Session 27 September 2025

[Evan]

I really needed this! Thanks everyone! After my recent ordeal, this comes as real restorative.

 

[YoYa]

Thank you, Laura, Andromeda, and everyone involved - please continue to take care.

 

[Mendell]

Thank you for the informative session! It was reported that Charlie Kirk was shot with a 30 - 06 rifle…that type of rifle is used for deer hunting and definitely there would have been a large exit wound. People are aware of this but nothing is mentioned on the news channels. It is getting stranger everyday.

 

[Fluffy]

What a session!
Thank you again and again to everyone involved with their questions, energies and loving support of each other and the truth.

I’m still very moved and emotional about Charlie, the love I feel for someone I’ve never met and hardly knew of before is immense, I think his soul has done a great service to humanity. Endless blessings to him.

Laura, those bedroom questions , yeah I’ve thought about that, even said out loud ‘are you pervs having fun?’, just remember to put up your shields so they can only watch- not get involved- ew!

I think the best thing we can do for ourselves on top of increasing knowledge, awareness and lots of networking is to be totally disgusting to the feeding system by being beautiful, loving life, laughing, singing, and spreading joy and happiness, no 4DSTS lordtard wants to eat that.

Love, blessings, healing and happiness to you all

 

[Lina L]

Thank you much for the session.
After reading the session while at work I came back home to the sky like this….


It does look like sword. I wonder what it means
View attachment 112386

 

[Bobo08]

"Or worse" could be that the US and its allies are preparing to start nuclear war with Russia.

I think they might try to attack Kaliningrad, which, in their calculation, would not lead to an all out nuclear war. If that's the case, they would probably experience "real shock and awe" as the C's mentioned in a previous session.

I can imagine though that you would not want to be overtly pro-Russia in the West in that scenario.

 

[Jacques]

Thanks so much for this new session laura and all the crew.

And more thanks for sharing it with us.

 

[BlueKiwi]

Thanks for taking the time to do this session, and sharing with us

 

[Aliana]

Thank you so much for the session, and answering the many questions surrounding Charlie's Kirks assassination. I suspected this was part of the program change, and noticed that I had been feeling unusually sad / anxious for weeks prior - it just felt as if 'something was afoot', or at the very least that HAARP was active - perhaps both.

Q: (L) When a person has passed over and they possibly are still hanging around, like for example their residence or their former family or whatever, and you have the idea that they can come and be in your kitchen, say, while you're cooking or sitting at the table or having dinner or whatever, or when you're walking around your yard. I mean, you read all the time about people doing different things and they feel the presence of their deceased loved one. So my question is do they - y'all are just waiting for this, aren't you? Do they hang around if you're in bed and doing things with your husband or wife? I mean, are they spying on you?

I am a bit confused about this, as I thought that people who 'hang around' 3D, are 'earth bound spirits' who have not 'gone into the light'. And that once you go through, you are quite busy with healing, life review, etc. and don't have time or any desires to pester those still in 3D. So - are those presences we feel, just entities / attachments that did not cross over?

Q: (Joe) One of the effects it seems - it's hard to know for sure, but by anecdotal reports - is that a lot of people have turned back to or rekindled their relationship with Christianity at the church. Was that an intended effect?

A: That is a 4D part.

Q: (L) So 4th density STS want people to get all religious and looshy?

A: Mostly. But be aware that there are also some people that turn to religion and do not become part of the feeding mechanism.

Q: (L) So they're just good Christians and doing the right thing. Because let's face it: Christianity and religions in many respects have a beneficial effect on society if it's done right, right?

A: Yes. But it is so seldom done right.

I had an idea that perhaps the part of the consortium that is 4D STO went along with this version of the program change, due to the possibility that people might make some positive changes in their lives in response to this, which would further the balancing mechanism. One can hope...

 

[Ruth]

I definitely agree that they are likely protected in a cosmic sense as well!

Knowledge protects too. Simply being aware of things as well. In a way that Charlie Kirk wasn't.

 

[palestine]

Thank you for the session. Thanks to the channellers - and thanks to the C's.

 

[AzarHyun]

Q: (Niall) They've said in the past that a Batman movie that was released in 2012-ish, which had references to the Sandy Hook shooting in the movie, even though it came out beforehand, was an instance of the Cosmic Mind sending many clues ahead of time. With the Charlie Kirk shooting, there's a 1998 Hollywood movie called Snake Eyes that has loads of similarities with the Kirk assassination. Was this another instance of that?

A: Yes there are many such instances.

..and they don’t always involve Hollywood blockbusters.

Take for example the 1981 Yugoslav film Dečko koji obećava (The Promising Boy). The main character just happens to be named Slobodan Milošević (Slobodan = “freedom”) — years before the real Slobodan Milošević would rise to power and dominate Balkan politics. The film is about a young man who’s supposed to be full of potential, someone who “promises” greatness, but instead spirals into disillusion, self-destruction, and a kind of private apocalypse.

Now compare that to the politician Milošević: he also arrived with a wave of promises, a figure many thought could lead to renewal, but his path led to war, isolation, and collapse. Both the fictional character and the real leader embody the same archetype — the one who promises much but delivers ruin.

It’s like the movie unintentionally prefigured the tragic trajectory of the entire country through its “Slobodan Milošević” character:

• the name tied to “freedom” but ending in captivity,
• the promise of a better future turning into disappointment,
• the personal downfall reflecting a wider collective downfall.

 

[Puma]

Thanks for the new session.

Q: (L) So 4th density STS want people to get all religious and looshy?

