Session 27 September 2025

[axj]

On the topic of whether an axial tilt change would produce tsunamis, I think that can happen if the axis shift is relatively fast. The ocean water would try to continue moving along the previous spin direction of the Earth.

The C's mentioned that perpendicularity of the Earth axis will be restored (no more seasons) and that the previous 20 degree axis shift was relatively slow.

Another thing that was mentioned is that the comet cluster would pass the plane of the ecliptic of the solar system between 2006 and 2012. Though we do not know how far from the inner solar system that happened. Since it is a periodic comet cluster (3600 years orbit), it is traveling around the Sun.

 

[MJF]

Germany is persecuting anyone who dares to criticize officials on the Internet. The UK is imprisoning thousands for their tweets. France is criminally investigating tech leaders who defend freedom and privacy.

Although I agree with the gist of what Pavel Durov is saying, he may be slightly exaggerating some of his facts. I am not aware, for example, that the UK is imprisoning thousands for their tweets. Certainly, a few people have been imprisoned recently for imprudent tweets that were judged to have been incitements to violence (some of these people made the mistake of pleading guilty in the hope of getting a lighter prison sentence when they may have been better advised to have pleaded not guilty and to have fought the matter in the courts). Besides, even if they wanted to imprison thousands of tweeters, there is no room in the prisons to do so, as they are full of foreign migrants who have committed real crimes rather than just posting a few "hurty" words on social media.

What is more worrying at the moment though is our erstwhile Prime Minister's (Keir Starmer) proposal to introduce Digital ID for all UK citizens. He is laughably selling the idea as a means of deterring illegal migrants/asylum seekers from getting jobs in the UK (most of them work in the "black" economy anyway). Already 3.5 million people have signed a petition opposing the idea since anyone with any common sense can see where this proposal will lead - i.e., to the massive expansion of the "Big Brother" is watching you state linked inevitably to a social credit score system as they have in China. Moreover, given how easy it has proven to hack UK government systems, do people really want all their personal data handed over to criminals to exploit at will when the state has proven to be so lamentably bad at securing people's personal data.

Starmer is highly unpopular already (he has the worse poll ratings of any prime minister in history after just over a year in office) but this new proposal will only see his poll ratings drop to even lower levels than they currently are and will lead to his party being hammered at the local municipal elections due in May 2026, which could then see him being removed as prime minister by his own party. There is no doubt though that like Tony Blair his former boss, Starmer is a globalist puppet following the globalist agenda, which, as the C's predicted years ago, is to herd us increasingly into an ever more confined space where our freedoms are concerned. However, it seems that the "peasants" may at last be revolting. Let's hope so.​

 

[KaWaiAwaAwa]

On the topic of whether an axial tilt change would produce tsunamis, I think that can happen if the axis shift is relatively fast. The ocean water would try to continue moving along the previous spin direction of the Earth.

The C's mentioned that perpendicularity of the Earth axis will be restored (no more seasons) and that the previous 20 degree axis shift was relatively slow.

Another thing that was mentioned is that the comet cluster would pass the plane of the ecliptic of the solar system between 2006 and 2012. Though we do not know how far from the inner solar system that happened. Since it is a periodic comet cluster (3600 years orbit), it is traveling around the Sun.

I taught physics in one of my careers. This bicycle tire angular momentum demonstration is only one of the many demos I did year in and year out.

There are other demos that explain that turning the axis of something that is spinning takes considerable outside torque and can result in disastrous consequences.

τ=Iα
Tau produces I*alpha

I understand that this is classical physics, but it still works on the scale we are talking about. That's why you can ride a bicycle when it is moving better than when it is stopped (because it takes a significant outside torque to change the angular momentum of the wheels).

 

[axj]

There are other demos that explain that turning the axis of something that is spinning takes considerable outside torque and can result in disastrous consequences.

Yes, in physics terms it is the conservation of the angular momentum that forces water in the oceans to continue on the original trajectory when the rotational axis shifts its inclination, potentially resulting in tsunamis.

The outside force that can cause an axis shift of the Earth could be the gravitational pull of a large comet cluster or a planet passing nearby, or maybe an electromagnetic force can play a role as well.

One strange thing I just realized is that apparently both Venus and Mars were knocked out of their orbits by the comet cluster more than once and passed closely to Earth, yet the Earth was never knocked out of its orbit like that? What could be the reason for that? Maybe our relatively large Moon stabilized Earth's orbit?

