That's inline with Laura's impression but all seven answers take the OP very seriously and try to give appropriate and well considered advice. Most of them stress that at age 13 much is still uncertain and go from there.
Personally, I'm not convinced one way or the other without further detailed knowledge. FWIW.
I thought the same about the writing style. The article mentions that there was some editing but when you go to the original article it still is pretty well written. The thoughts, ability to communicate, cited references, etc. do seem more like they are coming from an adult rather than a child.
In a way this touches on the common myth that psychopaths can be extraordinarily intelligent, but we know they are not. They do have the ability to project an image of intelligence but in general and from what I understand, they are not particularly smart (especially once you discover their maneuvers).
It doesn't sound as if this was written by a child. The 'girl's' level of insight -- being able to identify her drives and motivations -- into her own condition is too advanced for a 13 year old (and maybe even for a psychopath of any age).
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.