Thank you for this fascinating session!!
Quite mind blowing to be honest!
I sometimes wondered why we went from sex being considered a dirty sin and marriages being merely financial/practical unions for centuries - among the poor and rich alike - and then suddenly we had an explosion of promiscuity, one-night stands, situationships and friends with benefits. Basically, from one extreme to another when both are just as bad. But come to think of it, both approaches basically cut out the importance of love and psychic connection out of the picture, thus ensuring it's an STS food generator and little more.
I never delved particularly deep into this topic but it interested me enough to read the stuff I bumped into and snoop around it a bit. But I've never heard or read of any reports, hints, or anything that would imply the astronauts revealed anything about it. I wonder how they silenced them to keep this hush so successfully. And I'm also super curious to know what that altered reality was!
The Freemasonic flag (actually an apron) seen on the book cover was brought to the Moon by 32° astronaut Buzz Aldrin, and later ceremoniously presented to Scottish Rite headquarters in Washington D.C.
English author Graham Hancock commenting on the book made the point that. "Even fewer people are aware of the hard evidence that secret brotherhoods quietly dominate NASA, with policies far more aligned with ancient religious and occult mystery schools than the façade of rational science the government agency has successfully promoted to the world for almost fifty years."
It is likely that those in charge of the NASA Moon missions were already well aware of these structures on the Moon even before the first astronauts headed there through images that had been obtained by earlier NASA space probes . Quoting Hoagland:
Many of NASA's consulting sociologists and anthropologists to Brookings (like Dr. Margaret Meade, whom I had the privilege of actually working with in later years, at New York's Hayden Planetarium) had been warning NASA, even as Brookings was being researched and assembled, of "the enormous potential for social instability" if the existence of bona fide extra-terrestrials — or even ruins they left behind — was officially revealed in the socially repressive and heavily religious environment of the late 1950s.
With those first Lunar Orbiter images taken of the Moon, everything — the reality of ruins, their extraordinary scale, their obvious presence on more than one world in the solar system, how their builders vanished — suddenly was all too real.
There had been a powerful, enormously encompassing, extraordinary solar-system-wide civilization that had simply disappeared, only to be rediscovered by NASA's primitive initial probes. A civilization that, it would turn out later, had been wiped out through a series of all-encompassing, solar-system-wide cataclysms.
Let us note here that the C's have confirmed the existence of these ruined structures on the Moon and Mars and told us that they had been constructed by the Atlanteans. So Hoagland and Bara have the C's support on this contention.
Amongst other things, Hoagland discovered that there were several miles high glass shards which were perhaps the remains of former [Atlantean] environmental domes (see NASA image below) - noting here that glass in a vacuum such as the Moon has a tensile strength ten times that of steel on Earth.
Thus, for Hoagland and Bara, the manned Apollo Project was carefully conceived, from the outset as a kind of "alien reconnaissance" followed by an "alien artifacts retrieval" program [MJF: For "alien" read "Atlantean" here].
Huge structures such as these might have posed a danger to the small Lunar Lander when landing on the Moon. It should be noted here that the two astronauts actually overshot the original landing zone in the Sea of Tranquillity. In addition, for reasons never really explained properly, they had the side radar on the Lander operating during their descent, which would seem redundant unless you were concerned about large artificial structures that might impede your landing. Quoting Hoagland and Bara:
Using commercially available celestial mechanics/astronomical software — programs like the popular "Red Shift" series (which uses the official JPL ephemeris as its database) — we have been able to establish a pattern of behaviour on NASA's part that points to something truly as inexplicable as it is exotic: a bizarre internal obsession by the Agency with three "gods" and "goddesses," reaching across the millennia directly from ancient Egypt — Isis, Osiris and Horus.
It is these same three Egyptian gods (whose mythic story has been documented by many Egyptologists and authors, including Christopher Knight and Robert Lomas, in The Hiram Key) that are also key to understanding the history of the Masonic Order. As we show in Dark Mission, it is this same mythology that is also at the heart of the belief systems of the NASA "Magicians" and Nazis as well. This ritual Egyptian symbolism, secretly practiced by NASA throughout these past five decades, publicly shows up only in its repeating, blatant choices of simple mission patch designs.
For instance, if one looks at the official patch for the Apollo Program (below), armed with our preceding "heads-up" regarding the bizarre NASA focus on all things "Egyptian," it becomes elemental to match the "A" (for "Apollo") as an actual stand-in for "Asar" — the Egyptian designation for "Osiris." This successful decoding of the hidden Egyptian meaning of the Apollo patch is redundantly confirmed — because "Asar/Osiris" is none other than the familiar Greek constellation of "Orion" — which is, of course, the background stellar constellation on the patch itself.
In case you think such ritual symbolism is some kind of temporary historical aberration, confined only to the Apollo Program and the 1960s, think again; when NASA recently selected a patch design for its new "CEV" spacecraft, which will eventually replace the Shuttle — and ultimately take American astronauts back to the Moon — look what NASA curiously picked again (below).
