Session 6 December 2025

[palestine]

I don't disregard your warning about what you're telling us

I am sure that if there is "Ummo" in it, there are some unwanted things. Could be that the person has been influenced or that the person is an "agent" of some sort. At least, we know what to expect, we could safely be expecting "some" instead of "whoa such a nice avenue to explore". All alarm systems on, then, double Athena gears, etc, before starting the reading, I would say

These executables act as time capsules

Yes you are right. I disregarded this aspect, this is true. Well - then I did not posted content from it, we know there is that code, etc etc, nobody posted content from it, so best thing would be a personal approach and not to use the content of the book. Don't know if this is the "road"?

 

[palestine]

So, our concept of linear time is very much linked to our limited 3D awareness as you so astutely mentioned in your post.

I personally sometimes feel that "time" may be a factor (instead of a "constraint"), relating to 3D indeed, so a basic variable that the Universe requires, in order to make the "big machine" run.

The problem would be STS tampering, 4D are somehow "free" of this variable (and/or have possibilities of manipulating it - and are doing it)

I personally appreciate "time" as a positive feature, and I see it like a support for learning, while in 3D. I would argue about seasons, etc - it seems possible to orient our look to a positive aspect. A layer while in 3D. And then, that layer would be tampered with. but without the tampering, what we would have would just be a "part" of how things function.

 

[palestine]

Are you 100% sure of what you're saying?

Here is my chain of thought: the C session tells us about the Ummo material (not the book "el simbolo"). The Ummo material is, at first degree, "aliens contacting humans to help them". I remember having read that book. One excerpt is a scientist saying that he received a letter, telling him to leave his window open during the night. The so-called "Ummo aliens" would then be able to come to him, and they told the scientist that they were "eager to lay their hands on the scientist's heart". <> "We will come by, let us touch your heart".

You see - a recurring concept has been found, among the researching community. It says that, yeah, there exist "aliens", some abduct people, some are good aliens. But one thing that has been found, and this is a very recurring one - is that it's mostly the government who does many many "so-called abductions".

I am sure that many people will confirm this.

Ummo overall makes me think, thanks to the C session, of "the government-type fake abduction" scenario. This exists; it covers the range of many many "abductions". Many "abductions by aliens" are not exactly it. Why not part of it? I dont' know.

Don't ask me why governments do that! I don't know.

So: when I look at the whole Ummo thing, and when I see those elements, I cannot prevent myself from picturing a scenario. I don't know if this is the case. I absolutely have no proof.

And, well, it seems that the government who does those things is mostly CIA-affiliated. Secret programs, etc. It has ties to DARPA, and NSA. Those agenices have two faces, and they seem to operate quite a number of shadow projects, that even their government don't know about. It's a bit special those agencies - but we know they do.

@Sindy-S.R I cannot "prove" anything. I don't know "for sure". I would need to have access to the CIA office and find the papers!

I understand your concern, but with what you're saying, you're implying that the CIA promoted Laura's conference in Barcelona in 2011. Do you understand the point?

I did not know. Hmm let me ask you because I would like to know more about the financing of the conference, please. Let's start again with the basic Ummo material. It popped up around 1950 or something, seems to me. It gathered, at the time, a certain number of scientists. Many Spanish ones if I remember correctly.

My question is: what's the degree of the link, between the financers of the conference, and this original "core" of the "first-Ummo followers"? Those, who financed the conference, are they just "Ummo-afficionados", or are they "the core", of 1950 (who pursued the studies etc etc)?

I understand that the people who financed the conference have ties to "el simbolo", rather than "the Ummo core people". "El simbolo" seems to be a research that "uses" Ummo. To what degree, I don't know. The idea would be to define how much importance "el simbolo" attaches to "Ummo". Is "Ummo", to them, the very core of the matter - or is it a side study, that they use, in correlation to various different research? Only you can tell me because I did not read the book "el simbolo".

The CIA promoting Laura's conference would be a possibility! Overall! I have no judgment about that if such was the case. The CIA sponsored many many things and if we don't know, we just don't know. That does not make Laura - CIA , in my mind, right?

