Session 25 April 2026

Thank you for this latest session and also for the warnings at the end.

It is indeed volatile times, with much lashing out from the collapsing empire.

It is not surprising that the Iran situation is likely to flare up again as not enough lessons have taken place in the West and it is still far from being connected to reality. While Trump might be happy to declare victory and go home, Israel is clearly not going to let that happen.

That it isn't finished yet, is likely a blessing for Cuba as there has been strong signalling from Trump, that he would like to try his hand on that country too, once Iran is finished. A severe slam down might make Trump change his mind if he is even allowed to live that long as to consider doing something to Cuba. His usefulness time could expire before that.
 
Thank you for carrying out the session, transcribing it and posting it here.

Could someone help me to get clarity on something? Do the C's only give information when they are verbally requested to do so in a direct manner? Do the C's stay silent if they agree? I can imagine they would also stay silent not to abridge free will (for example if someone is so sure about something that there's no room for other possibilities, even though they're mistaken about the thing they're so sure of). Or can they give information if you don't ask verbally in the sessions? I'm asking because the conclusions the team came to regarding David Wilcock.

I'm wondering why the statement/assumption/conclusion below was not directly checked for its validity/truth to be either confirmed or disconfirmed, by simply asking the C's "Is my statement/presumption/conclusion true?"
(L) I mean, if they got rid of all the ones that were telling the truth, like the researchers and so on... But as for David Wilcock, I don't think they got rid of him. He just offed himself.

And, I would like to ask if @Beau could provide a link (URL) to the Blushield device, as I'm interesting in acquiring one myself, just so I don't buy the wrong one.

Is it this one? Or not? (Link: Phi Series Φ2 Plugin)

Then the name would be Phi Series Φ2 Plugin by Blushield (going at 302.95 euros currently).
 
And, I would like to ask if @Beau could provide a link (URL) to the Blushield device, as I'm interesting in acquiring one myself, just so I don't buy the wrong one.

Is it this one? Or not? (Link: Phi Series Φ2 Plugin)
That's the right brand. The one you linked is probably fine if one lives in an apartment. If you live in a bigger home with a yard, you'd be better off getting the one that covers the most distance, the cube.

 
Could someone help me to get clarity on something? Do the C's only give information when they are verbally requested to do so in a direct manner? Do the C's stay silent if they agree? I can imagine they would also stay silent not to abridge free will (for example if someone is so sure about something that there's no room for other possibilities, even though they're mistaken about the thing they're so sure of). Or can they give information if you don't ask verbally in the sessions? I'm asking because the conclusions the team came to regarding David Wilcock.

I'm wondering why the statement/assumption/conclusion below was not directly checked for its validity/truth to be either confirmed or disconfirmed, by simply asking the C's "Is my statement/presumption/conclusion true?"

I mean, I guess Laura is right, but my partly autistic brain would like to see a black-and-white confirmation by the C's, fully knowing that learning does not come from questions just being answered without having done the deduction work and networking ourselves first.
 
Thank you for sharing the session.
Poor Trump! We all have a role to play, small or big, but I wouldn't want to be in his shoes.
If we relate to the thought that we all part of "DCM" and that negativity is linked to positivity in the way that it balances it, then we could all thank Trump for the role he plays, but I would definitely not want to be in his shoes.
All to say that his lack of awareness and his refusal to question and learn is the damming bit for him and all those people (friends and family) I am talking to everyday who refuse to bulge from their opinions set ions ago.

A: Already warned. Be careful! Goodbye.

Well everyone, take good care of yourselves.

Ps: it's funny how I tried to prepare myself for the difficult time coming (house in countryside community, garden, tools) but medical circumstances catapulted me and my son in the "grand Paris" of all places! 🙃
 
Thank you for sharing the session.
Poor Trump! We all have a role to play, small or big, but I wouldn't want to be in his shoes.
If we relate to the thought that we all part of "DCM" and that negativity is linked to positivity in the way that it balances it, then we could all thank Trump for the role he plays, but I would definitely not want to be in his shoes.
All to say that his lack of awareness and his refusal to question and learn is the damming bit for him and all those people (friends and family) I am talking to everyday who refuse to bulge from their opinions set ions ago.

A: Already warned. Be careful! Goodbye.

Well everyone, take good care of yourselves.

Ps: it's funny how I tried to prepare myself for the coming difficult time (house in countryside, a good community, garden, tools) but medical circumstances catapulted me and my son in an appartement in the "grand Paris" of all places! 🙃
 
Thanks so much for sharing.

I think I bought the Blueshield a couple of years ago for our house. Are those the ones that plug into the wall? Is this the product? Edited: ignore my question, I saw someone else asked and @Beau already answered x
 
Back
Top Bottom