 

[Mari]

One strange thing I just realized is that apparently both Venus and Mars were knocked out of their orbits by the comet cluster more than once and passed closely to Earth, yet the Earth was never knocked out of its orbit like that? What could be the reason for that? Maybe our relatively large Moon stabilized Earth's orbit?

Yeah, I cannot find any direct answers from the Cs about Earth changing orbit.
My pure guessing is that perhaps at the time when Earth was surrounded by a water vapor canopy, it was a bit further away from the Sun. Then perhaps both Mars and Earth were knocked out, Earth acquired Mars´ water, and also Earth then perhaps moved a bit closer to Sun so now that vapor evaporates faster and doesn´t stick around like before.

 

[Gaby]

Because the moment of inertia changes. That is why spinning ice skaters' angular velocity increases when they bring their arms and legs inward toward the axis of rotation.

And with that question, I was just trying to get an idea about the forces and factors involved: external vs internal ones. I was focused on the grounding effect of sol's companion, which reduces spin frequency, as Pierre explained in his book "Earth Changes":



A grounding effect from the companion can make the Earth more spherical and, according to physics 101, in this case the rotation of the Earth could speed up because of angular momentum. And the Cs answered :

(Gaby) When we asked in August 2022 why was the rotation speed of the Earth recently increased by almost 1.6 milliseconds and you responded 'Grounding of the current!', could this mean that the Earth is now more spherical or less "wide" at the equator?

[...]

(L) Okay. Anyway, the question is again, does this mean that the Earth is now more spherical or less wide at the equator?

A: Not sufficient increase for that to happen.

So I took that as meaning that the increase in Earth's rotation was due to multiple factors, of which the releasing of heat from the inner core could well be a main player right now. And for all we know, this inner core dynamic is related to the comet swarm cycle. Earth is opening up just in time for their arrival, so to speak.

Essentially, TES states:

Exothermic (Cyclic) Core Theory of Climate Change

Recent climate change may originate from structural and exothermic phase changes in the nickel-iron core of the Earth, and not primarily from man's activity alone. Lattice structure (phase) changes in sloughed (shed) core material releases latent kinetic energy (heat) which flows to the...

theethicalskeptic.com

Earth’s core undergoes extreme exothermic change – sloughing high-latent-energy hexagonal closepack (HCP or ε-iron) iron from the inner to outer core—and by equilibrium from its D” layer into the lower mantle—where it converts to liquid face centered cubic (FCC/BCC) iron plus kinetic energy (latent heat of phase transition). The outer core Geomagnetic Current-Ring weakens and Earth’s geomagnetic dipole wanders as a result. Earth’s rotation speeds up on a decadal basis from the loss in magnetic coupling from outer core to mantle. Earth’s rotational axial geographic location also changes.

We can see that the South Atlantic Anomaly is getting bigger, and the northern magnetic pole is moving towards Siberia, which in the past has been a first step:

Exothermic Core-Mantle Decoupling - Dzhanibekov Oscillation (ECDO) Theory

Exothermic Core-Mantle Decoupling - Dzhanibekov Oscillation (ECDO) theory is a series of hypotheses regarding climate change and its relationship to the Earth's core, as well as both the evidence and mythology surrounding global cataclysms. It is solely the work of its author, The Ethical...

theethicalskeptic.com

Note as well that the Laschamp excursion from State 1 to State 2 [when there was forensic evidence of true polar wander event in the past circa 40000 BC] initiated with a change in geomagnetic pole geographic location, starting from Canada and moving into Russia, a pattern that also began for our modern era in 1973.

It's not black and white, as there was a significant decrease in Earth's rotation until not too long ago. Without even considering sol's companion, heat pouring out into the mantle can also explain it:

Our pace of addition in leap seconds (red line in the graph above) currently is many times faster than the Earth could sustain inside its angular momentum epochally. Had the Earth been slowing at this fast a pace throughout its eons of history, the planet would have come to a rotational halt by now. So we are obviously exiting (since 1972) a kind of uber-slowing phase of outer rotational body angular velocity. In Exhibit 6C to the right, one can see the simple principle that, when the core of the Earth, which spins separately from the outer rotational body of the Earth, passes mass to the outer rotational body – that outer body slows down in its rotation (angular velocity slows, while angular momentum is conserved) – and the inner body consequently speeds up.57 Ergo, the Earth rotates at a slower pace versus the sidereal day, as we have been for the last 50 years. The result of this is much akin to when a spinning ice skater extends their arms, and thereby slows the angular velocity of their rotation – mass added to the extremity of a rotating body serves to slow the rotation of that spinning body. That mass is being handed from the outer core of the Earth and into its lower mantle, outside of an excluding a series of Ultralow Velocity Zone (ULVZ) and Large Low-Velocity Province (LLVP) upwelled structures (core ‘sloughing mountains’) which become part of the separate outer rotational body.