I think that the CIA or an organism of a similar type is consciously doing the Ummo thing as a sort of mind control program. It would be to slow down people in their progression towards STO, things like that. This is what I think was the goal of "Ummo". Just another mkultra-like program, like the LSD wave, the MKULTRA projects, all the sects that the CIA has been setting up. I am using "CIA" because they especially illustrated themselves into this types of activities. They just ruined many many generations' minds. And today, as if their bad deeds haven't been enough - we must deal with Greenbaum. Honestly, we swim in a sea of many many potential mind control projects at every street corner. In the end, there is few material that is not it. You can see this: every time a person posts a new material here, it's discarded most of the time. People prefer to study reality through "romance books" because it brings more results for STO growth. This is a pity, this is crazy.

Wouldn't we ask C's about the "elsimbolo" book? "Is this material to be considered"?

The fact that Ummo is mentioned doesn't imply that it's the CIA.

Yes of course you are right.

We are used to stumble upon material that has specific "things". The "el simbolo" has some things that may be raising alarms in several people. It has been the case with me:

- mention of Ummo (big red flag)
- technology too high for an era in which it was less accessible and developped
- a layer of tech-space-transcendence-serious-tech
- the financial layer

So no definite conclusion here in regard of "elsimbolo"! Just a "watch out".

That's why I asked you before, have you read the book?

No I haven't. i just figured out that it was possible to read it, as I said. But it's a bit a dishonest trick so I won't read it.

FINANFOR is a financial consulting service; I'm not sure it's directly related to the rights to the book.

Browsing old versions of the "elsimbolo" site shows a website initially dedicated to finance. This has been very odd to find out. Seems the people there were engaged into a sort of "economical predictivity". Really not bad. I know Spanish people and they always loved tech, and innovative approaches. Like Dutches. And so the "financial" aspect is just "a hint". A red flag, just something that comes a bit out when I see it.

What I mean is that this website is very very atypical for the time in question and that this catches attention.

The material has "Ummo" in it and this catches attention.

The book can only be read via an electronical interface - and this catches attention.

I trained this like a muscle: when too many "it catches attention" and that I can see it, I leave. 90% of the time, I escape danger. 10% of the time, I loose something of value.

C's are super innovative in their teachings, but here, on the forum, we learn not about exceptionnalism, but about "Normal humans": Family, love. All the specs of "elsimbolo" attract my attention because it's "exceptionnal". Sometimes, this is a bait. A trap. Sometimes.

So - you see - I have a way and I am cautious because the danger comes from a specific place. Most of the time. The place is familiar. When it feels and smell "oh that familiar STS place..."... The kidding STS... "Ha! It's them!". It's all the time the same, it never changes. The "STS house" has a "smell".

And so, I wanted to tell you just to watch out. The Ummo spec definitely represents an opening. This means that if you study this material, I feel that it is safe, to assume, that you will in any case have false elements popping up. It cannot be else. At best it's in the chapter "Ummo" (if there is such a chapter) - or around. Look for the conclusions based on Ummo: what is it that the author discovers, "thanks to Ummo"? You may then put all of the conclusions under the umbrella "probably wrong to accept that" - "must specifically be cautious at this". We could study those materials but we need to be ready. The mind needs to know that there will be things that are not okay.

 

[Sindy-S.R]

Here is my chain of thought: the C session tells us about the Ummo material (not the book "el simbolo"). The Ummo material is, at first degree, "aliens contacting humans to help them". I remember having read that book. One excerpt is a scientist saying that he received a letter, telling him to leave his window open during the night. The so-called "Ummo aliens" would then be able to come to him, and they told the scientist that they were "eager to lay their hands on the scientist's heart". <> "We will come by, let us touch your heart".

You see - a recurring concept has been found, among the researching community. It says that, yeah, there exist "aliens", some abduct people, some are good aliens. But one thing that has been found, and this is a very recurring one - is that it's mostly the government who does many many "so-called abductions".

I am sure that many people will confirm this.

Ummo overall makes me think, thanks to the C session, of "the government-type fake abduction" scenario. This exists; it covers the range of many many "abductions". Many "abductions by aliens" are not exactly it. Why not part of it? I dont' know.

Don't ask me why governments do that! I don't know.

So: when I look at the whole Ummo thing, and when I see those elements, I cannot prevent myself from picturing a scenario. I don't know if this is the case. I absolutely have no proof.

And, well, it seems that the government who does those things is mostly CIA-affiliated. Secret programs, etc. It has ties to DARPA, and NSA. Those agenices have two faces, and they seem to operate quite a number of shadow projects, that even their government don't know about. It's a bit special those agencies - but we know they do.

