Gattaca
Padawan Learner
Definition of Noachian: Relating to or resembling Noah or his time, especially in reference to the Flood
Just some random finding for "Noachian languages" in old books e.g. on archive.org:
Alexender Winchell: Preadamites. Or, a demonstration of the existence of men before Adam (1888)
Reginald Stuart Poole: Genesis of the Earth and Man (1860)
Kerry M. Sonia: The Creation of Adam and the Biblical Origins of Race in The Slave’s Friend
John Fraser: The Etruscans: were they Celts?
Just some random finding for "Noachian languages" in old books e.g. on archive.org:
Alexender Winchell: Preadamites. Or, a demonstration of the existence of men before Adam (1888)
Common primitive elements in the Egyptian, Semitic and Hamitic languages should be expected from the common origin of the Noachian languages from an antediluvian Adamic form of speech, based on the preadamic Turanian. Hence a primitive Assyro-Babylonian Accadian which, while it was the predecessor of the widespread Hamitic type, retained Turanian reminiscences. Hence the linguistic cousinship of the Semitic and Hamitic forms of speech, whether as developed in Mesopotamia, Canaan, Egypt or Ethiopia.
Reginald Stuart Poole: Genesis of the Earth and Man (1860)
“The philosophical inquiry showed us that the monosyllabic or particle language on which the most ancient of these formations border, both the Turanian in the East and the Khamitic in the West, is the formation which must be supposed theoretically to have preceded the organic or formative language. Every word was a sentence before it could become a specific part of speech ; and either every language separately must once have been like the Chinese, or the Chinese itself is the wreck of that primitive idiom from which all the organic (or Noachian) languages have physically descended, each representing a phasis of development. Such a phasis itself would, under the latter supposition, be a necessary element in the evolutions of the idea in time, a link in an uninterrupted chain of development.”
Kerry M. Sonia: The Creation of Adam and the Biblical Origins of Race in The Slave’s Friend
According to Priest, it was divine intervention that made Japheth white and Ham Black. Much like the discourse about Adam’s name and his supposed redness, Priest argues that the name Ham refers to his dark complexion: “The word Ham, in the language of Noah, which was the pure and most ancient Hebrew, signified any thing that had become black; it was the word for black, whatever the cause of the color might have been.”37 Priest attributes great authority to the word choice of Noah in naming his sons, at times referring to such language as the “true Antediluvian Adamic or Hebrew language” and “Noachian language,” the latter of which he claims is identical to ancient Egyptian in the time of Abraham (Priest 1843, p. 31). After all, he argues, biblical names reflect the nature of the persons or things they signify, distinguishing Hebrew from all other languages.
John Fraser: The Etruscans: were they Celts?
In English we have many instances of the same kind; from clap, we form clash, clutch, clatter, cluster, and Sc. skelp ; from tread, we take stride, straddle. Let me, therefore, go to the Noachian language and select the root gaph or, unaspirated, gab or gap, " to leap " ; this is the Aryan form of the H. root tsaph, in tsaph-ar, " to leap." From gap I take the Etruscan word gapus, " a chariot," as will be shown in its own place.