Bernardo GA
Jedi
I have some ideas going around in my head, which are really questions, but I don't know how to put them without going too long in the necessary context. Being brief is difficult but I will try.
They are curiosities, given at different stages in and during the session, that are possibly related to each other.
At the beginning, the Cas mark a series of numbers.
These turn out to be "a code of information unknown to you yet".
This is also a "program change sequence".
It's not exactly like a "computer code", but it's something close to that, according to Cas' response to Laura's question.
I wonder what function that would have, because dialing a code at the beginning of the communication, was a very peculiar thing to do.
In this search, I find Pikabu saying "Meow!" at the exact moment.
I hope he's getting lots of kisses, cuddles and yummy things.
I will try to explain my point.
Events like "9/11", "the assassination of John F. Kennedy", which the Cas confirm to be somehow linked to "program changes", have like other, possibly specific, historical events, the common denominator of being events of much psychological impact on a collective level.
Keeping in mind that "No matter where you are, what matters is who you are and what you see", both the events on Kantek and the events on Earth are part of the same History.
And, Pikabu meows just as another event of much collective psychological impact is mentioned.
The same "tiger by the tail syndrome," which keeps 4D STS always in self-inflicted trouble, causes them to always be "moving in time," changing things in an attempt to remedy their situation.
For such purposes, since "time" does not exist, there must be reference points to be able to enter this or that "timeline" (concept of timelines Laura explains, using as an analogy the life of a tree, with its branches, etc.).
As I was saying, it may be that transcendent events, of great impact, leave a kind of energetic footprint.
These marks can be useful as reference points, when you want to enter a specific "timeline", for whatever purpose. Such as, for example, a program change.
If this makes sense, I believe that such events (referential marks) they can be natural phenomena or not. Even the subjective perception as to the positivity or negativity of the event does not count.
What counts is the collective psychological impact of such an event (collective suggests collecting, in the context of Gravity dynamics).
In other words, the thinking of many, focused on a particular thing, leaves a particular and distinctive imprint on the "Information Field".
I know very well that I am speculating in all this.
They are just thoughts that come to me in the search for the why, to mark a code.
Many possibilities come to mind. Example:
Maybe it's just a communication system through numbers, which we don't yet handle, but later on we may.
Suppose for example, 4D STS enters some "timeline", however they do it, and they change something.
Obviously many things in the history of that timeline will change.
Therefore, the information recorded there will be unstable, changing, fluid, or whatever.
(recorded information = time?) or (fluid time?).
The linear perception of "time" has been the norm for us so far, except for some curious fleeting or brief moments. Are we close to a change in that respect as well?
Suppose that starts to happen.
Surely, we will have to develop and/or adopt a new language system for the exchange of information.
For such purposes, becoming familiar with "numbers" seems to be an excellent idea.
Such a language would even cover various needs, or have various functions.
For example, it would be interesting if, with specific agreed or consensual numbers, we could indicate, point out or name "the essence or meaning" of something, without the need to mention an infinity of things, circumstances or events that mean the same thing in essence.
In that way, no matter how shifting the events are in any timeline, our reading of reality and communication will be based on the "essence or meaning".
The wording of event or elements, would be something optional in information exchanges, if circumstances require it.
These thoughts come to me from a certain idea that may be wrong, or may be right.
And this is that it seems to me, that a "change of program" does not necessarily mean a change of agenda. It is just the opposite.
When the 4D STS agenda is in danger of collapse, they provoke and install events, which are new elements in the equation, so that it changes its outcome.
I have also thought that the Cas put that code at the beginning of the session, as a sort of "anchor", in the sense of connection, when we are in an ocean of information.
The waters are very choppy lately.
I don't know if these thoughts make any sense to others.
The one thing I am sure of, is that if for some reason we needed to get to know numbers better, I will be in trouble because I have always been a math slacker.
Thank you. And best regards to Pikabu.
Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
They are curiosities, given at different stages in and during the session, that are possibly related to each other.
At the beginning, the Cas mark a series of numbers.
These turn out to be "a code of information unknown to you yet".
This is also a "program change sequence".
It's not exactly like a "computer code", but it's something close to that, according to Cas' response to Laura's question.
I wonder what function that would have, because dialing a code at the beginning of the communication, was a very peculiar thing to do.
In this search, I find Pikabu saying "Meow!" at the exact moment.
I hope he's getting lots of kisses, cuddles and yummy things.
I will try to explain my point.
Events like "9/11", "the assassination of John F. Kennedy", which the Cas confirm to be somehow linked to "program changes", have like other, possibly specific, historical events, the common denominator of being events of much psychological impact on a collective level.
Keeping in mind that "No matter where you are, what matters is who you are and what you see", both the events on Kantek and the events on Earth are part of the same History.
And, Pikabu meows just as another event of much collective psychological impact is mentioned.
The same "tiger by the tail syndrome," which keeps 4D STS always in self-inflicted trouble, causes them to always be "moving in time," changing things in an attempt to remedy their situation.
For such purposes, since "time" does not exist, there must be reference points to be able to enter this or that "timeline" (concept of timelines Laura explains, using as an analogy the life of a tree, with its branches, etc.).
As I was saying, it may be that transcendent events, of great impact, leave a kind of energetic footprint.
These marks can be useful as reference points, when you want to enter a specific "timeline", for whatever purpose. Such as, for example, a program change.
If this makes sense, I believe that such events (referential marks) they can be natural phenomena or not. Even the subjective perception as to the positivity or negativity of the event does not count.
What counts is the collective psychological impact of such an event (collective suggests collecting, in the context of Gravity dynamics).
In other words, the thinking of many, focused on a particular thing, leaves a particular and distinctive imprint on the "Information Field".
I know very well that I am speculating in all this.
They are just thoughts that come to me in the search for the why, to mark a code.
Many possibilities come to mind. Example:
Maybe it's just a communication system through numbers, which we don't yet handle, but later on we may.
Suppose for example, 4D STS enters some "timeline", however they do it, and they change something.
Obviously many things in the history of that timeline will change.
Therefore, the information recorded there will be unstable, changing, fluid, or whatever.
(recorded information = time?) or (fluid time?).
The linear perception of "time" has been the norm for us so far, except for some curious fleeting or brief moments. Are we close to a change in that respect as well?
Suppose that starts to happen.
Surely, we will have to develop and/or adopt a new language system for the exchange of information.
For such purposes, becoming familiar with "numbers" seems to be an excellent idea.
Such a language would even cover various needs, or have various functions.
For example, it would be interesting if, with specific agreed or consensual numbers, we could indicate, point out or name "the essence or meaning" of something, without the need to mention an infinity of things, circumstances or events that mean the same thing in essence.
In that way, no matter how shifting the events are in any timeline, our reading of reality and communication will be based on the "essence or meaning".
The wording of event or elements, would be something optional in information exchanges, if circumstances require it.
These thoughts come to me from a certain idea that may be wrong, or may be right.
And this is that it seems to me, that a "change of program" does not necessarily mean a change of agenda. It is just the opposite.
When the 4D STS agenda is in danger of collapse, they provoke and install events, which are new elements in the equation, so that it changes its outcome.
I have also thought that the Cas put that code at the beginning of the session, as a sort of "anchor", in the sense of connection, when we are in an ocean of information.
The waters are very choppy lately.
I don't know if these thoughts make any sense to others.
The one thing I am sure of, is that if for some reason we needed to get to know numbers better, I will be in trouble because I have always been a math slacker.
Thank you. And best regards to Pikabu.
Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