@Sindy-S.R I cannot "prove" anything. I don't know "for sure". I would need to have access to the CIA office and find the papers!



I did not know. Hmm let me ask you because I would like to know more about the financing of the conference, please. Let's start again with the basic Ummo material. It popped up around 1950 or something, seems to me. It gathered, at the time, a certain number of scientists. Many Spanish ones if I remember correctly.

My question is: what's the degree of the link, between the financers of the conference, and this original "core" of the "first-Ummo followers"? Those, who financed the conference, are they just "Ummo-afficionados", or are they "the core", of 1950 (who pursued the studies etc etc)?

I understand that the people who financed the conference have ties to "el simbolo", rather than "the Ummo core people". "El simbolo" seems to be a research that "uses" Ummo. To what degree, I don't know. The idea would be to define how much importance "el simbolo" attaches to "Ummo". Is "Ummo", to them, the very core of the matter - or is it a side study, that they use, in correlation to various different research? Only you can tell me because I did not read the book "el simbolo".

The CIA promoting Laura's conference would be a possibility! Overall! I have no judgment about that if such was the case. The CIA sponsored many many things and if we don't know, we just don't know. That does not make Laura - CIA , in my mind, right?

I think that the CIA or an organism of a similar type is consciously doing the Ummo thing as a sort of mind control program. It would be to slow down people in their progression towards STO, things like that. This is what I think was the goal of "Ummo". Just another mkultra-like program, like the LSD wave, the MKULTRA projects, all the sects that the CIA has been setting up. I am using "CIA" because they especially illustrated themselves into this types of activities. They just ruined many many generations' minds. And today, as if their bad deeds haven't been enough - we must deal with Greenbaum. Honestly, we swim in a sea of many many potential mind control projects at every street corner. In the end, there is few material that is not it. You can see this: every time a person posts a new material here, it's discarded most of the time. People prefer to study reality through "romance books" because it brings more results for STO growth. This is a pity, this is crazy.

Wouldn't we ask C's about the "elsimbolo" book? "Is this material to be considered"?



Yes of course you are right.

We are used to stumble upon material that has specific "things". The "el simbolo" has some things that may be raising alarms in several people. It has been the case with me:

- mention of Ummo (big red flag)
- technology too high for an era in which it was less accessible and developped
- a layer of tech-space-transcendence-serious-tech
- the financial layer

So no definite conclusion here in regard of "elsimbolo"! Just a "watch out".



No I haven't. i just figured out that it was possible to read it, as I said. But it's a bit a dishonest trick so I won't read it.



Browsing old versions of the "elsimbolo" site shows a website initially dedicated to finance. This has been very odd to find out. Seems the people there were engaged into a sort of "economical predictivity". Really not bad. I know Spanish people and they always loved tech, and innovative approaches. Like Dutches. And so the "financial" aspect is just "a hint". A red flag, just something that comes a bit out when I see it.

What I mean is that this website is very very atypical for the time in question and that this catches attention.

The material has "Ummo" in it and this catches attention.

The book can only be read via an electronical interface - and this catches attention.

I trained this like a muscle: when too many "it catches attention" and that I can see it, I leave. 90% of the time, I escape danger. 10% of the time, I loose something of value.

C's are super innovative in their teachings, but here, on the forum, we learn not about exceptionnalism, but about "Normal humans": Family, love. All the specs of "elsimbolo" attract my attention because it's "exceptionnal". Sometimes, this is a bait. A trap. Sometimes.

So - you see - I have a way and I am cautious because the danger comes from a specific place. Most of the time. The place is familiar. When it feels and smell "oh that familiar STS place..."... The kidding STS... "Ha! It's them!". It's all the time the same, it never changes. The "STS house" has a "smell".

And so, I wanted to tell you just to watch out. The Ummo spec definitely represents an opening. This means that if you study this material, I feel that it is safe, to assume, that you will in any case have false elements popping up. It cannot be else. At best it's in the chapter "Ummo" (if there is such a chapter) - or around. Look for the conclusions based on Ummo: what is it that the author discovers, "thanks to Ummo"? You may then put all of the conclusions under the umbrella "probably wrong to accept that" - "must specifically be cautious at this". We could study those materials but we need to be ready. The mind needs to know that there will be things that are not okay.

