Session 27 September 2025

Q: (Gaby) TES (The Ethical Skeptic) has a hypothesis based on these blobs and posits that Earth's core and mantle dynamics drive periodic rotational instabilities, leading to true polar wander events.

[Background info: Exothermic Core-Mantle Decoupling - Dzhanibekov Oscillation (ECDO) Theory]

A: Partly involved, yes.

Q: (Gaby) He claims that a weakening of the core mantle magnetic coupling causes heat from the Earth's core into the mantle, excluding these blobs. This makes the rest of the mantle denser than the blobs, contributing to:

- Loss of current influence in the position of our geographic North Pole

- Increase in sea surface temperature and in the Earth's axis of rotation

- Shift in the planet's rotation around its maximum axis (the denser mantle)

- Increasing the chances of a True Polar Wander event with an axis of gyroscopic moment based upon the African blob.

A: Very close!

Here I found an interview with The Ethical Skeptic (Roger Cunningham) about the ECDO theory.

He has also published a book:
 
Q: (L) Should we delete our social media accounts which are full of our rants about Israel?
A: Yes
Q: (Chu) Delete our accounts or just the posts?
A: Posts if possible.
Q: (Joe) So the more inflammatory, accusatory, pointed posts referring to specifically Israel and Jewish deep-stater type things?
A: Yes

oh


Ana Kasparian said:
"The bill introduces sweeping new offences. It criminalises denying Israel's existence - while no law criminalises denying France's right to exist - and outlaws comparisons between Israel and Nazi Germany."

Critics of Israel could face 5 years in prison if their insane bill passes.
Middle East Eye said:
French lawmakers set to push bill criminalising speech on Israel, with penalties of up to five years in prison

 
This five minute video seems real. But this one also has fake AI footage about the sphere flying - but not rotating - as multiple people examining the sphere state that it had to be rotating fast in various directions, so the central rut etching could NOT be seen on the only available two, real, low-resolution bad quality videos showing the sphere flying. There are no high-resolution videos about this bi-density probe flying in the air at all.

So any hi-res video showing the sphere flying with its deep central ruts visible is fake. There is even the video expert guy explaining the only two available real, bad quality footages. So this is the third real video about the sphere distanced from the fake AI videos inundating YT.

Here is another video about the current owner speaking English and the pudgy scientists explaining what they found. Already also has AI-generated fake scenes for visuals:
The MO remains the same. Humans are not allowed to know, what makes the bi-density probe AKA "Buga sphere" tick.

While trying to find actual real videos, I found all the other dozen AI fake creations about this bi-density probe dubbed the Buga Sphere. These are staggering in number, how they inundated YT. Copycat profiteering [censored-word] people spewing AI-generated lies - saturating YT with fake videos just about every other interesting research topic as well.

After an acquaintance told me about the Buga Sphere, I watched a few analyses, and I think this one is the best:

I agree with the points:
  1. It flies exactly like a sphere suspended from a drone would look like, not UFO-like. First nail in the coffin.
  2. The design on the front must have been cut by hand, as it's clearly imperfect. At least based on the original close-up photos. The rest may be AI-generated.
  3. It resembles a modified hydrazine fuel tank, and rocket fuel tanks are made of hard aluminum alloys.
  4. One of the supposed X-ray scans shows a bowling ball-like shape inside. This suggests it may just be a bowling ball welded inside a fuel tank, polished, and with dremmelled engravings.
  5. The supposed holes on the rim are spaced unevenly, and they're not even holes. They resemble dots painted with a black marker. Alien tech? Come on.
Another analyst (Or was it the same one? I forgot.) noticed that the radiocarbon analysis that dated it to 12,560 years old was of a foraminifer - a type of shell. It's written right there, on the document of the analysis. It might be a scan of something completely unrelated, or of those orange dots around the chip pattern, which may have been found on a beach, cut to shape, and glued to the sphere. I've also heard it could be easily checked for its origin by performing an isotope analysis of the metal or... just by cutting it open.

Do you see anything ET about the Buga Sphere? Is there any credibility to the bi-metallic, optical fiber, exothermic, or X-ray claims?
 
(Approaching Infinity) Yeah. I wanted to ask about the markings, because when you look at a closeup of the markings, it's really clear that they're imprecise and it looks like they were carved in by a human hand. They don't look like a perfect crop circle or something like that. So I just wanted to ask what the significance of that is. Does that mean that those markings were added on by someone else, or it was just sloppily made?

A: Fading in and out gives a false impression.

Q: (Joe) So, transiting densities messes up the writing.
I've just read the transcript, by the way. If all bi-density objects conveniently (or inconveniently, depending on whom you ask) transform into looking like they were made by human hands when they enter 3D... well, that's just a bit too convenient if you ask me. It's like a human made a 3D replica of a 4D object using available materials, modern tools, and also made sure it flies like it was suspended from a drone, just to be absolutely sure that it cannot be proven to be ET by any means. How does that even make sense? If it walks like a duck and talks like a duck...

Next thing we might hear is that a real UFO was found intact, but it appears to be a UFO replica made of airplane parts welded together. I don't want to anticipate this. I just think that if someone wanted to go one step further, that's what they'd do.
 
Back
Top Bottom