I believe he has been keeping the head cold, in the opposite of most people who advocate for him as having turned nuts. I think he has experience in dealing with pathology, otherwise he wouldn't have been making it to a first presidency, and then a second one. I think psychopathology is very present at the level of US politics, and that it could be Trump has been building himself a way to deal with it, to go through, to stand it. At least, he has been able to operate in such an environment, at least during his first presidency, without damages, without wars.

But every human has limits - and it's "hopefully". I think it's the human nature that is so. Nobody is a superhuman - otherwise we wouldn't be "humans". So Trump has limits, and like anybody, he can get "touched". He can get killed, he can be "pushed", etc.

EDITED: the ponerology article shows a pathocracy about to mature during Biden. It means there is no need for Trump to accelerate its motion. I know a pathocracy is a matter of decades, but Bush, Obama and Biden seem to have played a huge active part in it - not Trump. It's only late, and after that somebody (H. Koehli) spotted the pathocracy - that Trump did the Venezuelian stuff. Troubles don't seem to come from him overall. The big pillars at least.
 
Last edited:
It has been interesting watching Trump conducting the duty of acting as host to King Charles III during the latter's state visit to the USA marking the 250th anniversary of the USA's independence. Given his recent tetchy comments about Sir Keir Starmer's lack of support for Trump's war in the Gulf, it has been quite revealing to see Trump taking a welcome break from the politics of the war to revel in the royal visit, which has been taking place against the backdrop of the latest assassination attempt on his life at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner. Trump even made a joke at his own expense (Trump does not usually do self-deprecation :-)) when he said King Charles had done something at his speech to Congress which he had never been able to do and that was to get a standing ovation from the Democrat representatives.

I saw today in the Daily Mail newspaper an interesting article which set out parallel family trees showing that King Charles and Donald Trump are in fact distant cousins since both are ultimately descended, through their respective mothers, from King James II of Scotland.

The Daily Mail reported that the British royal and the U.S. president are 15th cousins: the outlet's family tree links both King Charles and Trump back to Scottish nobleman John Stewart, 3rd Earl of Lennox, who lived from 1490 to 1526 and was the great-grandson of King James II of Scotland. Stewart's bloodline through his daughter Lady Helen Stewart evolves through surnames Gordon, Mackay, Munro, Mackay again, and MacLeod, the last of which is the maiden name of Trump's mother, Mary Anne MacLeod Trump.

What particularly concerns me here though is that just like King Charles, this makes Trump my distant cousin too :scared: since I am also descended from King James II of Scotland through Mary Queen of Scots and her husband Lord Darnley.

Such links between US presidents and royalty is not uncommon though, since it has been discovered that American presidents are at least six times more likely to be descended from royalty than the US electorate.

As to Trump's newly discovered royal bloodline, this reminds me of what the C's once said about the pre-ordained activities of royal bloodlines:​
Q: I have two last questions: at one point you said to note the "struggle out of sequence with pre-ordained activities of royal bloodlines." Now, of course, I made the remark about usurpation of a throne, but later I realized that we don't really know what the pre-ordained activities of royal bloodlines really are. They don't necessarily have to do with a secular position, they could be a function. What are the pre-ordained activities of royal bloodlines?

A: Control.

Q: Control of what? People?

A: Close.

Q: Control of the reality in some sense?

A: Not as close.

Q: Control as in STS domination?

A: Yes.

Q: Are there any other pre-ordained activities?

A: Need there be?

Hmmm... that certainly seems to be the case where Donald Trump is concerned.
 
What particularly concerns me here though is that just like King Charles, this makes Trump my distant cousin too :scared: since I am also descended from King James II of Scotland through Mary Queen of Scots and her husband Lord Darnley.

From Grok:

15th Cousin Population Percentage

Based on population genetics models, it is estimated that **97.2%** of any two randomly selected people from the global population are at least **15th cousins**.

This high probability arises because the number of ancestors doubles with each generation; by the 16th cousin level (sharing a common ancestor 17 generations ago), an individual has approximately 131,072 ancestor slots. Given the historical human population size, the likelihood of two people sharing even a single common ancestor at this distance is extremely high. However, while **97.2%** are genealogically 15th cousins, the amount of shared DNA is typically negligible (often indistinguishable from background noise or identical-by-state) and may not be detectable by standard genetic testing.

Not sure how precise that number above is - but the dimension is probably accurate: If you go back far enough, everybody is related to everybody else.
 
Back
Top Bottom