Session 27 September 2025

A properly shaped charge would pass right through his neck expanding on the way. No projectile needed. I am not saying there wasn't a projectile, but if the "shot" came from the microphone attached to him, then it didn't need one and furthermore the risk of that projectile hitting the man asking the questions (Zin) would have been a problem.

Right. A shaped charge produces its own "projectile" from the liner in it, assuming it was made as a "mini" version of a common military shaped charge.
 
About that mandated gathering of top military officers -

After Charlie Kirk, perhaps I have become too fond of complicated theories.

But it’s ludicrous to have called so many senior guys in for such a silly agenda. A stern memo and/or video sessions would have done.

So the big stoopid meeting, IMHO was to cover for a smaller gathering that had to be done in person. And where whoever was summoned would be a big tell as to what the focus was.
Was the real purpose of this spectacle to hold a secret side meeting to give orders for an impending, multi-continental war? We’ll know soon…

Venezuela, Iran, or both?

Wait and see.
 
That's my impression. The lithospheric shift suggested by this would literally mean the end of most life on earth. You can't "rearrange the continents" without that happening. So I think he's wrong on that count. He's also wrong, IMO, on his idea that the flood that caused the water damage on the pyramids and sphinx were a result of major lithospheric shifting. Those were more likely the result of a flood caused by a tsunami, from a meteorite impact.
Not sure I agree with you on that one Joe. A flood would not cause the erosion on the Sphinx. IMO. Of course I could be wrong.
 
Interesting session.

The C's are usually very succinct with their choice of words, so "stranger than you can imagine", to me, omits things like war's escalating or Isreal tightening its control, because none of these things are strange in any sense of the word, more so expected. Almost seems like something more hyperdimensional. Although that could just be wishful thinking.

It's pretty hard to imagine how a "new world to be explored" could be the fallout from where the world is currently heading without some major paradigm shifting type of events. The rot seems so deep at this point. Maybe we aren't at that point yet.

Thank you very much to everyone involved.
 
Yes, that could be the case.

In his hypothesis, the entire mantle becomes "buttered up" from the heat, so the gyroscopic shift is within the mantle itself, not the lithosphere. The latter just goes along with relatively less stress. Like the difference between a green tough avocado, to a "buttered" one. In the former, a shift of the lithosphere (the skin of the avocado) requires a lot of stress or huge hit to even move it minimally. In the "rotten/butter-like avocado, you just twist it gently and the entire thing shifts around the seed. That is, the entire mantle shifts around the core, with relatively less stress to the lithosphere/skin. It's within the mantle itself that the decoupling and gyroscopic movement takes place, not the lithosphere. You can check out his articles:


It's one of those things that are unbelievable, yet the science is there.
It does sound unbelievable as, given the mass of Earth and the inertia thereby generated, even a 'gentle twist' would be equivalent to a massive discharge of energy. However, TES' theory doesn't include an external force in its calculations. The weak point of the theory, as I understand it from my layman's perspective, seems to be how the process begins through the exothermic iron core phase change which, for TES, abruptly (in planetary terms!) creates sufficient heat to power the process of gyroscopic movement. Still, that's a mere technicality if the latter stages of the theory, post-indigo point (the point of no return), can be quantitively proven.

The fact that the C's said TES' theory was very close to reality suggests that we should pay close attention. That, my friends, requires better trained brains than mine!
 
Back
Top Bottom