Session 27 September 2025

[Jones]

Thanks for an amazing session, FOTCM members. I'm also pleasantly surprised a question about 3I/ATLAS made it into the session.

Hello @Makeshifting
I notice that you haven't written an introduction in the Newbies forum. You are invited to do that to tell us a bit about yourself and how you found your way here.

Cute kitty paw by the way!

 

[adam7117]

But then they are idiots and you know what they're like with poisons. I guess you could include "dirty bombs" here.

Or a nuclear reactor. Or two

 

[bianca etezete]

thanks a lot for sharing this truly explosive session!

 

[Brewer]

A: Yes. But not exactly as you think. Though there [are] troubled souls with sex or other bodily addictions that are magnetized by such activities.
Q: (L) So if you're, say, drinking or doing drugs or having sex or any kind of... I suppose somebody could be addicted to running and if you're running, they hang around you. Is that true?

So as a hunting addict I'll be on an eternal deer hunt? They won't be able to see, hear or smell me but I won't be able to take a shot.
I'm there already! I'm good at stalking but most of the time they're on the wrong side of the fence!

I remember a coma patient in Germany describing his experiences after being comatose for 3 weeks. He gave me Monroe's 'Journeys out of the Body' and said the initial chapters gave a pretty good description of what he experienced.
Question, is it possible for someone, having left 3D, to hang around and help others in 3D undergoing entity attacks? I've had a lot of high strangeness from an early age and for the past 30 years when they pay a visit I often tell them if you kill me you'll make me stronger. Not sure if its true so I'm wondering if this is possible, no interest in going there yet, life is very good.
But is it possible, if you hang around, can you help? Interesting session, thanks.

 

[palestine]

I wasn't surprised to read what the C's said, but am confused considering a video seen recently. It featured a very qualified expert who pointed out that any projectile fired towards Charlie should've kicked the mic battery pack away from Charlie, BUT the video shows that the battery pack moves towards Charlie, which he concluded rules out a projectile being fired from the battery pack. Any thoughts about how his point and the C's explanation can be reconciled?

I understand that there was an explosive mic AND a bullet coming from the back.

We may tend to read the following dependently:

(Joe) The wound we saw on him in the video, was that an exit wound?
A: Yes

Q: (Joe) So was it effectively a bullet within the microphone case?
A: Not a "bullet" exactly.

But I operate a distinction and understand those two chunks relate to two different motions.

I may be wrong and I would be happy to dig this deeper.

 

[Pinocchio]

Thank you thank you for everything you do and have continued to do over the years and for continuing to provide a source of light and inspiration in keeping going through these times. Love

 

[JEEP]

So, what? Plan A totally (and literally) blew up, so Plan B is a go now?

Um . . . Plan C?

JUST IN: Trumps Gaza Plan Was Rewritten After Netanyahus Visit.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1973101227274805349

 

[JEEP]

Here comes the BOOM?!

https://twitter.com/x/status/1973040155305951318

 

[Gaby]

Q: (Gaby) TES (The Ethical Skeptic) has a hypothesis based on these blobs and posits that Earth's core and mantle dynamics drive periodic rotational instabilities, leading to true polar wander events.

[Background info: Exothermic Core-Mantle Decoupling - Dzhanibekov Oscillation (ECDO) Theory]

A: Partly involved, yes.

Q: (Gaby) He claims that a weakening of the core mantle magnetic coupling causes heat from the Earth's core into the mantle, excluding these blobs. This makes the rest of the mantle denser than the blobs, contributing to:

- Loss of current influence in the position of our geographic North Pole

- Increase in sea surface temperature and in the Earth's axis of rotation

- Shift in the planet's rotation around its maximum axis (the denser mantle)

- Increasing the chances of a True Polar Wander event with an axis of gyroscopic moment based upon the African blob.

A: Very close!