For more see:
Dark Mission: the Secret History of NASA - Graham Hancock Official Website
But what did they discover on the Moon once they got to the surface? Although it is considered to be just a conspiracy theory, the truth was apparently picked up by a number of ham radio operators back on Earth. NASA never anticipated that ham radio operators on Earth would be able to intercept Apollo 11's transmissions, but NASA was careless in not realising that both the Gemini and Apollo missions had been heard by many ham radio enthusiasts. It is not well known that NASA astronauts had two radio transmitters in their space suits. One was for general communications with Mission Control in Houston and the other was a direct link to medical specialists monitoring the astronauts with whom they could confide any personal medical issues they might be experiencing. Legend has it that Neil Armstrong used this second medical radio link to let Mission Control know that they were not alone on the Moon but were being observed by aliens:
Here is a brief account of what was supposedly recorded:
Mission Control: "What’s there?"
"Mission Control calling Apollo 11."
Apollo 11 (Neil Armstrong speaking): "These babies were huge, sir! .... Enormous! .... Oh God! You wouldn’t believe it! .... I’m telling you there are other space-craft out there …. lined up on the far side of the crater edge! .... They’re on the Moon watching us!"
This story was told in
Timothy Good's book
Above Top Secret: The Worldwide U.F.O. Cover-Up and repeated by
The Examiner and
Global Paranormal in which Neil Armstrong saw aliens on the moon, and the fact was covered up.
Maurice Chatelain, supposedly a former chief of NASA Communications Systems, confirmed that Armstrong had indeed reported seeing two UFOs on the rim of a crater.
Here is reproduced completely another version of the alleged dialogue between the American astronauts and Mission Control:
Armstrong & Aldrin: Those are giant things. No, no, no - this is not an optical illusion. No one is going to believe this!
Houston (Christopher Craft): What ... what ... what? What the hell is happening? What's wrong with you?
Armstrong & Aldrin: They're here under the surface.
Houston: What's there? (muffled noise) Emission interrupted; interference control calling 'Apollo 11'.
Armstrong & Aldrin: We saw some visitors. They were here for a while, observing the instruments.
Houston: Repeat your last information!
Armstrong & Aldrin: I say that there were other spaceships. They're lined up in the other side of the crater!
Houston: Repeat, repeat!
Armstrong & Aldrin: Let us sound this orbita ... in 625 to 5 ... Automatic relay connected ... My hands are shaking so badly I can't do anything. Film it? God, if these damned cameras have picked up anything - what then?
Houston: Have you picked up anything?
Armstrong & Aldrin: I didn't have any film at hand. Three shots of the saucers or whatever they were that were ruining the film
Houston: Control, control here. Are you on your way? What is the uproar with the UFOs over?
Armstrong & Aldrin: They've landed here. There they are and they're watching us.
Houston: The mirrors, the mirrors - have you set them up?
Armstrong & Aldrin: Yes, they're in the right place. But whoever made those spaceships surely can come tomorrow and remove them. Over and out.
Unfortunately, NASA has conveniently lost the original recordings of most of Apollo 11's mission tapes so such transcripts cannot be verified or denied.
Years later, a certain professor, who wished to remain anonymous, was allegedly engaged in a discussion in a hotel room with Neil Armstrong during a NASA symposium.
Professor: What REALLY happened out there with Apollo 11?
Armstrong: It was incredible, of course we had always known there was a possibility - the fact is, we were warned off! There was never any question then of a space station or a moon city.
Professor: How do you mean "warned off"?
Armstrong: I can't go into details, except to say that their ships were far superior to ours both in size and technology - Boy, were they big!...and menacing! No, there is no question of a space station.
Professor: But NASA had other missions after Apollo 11?
Armstrong: Naturally - NASA was committed at that time, and couldn't risk panic on Earth. But it really was a quick scoop and back again.
Armstrong apparently confirmed that the story was true but refused to go into further detail, beyond admitting that the CIA was behind the cover-up.
We could until recently have readily discount these alleged radio transcripts but then the C's have just confirmed that the two Apollo astronauts did really encounter aliens on the Moon, which suggests that they may well have made secret communications to Houston describing what they had seen:
Joe) What did the Apollo astronauts see?
A: Aliens and altered reality.
Q: (L) Are there things on the moon that are part of another reality that we cannot consistently see?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) So what they saw was something that is normal on the moon - that wasn't put on for their benefit?
A: Yes
One indirect corroboration that Armstrong may have seen aliens on the Moon, which may have piqued his interest in the Ancient Aliens hypotheses (first promoted by Erich von Däniken), was when Armstrong took part in 1976 (see below) in the largest and most expensive exploration of the Tayos Caves system in Ecuador launched by English explorer Stan Hall, which involved over a hundred people, including British and Ecuadorian military personnel and expert cavers plus Armstrong. In 1973 von Däniken released his bestselling and controversial book
The Gold of the Gods, in which he claimed that Argentinian-Hungarian entrepreneur Juan Moricz had discovered gold, unusual sculptures, and a library of metal tablets in a series of artificial tunnels within the caves. Tayos was also mentioned as the location of
Father Crespi’s collection of mysterious golden artifacts, given to him by the indigenous people of Ecuador. To date nothing has been found.