In short, several major important factors are involved and have been for a while, which seem to be coming to some sort of denouement.

There's even a study showing how a database detected significant geomagnetic field changes as early as the fall of the Roman Empire in the 500s, coinciding with the comet(s) that brought the Roman Empire to an end [follow the line of "sint-2000" on the second graph]:

According to TES, the above study is

is akin to estimating the ten-minute-interval speed of a car during a 10-day trip, with a standard deviation-based confidence band ranging from 10 to 110 miles per hour and a discrimination interval of half a day, from sampling only conducted while the car was on two-lane roads, and only by means of an agreement between tire and wind noise (no speedometer). Based on this type of analytical approach, the car would never exceeded the speed limit and never stop even once for gas, fuel, or restroom.

I'm just baffled by the entire thing and how the PTB are keeping us in the dark except for the data that can't be ignored, which is piling up.

TES has a track record of reflecting the medical experience that I was witnessing after the COVID-19 era in his graphs, before studies get published. So that's why I'm taking a look, and then when you see all this data published in hard-core journals and no "influencer" talking about it, it just makes you wonder.

 

[SasaM]

I was focused on the grounding effect of sol's companion, which reduces spin frequency, as Pierre explained in his book "Earth Changes":

A grounding effect from the companion can make the Earth more spherical and, according to physics 101, in this case the rotation of the Earth could speed up because of angular momentum. And the Cs answered :

A number of things stated in ECHCC seem to exhibit so called confirmation bias.

Regarding the statement that solar companion's grounding decreased rotational speed of the Earth, even the C's in that quote basically indicated the opposite, that "grounding of the current" was behind Earth speeding up in its rotation, not slowing down.

So I took that as meaning that the increase in Earth's rotation was due to multiple factors, of which the releasing of heat from the inner core could well be a main player right now. And for all we know, this inner core dynamic is related to the comet swarm cycle. Earth is opening up just in time for their arrival, so to speak.

In ECHCC, Earth's opening up was directly related to slowing down in its rotation, IRC, while here you basically say the opposite, that the increase in Earth's rotational speed comes from the mechanism behind the opening up.

It's not black and white, as there was a significant decrease in Earth's rotation until not too long ago.

Not exactly true, check LOD (length of day) plots in the posts here and here.

For the last 50 years overall trend is towards shorter days meaning that on average Earth has been spinning faster year after year. Before that there was significant slowing down on average for about 40 years, and before that a super pronounced speeding up for about 20 years. So, it's indeed not black and white.

We can see that the South Atlantic Anomaly is getting bigger, and the northern magnetic pole is moving towards Siberia, which in the past has been a first step:

How do you explain supposed reversal of Earth's magnetic field polarity that allegedly happened maybe half a dozen times or even more in these last 40000 years? Each one of them would have been accompanied by movements of geomagnetic poles, from one side of the globe to the other and vice versa.

 

[axj]

How do you explain supposed reversal of Earth's magnetic field polarity that allegedly happened maybe half a dozen times or even more in these last 40000 years?

The last full reversal of the magnetic poles was 780,000 years ago, based on scientific data. There was one 'excursion event' 40,000 years ago that did not result in a magnetic pole flip and apparently nothing more since then.

 

[Daf]

What if they're part of the same thing? It's possible that there's a lower proportion of psychopaths among those who are considered right-wing or conservative. But if you've been following the events since Charlie Kirk's murder, it's produced a shift in the population toward religious sentiments that don't help calm the waters. There are whispers of attempts to reach a state of civil war. From my point of view, there's a divide and conquer in action.

The C mentioned that the 3rd Reich was a trial run. This polarization and divisiveness you are pointing is "à propos". I believe that the key elements is to let loose the psychopathic elements of any side destroying the social order unopposed. So far the one that are organized and galvanized are the far leftists, they have a huge edge in regard to the conquest of some key institutions.

You mentioned that the reaction could see the rise of a Nationalistic Christian side. (I do not believe we are to see any white ethno-centrist alt right movement though...) It would make sense, yet they are stirring and still have to get rid of the woke incrustation.

Right now, we could clearly see the "two tier policing" in action in many places. (ex: Daniel Penny & Iryna Zarutska) Justice being though against order people, lenient toward chaos/violent elements.