Those who have the inclination can read TES articles and check out his over 400 citations. The record sea surface temperatures of the last few years (including 2025) means that we might be passing a threshold. How long it takes to manifest, if at all, might depend on the multiple factors involved, including possibly sol's unrecognized companion. The latter might ground a true polar wander event, or even trigger it, who knows.

We're talking about a true polar wander event, i.e. the south of Africa would be the North Pole for a period of time, the time all the factors stabilize or cool down, so that "things can go back to normal".

Here's a video illustrating the above:

https://videos.files.wordpress.com/0QF3nivm/ecdos3-mp4.mp4

A graphic:



Crazy, eh?

What is more, TES is finding presumably ancient structures which are lined up with this North Pole in Africa, i.e. underwater Cuban formation which I'll post more in the "Where Troy Once Stood" thread. His latest update:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1973103498129543248

The Cuban Underwater Formation aligns to ECDO Np' - making this structure our first verifiable State 2 monument construction.It did not take 50,000 years for it to get to this depth. Just a State 2 to State 1 ECDO rotation.The world has changed, and only a very few know this...

 

[Beau]

This is an interesting topic about "trees acting weird". I've especially noticed this year that the trees in my yard have turned colour and most of their leaves have fallen already and it's not even October yet! The weather has been quite warm even at night and there hasn't been a lot of rain in the last month or so. The leaves normally change colour when it gets cold at night and it's mostly the rain that would take the leaves off the trees during "normal times". Very little of anything is "normal" anymore.

I was discussing this very thing last week, the same thing that you reported. Here in western North Carolina the leaves started dropping mid-September, and before October hit the colors on the leaves were already changing. By the Farmer's Almanac that's a couple weeks early. And just like in your area, it hasn't been that cold here. When the leaves started falling it was only getting to around 21C/70F at night which is still summer weather. We've had some rain but it still feels like it was really early compared to years past.

 

[JEEP]

I was discussing this very thing last week, the same thing that you reported. Here in western North Carolina the leaves started dropping mid-September, and before October hit the colors on the leaves were already changing. By the Farmer's Almanac that's a couple weeks early. And just like in your area, it hasn't been that cold here. When the leaves started falling it was only getting to around 21C/70F at night which is still summer weather. We've had some rain but it still feels like it was really early compared to years past.

Here in midwest Ohio, we've had our 2nd summer of extreme drought with a very, very soggy spring. I can't imagine how stressed the trees and other vegetation is with such conditions and not at all surprised by early falling leaves (yellowed) and early coloration. Plus, it's October and we're still having temps in mid to upper 80s! That's crazy! And while we got some rain recently, it didn't put a dent into dry conditions. The plants in my yard are showing obvious distress and some look to be dead or dying. Although we have underground sprinklers, only certain sections of the yard get that water. Not really practical to attempt manual watering and frankly, I'm no longer physically up to doing that anymore. At our previous home/yard, I did it frequently, but the current yard is way too much for that. Plus, we have "woods" at the yard boundary that is constantly infiltrating with unwanted, invasive plants - poison ivy, honeysuckle bush, grapevine, and tree seedlings of all sorts including black walnut that can even kill adjacent plants. An abundance of squirrels deposit the walnuts everywhere - including just setting on top of a deck railing! They like to dig into flower planters, too, requiring covering all open space with rocks. We currently have a groundhog living under a lower deck who's made large holes in the yard, one of which provided a home for a nest of aggressive yellow-jacket type bees. Bombed it with Sevin and I think we finally got 'em all. And yesterday spied the groundhog walking over and sitting atop that hole before moving on to the wooded area that goes back to a creek. Don't know if he got any Sevin on himself and if it will affect him. Haven't taken any measures other than a live trap to evict him from our yard. My spouse said he saw a youngster peek out from under the deck, so offspring may also be part of the mix now. I didn't put any potted flowers on that deck this year, only on an upper deck (which the squirrels have played havoc with), but other perennials show signs of being grazed. That could be deer or rabbits, but the groundhog has to be eating something and why not go as local as possible.