From my point of view, you are creating a BIG narrative about something you don't know.
It is very important to be cautious, but it is dangerous to make statements based on HUNCHES.
I would suggest that you forget about this story from this book that you haven't read and don't know the context of why it was written.
If the administrators of this forum have not been interested in learning about this book, it is because it is not important to know about it.
That is how I see it.

 

[panoptix]

I am sure that if there is "Ummo" in it, there are some unwanted things. Could be that the person has been influenced or that the person is an "agent" of some sort. At least, we know what to expect, we could safely be expecting "some" instead of "whoa such a nice avenue to explore". All alarm systems on, then, double Athena gears, etc, before starting the reading, I would say

No. I decompiled the program, extracted all the files (text + images) and created a folder with all the sections & chapters as PDF files: Then I performed a thoroughly search (case insensitive) but there is no mention to the Ummo Case.

Yes you are right. I disregarded this aspect, this is true. Well - then I did not posted content from it, we know there is that code, etc etc, nobody posted content from it, so best thing would be a personal approach and not to use the content of the book. Don't know if this is the "road"?

In the meanwhile I skimmed some files as I processed them: One of them is the Glossary where the author names Agartha and Baphomet; I take the chance to quote and translate these two items because the former I'd bet will be of interest to @MJF and the latter well... speaks of the Templar regalia —the Baphomet ring— that Fulcanelli used in front his acolyte (the marking is on the original):

What we wish to emphasize about Agartha is its preparatory and initiatory function in relation to the Grail. We must highlight that here the legend takes on the appearance of a reality corroborated by the experience of one of the authors of this book and by the other, also immersed in this transcendental project. Agartha, then, is transformed for us into a real place, a site stripped of the tinsel and legendary mysticism that tradition has led us to imagine it should be in a certain way. But reality, by assuming certainty, immerses us in a new version, perhaps even more mysterious, by its very nature, than the previous one. The circle, in closing, deprives us partly of the mystery of its construction and shows us its closed structure, but it also opens up a new mystery: what it contains and holds within.

According to the Venetian Masters, Marco Polo, that tireless Venetian traveler (1254-1324), from the same era as the Knights Templar—let's not forget that fact—brought back to Europe, specifically to Venice, the highest Initiates and Masters of Tibet at that time, on one of his journeys to Tibet. Upon arriving there and seeing them so far removed from civilization, Marco Polo convinced them that if they truly wished to work for the benefit and enlightenment of humanity, and not merely for their own personal gain, it would be wise for them to join forces and knowledge with the members of the Calidae of Venice and move there, to the center of the civilized world, where they would have a better opportunity to achieve their desired goals under more favorable conditions than in the solitude and cold of the high peaks of Tibet. History, of course, reflects none of this, just as it neither reflects nor tells us anything about the true meaning of his name: Marco Polo, a pseudonym behind which a great Venetian Initiate hid.

The association of his name, Marco, with our Symbol is evident, as is the association of the word Polo with the folds of our frame [marco in Spanish: see the image of the symbol in the link provided by @palestine]. We could say much more about Agartha, the Calidae, Marco Polo, the traditional Prester John, or our current Pontiff, even about the Grail itself, associated with our already traditional Symbol, but for now, prudence on the one hand and the additional space we would need on the other lead us to consider refraining from doing so. Perhaps in a future appendix, and if we receive approval, we can do so.

Finally, I would like to say that there may also be other Agarthas and other Shambhallas, opposing reflections of the former in both their purpose and function. However, just as in our Symbol, and despite occupying different signs and places within it, both are integrated into a common space, both are integrated into the Symbol itself. Therefore, one part cannot be understood without the other, since without one of them, the Symbol itself, without its complementary or opposing part, would not exist. The use of reason and discernment, then, must be essential in this case to unify criteria and to guide us all along the Path and find the truth in all of this.

Now, let us recall what Canseliet said about Fulcanelli's Baphometic ring (painstakingly translated from French to English):

[...] thus concluded Fulcanelli, taking the indication from his prodigious memory, with all the benevolence of his smile, with his hand raised in a habitual gesture in which that night shone the Baphometic ring chiseled in gold of transmutation and reached him from the Templars of the Hennebont commandery in Brittany.