A: Mostly. But be aware that there are also some people that turn to religion and do not become part of the feeding mechanism.

Q: (L) So they're just good Christians and doing the right thing. Because let's face it: Christianity and religions in many respects have a beneficial effect on society if it's done right, right?

A: Yes. But it is so seldom done right.

This part of the session reminded me of Peter Demianovich Ouspensky's notes on Gurdjieff's talks. In Tentium Organum, he mentions that religion is doing.
​

"Religion," he said, "is always a relative concept; one man's religion may very well not suit another. For religion corresponds to the level of being. I mean that the religion of a man who has a certain level of being may very well not suit another man, at another level of being. "It must be understood that the religion of man No. 1 is not the religion of man No. 2, and that that of man No. 3 is yet another religion. Likewise, the religions of men No. 4, No. 5, No. 6, and No. 7 are entirely different from the religions of men No. 1, 2, and 3.

"Secondly, religion is doing. A man does not merely think or feel his religion; he 'lives' it as much as he can; otherwise it is not religion but fantasy or philosophy.

Like it or not, he shows his attitude toward his religion by his actions, and he cannot show it except by his actions. Therefore, if his actions are contradictory to what his religion requires of him, he is not a true believer. Whether he likes it or not, he shows his attitude toward his religion by his actions, and he cannot show it except by his actions. Therefore, if his actions contradict what his religion requires of him, he cannot claim to belong to that religion.

The vast majority of people who call themselves Christians are not entitled to this title, for not only do they not follow the commandments of their religion, but they do not even seem to suspect that these commandments must be obeyed. "The Christian religion forbids murder. And all the progress we have made is progress in the technique of murder, in the art of war. How can we call ourselves Christians?

Or how can we call them God's chosen people or say "I was saved by God" while continuing to supply weapons?​

"No one has the right to call himself a Christian if he does not fulfill the precepts of Christ in his life. A man may say that he wishes to be a Christian if he strives to fulfill these precepts. If he does not even think about them, or if he laughs at them, or if he replaces them with anything of his own invention, or simply if he forgets them, he has no right to call himself a Christian.

Last time, Caesar gave us three pieces of advice:

1) Don't try to change the masses. (Many of us think that our social media posts will make a difference, but that's not the case. A funny or pornographic post gets more views than yours, and you only reach those you need to reach.)
2) Educate yourself and educate children from an early age. (The Cs also mentioned not hiding anything from children because Knowledge protects)
3) You must be true to your own nature and fear nothing. (What will be will be, have faith in the invisible, and enjoy the show.)

Ephesians 6:12 should be constantly present in the mind of anyone who considers themselves a good Christian in this times bacause it's not you against me​

12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.

 

[MJF]

I think they might try to attack Kaliningrad, which, in their calculation, would not lead to an all out nuclear war. If that's the case, they would probably experience "real shock and awe" as the C's mentioned in a previous session.

I can imagine though that you would not want to be overtly pro-Russia in the West in that scenario.

I think it is quite evident that the US, EU and NATO are getting increasingly involved in the conflict in the Ukraine in direct ways. I have, for example, recently heard that NATO forces are congregating in the Odessa region of Ukraine. According to reports, the first group of regular military personnel from France and the UK has already arrived in Odessa (SVR: NATO troops arrive in Odessa to occupy Moldova: EADaily). If this report is correct, it is a very worrying development indeed.

Zelensky desperately wants to involve NATO directly in his faltering war effort as it is the only realistic way he can maintain his presidency and role as Ukrainian war leader. He is very keen to get his hands on long range US missiles so that he can strike deep into Russia and particularly hit Moscow. Hence, this recent report in the UK's Daily Telegraph newspaper suggests another very worrying development:​

On Monday, the United States signalled potential authorisation for Ukrainian long-range strikes into Russia using American weapons.

Keith Kellogg, Donald Trump’s envoy, said on Sunday that Ukraine could receive approval for deep strikes into Russian territory.

Asked if Mr Trump had authorised such strikes, Mr Kellogg said: “Reading what [Trump] has said and reading what vice-president JD Vance has said, as well as secretary of state Marco Rubio, the answer is yes.”

“Use the ability to hit deep. There are no such things as sanctuaries,” Mr Kellogg said.

Mr Vance, the US vice-president, said on Sunday that the US was discussing whether to provide long-range Tomahawk cruise missiles to Kyiv, a request Mr Trump previously denied.

“It’s something that the president is going to make the final determination on,” Mr Vance said, adding the US was considering “a number of requests from the Europeans.”

Dmitry Peskov, a Kremlin spokesman, dismissed the potential weapons transfer on Monday, saying “there’s no magic weapon” that could change the state of play on the battlefield.

“Whether it’s Tomahawks or other missiles, they won’t be able to change the dynamic,” he said.

It strikes me that Zelensky could not care less if he triggers World War 3 since he only seems to care about saving his own skin. Upwards of a million Ukrainians have already lost their lives because of his vanity. If he helps to trigger WW3, the final death toll may be exponentially greater.​

 

[nicklebleu]

Thanks, Chateau crew, for the new session - illuminating - and disturbing.

Last time, Caesar gave us three pieces of advice:

1) Don't try to change the masses. (Many of us think that our social media posts will make a difference, but that's not the case. A funny or pornographic post gets more views than yours, and you only reach those you need to reach.)
2) Educate yourself and educate children from an early age. (The Cs also mentioned not hiding anything from children because Knowledge protects)
3) You must be true to your own nature and fear nothing. (What will be will be, have faith in the invisible, and enjoy the show.)

Good reminder - thanks, Puma!