It's been a fun summer and it's not over yet!

 

[thorbiorn]

Thank you to the Chateau team for sharing this timely session; there is much to think about.

Regarding:

Q: (Gaby) Rupert Sheldrake explains, just as Pierre did in his book "Earth Changes", that the Earth is electrically charged in a negative direction in relation to the atmosphere. A tree is negatively charged, because it's connected to the soil through the sap growing up through the wood, which is electrically conductive, sticking up into the positive atmosphere. And so there's a big difference between the tree and the air around it, which means that the electric tips of the tree and of the branches and of the shoots attract positive ions and they affect the electric field all around them.

In 2012 we asked about a couple of 1500-years-old giant sequoias falling in California on September 2011 during a normal day. At that time comet Elenin was disintegrating after being hit by a coronal mass ejection in August 2011. We also mentioned Meager1's experience during a bizarre early snow storm that took place in New England on October 2011 and how so many trees fell. You said 'The two are related. The "opening up" of Earth has already exhibited a number of interesting repercussions...'

Pierre expanded on this “opening up” in his book “Earth Changes”, explaining how a grounding effect from Sol's companion results in a reduced atmospheric E-field and surface-core E-field.

That topic of the electricity of the earth is described with a practical demonstration in this video, How Powering with Atmospheric Electricity Works
The author refers to Feynmann's lectures Vol II, Chapter 9:

​

Reference: Chalmers, J. Alan, Atmospheric Electricity, Pergamon Press, London (1957).​

9–1The electric potential gradient of the atmosphere​

On an ordinary day over flat desert country, or over the sea, as one goes upward from the surface of the ground the electric potential increases by about ​

100 volts per meter. Thus there is a vertical electric field E of 100 volts/m in the air. The sign of the field corresponds to a negative charge on the earth’s surface. This means that outdoors the potential at the height of your nose is 200 volts higher than the potential at your feet! You might ask: “Why don’t we just stick a pair of electrodes out in the air one meter apart and use the 100 volts to power our electric lights?” Or you might wonder: “If there is really a potential difference of 200 volts between my nose and my feet, why is it I don’t get a shock when I go out into the street?”​

We will answer the second question first. Your body is a relatively good conductor. If you are in contact with the ground, you and the ground will tend to make one equipotential surface. Ordinarily, the equipotentials are parallel to the surface, as shown in Fig. 9–1(a), but when you are there, the equipotentials are distorted, and the field looks somewhat as shown in Fig. 9–1(b). So you still have very nearly zero potential difference between your head and your feet. There are charges that come from the earth to your head, changing the field. Some of them may be discharged by ions collected from the air, but the current of these is very small because air is a poor conductor.​

The book has this image:

The video shows what the situation is for taller objects, like the 120 meter mast he uses for his experiment to power an electrostatic motor, the function of which he demonstrates and explains later in the video.

There was also:

Open access Published: 30 September 2023

Near-surface atmospheric electric field changes through magnetic clouds via coronal mass ejections​

Geoscience Letters volume 10, Article number: 45 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract​

The Earth’s electrical environment is influenced by both external and internal driving factors. Internal driving factors include the global charging current produced by lightning storms, global aerosol concentrations and cloud coverage. External factors are caused by various space weather phenomena, including changes in the Sun’s magnetic field, solar flares, coronal mass ejections, and ionization changes from high-energy particles from the Sun and galactic cosmic rays. This study focuses on the cosmic ray intensity changes observed at the OULU Station and the vertical atmospheric electric field changes observed at the Azores and Studenec stations during a solar activity event in September 2017. The results indicate that the atmospheric electric field at the two stations (Azores and Studenec) simultaneously decreased by 80% and 120% of the mean atmospheric electric field value, respectively, during the same time as the significant decrease in cosmic ray intensity. The linear correlation coefficient between the decreased atmospheric electric field measured at these two stations was 0.60, indicating a global effect from the shocks and magnetic clouds associated with coronal mass ejections on atmospheric electricity. Finally, this study describes shock waves and magnetic clouds that impede the propagation of galactic cosmic rays, resulting in a decrease in ionospheric potential and atmospheric electric field.