BTW, here we have a photo of the famous ring (upside down), beared by the beloved disciple:

​

Now, let see what The Symbol (El Símbolo) has to say about Baphomet (and I translate):

We are faced here with the name of an idol that, throughout the centuries, has given rise to varied interpretations and confusion among scholars of esotericism in general, and of the Templars in particular, regarding its meaning and purpose. One of the most serious accusations leveled against the Templars was the alleged worship of this controversial figure, whom the prosecution transformed into the devil himself, or Satan. (See Templars.) However, it is a truly ancient figure; more than a figure or idol, a symbol, since various cultures and religions throughout history have considered it a paradigm of something transcendent and have perpetuated it in their initiation rites. Its outward, objective form could vary depending on the era, culture, or religion that possessed it.

In the interrogations of the Templars imprisoned in 1307 after their virtually voluntary surrender to their executioners, the interrogation of Brother Garcerant stood out. After enduring inhuman torture, he confessed that the Knights possessed an idol "in figura Baffometi" which they worshipped. This figure represented a kind of bearded old man with horns and pointed ears, giving him the appearance of a goat, hence the association of this whole with an animalistic appearance. Let us see what the Master tells us:

« ...a complex figure indeed, this of our Baphomet, with its horns and crown, a solar symbol in which the great Initiates of the Temple had grouped all the elements of High and Sacred Science and those of tradition. In it, first and foremost, is found the mystical fusion of the natures of the Great Work, symbolized by the horns of the crescent moon placed upon the solar head. One is not surprised by the strange expression, a reflection of a devouring fire emanating from this inhuman face, a specter and symbol also of the Last Judgment. Even the beard, a hieroglyph of the luminous and fiery beam projected toward the earth, justifies the precise knowledge this sage possessed concerning our destiny, which he so aptly captured in the head he placed in his mansion.
« Are we looking at the dwelling of someone affiliated with the Illuminati, Rosicrucians, or Freemasons descended from the Grand Masters of the Templars...? The cyclical theory, parallel to the doctrine of Hermes, is so clearly presented there that, barring ignorance or ill will, one could not suspect the knowledge of our Adept.
« What we have before our eyes, then, is undoubtedly a Templar Baphomet. This image, about which we have only vague indications or mere hypotheses, was never an idol, as many have believed, but simply a complete emblem of the secret traditions of the Order of the Knights Templar, used primarily externally as an esoteric paradigm, a seal of chivalry, and a sign of recognition. It was reproduced on jewelry, as well as on the pediments of the residences of the Initiates and on the tympanums of their chapels.
« Its schematic form consisted of an isosceles triangle with its vertex pointing downwards, a hieroglyph for Water, the first element created and the foundation of the rest of the Great Work. A second, similar but inverted triangle, smaller in relation to the first, was inscribed in the center and seemed to occupy the space reserved for the nose on the human face. This symbolized Fire, and more specifically, the fire contained in water or the divine spark, the incarnate soul, life infused into matter. On the inverted base of the water triangle rested a graphic sign resembling the letter H but wider, its central bar cutting a circle in half. In Hermetic stenography, this sign indicates the Universal Spirit, the Creator Spirit, God.
« On each side of the fire triangle, to the left, was the lunar circle with the inscribed crescent, and to the right, the solar circle with its apparent center. These small circles were arranged like eyes.
« Finally, welded to the base of the inner triangle, the cross crowning the globe thus completed the double hieroglyph of sulfur, the active principle, associated with mercury, the passive principle and solvent of all metals. Often, a more or less long segment located at the apex of the Water triangle appeared undermined by vertical lines in which the uninitiated would not recognize at all the expression of luminous radiation, but rather a kind of chin strap.
« Presented thus (with the apparent horns of the crescent moon included), Baphomet had a crude, imprecise form, difficult to identify. This undoubtedly explains the diversity of descriptions that have been made of it, in which it is seen sometimes as a haloed skull, sometimes as a bucranium, sometimes as the head of an Egyptian Hapi, other times as a goat, and still other times as the very horrifying face of Satan himself! Simple impressions, then, far removed from reality, but such unorthodox images that, unfortunately, they contributed to leveling the accusation of satanism and witchcraft against the Wise Knights Templar. »

We wish to add nothing further to what the Great Fulcanelli has already stated here. We believe its true meaning is more than clear; we would only add that the word Baphomet comes from the Greek word or root meaning “dyer” and another meaning “moon,” unless we intend to refer to “mother” or “womb,” which brings us back to the same lunar meaning. The moon is, in truth, the mercurial mother or womb that receives the dye or seed of sulfur, representing the male, and which, through immersion, gives us a new compound according to its emission. This leads us to the symbolic baptism, which is precisely what the word Baphomet means in its overall sense.