So, why did Neil Armstrong — an astronaut known for his calm, scientific approach to exploration — choose to join a mission filled with mystery and speculation? According to Eileen Hall, her father’s deep spiritual experience may have played a role in convincing Armstrong. Stan Hall had described a moment in his life when he felt enveloped by white light, during which he believed he was shown the infinite connections between this dimension and others. This profound experience drove him to explore Cueva de los Tayos in the hope of uncovering hidden truths about the universe.
Armstrong, too, may have been searching for answers. After walking on the Moon and looking back at Earth from space, Armstrong’s perspective on humanity’s place in the universe likely expanded. Perhaps the idea that extra-terrestrial visitors might have once influenced human history was too intriguing for him to ignore.
So, why did Armstrong risk his reputation by taking part in what on paper was a wild goose chase if he had not harboured an interest in aliens having encountered them on the Moon?
But then Armstrong was not the only one to raise awareness of an alien presence in the solar system since his partner Buzz Aldrin referred to a strange monolithic structure on the Martian Moon Phobos during an interview at an ice hockey match a few years ago:
The discussion on the monolith became more intense when Buzz Aldrin, one of the first men to land on the Moon, jumped into the matter. He said: “
We should visit the moon of Mars, there’s a monolith there, a very unusual structure on this little potato-shaped object that revolves around Mars once every seven hours. When people find out about that they are going to say, “Who put that there? Who put that there?” Well, the universe put it there, or if you choose, God put it there.”
Just to remind everyone that the C's have previously confirmed that the Martian Moon Phobos is an alien base:
Q: (L) What are Mars' moons?
A: Disguised bases.
Q: (L) Who built them?
A: Who else? The Lizzies.
So, it wasn't God put it there but the Lizzies instead. And it seems the US have known about this structure for a long time:
In 1960, Dr. S. Fred Singer, special advisor to President Eisenhower on space developments said: “Phobos, generally accepted as a celestial body, actually may be an artificial satellite launched long ago by an advanced Martian race.” Astronomer Carl Sagan and Russian author Shklovskii also supported this claim.
The monolith of Phobos is truly an anomaly that cannot be easily debunked. It stretches approximately 90 meters from ground level and is located in a desolate region of Phobos, making its origin even more questionable. The object could be interrelated to the other one found on Mars. Could these be surviving artifacts of a long-forgotten Martian civilization?
There has been some talk of Freemasonry on this thread and I have already posted a photograph above of Buzz Aldrin holding a Masonic apron on the surface of the Moon. It is not known if Neil Armstrong was also a Freemason at the time but it is known his father was one. What most people don't appreciate is that when Armstrong and Aldrin landed on the Moon Aldrin conducted a small Masonic thanksgiving communion ritual in the Lunar Module (LM) involving an offering perhaps to the Egyptian goddess Isis. In his biography, Aldrin described the ceremony as follows:
"In the first idle moment in the LM before eating our snack, I reached into my personal preference kit and pulled out two small packages which had been specially prepared at my request. One contained a small amount of wine, the other a small wafer. With them and a small chalice from my kit, I took communion on the moon, reading to myself from a small card that I carried on which I had written the portion of the Book of John used in the traditional communion ceremony."
However, Hoagland and Bara discovered that the ceremony took place exactly 33 (a significant number in Freemasonry) minutes after the landing. Hoagland also discovered that 20th July was an extremely significant date in Egyptian lore since it linked back to the heliacal rising of the star Sirius (representative of the goddess Isis) in the pyramid era. At that time at Tranquillity Base, Sirius was precisely 19.5 degrees over the horizon, a number which had a special (tetrahedral) hyperdimensional significance for Hoagland as has been discussed in the transcripts, which was the one and only place on the entire Lunar surface where this specific alignment could take place precisely 33 minutes after the Eagle had touched down. Interestingly, the sine of 19.471 degrees (the key "circumscribed tetrahedral angle") is .3333. Moreover, using the Schlafli nodal system, a tetrahedra's nodal designation is {3,3}.
After studying dozens of similar stellar coincidences with NASA space shots, it became obvious to Hoagland and Bara that NASA was following some kind of stellar ritual pattern that involved power numbers, stellar alignments and ancient Egyptian gods. The two men subsequently became aware that the man who selected the Apollo landing sites and times of landing was an Egyptian called Dr Farouk El-Baz, a geologist who the astronauts dubbed "the King" or Pharaoh. It transpired, however, that El-Baz's father was a religious scholar whose speciality was studying the ancient stellar religions of Egypt. Is it stretching coincidence to think that something of the father's knowledge did not rub-off on his son when the latter selected the landing sites and times of landing for the lunar modules?
So, there seems to have been much more to the first Moon landing than meets the eye.
).
.