There is probably someone tracking the changes and variations, but the above is what I found.

 

[JEEP]

The video shows what the situation is for taller objects, like the 120 meter mast he uses for his experiment to power an electrostatic motor

I haven't yet read what you and Gaby have posted - it's very interesting/intriguing - but this came to mind from above statement:

Wardenclyffe Tower (1901–1917), also known as the Tesla Tower, was an early experimental wireless transmission station designed and built by Nikola Tesla on Long Island in 1901–1902, located in the village of Shoreham, New York. Tesla intended to transmit messages, telephony, and even facsimile images across the Atlantic Ocean to England and to ships at sea based on his theories of using the Earth to conduct the signals. His decision to increase the scale of the facility and implement his ideas of wireless power transfer to better compete with Guglielmo Marconi's radio-based telegraph system was met with refusal to fund the changes by the project's primary backer, financier J. P. Morgan. Additional investment could not be found, and the project was abandoned in 1906, never to become operational.

 

[Cici]

Big thanks for the session!

 

[JEEP]

A relevant article, it would seem (my bold):

How many times can Ukraine play the nuclear card before Europe gets barbecued?

In October 2024, Vladimir Zelensky told Donald Trump that Ukraine faced a stark choice: either ironclad security guarantees or a return to nuclear weapons. Nearly a year later, that statement still reverberates through international debates. Moscow has warned that any Ukrainian move toward nuclear arms would cross a “red line,” while in the West it’s seen as a deeply unsettling signal.

Talk of a “nuclear option” for Ukraine has surfaced before. In this piece, RT looks back at why Kiev gave up the world’s third-largest nuclear arsenal in the 1990s – and asks how realistic today’s nuclear rhetoric really is, from the specter of a “dirty bomb” to dreams of restoring full nuclear status.
[...]
Ukraine still has uranium mines, spent nuclear fuel from its power plants, and storage sites for radioactive waste. That creates at least a theoretical capacity to produce a radiological dispersal device – a so-called ‘dirty bomb’.

Such a weapon does not trigger a nuclear chain reaction. Instead, it uses a conventional explosive to scatter radioactive material over a targeted area. Its effect is not the devastating blast of an atomic bomb, but contamination, panic, and long-term disruption of normal life. Military value is minimal – on the battlefield it would achieve little. But detonated in a major city, it could cause significant psychological and economic damage.

Experts point out that this is why dirty bombs are often described as tools of nuclear terrorism rather than instruments of war. No such device has ever been used in combat, though attempts to build them have been uncovered – for instance, the 2004 arrest in London of suspects trying to assemble a radiological device using americium-241 from household smoke detectors.

For Kiev, the nuclear question has become less a matter of military reality than a political weapon. Invoking the “nuclear option” allows Ukrainian leaders to pressure Western allies and provoke Moscow – but little more. The hard facts remain unchanged. Ukraine lacks the industrial base, the expertise, and the political cover to rebuild a genuine nuclear arsenal.

At most, Kiev could gamble on a radiological device – a dirty bomb designed to spread fear rather than deliver a decisive blow. But even that would be an act of nuclear terrorism, exposing Ukraine to devastating consequences and alienating its own Western sponsors.

Russia, meanwhile, has drawn its red lines with clarity: Ukraine must remain neutral, outside NATO, and without nuclear weapons. In this sense, the nuclear debate underscores the broader reality of the conflict. For Moscow, the nuclear issue cannot be settled by rhetoric or Western guarantees. As Russian experts note, the only lasting solution lies in the successful completion of Russia’s military operation – the outcome that alone can answer the Ukrainian nuclear question once and for all.