Finally, he adds the following design:

​

I don't see anything terribly wrong that hinders growth; obviously, there are some biases and a mix of truth and falsehood, but that's something that can be studied by paying attention (basically, like almost everything else). If anyone is interested in the original files in Spanish, they can request them privately; and if the Forum Administrators and/or Moderators allow it, the book can be uploaded to a private area of the forum.

 

[Wandering Star]

No. I decompiled the program, extracted all the files (text + images) and created a folder with all the sections & chapters as PDF files: Then I performed a thoroughly search (case insensitive) but there is no mention to the Ummo Case.


In the meanwhile I skimmed some files as I processed them: One of them is the Glossary where the author names Agartha and Baphomet; I take the chance to quote and translate these two items because the former I'd bet will be of interest to @MJF and the latter well... speaks of the Templar regalia —the Baphomet ring— that Fulcanelli used in front his acolyte (the marking is on the original):



Now, let us recall what Canseliet said about Fulcanelli's Baphometic ring (painstakingly translated from French to English):


BTW, here we have a photo of the famous ring (upside down), beared by the beloved disciple:

​

Now, let see what The Symbol (El Símbolo) has to say about Baphomet (and I translate):


Finally, he adds the following design:

View attachment 114792
​

I don't see anything terribly wrong that hinders growth; obviously, there are some biases and a mix of truth and falsehood, but that's something that can be studied by paying attention (basically, like almost everything else). If anyone is interested in the original files in Spanish, they can request them privately; and if the Forum Administrators and/or Moderators allow it, the book can be uploaded to a private area of the forum.

I don't know anything, but when I see the figure of Baphomet, I see a symbolic representation of the physical basis of the human body and the energetic form of the fully activated human being.

If we could see the energetic form of a human being fully activated in all their energy centers, perhaps we would see two horns coming out of their head.

The uninitiated would see a figure that inspires fear and superstition.

 

[panoptix]

If we could see the energetic form of a human being fully activated in all their energy centers, perhaps we would see two horns coming out of their head.

Yes. Perhaps like a kite... The union with the supra-centers.

 

[Wandering Star]

Yes. Perhaps like a kite... The union with the supra-centers.

And flying wooden kites, as mentioned by the C's in a session, could increase the range of connection with other like-minded individuals.

Like an antenna deployed.

It just occurred to me when I read your comment.

 

[panoptix]

And flying wooden kites, as mentioned by the C's in a session, could increase the range of connection with other like-minded individuals.

Like an antenna deployed.

It just occurred to me when I read your comment.

Cernunnos... I don't know if someone already have compared with the Homme des Bois (Woodsman): Fulcanelli's Mystical Herald of Thiers.

 

[Wandering Star]

Cernunnos... I don't know if someone already have compared with the Homme des Bois (Woodsman): Fulcanelli's Mystical Herald of Thiers.

For greater clarity:

June 20, 1998

A: 7367. Kites were used for cross communication between bloodline members.

Q: Kites?! What do kites have to do with it? What the heck... you guys are driving me NUTS! Do you mean kites as in paper and string or kites as in the bird?

A: Yes, paper wood and string.

Q: (C) Like smoke signals? (L) Well, how is flying a kite... (C) Well, if it has a certain symbol on it...

A: And shape.

Q: What shape is that?

A: No, not now.

Q: (C) Well, maybe the shape of a cleft chin? [Laughter] (L) Fair skin, cleft chin... (C) Yeah, and how did they communicate when it was raining? (L) Yeah, and at night? Did they set them on fire? Kites. This is obviously something that... (C) This is implying that such people know they have the bloodline and keep in touch with each other? (L) Or, is this something for the future when those of the bloodline wake up?

A: Yes.

Q: All of the above? Or just the last part?

A: Latter.

Q: So, we need to go fly a kite... (C) With a particular shape and symbol...

A: Research kites.

Q: (C) The Japanese fly kites... and there are a lot of people who hang banners outside their houses all the time...

A: Want revelations? Prepare for "Treasure" Hunt.