As fear and instability will grow, it will be people asking to get stripped of any freedom left just to see some return to order and safety. Folks should be primed to accept digital ID or CBDC bullshit at this point.
Anyhow no matter what, one violent side will win in the end and it will likely be totalitarian. It could be one of a marxist type or something fascistic that respect private property. Maybe more the later if the C are right.

Finally, it does not matter for the top echelon STS (Globalist) for I am sure they will be banking both side and capture the winner.

 

[rrraven]

Thanks for the session
True north , I have been playing with my new globe , I put a string around the equator and then tied it to the arm of the globe at 20 degrees north to see where the equator was last time it was perpendicular, and how that would have affected the weather or climate
If I put the arm on the pyramids longitude we get a north Pole in Alaska, equator going through Peru, crossing the,,old,, equator in North Brasil and Indonesia , so the main effect is a tropical Sahara and a subtropical Europe .
As far as no seasons in the historical records, isn't there stories of a golden age , sep tepi for the Egyptians , Dreamtime for Australia, and stories how the sun rose in the wrong place

 

[axj]

True north , I have been playing with my new globe , I put a string around the equator and then tied it to the arm of the globe at 20 degrees north to see where the equator was last time it was perpendicular, and how that would have affected the weather or climate
If I put the arm on the pyramids longitude we get a north Pole in Alaska, equator going through Peru, crossing the,,old,, equator in North Brasil and Indonesia , so the main effect is a tropical Sahara and a subtropical Europe .

The C's have said that prior to the Younger Dryas Atlantis cataclysm the geographic north pole was in south central Canada:

(Pierre) Two quick questions about flash-frozen mammoths. [laughter] The cometary body that impacted Earth, I would like to know what was the location of the north geographic pole before and after the impact?

A: 7 degrees different.

Q: (Pierre) Well, 7 degrees... I was asking for the location of the north geographic pole before and after the impact.

A: Close to South Central Canada.

Q: (Pierre) That's before?

(L) Didn't you ask before?

(Pierre) I asked where was it before and after. I guess that's before.

(L) I think they're talking about the tilt of the axis with the 7 degrees.

(Pierre) Okay, relative to the ecliptic.

(L) And 7 degrees change in the tilt of the axis will certainly change climate conditions.

(Pierre) Of course.

A: Yes

Q: (L) So you're saying that the lithosphere slipped that much?

A: Yes

Q: (L) Not only did the axis change, but the lithosphere slid. That would explain why all those piles and piles and piles of bones were just... I mean, they had like practically islands of bones all jumbled together in the Arctic! Almost entire islands. Just crazy.

(Pierre) South Central Canada is before?

A: Before.

Either the axis or the lithosphere shifted by 7 degrees (or it was the result of both shifts) during the Younger Dryas cataclysm in about 10,700 BC.

Then there was another, bigger shift of the axis in about 2300 BC during the "Exodus cataclysm":

(Pierre) Did the catastrophic events that occurred around 2300 BC modify the axial tilt of our planet?

A: Yes.

Q: (Pierre) How many degrees?

A: 20. Not in an "instant" but quickly enough taking scale into account.

Interestingly, the "Green Sahara" period does fall almost exactly between these two cataclysms (around 10,700 BC and 2300 BC), so maybe the different axis orientation was indeed the cause.

I am not sure if the C's or Ra have said that the axis was perpendicular before (no seasons) and when.

 

[Gaby]

Regarding the statement that solar companion's grounding decreased rotational speed of the Earth, even the C's in that quote basically indicated the opposite, that "grounding of the current" was behind Earth speeding up in its rotation, not slowing down.

Exactly! That is why I asked in the session. I was thinking, how come Earth's spinning is increasing, is it because we're one step ahead so to speak? Instead of sol's companion grounding slowing down Earth's rotation, we're now moving faster because Earth's is compressed at the equator (more spherical) secondary to this sol's companion grounding? Cs said, not enough to make a difference. So there's other "grounding" factors at play, i.e. heat being released which increases the Earth's spin.

In ECHCC, Earth's opening up was directly related to slowing down in its rotation, IRC, while here you basically say the opposite, that the increase in Earth's rotational speed comes from the mechanism behind the opening up.

See above. You factor in inner core dynamics. We're still "opening up" if the magnetic forces are decoupling from the core.

For the last 50 years overall trend is towards shorter days meaning that on average Earth has been spinning faster year after year. Before that there was significant slowing down on average for about 40 years, and before that a super pronounced speeding up for about 20 years. So, it's indeed not black and white.

That is exactly the concept of what I quoted from TES article, hence my post.

We were emphasizing slowing down of the rotation, while the trend is opposite right now. It's a dance of Earth Changes where several factors are at play.